DATE	SUBJECT    (Previous Archive: Jun-00) Return to Archives Page
07/31	Greetings, I am the mother of James Brown, a Chelan (Washington state) Rappeller who is in Provo, Utah today.  He said he was interviewed today and that I would be able to locate his interview under "current incident".  I have been unable to locate the catagory.  If you can assist me, please help! It would be great to see him and forward the info to family.  Thanks! Please respond to chelandiane@hotmail.com Thank you!  Diane Brown
07/31	Just gettin up on the soap box for a second... We ran into alot of this on the Hi Meadow fire here in CO... Apparently, alot of mountain residents took the Y2K thing very seriously, and have stock-piled everything including gasoline and propane.  This stuff we found to be located all over the property - 20 and 100 gal propane cylinders buried under pine needles (to keep them cool???). Anyway, I had to pull my shorts out of my throat several times when doing structure protection and one of the things vented not 10 feet away (sounds like a jet taking off).  We found other stuff - buried/hidden bunkers containing ??? didn't even go there, turned around and selected another house. Just wanted to let everyone know the potential of what's out there.  Take a close look at your surroundings before the fire gets there (if you have that luxury).  BE SAFE! g
07/31	According to the SIT report, the US is currently 18% over the 10 year average for number of fires and 82% over for the number of acres.  Interesting how less than 20% more starts result in the much larger ratio of acres burned. just another dispatcher working overtime.
07/31	Thanks to Kent for the report on his trip back to D.C.  So there it is,  federal wildland fire fighters, your agencies haven't got the interest, and I  expect the huevos to show up before a House Sub-committee to discuss the  overtime pay cap; and I would think a whole bunch of other items the  congresspeople would be mulling over, with 250,000 plus acres burning out of  control in the nation.  This is the kind of reaction that really <expletive> off  an old maddog, and is the kind of attitude we've been facing since well  before the mid-70's from our wonderful leaders.  Having just read the morning incident report, brother are we in for it in  August!  They better skip right up to about 4 battalions of Army right off  the bat.  Remember Yellowstone?  The Siege of '87?  Now just how will they deploy them remains to be seen?  My last encounter with running an expanded  dispatch operations last year, showed me that STL Crew (military) will be a  very rare critter indeed.  But I'm willing to bet my old boss is ADing it  right now.  Go Big John! I've got to go and take a walk and plan my next official vent on the latest  developments out of D.C.  Since most of you will be off on some coyote ugly mountainside  right now,  I'll send out my wishes both verbally here, and mentally as I mediatate; that  each and everyone of you safely navigate this fire season.  Remember,  California is just now coming up to prime, so there's an incredible amount of  potential fire yet to be.  Be SAFE.  REMEMBER your BASICS. Keep your HEADS  up.  HELP each other. There is NO piece of ground, no resource more valuable than YOU.  Keep on, keepin' on Maddog
07/30	As promised this morning.  An update from FWFSA president Kent Swartzlander. FWFSA Legislative Update A hearing before the Civil Service Subcommittee in regard to H.R. 2814 (the bill the FWFSA had Representative Pombo introduce) was scheduled for 7/26/00.  Myself and CPF 5th District VP Judd flew to Washington DC to testify at the hearing.  Upon arrival in DC (some 12 hours prior to the hearing) we were notified that the hearing had been postponed.  This apparently due to the administration’s indecision of their support of our bill.   The information I received while in DC for two days was that the administration was going to hang their hat on the HR 1770 bill, which Cummings introduced nearly two years ago.  HR 1770 provides all federal employees overtime pay which is the greater of the current GS-10/1 pay cap or their base salary, which ever is higher.  In other words, you would have to be a GS-12 or higher to see a benefit in this bill.  Did you know that the most populated GS grade level is in fact the GS-12 in the U.S.?  This bill is figured to cost about 100 million dollars and will have almost no effect for our wildland firefighters.  On the other hand, our bill HR 2814 is costed out at 3 million and would effect those in the Captain ranks and above.  The two bills have no similarity. HR 1770 has ten co-sponsors to date (dead in the water), and HR 2814 has 66 and still growing.  We were provided about 2 hours with members of the Civil Service Subcommittee on this trip and it seemed fruitful, i.e., we were able to educate them about the bill and the issues in a more casual atmosphere.  I was able to provide the Civil Service Subcommittee with 8 additional written testimonies from our fellow FWFSA members and was asked to provide additional information as well.  We have two potential occurrences here.  One is that we can provide enough convincing information to the Civil Service Subcommittee that would allow them to mark up the bill to the full committee with recommendation to the floor of the House.  The other option is to reschedule the hearing for September, at which time the Agencies would again be invited, but if they fail to provide testimony or show up to testify, we would continue the hearing without them.  We have hopes of including the issue of the inclusion of HP as part of basic pay for retirement calculations into HR 2814 and will continue to address this.  I also spoke with Senator Burns office about S 1498, our mirror bill in the Senate.  Some potential still exists for inclusion of S 1498 into an Appropriations bill.  There are some good folks in Burns’s office pursuing every option.  All in all I was very dissatisfied that the Agencies did not provide testimony or show up for this hearing.  Especially when just 1 ½ years ago they in fact put in a request to the OPM to eliminate the pay cap for firefighters.  OPM’s reply was that they understood but did not have the power to change law – that would take legislation.  So, the FWFSA provided the vehicle by crafting a bill which satisfied this request and then those who originally requested this are seemingly not in full support.  FWFSA President, Kent Swartzlander
07/30	Ab, we would appreciate this note be posted on your web site: We are looking for Wildland fire retirees or others with logistic experience  in Unit or Branch wildfire positions to work with a contract ICS team  managing a large staging area near Missoula, MT. The team is operating a full  facility fire camp, and the camp is located in a forest setting with plenty  of shade. Team members are housed and fed on site.  Pay is by the private contractor and higher than AD rates. A 14 day  commitment is required. Shifts are 12-14 hrs and pay is 8 hours base pay and  time and a half for hours beyond 8. Pay rates range from $10-$35 per hour  depending upon position filled.  Current NWCG red cards are not a requirement. On the job training will be provided to get team members up to  speed.  For more information contact Bob Alvord, Deputy IC at 541-975-4730. If he can  not be reached in a reasonable time email your name, phone number and short  summary of experience to: jf37m@aol.com  John Marker
07/30	Any idea of FWFSA testimony results this week? Maybe a Place to read on the  "Thomas" web site?  Only thing I can find with a number is the meeting & 2203. Lots of people thinking the paycap was raised and a retro active back pay til  Jan?  Maybe somebody has a scoop?  Swartzlander was there, no news on the  FWFSA web page..........  "Neadermeyer" I spoke with Swartzlander yesterday briefly, he said he was met by a representative as he exited the plane and was advised the hearing was canceled.  I'll try to get a statement from Kent today.  Ab.
07/30	I, too, am wondering about the "rathole" of resources in Nevada.  The last few fires that I have been on in my area have had little in the way of resources to play with.  Since the national preparedness level went to 5, we have kept staffed 3 dozers on ot, along with an elevated manning level at all our stations because the cup hath runneth over, so to speak, everywhere but here (not counting the cricket fire, now at 60k acres and no end in sight), well, gotta go, stay safe everyone.   Nytinarmor
07/29	Uh Oh UH1', 204's, 205's and 212's are grounded. It is aircraft specific in some cases. The USFS obtained a 50 hour exemption from the FAA for it's firefighting aircraft. CDF is using the National Guard to replace some of their aircraft. J-Bob
07/29	Hi there... Latest word on the Bell helicopters I heard is that CDF was grounding theirs  today until the first ones can be fixed, probably by Monday.  Sounds like  the federal word is that it will probably happen very soon. Just finished reading Hickman's section, and Ab's response, and have this to  say.  Number one, yes, it's been an incredibly slow week on the site.  I've  attributed it to all of us being incredibly busy, as I'm sure you all have.  And second, I'm guessing, this is the big stuff we all knew was coming, and  it's not a surprise.  Kept waiting for it last year, but things just didn't  quite come together in such an explosive fashion. Well, my point is, I've been expecting this for some time, I suppose, so I  guess I don't really have any comments at this time.  More of the same,  really:  lots of fires, more and more houses threatened, resources  stretched.  What's to say?  Except, I'm too tired to say much at all!  Well,  take care out in the heat y'all, and be careful.  Our wx here hasn't been  quite as predictable as it can look in the wx briefing, so take care! --still watching
07/28	Ab. Some cold news on a hot day: All Bell helicopters have been grounded until new inspection criteria on their main rotor shafts, dictated by the FAA, has been completed and certified. All AD hired tree fallers must pass the Arduous WCT prior to their next hire. All USFS dozer operators must pass the WCT at the Moderate level prior to their next assignment. Fact or Fiction? Sign me Uh Oh.
07/28	AB, the reason STL crew are a critical need is because they activated the military.  Therefore they need 32 STL's for a 30 day commitment to work with them or they cannot put them in the field.  This is the kind of deal the portal to portal  folks live for.  With resources as short as they are wonder if we will resort to a "draft" of STL's.  Everybody be safe out there, we have a long way to go with no relief in sight.  Pager going off, got to go. DEEFAMO I think I get your point and think we both read the same part the same way.  My point was that ten years ago or even a little further back during Yellowstone with massive military activation the need for STLCs wasn't refererred to as "critical", ya just ordered them up and they came.  What was that old cliche, something about having a war and no one showed up?  Ab.
07/28	Good day from the Ozarks.  Well as good as can be expected, anyway, I’m  still sitting on the front porch watching a whole dang procession of cars  going by and haven’t found the right one to latch onto yet.   Would be out  there if I had not of have had an unexpected (Add obscene,unkind, and  profane language into this area.) commitment come up.  But come August 19th,  hope to be off this porch and dragging in a few vehicles to bury in the back  yard.  That is if you’ll let a Ozark Hilbille into your neck of the woods.  The State of Missouri has sent out one crew, working on second, and already  sent some overhead into Idaho and Colorado, but I’m still set here.  (For  those which don’t like long post….STOP HERE!) Have been watching ‘Theysaid’ for sometime and have seen a great deal of  good information coming across the different post.  Being a fire fighter and  living around a fire station putting up with a lot of BS, I I enjoy setting  down at the computer, both on and off duty and reading that others have the same problems as I, but only in a different area of service.  To me, I enjoy  dropping by the ‘Theysaid’ page and reading all the comments.  There are so  many areas on the net that you can go to and read a lot of ..DEEP.. BS, but  to be able to come into ‘Theysaid’ and read what people think is truly an  enjoyment. In just the last few months alone, I loved the comments about the  Lookouts and all the information that was exchanged. Including R5Firecapt’s  “humble apologies” and to your response…(Use to work in one of the 120  footers in Missouri and now wish they would take it down due to its’  condition, just because it’s not the same as it was in the good old days.  And, I too have walked a little funny once or twice from the butt chewing,  but remarkably Firecapt, those chew marks do heal)    Loved the letter from  the schoolteacher, which thought that ‘Theysaid’ was to rough a place for  school students to visit due to the language and comments…(As if some of  these kids haven’t heard worse.)  Enjoyed Utah Wife’s letter and responses  to it, (My wife has been there a time or two also)  ‘Theysaid’ is a place to  sit and speak your mind, express your thoughts, and even pop off a little  steam, even if others may not agree with what is said, everyone is entitled  to their opinion and everyone has the right to speak their.  Even if we  don’t all agree which each other, we still can speak our piece and that is  one thing that we should all agree upon.  At least no one has walked into  the page and shot someone else over a remark, although Firecapt may have  gott’n chewed on a little.  Sometimes today’s world is to Politically  Correct.  We are so afraid of offending others and try to C.O.A’s (no it’s  not Call Our Attorney, it’s called Cover Our Ass..ets) that we sometimes  forget how we got to where we are today.   Men and Women (had to get Utah  and California Wives, Kelly, Millie’s and the rest of the female gender  covered to be PC) alike have fought and died giving us that right and to  those individuals I not only tip my cap, but remove it and cover my heart. Before this fire fighter runs on to much farther, I’ve got a couple of  questions for the creator of this page. I once read in your page, where you had a huge number of hits during the  month on your page, I assume that you have a counter somewhere hidden from  all of us.   I am curious as to when did you start ‘Theysaid’, your archives  go back to October – December of 97 and it appears that it had started  sometime before that. Question 1:  So how many times has your page been viewed since you started  it or since you started counting? Question 2:  Did you ever think that it would take off the way it has and  has it met your expectations from your original idea of what the page should  or would do? Question 3:  And, (I know only a couple of questions) How much farther do  you think “The Wildland Firefighters Web Page will go? Thanks Again Ab!  Enjoyed releasing the pressure of not being out fighting a  western fire. And I’m not sign’n off with another name (If’n you don’t like what I got to  say or it’s to long….Lump it!) Hickman Thanks for the kind, generous comments Hickman.  Any and all Ozark 'billies are welcome in my neck of the woods.  I sincerely welcome and appreciated your kind words.  It's posts like yours and the one a couple messages down, and all the others over time, that fuel my committment to keeping this site alive.  It never seems to fail that just as soon as I began thinking this site may have outlived it's usefulness or Abercrombie doesn't seem able to rise to the challenge, that appreciation, a fresh flow of ideas, questions, or new, addictive topics appear.  The last week has probably been one of the slowest on this  page I remember.  Course, sometimes I can't remember past last week, especially during this time of the year.  I enjoyed your encapsulation of the messages posted here during the past several weeks.  It's a stimulating reminder of the variety of issues important to many different firefighters, those who love them, and why Abercrombie must remain focused on his duties. As for your questions, interesting timing on your part cause I've recently been asked in another email some similar albeit far more pointed questions.  I've been composing a reply to the message and am trying to get it posted here asap.  I will provide answers to "who" Abercrombie is, "when" the site was born, and especially "why" the site was created. While you and any other curious readers await the shocking (mostly boring) details, I'll answer some of your questions.  First, I really don't have a good grasp on the real "total" number of times the site has been viewed since it's first publishing.  I've experimented with several counters prior to the one shown on the bottom of the main page.  Theoretically, according to the current ISP, it counts all hits on all pages, but I don't think so cause several experiments show otherwise.  But it does provide a general idea or at least a ratio of busy days compared to slow ones.  Daily hits according to it are normally between 150-200 hits per day.  The interesting one to check out is the little planet looking icon below it which was installed a month or so ago.  It only tracks the home/index page, but feel free to click on it and explore what's lurking behind it.  There may be a few surprises for some. Next question, I KNEW there was a huge vacancy waiting for someone to step in and provide a place like this for the wildland firefighters, so I have yet to be surprised at any success it may have.  As a teaser to the coming post I will tell you, I tried my best to give the idea of wildlandfire.com away.  Couldn't do it, those I approached weren't interested.  "Waste of time", they said!  Long time readers of this page are aware of several pages I've  introduced on the site to determine interest but there are two areas I haven't changed much, the photo areas and "they said".  I feel comfortable assuring you these two areas are integral to the site and  will remain. As for the future, I've more ideas than time right now.  There remain extreme information gaps between many segments of our wildland organizations I would love to try and fill.  Some of them I don't know how yet, others just aren't ready for the solution.  Guess you'll just have to stay tuned along with, Ab.
07/28	If the camp was in fact "closed"  vs "don''t drive the govt rig to town"  there is a pay recourse.  Comptroller General ruling yrs ago re a closed camp  on the Rainbow Fire covers this situation.  The short version is you have to  be paid in accordance with the law.  Use a search engine to look up the exact  Case number. The phrase " Bill Smith and 20 Fire Fighters was in the title.  If you want help on this issue E. Mail me and I will send you a copy of the  case, which I have in our union office. ANF employee
07/28	Ab... I really enjoy the site... I have to admit, I've been lurking for some time just seeing what's going on elsewhere.  We've been holding our breath here in Colorado this year.  The Hi Meadow fire was a near miss... just 10 miles from our district.  We had hand and engine crews on it for the first week... until the weather turned and gave everyone a break.  We had a lightening strike yesterday afternoon, 10 x 10 area in 1.5 - 2 feet of duff... fun!  It took 2 hours to hike into the fire but we were able to stomp it out non-the-less.  More dry lightening storms today... guess what we'll be doing this weekend... One question...is the Interagency Business Management Handbook available online somewhere? Thanks, g

07/28	Hey Guys!! R-3 is burning hot and fast. Most of the remaining resources here in AZ will not be heading out of state until we get some monsoonal rains, if that really ever happens. With that in mind, I hope that you folks keep the fires going so that we can to see some different country. Speaking of seeing different country, I may have an opportunity to take on a new position in Texas. Yes, Texas! Not too sure if I want to give up my coush job here as A/C, you know, with no responsibility and those really short days at the office :). This Texas position is with the Texas Forest Service as a regional fire coordinator. What I would like from the group is any info on the position from you folks from the lone start state. I know what the job discription is, but I would like another perspective from the folks on the street, those who have worked with fire coordinators before. I would like to know how the operate, what is the opinions of those fire departments that work with fire coordinators, and do they have a signifcant inpact on the fire suppression/mitigation in the state. I'd apprieciate any and all honest responses. Thanks in advanced for all of your help. See on the big one, soon!! AZ Trailblazer
07/27	SL  I agree with the comments to pass up your concerns on briefing through the safenet process -- good way to go. I was also in Nevada the last couple weeks and have a real concern for the apparent lack of concern and organization with some of the fire folks there.  As for the camp issue there are about four things to keep in mind.  1. There are work/rest guidelines which management needs to manage.  2. There are very clear guidelines for pay in the Interagency Business Management Handbook; you may want to pick one up and share it with your crew.  3. You didnt say it, but implied that you are on an engine. If so, there are driver duty hour and rest guidelines as well as fitness for duty issues which, as a module leader, YOU are responsible for, as well as management.  4. Management has the option to have an open camp where you are free to come and go, but they can restrict the use of agency vehicles and simply not allow the rigs to leave camp.  One final point -- as a module leader (driver or foreman) you are now part of management whether you want to be or not. Firefighter safety is the issue. Be safe out there!  adrenaline junkie Well-put. It's great to have the variety of input on issues like this. I echo, be safe. Ab.
07/27	HEY!!! Read this!  Dombeck is a little late! The letter to agency managers and forests should have been sent out months ago! Please, my friends, *stay safe* wherever you are! In FF1 we were taught that the fire we come to fight is not *our* emergency. It has got to remain someone else's emergency for firefighters to continue to think clearly and act safely. Do not take a chance with your lives! No physical place or "resource" is worth risking life over, including my own place -- although I am mighty thankful for your help! The bottom line is this: Places can be rebuilt. Plants and trees will grow again! Fire is a natural part of the ecosystem. Stay safe for the sake of your families, your friends, us, your fire community! I hear from groundpounding, helitack and overhead friends in Nevada, Idaho, Utah, NM that they are tired already, stretched thin already, there are not enough resources already and it's only July! A call is put out for 12 helitack and none come. More engines are needed everywhere. Engines sit idle on many forests because there are no module leaders, no crew! (In R5 engines were cut by 10.2%, dozers by 13.9%, firefighters by 5.8%. Helicopters increased by 1.9% and that's still not enough! The cuts resulted from the 25% of MEL that was not funded or the money that got used up paying new *indirect* costs under the new budgeting system that some yahoo brought in from Dept of Commerce!!! Primary Purpose my deriere!) Right, the budget increased by 15.5 million dollars in R5 this year (thanks WO) and we got only ONE MORE ENGINE out of that deal! Please, Lurkers, tell me I'm wrong! The Forest Sups and other forest line officers need to wake up to the fact that the cash cow may burn this summer because of the slabs they chumked off its sides as it walked through the yard on its way to fire! Fire money needs to get to the ground FOR FIRE for it to be helpful! Don't they get it that the logical consequence of not having enough firefighting resources is that STUFF BURNS! Stuff burns BIGTIME! HOT PATOOTIES!  OK -- to the R3 Dave who likes short messages, two looong paragraphs so far. I'll quit preaching to the choir! Dave, I want to say thank you -- for your help. I don't know who you are, but I know that you helped a lot in R3 earlier in the year.  Mikey, get well bro. We need you back with us facing the dragon on two good feet! Nuff of that lolligagging in the hospital! The world is burning out here! Mellie Hadn't seen the Chief's letter through the usual, trickle-down official distribution email yet, thanks Mellie.  It does appear to come a little later in the year than normal and sadly enough, this year may have little effect in producing additional Ops. resources.  Because. . .there aren't any, at least on my forest.  Interesting issue that STL crews are the "most critical need".  Interesting in that any firefighter who has reached the level of Squad Boss or above knows who REALLY puts out large fires.  HANDCREWS.  Read the National Sit Report on any given day for the redundant following cliches; remote area, high elevation, inaccessible area, limited access, steep and rocky.  This means handcrews.  All the engines, hose and water in the world aren't going to help you here. So where are all the handcrews and Strike Team Leaders necessary for these typical large fire needs?  Glad I asked. On my Forest we used to have five ten-person Initial Attack handcrews.  All crew leaders and assistants were STL qualified.  The crews were frequently combined into twenty-person crews for off forest assignments.  Either the leader or assistant were available at all times for individual STL assignments.  We now have zero IA handcrews or the ability to produce even a single FS regular crew.  We also no longer host any OC crews where we used to have four.  Here's why. NFMAS sez engines have a higher production rate than handcrews.  Comparison runs in NFMAS show more engines and less handcrews are more effective in stopping the number of escapes thus a lower amount of large fires.  Consequence, handcrews dissappear.  NFMAS doesn't know or care what happens after the first 24 hours or once the fires exceed a certain size.  No one person dictates to Forest FMOs to reduce their handcrews and focus on engines, the allocation committee simply reduces handcrew funding to a level that they are forced to.  I heard one FMO who has little use for many large engines complaining that his funding was down to around 25% of neccessary budget for his handcrews. This may be one area (STLCs) private contractors will be unable or unwilling to fill the void.  The level of experience necessary for this position just isn't easy to come by and can't be found by advertising in the local help-wanted ads.  Comments please:  where have your handcrews gone?  Ab.
07/27	SL,  The information in your 7/26 post regarding the poor briefing in Elko should be reported. Please consider submitting a SAFENET report. Information on SAFENET is available at www.nifc.gov/safety_study/index.htm Click on the SAFENET information bar for reporting procedures, etc.  Puffin II
07/26	Maggie & R5 Firecapt RE: Lookouts  Great! Sounds like someone DID listen! (crossing fingers)  I know that on our forest, if we can get our lookouts up and running, registered and safe for visitors (and with volunteers doing most of the work at that!), the ones with paid staff can get the support to do the same!  Hang in there and keep us updated!  AnneGwish
07/26	HAPPY BIRTHDAY MELLIE, FROM YOUR FIRE FRIENDS!
07/26	Hi Ab and All (well, maybe not all since a lot of firefolk are on the line instead of at their computers!),  Checking in... What's the the rathole of resources in Nevada that might not get supported? From what I've seen, there are no extra resources anywhere!  Mellie
07/26	Dear Ab and R5 Firecapt,  WOW! Whatever you said or did regarding the Lookout Issue for your other half, must have woke up some of the folks around the country... Since your first posting regarding this matter, The Fire folks on our forest have already started to make a list of things that need to happen for safety reasons more than any other... They also issued some letters to the lookouts that basically reminded them that part of their job description was to be responsible for minor repairs and if they needed larger repair or materials that they should contact their immediate supervisors or use chain of command to get what they need to provide for their safety first..  I know a lot of people don't look at the Fire Lookouts as being Fire people, but does anybody remember what their very first FIRE ORDER is?? Fight Fire Aggressively, But Provide For Your Safety First.  It seems as some folks do forget that the LOOKOUTS are FIRE People even if they didn't have to take a pack test to get there.. Sometimes, their jobs are long and drawn out as they are constantly on the lookout for any kinds of smokes. They have to use their own vehicles to drive to the lookouts, well most lookouts do, but some agencies do give them a agency vehicle to drive. I know on the forest I work on, the lookouts have to conquer some serious terrain to even get to the lookout, i.e., narrow paths along big rock crags and some of the other ones, you even have to hike as much as 1/2-3/4 of miles with their food and drinking water. I think you are right FIRECAPT, if my other half was dealing with those kinds of situations, I would definitely speak up about it. It seems as though she may have been too afraid to say anything... Was there any bad blood between her and the folks she works with? I am curious as to why she didn't speak up about it though. SOunds more to me like she was afraid that even if she did say something to the right folks, that she probably would have got reamed for it.. Just MY OPINION as well.  In my experiences on my forest, I do think however in many situations that some of these lookouts should be required to either have a medical exam of some kind or have to take a Light Arduous Type of test as to a lot of their job requires them to climb high elevations in all kinds of terrain. ANd if they are having to hike in to where their lookout is, then that is practically as much weight as what a person has to carry for a pack test... I think that part of the job should be evaluated. AS if somebody has a heart condition of any kind, the elevation can cause some serious other health problems.  Please do keep all of us updated on your other half's situation. I'm sure that if you rated a call from a Supervisor, that you probably got a little slack for your comments. Hopefully, you were able to wake up some folks as to some of the situation of their lookouts and if they are having problems getting money to buy materials and such, then they should also think about maybe putting up a donation can at the lookouts and then maybe sending a form letter to all local businesses that the lookouts overlook and protect and see if any of the businesses are willing to donate time, materials or money to help in restoring parts of the lookouts and keeping it safe not only for the employees, but also for the public as well. I know that on our forest, the local public visit the lookout quite often and would give almost anything to make sure that the lookouts stay in business so that they will feel secure about their homes being protected. some of them even come up and pick up the garbage and help with small repairs.  Well I hope all works out for you and your other half, like I said please keep us updated on the situation and if there are any ideas that I can help you with, please feel free to ask.  GOOD LUCK TO YA and EVERYBODY STAY SAFE THIS SUMMER!!! Maggie
07/26	did anyone get to elko in the last week or so? we had an am brief and that was the poorest brief that i have had in all the years doing this. no sit report. no weather and we where also told that we can not leave the camp to go into elko after our shift. but they then said this was not a closed camp but we can not leave......OK i am confused. how may i ask can they do this and not pay us? we where paid for 12hrs standby and not paid to stay all night... can someone help me understand this? i need to tell my engine crew... thanks SL
07/26	Hey all . . . Been a bit busy on the home front, its hell to be the ones protecting the home area, LOL NOT!. I have to say that there is now a regular schedule for water deliveries on the towers I mentioned, repairs are starting and a fumigation has happened! So good things are happening . . . Thanks are in order to the supervisory folks responsible for these towers!! All take care out there in Idaho, Montana, Colorado and California. Remember . . . the dragon lives. Word has it that R5 will no longer support the rathole of resources in Nevada ???  R5Firecapt
07/25	Friday, July 21 at 11:30 AM a fire started at Five Waters in the orchard near the road as Dick was mowing the high grass there. He ran over some rocks and a spark ignited the tall grass.  Unaware, he mowed on, Around and around 3 or 4 times. It finally reached critical mass and he was astounded by the billowing plume of smoke. He screamed for Marj working at the cabin. Dread filled them both as they realized what was just beginning.  He and Marjie were the only ones there and battled the spreading blaze alone for ONE HOUR! Alone...they battled a blaze threatening all that they loved. Alone, each on a different side, with little contact but working till it seemed like they would burst.  Each time it seemed they had it controlled the wind would pick up and defeat all their efforts. Each time they felt they could relax even the slightest, the fire would pick up again and advance. Here, then there, then over there, then back where they had just come from. How could they win this battle? Stay focused, stay focused.  It jumped the ranch road to the other end and, without a phone, they had no way to call for help. They could only rely on Ironside and the lookout's vigilance above, their presence in the valley. The overlooking safety net of the USFS fire lookout at the top of Ironside Mountain! It was all they had! Please come! Where are you? It could not be swift enough. Please, oh please, come!  At 12:30 Tom and his nephew, Ted, arrived to help perpare for the upcoming wedding only to find the valley engulfed, the smell of smoke everywhere. The dread, the sinking feeling was too overwhelming for words. But they dove right in, grabbing tools, water hoses and collectively beseeching the firefighters, the wind, the fire god to be on their side. Marj and Dick were so thankful to see them, to feel their presence, to know they were not alone. Help has arrived! Thank you god!  But it was not to be... yet. The four of them valiantly battled on, only to be beaten back here, then there. But they were winning a few. They stopped the fire from reaching the equipment shed and all the volitale fuels and lubricants. They stopped it from backing down across the orchard and central pasture. Dick was driving the tractor over crazy hillsides cutting through to the bare earth to make fire break and keep it from spreading down the valley. He stopped it above Martha Dyer's grave.  But advance it did, it would not stop, it just would not stop! It moved with the wind, it moved up the hill! It would move one direction and then turn 90 degrees without rhyme or reason. It really looked like they had it stopped, really, it looked thataway. Really. Stopped. Really. Oh, please, please be stopped...  Then the first green truck arrived! Oh, thank god they are finally here! We will be saved! The time was 1:30 pm but who cares at this point, they are here! But he was a lone law enforcement officer with no fire fighting capability. As they breifed him, a sickly parasite-ridden pine torched and, like a roman candle, it spewed flames and embers too high into the sky! Too high! Oh my god we are lost! And a breeze caught them and it jumped the road and was moving up the hill again. Oh tragedy, oh defeat. Thinking, I can't go on any more, I've got to go on. We've got to stop this thing! I absolutely cannot do this anymore. My body will not do this any more.  Right then an areial tanker arrives and drops PhosCheck, a fire retardent, beyond and above the advancing flames. Then two engines and their 3 man crews. They string out fire hose and begin laying a wet line and circling and pinching off the advance. The aerial tanker arrives again and again, and two more loads of PhosCheck slow the advance. A chopper arrives with its water bucket and begins making precision drops on hot spots. 3 or 4 more engines, two water tenders, two crews to cut fire line.  The dragon had turned but it does not feel like that to Marjie and Dick and Tom and Ted. It is only 3 o'clock and they will work on until after 6:00 pm before they feel comfortable enough to break, to slow down, to breathe, to get a drink of water, relax and reflect. To wonder at what they just did. To marvel, to recount the tales, the funny encounters. To cry a little at the frustration. Stein and Bryn, Bob and his family will arrive near 3:30 to help with mopup.  We are still telling and re-telling the story. Drawing maps, developing photos, wondering, worrying, trying to understand. Supporting, consoling. To learn, to do better next time. We have been lucky. We will be better prepared. More knowledgable, more aware, in closer contact.  Perhaps the lookout will as well.  The wedding will proceed. We will all rejoice. Come and join us. Come and be careful in our valley.  We love you all. Roger Here are the photos of one end of the valley before (from the ridge above) and after (from a plane) photo1 and photo2. Ab.
07/24	Some interesting sites to check out, complements of Firescribe:  www.nifc.gov/fireinfo/firemap.html locations of the large fires  www.nifc.gov/fireinfo/nfn.html great info on the current large wildfires around the country  www.nifc.gov/stats/wildlandfirestats.html numbers of fires and acres by decade, by cause, and suppression costs for govt agencies  www.nifc.gov/stats/historicalstats.html historically significant wildland fires  www.nifc.gov/stats/prescribedfirestats.html prescribed fire costs
07/23	Hello everyone, yes and RED, just made it home to sleep in my own bed one night and the phone rang. (Idaho this time) hey Red tell Dave and Tony Hello for me. Thanks bro. ....and to all of my fellow brothers and sisters in fire, it's 94 all over again, so heads up. CF5945
07/22	Well All,  Ya'll won't believe this, but we had a 5 acre fire at Five Waters yesterday and it could have been VERY BAD. Here's to resources for INITIAL ATTACK. All I can say is ohmygod. We were using our new tractor with all safety features and had made firebreaks. We were concerned about hot tailpipes of city folk lighting stuff off (wedding remember), so we were cutting it. Something sparked in the star thistle. Fire took off and romped in the very tall thick dry grass. Extended family members did a pretty good job of holding it at the edge of the meadow below the road, but it lit off a dead pine and jumped across into the trees, heading uphill into the only watershed not burned in the Big Bar Complex.  Before it was contained, we had 5 engines from Big Bar, Junction City, Burnt Ranch, Hyampom, and Salyer. Thanks guys!!! Two water tenders were sucking on our stand pipe's 283 lb of pressure-- thank god for that! Also had great handcrews: and the FS Trinity 3 Handcrew, CDF Hardrock Criminal Handcrew, and the Trinity Conservation Corps. Steve Decker (Div from the ShastaT), you did a great job! Thanks, Bud, will hug you in person. Special thanks also to the CDF Vina Helicopter crew, the air attack plane and the 3 airtankers. By all accounts it was the retardant drops that made the critical difference in picking it up. Let's hear it for the retardant dropping boys of the Redding Base. Many thanks!! Enjoy lurking on your website BTW.  I wasn't at Five Waters when this happened and I want to say special thanks to John Wendt (my bud, FMO Six Rivers), Ron Raley (dear man on the Shasta T) and Mark Stevens in Weaverville (must meet you in person) for providing information and holding my virtual hand.  I realize I find it harder to be the person away than to be the person on the line. Can't believe I missed it!!! But we may have a few more adrenalin junkie family converts to the fire scene. Have been wishing for clones to help me get word out to the public! Seriously, I can't wait to see pictures of the nomex clad and blackened faces of my extended family. I'm told they were a sight! I'm just glad everyone is OK. I'm very thankful.  Stay safe! Sparks fly right and left. Fine fuel is tall and dry out there. Watchout! Love you all! Mellie Glad all is well. Ab.
07/22	The Government Accounting Office (GAO) conducted an investigation of the Cerro Grande Fire that burned into Los Alamos. A .pdf copy of their testimony originally prepared in anticipation of a hearing on July 20 before the Senate's Committee on Energy and Natural Resources can be found at: www.gao.gov/new.items/rc00257t.pdf It has excellent graphics, including aerial photos and maps. If you view it online it takes a long time to load each graphic. The best way to see it is to save it to your hard disk, get a beer while the whole file downloads, then read it off-line.  Engine Guy  I was starting to think I was the only one here... Ab.
07/21	Hi all, here are two articles that may be of interest given recent threads: 1)Firefighters at Hanford and radiation testing 2)More money for logging, less for fire Firescribe
07/20	Lo ab et al.  Having a blast. Its been six weeks since ive seen my home... or a computer. Weve done the Ragian, Box Canyon, Rockcreek, Vigus, Strawberry, Cherry Creek, and are currently on the Fenster fire in Salmon Idaho.  Met the Lurker in Nevada. He runs a tight ship down there. Very impressive.  Got most of the rigs out, and looking forward to ripping it up tomorrow. Met some great Shots from North Carolina. Great bunch of folks to work with.  Looking to rotate some folks in and out, so call if you're interested in working some engines.  eric PW 800 704 4594  Rock N Cindy at Woods. Call Wajax Pacific in Kent WA, they have some slip in units available. Rick up in Stanwood @ Northwest Emergency Equipment has them in stock also, great preices too.  later all and have fun out there!!!!!
07/20	Hey, MADDOG-- Big bash/brother's wedding happening in the Trinities soon. Get me a mocked up letter, I'll make some versions and copies and I'll bet a bunch of friends, family, residents will do a mail/fax in with me! (Any friends, drop me a note (hotmail) if you wanna come play with us!) YOU GO GUY! Yeah, let's get the word out! Firefighter pay changed some few years ago because spouses got together and lobbied. Mellie
07/20	The enclosed editorial appeared in the Capital Press, the biweekly agricultural newspaper for N.Calif. and the Northwest States. I thought it might be of interest in light of Maddogs comments concerning testimony to Congress.  Firemark --------------------------- WILDFIRE DANGER INCREASES!  Fire protection agencies are stretched to meet demands for service in these days of tight budgets. Federal wildfire agencies are severely challenged. The Forest Service may be hurting the most, with BLM close behind. This is not good news for those of us living near public lands.  In 1999 both agencies saw over 2.4 million acres in their protection in California and Nevada burn. The firefighting cost, according to media reports, exceeded $500 million. Losses to private property, natural resources, and endangered specie habitat are also estimated to be in the millions of dollars. The Northwest was spared... last year.  Significant factors in fire losses are continued agency downsizing and budget cuts. Optimistic observers think the BLM may have bottomed out, but the Forest Service, according to many employees, is still bleeding.  It is hard for me to understand the Chief of the Forest Service talking of restoring the land from past abuses, managing for healthy ecosystems and sustainable natural resources while wildfires run amuck across the forests. Successful use of prescribed fire is also compromised by loss of fire protection resources. It boggles the mind to weaken fire forces so that control of both prescribed fire and wildfire is marginal at best.  How in the world can Forest Service leadership champion its "Caring for the land and serving people" mantra while the ability to control fire declines putting firefighters, the neighbors and forests in harm's way? I am told that fire funds are now the largest part of the Service's budget, but, according to many experienced firefighters, there aren't adequate resources for basic wildfire protection. It is as though there is a big disconnect between the leadership in Washington and the people in the forests.  One problem might be how fire management funds are spent. I hear from Forest Service people that as high as 60 cents of every fire dollar coming from Congress goes to non fire programs. I am told most diversion is because the Service was left with a huge infrastructure and many mandated, but unfunded, programs when timber activities collapsed. However, in my view the Forest Service needs to do some serious soul searching about agency mission and priorities. Consciously deciding to put the public, the forests and firefighters at risk is not caring for the land and serving people.  The fire protection issue is more than funding and the number of firefighters and equipment available. Effective and efficient management of prescribed fire and control of wildfire requires trained, committed and experienced people. Downsizing, budget cuts and retirements have left the Forest Service short of experienced hands with wisdom acquired from years spent doing the on the ground fire management. Replacement of the veterans requires a commitment of time and money.  Cooperative relations with state and local fire agencies, once an outstanding example of agencies working together, are deteriorating as people and funds grow scarce. I hear from colleagues in the fire business concerns about the continued erosion of Forest Service firefighting capability and leadership, especially in rural areas. State and local fire agencies cannot pick up the firefighting slack left by Forest Service losses.  When the National Forests were established, a primary direction was to protect forests for future generations, and control of wildfire was a priority. Later, with the help of science, the beneficial use of fire became accepted. However, some bad experiences with escaped fires slowed its acceptance as a management tool. Today many people advocate aggressive fire use as the antidote for "over protection" and as an elixir of forest health. But to achieve beneficial results without causing harm is still a challenge.  Some voices advocating burning are not overly concerned about escaped fires, but there is a different perspective from those who own the smoking foundations or blackened land. Unfortunately, this cavalier attitude may influence some people holding the purse strings. Strapped for money, some decision makers may rationalize that maybe they can slip by, and if there is a fire escape it probably isn't a big deal.  I can understand the dilemma of having more demands than money, but in my mind management of a public trust by random events and rationalization is inappropriate. The neighbors, along with firefighters, should not be put in harms way by short-sighted decisions that ignore the realities of fire on the land. Paraphrasing Smokey Bear, "Don't play with fire!"  [John F. Marker is a partner in Wildland Firefighter Magazine, a monthly trade magazine, and a farm owner in the Hood River Valley. He has been involved in wildland fire protection activities for almost forty years including a career with the U.S.Forest Service.]
07/19	Greeting my wildland firefighting brothers & sisters         I give you a challenge.         On July 26th, the President of the Federal Wildland Fire Service Association will be testifying before the House Committee on Government Reform, Subcommittee on Civil Service. This testimony is in support of H.R, 2814 the Federal Firefighters Pay Equity Act. To date this bill has 58 co-sponsors in the House, and ten on the Senate side where S. 1498 mirrors the language. This bill, if enacted, would lift the infamous overtime pay cap for federal employees. Some of us have been asked to submit formal written testimony.         I ask each of you to take the time to rough out a brief letter, fax, e-mail or even call your elected Congressional representatives in support of the legislation, getting it out of committee onto the floor and voted AYE! If you don't know the address, e-mail or even who reps you, let me know I'll let you know, I've got the 106th Congressional Directory memorized (yeah, right!). Make it short. Add a bit of autobiographical background. Be polite but make your point. Other issues that also will be presented before this Subcommittee will touch on proper classification for federal wildland firefighters (OPM is supposely working on this), portal to portal pay, inclusion of Hazardous duty pay for purpose of retirement calculations, increasing funding to fire management to reverse the very ugly state the federal IA forces have been slashed to; among others.         Recent events at Los Alamos, Hanford (got it right), reprecussions from last year's fire season make the time right to step up and voice your personal protected opinion on these very important issues. As citizens of this great nation we all should be appalled by the condition the federal fire wildland fire readiness has become. I would also ask that you spread the word and get family and friends to do the same.         I would be happy to provide a generic draft if anyone wants it. Keep the faith. Maddog Send in a generic letter and I'll link to it. Ab.
07/18	Ironman, congratulations on getting your saw certification! Don't forget to know when to say no. What you worked out was slick. Maybe you can find a cure for this one:  Important man on forest would just as soon certify everyone as B. To me, B is skilled sawyer. Lots of casual sawyers on district with no training and little experience. Important man says "woe is me". Forest Saw Person will not certify my guys after 4 hours of training. "Woe is me" No other C sawyer will certify his guys either. Important man has brilliant idea. "I will certify my own guys". Health and Safety Code says it takes a C Sawyer to certify a B sawyer. Important man himself has no saw training or certification. No big deal. Important man will certify anyway.  Pretty soon,  with saw in hand,  important man turn into impotent man.  Any ideas?  Sorry, cannot sign real name.  Sign me: Sawgash
07/18	Yowsers!  After going through the posts about the fire lookout, I figured I might as well drop in my two cents worth, coming from a lookout volunteer’s point of view.  I completely agree with raising a stink about the H&S issues. I about fell out of my chair, dead (though the thud would have been equivalent, the drop itself would not even compare to a 1000 foot fall!) when I read the post about the conditions of this lookout. The organization I volunteer for would NEVER put anyone at that kind of risk. Over the years we’ve opened more lookouts, but it wasn’t done without going through all of the archeological and geological….yada yada yada surveys. (I figure you folks probably know more about this kind of stuff than I do and why it’s required…etc.) In fact our group just recently received a donation for one of the lookouts but nothing can be done with the money until the techy guys get in there and do their thing.  So, I guess my question is this: If our organization has to go through this kind of red tape (Yes, I understand there is protocol and I’m not by any means arguing that!) for what might seem a simple project, then how the heck can a district, forest folk……etc, ignore such conditions and hazards that are a risk to their PAID personnel?? That’s some major, scary stuff! Granted I don’t know anything about that particular area..etc, but sheesh. If we so much as have a wingnut out of whack, we’re throwing on the tool belt and fixing it. But then I guess the difference is, we’re also open to the public. I’m curious is this lookout also available or open to the public to hike up to and visit? (Double YIKES if it is!)  As far as getting the ball rolling, yes there are many grants and organizations out there that can help. FFLA was mentioned and is a good start. Grants are also a great way to go but the homework better be done first. That would mean getting someone up to the lookout that can hopefully give a pretty damn accurate estimate for restoration costs. But it doesn’t stop there. If you want more money as a whole, tag on the costs of other lookouts, including the restoration costs. All they need is someone who knows the cut and dry and who can write it for them.  Here’s another trick... all of your local congressmen/women have funds set aside every year for various organizations, needs, etc. They LOVE to spend money on this kind of thing! It’s called a “Member’s Request” and has to do with appropriation committees, local members of legislature within the district…etc, and from what I hear they’re VERY easy to get, even more so than grants.  Home Depot gives grants to Forestry and Ecology, Home Base has a partnership and donates supplies and even little businesses love to donate stuff to fire lookouts. Face it, lookouts are cool and people love them!  Ok, so now what? Well, it’s up to the district where the lookout is. Maybe someone can nudge them along or merely suggest “ok..here are some ideas that came up, why don’t you give it a try.” There are so many avenues for getting these lookouts up to par. There should be no excuses and definitely, no one should be at any risk of injury or worse.  I take it, from the general census, that you all feel the same way the lookouts need to be open and deserve attention, not only because of their part of history but because they’re still a valuable asset. I sure hope someone is listening.  Okie dokie I’m done ranting. Again, this is just the opinion of a “every-other-weekend-volunteer” who LOVES those lookouts!  Crawling back into the cab! AnneGwish
07/17	Hey Ab, please pass on my e-mail addy to MTWO as I'd like some info . . And Thanks to Firehorse for the support on the lookout issue . . .  Well I guess I stirred up the proverbial bees nest as I got a personal call from the Battalion thats resopnsible for these towers. I must say that I havent had such an ear bending in quite some time. Therefore . . . I offer my humble appologies to those whos toes I may have so smartly trampled on. It was not my the intention to piss y'all off only to enter into some converstaion and blow off some steam as Ab has stated that this site is for. I did not intend to infer that the local engine crews have nothing to do, I am an engine captain and know whats up. My intent is to make a point. And i guess i made one, but not the right one. And so I reiterate in my oh so humble manner that I do appologise, no hurt intended, and that I have NOT reported anything to the all powerful, (dare I mention it) OSHA. Believe me I'm not a glutton for punishment, I had my station "safety inspection' not 3 days ago an now have a laundry list an arm long to work over, not to mention uprooting underground fuel tanks and general disruption. So I hope that there is "no harm no foul" called in this purely personal expression of opinion. I feel the need to make perfectly clear that this is MY PERSONAL OPINION, not related to any other person or related to any official capacity.  call me . . Humbly Corrected R5Firecapt My friend, do not appologize for opening a discussion on unsafe conditions within the fire organization. We live in a country that insures freedom of speech and we owe it to our own to make problems known. To all posters here: If you anticipate repercussions from a question you raise, please protect yourself by not offering too much personal information that could make you identifiable. We try to be alert to these issues for you, but do not catch all identifiers. Feel free to use a second alias if people know you by your first moniker. We will protect your identity to the best of our ability. Ab.
07/17	Lookouts are easy to forget, you don't see them everyday, and you've got to go out of your way to make the trip. We have 9 lookouts in the zone, with 6 staffed. Yes, they are a maintenance headache, yes they are out of the way, yes sometimes it's inconvenient to make sure everything is up to standards, BUT, they do report 63% of the fires detected around here and we would have some serious problems without them. They don't cost that much in labor, GS-3 & GS-4's. We spend about $600/yr in annual maintenance, and occasionally we have to spend alot more for a major repair or improvement. We have the same problems as everyone else with remote sites that sit out all year in the elements, exposed to the worst weather conditions, vandalism, rodent & bird & other critters, yet we can't live without them. And we don't want to. Most of our lookouts are reasonable folks with reasonable needs. The FMO at that unit that is ignoring the obvious should just get out of the lookout business. Do you think he would let his other resources degrade to that kind of condition, engines with crap falling off, not working etc. Helicopters with oil leaks and cracked windows? That would probably get someone's attention. The NFMAS Fire Planning process accounts for detection, (lookouts), in the modeling portion. He needs to do another run without any detection and then try to sell the fact that he never catches any fires because they are already humugous when his fires are discovered. The State office/RO review of that setup would generate some laughter for sure. A unit with a history of neglect of their lookout facilities, doesn't need them. Get out of the business before something bad happens to your folks. If not I'd say those lookouts can do alot better in the PNW as experienced folks are always in demand.  Dispatch Dude.
07/17	Firehorse & R5 Fire Capt,  I don't think you want call OSHA to get the Fire Lookouts fixed. You might end up with a total shutdown if OSHA really got their teeth in this one. The problem that I beleive is common to almost all lookouts is egress. One way in & out. OSHA says you need two exits. They have dealt with the FAA and their aircraft control towers because of this egress problem. FAA was using something called Sky Genie for an emergency exit for a while. I don't think they are still using this but they do have something. Now where OSHA wasn't going to shut the control towers down and disrupt air travel they probably have no qualms about shutting down fire lookouts. Who would know? As far as inspections state OSHAs have no jurisdiction over Federal employees, so you are stuck with Fed OSHA. Maybe good, maybe bad. Depends on the inspector. Good or bad, Fed OSHA cannot fine you! The only thing they can do is write you up and put their classification on the write up. Even at South Canyon the writeups the Forest Service & BLM received said Willful and Serious. The writeups are public record so that is where some of the pressure comes from not to be written up or to fix things immediately so the problem goes away.  To beat a little more on HAZWOPPER. Yes 29CFR1910.120 is the Hazardous Waste & Emergency Response Standard. If anyone wants to actually read this you can go to www.osha.gov. Click on regulations, click on 29CFR1910 and find the screen containing the 120 Standard. There are other 1910 standards that apply to firefighters like Hazcom (1910.1200), Personal Protective Equipment (1910.132), Noise (1910.95) and I'm sure a bunch of others.  Enough, its Sunday and time to kickback. Be careful out there!  Fitch
07/17	A couple of comments re broken-down lookouts:  1) OSHA can CITE the Forest Service, but cannot FINE federal agencies.  2) To get ball rolling:  Each forest has, or should have a Forest Safety and Health (Officer, coordinator, program manager, depends on where, pick one) person. A chat with this person should at least get a conversation going, won't guarentee any results, but that is why that person is there. Forest Service, alas, is a beast with a great deal of momentum and not much cash, so it tends to continue in the current direction and be resistant to changes in direction. Money is what usually greases the wheels. On a former forest, we got a lookout rebuilt because a local land owner was attached to it, served as the volunteer lookout, and did all the work. We supplied materials, had to be quite creative in doing so (don't ask). Check in with local saftey folks, give 'em a chance.  Second avenue - Union. If the forest is in a bargining unit and lookout is in bargining unit position, call the union vice-president for the forest. You may have to ask around a bit to find out who this is. They may or may not be useful, depends on who and where. Most likely affilaited with NFFE. My current forest is not in a bargining unit, a former forest has a union rep sit in on all Leadership Team meetings. Union is variable in the FS. A warning - if you get zero response from forest safety folks, safety program is broken - be very careful!  3) Call OSHA. WARNING - be prepared for consequences. Some managers don't take well to having a dime dropped on them, they will find out who called. Good managers take it in stride and hold no grudges, bad ones, or highly ambitious ones who take a black mark as a threat to their ambition, react poorly. So at the very least, cover yourself by giving local management and safety folks a chance to do the right thing. Protecting you and your fellow workers from obvious safety hazards is the right thing to do, so your bringing the situation up is the right thing to do and an honest serious effort to investigate and mitigate hazard is the right thing to do.  Good Luck A Forest Safety and Health Program Manager
07/16	Someone told me that last year a letter went out from Dombec in March or April saying that fire is an emergency and a priority that takes precidence over district targets. He hasn't sent out that letter this year. Whatsup? No longer an emergency, or finally getting realistic about his priorities!  One coastal NorCal forest (not 6Rivers) used to have trail crew that were trained/redcarded by the forest to fight fire. They were able to work on engines on the weekends at least. This year, the Forest Sup says, "Sure, they can work weekends on fire, but the forest isn't paying for the critical refresher and pack test." -- So, in this year that we're short on engine modules, we have a situation where we could have trained people available, but they are unavailable until further notice because they have to foot their own training bill! By default he's saying that until timber is marked and trail is complete they can't do fire at all. Seems kinda bass ackward to me...  I think line officers should have to spend some quality time in fire as a prerequisite for their jobs-- Come on, fire is what finances the forest these days. Why doesn't more of the money get to the ground and more get put into training? Hope this doesn't come back to bite us on the butts this fire season!  Sign me: Wanting to work some fire, even weekends...
07/16	Ab--  Already wondering about safety on fires. In Nevada recently, shots were working 54-65 hours straight. They didn't need to, just wanted the overtime. This could be unsafe. Was definitely excessive work hours. Sleep deprivation contributes to unsafe work conditions.  In AZ there was an engine crew that worked 32.5 hrs before taking time off. Not following work-rest guidelines or driving regs. What are driving regs for the Class B, anyway? Is it something like can only drive 10 out of every 15 hours? Module leaders who push themselves and engine crews put everyone at risk. Two of the crew were green and didn't know to protest. For the rest of the crew there's peer pressure and OT pressure. For the leader there's ego and refusing to realize that people are not machines. He pushes people to exaustion... Doesn't the IC or the line officer have to sign off on deviations from Safety Regs? Correct me if I'm wrong, but the Div signing off is not enough, is it?  Please be safe and report unsafe conditions. AL
07/15	ab,  We are looking for a CWN Engine Crew Boss and experienced WL firefighters in California and Nevada for wildland fires and Rx burns. Is there any system on the Internet that I can post this information? Your help is greatly appreciated. Steve firemeup@fire-stop.com
07/15	RE: The Lookout:      When I was on the Santa Fe N.F. back in may during my first assignment there. I meet a Volunteer Lookout person who got the ball rolling. To the point where I volunteered to install the Linoleum that she was able to get donated. This was on the Pecos/Las Vegas RD. This volunteer was able to get items donated for the lookout and was able to get the DFMO, etc. behind her.     Just to let you know it can and will work if, you use the right touch. You all take care and be safe when the Fire Gods start dancing again!! Mike:)
07/14	Hi Ab!  A sad note for the mountain communities of Auberry, Tollhouse and Bald Mountain (CA) as well as our ranger unit, the Fire Chief of the Auberry Volunteer Fire Dept passed away last week and was laid to rest in Tollhouse yesterday. Mike Thompson was a fixture in the area well known by all agencies in the Fresno County foothill area as a great firefighter and friend. CDF and Auberry Fire put together a moving tribute to Mike, we took him to rest in an impressive procession of local and federal fire equipment along with many family and friends. Mike passed from complications from leukemia.  It was gratifying to see the support to Mikes family.  I have been reading with interest the postings on young wives attempting to deal with their spouses addiction to firefighting. My wife and I are both employed by CDF, she as a Fire Captain in the Bay Area, I am an Engineer in Fresno County. We have been together for 13 years now and still find it hard at times to be separated by long fire assignments and long commutes to work for both of us. This year for the first time in a great while we managed to get the same shift days and can spend much more time together. In the past, when I worked a 2 on 2 off schedule in the valley and she worked the 3 on 4 off we both work now, it was not uncommon to only see one another 7 or 8 days in a month, especially during fire season. But through it all, we understood the fact that the fire service was a calling and a career for both of us and that we are each others support in the tough times. Every marriage has to be made of compromise and communication and trust or it will fail. Just as my wife has been in my corner through it all from my fireman days on a busy medic engine to my current assignment in the hills, my support and faith in her and her love for all things wildland from engine captain to finance chief has seen her through many days gone to the big one. We are very lucky to have an understanding of what goes on in the station and on long campaign fires, this makes things easier to deal with. Missed birthdays and family gatherings are common, our families take all in stride.  My point of all this ramble is, if you are in a relationship where one spouse or significant other is in fire, communicate! Try to call home every day, don't forget the little things in life that count, tell him or her you love them and when you are together, remember to respect each other and be as understanding as you can with the others fears about what you do.  OK, I'm done. Be safe out there. Engineer Emmett
07/14	I know what Firehorse is saying about, "getting the ball rolling" in regards to the poor conditions of the lookout. But I have to wonder what your forest, district, ranger, FMO, etc...really think about the lookout and it's upkeep. Doesn't sound like its a priority or even on the list, and while, stirring the pot, might get some action...what kind of action will that be? My first thought is, this forest doesn't give a shit, and rather than spend money fixing it up, it might be easier to just shut it down. And send someone up there once in awhile with a hand held radio, to check for smokes, after a lightning storm. What does your significant other say about you getting the ball rolling? And if she is just the relief, what about the person who is there full time? I would think, you should get that person to do the complaining, first or at least get them on your side? But, my guess is, if they haven't already complained, then perhaps, they fear for their job, and so instead...they are just making the best of the situation themselves.      Worked on a forest with a lookout, similar to yours, the cat walk was falling down, although once you got inside the building, it was pretty safe. So, rather than man it full time and or fix it, they just sent some one up during lightning...and that someone was always the same person, a tiny little 100lb female. Who just skirted around the bad part of the deck. And always, someone would call her on the radio at the begining of her watch and ask, "make it over that catwalk, Okay?" One of these days, she might not be answering back. Thats when they will shut it down for good, no doubt.      Unfortunately alot of forests would rather not deal with lookouts and their upkeep at all. I'm not saying that you shouldn't do anything, because it sounds like this lookout while being manned is definately a hazard, but you should also be prepared for the possibility that the outcome might not be one that you like. However, there is an organization FFLA, Forest Fire Lookout Association, that might help give you ideas about restoration possibilities.       Also, if your forest should decide that it would rather shut it down, there are other forests, that have used volunteer groups, and gotten grants to pay for their restoration The McConnell Foundation, out of Redding, CA. just recently gave a grant to the McCloud Ranger District of the Shasta Trinity to restore two of their lookouts. The McConnell Foundation give grants only to the northern california area, I'm not sure how wide of a swath that is, but perhaps your area falls in it. Also, don't overlook, your own local merchants to donate supplies. So, maybe before you go get someone all in a huff with the threat of OHSA fines and a big headache over the problems with this lookout, maybe you should get your duckys lined up and be ready with a list of possibilities, on how to fix them and where to look for some money to do it. AND, after you've said and done all that, be willing to offer yourself up as someone to be a part of the project. Its all about money, time is money, equipment is money, and who has the time or the money these days?       Bottom line, what District Ranger (or someother muckity muck) wouldn't just love to see their own swollen little egotistcal face in the local paper, being congradulated and sucking up kudos, over some wonderful community project, that didn't cost them a dime? Doesn't matter that it wasn't their own idea, somewhere along the line, because they gave the "go ahead", they will believe it was. And you just might have that Lookout in better condition, than you could have ever imagined.       Give it a shot. Send a message to me, through Ab, if he doesn't mind, I can line you up with some amo, before you go in to confront the bigwigs.  MTWO I'd be happy to pass it on. Duckys, eh? Ab.
07/13	To R5Firecapt, One way to get the ball rolling on the poor lookout conditions is to put in a call to Federal OHSA or State OSHA. The FS is not above being fined for breaking OSHA regs. My last forest would have gotten hit with fines of a couple hundred thousand dollars if they did not take corrective action. Might also talk to the local FS union rep. Several years ago a lookout on one of the sites in western Oregon could not be contacted. Upon investigation it was determined the person had fallen off the lookout, over the cliff and was killed. If I remember correctly the FS was raked over the coals a few years ago for a person that was injured on a fire and there was no communications with a dispatch center or anyone. Might check the "Health & Safety Code" for the communications problem and the others you were concerned with. See if they are addressed in the good ol' "Green Book". If it is in the H&S and being ignored, someone could be in some very serious "Doo-Doo"!! Those are not "You might think about doing this", they are "You don't do it unless you do it this way!!!  Not sure why nobody wants to visit the lookout in an official capacity. That was always one of the highlights of my old AFMO job was to visit the lookouts. Go to a lookout and get paid at the same time? That is a "No Brainer"!  Firehorse
07/13	pumpkin dropper:     all is well in chainsaw land, i hearded my FMO and my sdupervisor into an office this morning and popped the question about my proficiency. neithe one had any objections in front of each other, so this afternoon i qualified, for the third time, to be a B faller. ive found out that if you get conflicting stories from middle management, get em in front of each other and let em battle it out. worked before, and worked today...so im guessing it'll work the next time i "want" something!  thanks for everybody's help, ironman
07/13	Ironman, My first question to you is, have you asked your supervisor why they will not recognize it? They need to tell you why. Maybe they do not feel you are ready yet. Trust me, I have been a lead program instructor on our forest for falling for some time now, and two B class trees are not enough to consider someone as a B Faller. Of all the jobs you do this is the one that will kill you in a heart beat. If there is any doubt in your supervisors mind, I support them in their decision to not recognize the Qualification. Find out where the problem is and ask for help to improve. Practice practice practice. And if you do get carded as a B faller, remember they can pull it from you anytime they feel you are unsafe and don't meet the standards. Although there are some general standards, each forest and/or district makes the decision on who will or won't be qualified. This is one area; just because you pass the class, doesn't mean you will be qualified. Sign me, Pumpkin-Dropper
07/13	Hey AB and all . . .  Been a while since I had the time to post, busy busy as all of us are at this time of year.  I must say that I have to agree with many of the thoughts of all on the aspects of being married/cohabitating with a fire goer, my significat other now works lookouts, one of which is remote and requires a weeks stay at a time. I guess now I know what she's been feeling for a couple of years now, separation and missing the other half. I guess maybe its my time to get a taste of what I've been dishing out for years now and through several relationships, but I wont give up my line time yet!  Now this brings me to another subject . . .  Treatment of our detection people.  A friend works as relief detection on a northern R5 forest.  The condition of these facilities is disintigrating to say the least. Safety violations abound, including loose boards on catwalks, no safety rails on steep access stairs, (with 1000' drop to the rocks), possible asbestos insulation, rodent access, and to top it off the Districts lack of provision to power the cell phone that they provide, (the regular attendant has been providing his own battery for this for years and it also powers the water pump to lift water to the tower). When the regular attendant has taken the batteries down the hill for charging or what ever this leaves no water or phone in the tower. In addition the prevention person is of the mind that it's a hassle for him to take water to either of these towers except on his schedule and that if the phone is desired she should provide the battery, therefore the cleanliness of these facilities leaves something to be desired and personal safety may be compromised as only one of these towers can communicate with a 24 hour ECC. Is expecting people to pack 5 gallon water containers up unsafe stairs, for long distances and at altitude just to keep a reasonable semblance of personal hygene a bit rediculous? I for one find it to be unacceptable! The most unacceptable part of the whole thing is the district personnel attitude about the situations, they have been advised and respond with admonishment. I have taken the liberty to inform the province safety coordinator of these situations and recieved a promise from him to look into the thing.  Part of what really chapps my hide is that the detection facilities and personnel on my district/forest, recieve the utmost attention and respect. I jump to the task whenever one of our detection facilities or persons even suggests that they might have a need, this is even though I am not responsible for taking care of this. All of the forests I have had the pleasure to work on have given one of the engine crews the task of providing upkeep and supply of these remote facilities, I find it exhilerating to visit these monutain tops as it provides a completely different perspective on the initial attack area and gives excellent orientation to the crew members, not to mention builds repore with the tower attendant. My friend has yet to see the nearset engine crew and they are at the bottom of the hill, 30 minutes drive away from the closest tower. What is the deal?? True that one of these towers is a 20 minute walk from the parking lot, but that has NEVER been my excuse to not visit and at least say HI.  Another allegation is that the attendant for the most remote tower has a powerful someone in in their pocket. So what? Is this a reason to not get things done or to deal with the problems associated with eccentric folks who live in these places and seem to think that it belongs to them. True that someone who lives in a tower for 10 days at a time begins to think of it as home, but is it proper for them to complain that their relief "used too much water"?? I for one find this a bit much to swallow, especially when personal hygene and facility cleanliness are the issues. As a concerned citizen, I will be visiting this remote location myself today for my own perspective.  How are the other areas that have lookouts taking care of thier personnel and facilities? Are they allowed to fall into disrepair and require the employees to provide for some of the operating systems of the facility?? I know for a fact that the local Natl Park that has a remote tower that they are renovating and that they use a freaking helicopter to supply the place! Helicopter cost vs a trip in a patrol rig to supply? You all do the math . . .  Makes me wonder where the heads of some of these folks reside.  Its my belief that these folks that sit on windy, dry mountain tops looking for the one that might get really big in our back yards need to be taken care of with the utmost importance, they are the ones that help us do our job of "Hittin 'em hard and keepin' 'em small". . .  Call me a concerned citizen. . .  R5Firecapt
07/13	Mike, if you are looking for experienced firefighters try posting to forums.dnr.state.mn.us/~community_forums under employment opportunities. We encourage our members to look there as soon as they are demobed. The vast majority of Minnesota Wildland Firefighters Association members have at least 6 years of wildfire experience. Also there are MN folks with less experience who are not being included in the national availability list with only one to three years of experience in fire who have worked with engines but are not red carded for it. If any fire employers are looking for firefighters, this might be good place to post. You have to sign in to post so if you wish I can post for you...just contact me at linscott@rea-alp.com.  I am also going to start a work wanted section in the same forum so any firefighters looking for work can post there. You don't need to be from MN. Please remember to either post again when the position is filled (for employers) or you find employment (for firefighters). This could be a great asset to both if it is used wisely. Ab, feel free to direct folks to me if you get employment related requests.  Gordon, I am very interested in the report that your classmate did. Please if at all possible have him contact me at the above email address. I would like to follow up on it and especially want to see his citations. Fire fighters deserve to KNOW what the dangers are in fighting fire...I really do not believe that we can depend on our employers to provide the info...if they are even aware of it.  If there is evidence that we have a higher incidence of cancer we should know it. This is especially true since the early effects of lung disorders would show up as an inability to pass the fitness tests and by the time the diagnosis is in too much time may have passed to hold the employers responsible. Too often I have heard the response "they know the dangers" when I know firefighters seldom do know most of the dangers. I for one do not appreciate being treated like a mushroom...kept in the dark and fed [snip].  Dana

07/12	Howdy AB how is you and yours? Just wondering if anyone knows how to get a slip on pump package faster then 10 weeks?  Looking for any and all help regarding this. Its for a type 6 that we are just completing. 200 gal, 100 psi, 50 gpm, If anyone can help it'll be greatly appreciated. Thanks: Mike:)   Woods Fire. rmmcgee@jps.net
07/12	MOC4546, i have had (and passed) S-212. i sawed two "B" size trees for the fellow conducting that school ( May 2000) and i got my B card on a fire detail in june 2000, but my forest will not recognize it. being in my "lowly" fire position, i dont want to go above my bosses head, but i do want the certification. my chainsaw instructor on district will be glad to certify me, but the FMO will not give him the ok to do so.  any suggestions from anybody? thank yuh much  better change my pen name b4 i get myself in trouble so im: ironman
07/12	Hello all. First off I'd like to say thanks to Abercrombie for this site. It is great. I'd like to tell a little about myself. I'm a vol. ff. Been with them for 2.5 yrs. Got started in firefighting with a temp job with North Caolina Forest Service. I have applied for 2 positions with them and am waiting to here something. I took the pack test for the past 2 yrs to go on national fires with NCFS. Last night we got dispatched to Louisiana. Unfortunatley, I was an alternate and didn't get to go. So disapointed, not mad though, just been looking forward to it. But it is still early, maybe I'll get to go somewhere later in the summer. If not there is always next year.  Where is Tiny? Still got the cast on his arm? Just wondering have'nt seen him post lately.  Ya'll all take care and be safe. David  Miss'in our firepup? Tiny got the cast off his arm, a clean bill of health from his doc, and went off to camp toward the end of June. There he is known as Ranger Tiny. He's teaching orienteering and related classes and is in charge of fire safety. He walks around at night making sure campfires are out. I'm sure as soon as he is back online we will hear from him. Ab.
07/12	I hope you can stand one more response to the letter from the Utah wife. I have a slightly different view on it. My husband and I have been married 9 years. He has been a firefighter for 7 1/2 of those years. When we got married, he had never been to a fire so communication wasn't the issue. He joined the Volunteer Fire Department in the small town that we lived in in 1992 and has been addicted to it ever since. He fought wildland fires for 2 seasons and I thought it would drive me crazy that first year. Not because of what he was doing, but because I didn't know what to expect since this was new to both of us. I didn't know that I wouldn't see him or hear from him for weeks at a time. Hearing about fires on the news and not knowing if that was where he was. When he returned after that first year it was tough getting back into the "routine." When the second season came around, we discussed at length the pros and cons of him doing it again. Yes the money was great, but that wasn't the only consideration. There was the fact that he is gone 6 months, he was trying to finish his Masters Degree and that would delay it for another year, and it honestly scared me to death. It finally came down to my accepting that fighting fires was not only what he did, but it was, and still is, who he is. It is his passion. He has not gone back to the hotshot crew due to an injury and a job within his degree field, but a day doesn't go by that he doesn't think about it and miss it. He is a volunteer with the forest service where we live now and that helps to keep the love of the job alive. I guess the point that I am trying to make is that to survive this kind of job there needs to be communication, understanding, patience and acceptance from both spouses and never issue an ultimatum. Ya'll stay safe out there.  Another firefighters wife.
07/12	More on the los alamos/hanford thread.  A classmate of mine in college did a paper on this very subject.  There are low level isotopes in the background all over the world. In the soil, air, water, etc. It is all natural and too low a level to be a health hazard. Plants take up these isotopes along with all other minerals and nutrients, and are incorporated in to woody plant tissue. Upon death the material is slowly released back into the soil through decomposition.  When vegetation burns, it is released all at once. This causes the long-known radioactivity 'spike' found in all fire areas. Officially, it is still too low a level to be a hazard (the abnormally high cancer rate among firefighters??). Of course, the labs also have methyl-ethyl-bad-crud all over the place too. But some of the readings were the natural low-level stuff found on all fires. You never hear about it on normal fires because no one carries a geiger counter on a typical fireline.  Gordon
07/12	Well, advertise where you can I say. The Burns Interagency Fire Zone, R-6 Oregon, is looking for a couple of trained FFT2's to pick up on 1039 appointment, starting...hmmm...today. Engine crew folks for Type 4,5 or 6 engines. Guard Station housing. If interested contact Mike @ (541) 573-4330.
07/12	Mike,  No I was not at Cerro Grande...I am in Smokechaser purgatory. You see we have been forming what from the looks of it will be an actual wildfirefighter union in MN and there have been consequences.  For my organizing and lobbying/testifying activities I was acknowledged by our members by being elected to vice chair of the Minnesota Wildland Firefighters Association. I was also blacklisted by the Head MN DNR Fire manager.  In addition to not being allowed to be employed by any DNR area supervisor (several asked) he also ordered that I not be issued a red card by the Minnesota Interagency Fire Center (although the center is a joint Fed and Stated effort the person responsible for issuing red cards is a DNR employee). Since the DNR retains all of my training and experience records and they have refused to release them I am effectively prevented from fighting fire this season.  I am being made an example of as are several others in the MWFA. Several had been promised that if they would stick around for the MN fire season (Spring) they would be guaranteed advanced training slots...only to have them pulled when they accepted summer positions from independent contractors during the "off season". Again on the orders of the head fire manager. Just his management style I guess. We knew he would do it long before he did...it has always been how he deals with firefighters who fail to show him the "proper" respect.  In my case it was a blessing...a month and a half ago my mother was diagnosed with aggressive colon cancer which had spread...and the hiatus has allowed me to provide the loving personal care she deserves in her last days. With out the heavy-handed tactics of the MN DNR I would not have been there to insist that she could not wait a few weeks for an appointment and she would have died with far less dignity and surrounded by strangers. As it was I was my normal pushy self and after (being forced to ) administer tests immediatly the doctors were operating the next morning for an emergency surgery which while succesful was only the beginning.  If I had been away fighting fire, as I have for the last 15 years I would have made it home in time to arrange for the funeral at best. Just another unforeseen consequence of loving to battle the dragon.  Anyway, I was just informed yesterday that as a result of this Manager the DNR was unable to recruit enough green trainees to make up for the exodus of experienced firefighters (seasonal) for the second year in a row. This year they came up short by 200! I have also recently discovered that the vast majority of firefighters being dispatched out of state are our members...the trainees are being treated the same way we were...not having their names passed on for national availability. They won't be back next year!  I have no idea what this guy is thinking...except that if we continue our efforts he will have to answer to the legislature for his "lack of management" and the decline of Minnesota's ability to suppress fire...while at the same time fire fund expenditures have skyrocketed as he attempted to make up for the shortage of available firefighters by contracting enormously expensive equipment (air power) to save his ass if a major fire breaks out. Of course he has no fire experience...inherited his job from his boss...who died in the middle of setting up (still unimplemented) badly needed major changes to the fire program.  OOPS! What started out as a contribution to the ongoing discussion became a rant.  Being a firefighter involves much more than putting a fire out...and while the "Govt" will often not acknowledge how difficult the difficulty of the job we do...and sometimes seems to actually try to make it more difficult to do so. It is a great life if you can pay attention to your other responsibilities to your family and yourself. Safety is more than not getting burned,broken, or cut now days. And unfortunately I have not seen any trend toward our employers actually adjusting to the rapidly changing nature of wildfire/interface fire suppression and the new dangers presented. Structure firefighters had this same problem until they unionized...and I suspect that is part of the reason that they have an average lifespan of 15 years less than the general public. I suspect that wildfire employers are in no hurry to "discover" how many years fighting wildfire takes off ours. You know I once had a supervisor respond to my question ..in between coughing fits after a fire...as to how toxic pine smoke was by replying that it couldn't be too bad..cause it was natural! Yeah, we sure are lucky that we don't have to breath in unfiltered "synthetic" toxins on a regular basis.  Dana
07/11	Everyone, There’s a USFS temporary employment memo that came out recently that tells fire staff to cut out requesting exceptions to the temporary limited employment regulation (the rule that temp employees may not exceed 1039 hr). The ’99 fire season was so severe that exceptions were requested and granted, allowing some employees to exceed the 1039-hour limit. If there is a continuing need for a fire position, a permanent position should be created. Sounds great to me! Having permanent positions rather than temp ones are better in this profession in which people work hard training to fight fire all winter and fighting fire SAFELY the rest of the year.  So, on the one hand, it's good to hear the WO saying that providing more permanent employment status is the right thing to do -- especially in light of the fact that although there is currently more money for engines, engines sit idle on many forests due to lack of qualified permanent or temporary personnel!!!  I just worry that this year will be as extreme as ’99 and if we can't get exemptions to the 1039 like last year, this screws us for the 2000 season. This also means that our fire guys on the forests and regions need to take all their bigtime temporary fire staff, budgets, and planning and try to put that into their budgets for 2000! Dontchaknow that is gonna BUNGEE the budgets for next year, and like what do you think the response will be when our fire guys' budgets take a SERIOUS hike because of this??? This is a bold stroke, a bold move, but I wouldn't bet a firecamp shower on its political chances of success!!  Be safe out there, Mellie  hey Ab, PSSST, if you're still there... The fact that no contaminated soil was found outside the compound at Los Alamos doesn't mean there was none; samples may not have been taken in a "hot" spot. However, there may not be much or any contamination. I don't know how good DOE really is ... Still would like some info on their track record.
07/11	I've been reading but haven't had much time to write, since I had been wondering if Utah Wife, would respond to all that has been written about her. Am glad that she did, it was good to get more clarification from her, about her situation, and learn that she wasn't as uninformed about being with a wildlandfire fighter,as some of the earlier posts seem to think.      My spouse and I were both wildlandfire fighers (with USFS) when we met, and had been for at least 10 years. So, when we started to talk wedding, and figure out a date...Fire Season was immediately OFF limits, it was just a given. No missed wedding anniversaries for us, however, we pushed it and got married, in May, and the day after our wedding...one of us went on an out of state fire assignment for a month. The honeymoon was rescheduled and we thought it was worth the wait, a full week, at Heavenly, skiing over New Years.       Here's the kicker, our child was planned and concieved, so that his birthday would be in the winter. Fire season and it's importance to us, was a must..and when conception didn't happen, we put it off until the next years window of opportunity. Sounds a little anal, to reschedule, but we did and now our son enjoys birthdays every year with both of us home.       Both of our birthdays are in the winter also, (boy did are parents, do that right) we take vacations in the winter, travel and visit family in the winter, and if it means taking our son out of school, we just work with the teachers and schedule it. How much more exciting is it for a kid to come home from disneyland in January and to get to go back to school and tell all about it, than in the summer, when everyone is off doing their own thing. In the summer we take our days off together and cram in as many mini vacations as possible, and if there isn't any lightning predicted for a while, we'll take an extra day or two and do something special.       And those, hotel fire assigments, often turn into visits. If it's not too far away and the hotel has a pool, load up the water toys, and we're there. And if fire camp is near by, there's often a need for hand delivering a care package.       20 years ago, this kind of stuff, wouldn't have happened, but with cell phones, it is easier for familys to keep in touch, we call our son, everynight if possible, at bedtime to help tuck him in and make sure he knows how important he is. And its a must to bring something back, for everyone, even if it's just another fire t-shirt.       With both of us being in fire, the talk when one comes home is often, loads full of fire gossip, "guess who I saw" or "you're not going to believe what I heard."      For our son, this is just the way it is, and maybe when he gets older, there might be problems, like little league or camp or what ever, but we'll just make sure it all gets, scheduled in.       When you have a mortgage, car payments, kids stuff to buy, bills to pay, vacations to plan, the first thing we ask is..."is it a little lightning strike, up the hill out back, or is it some ripping blow out two states away?" The later,always gets the spouse a running, to help you pack.      Which brings me back to the Utah Wife, we've all been there, with the, hurry up and wait, standby status, but you know, we look at it this way, O.T. is O.T. and no matter how easy or hard it was to get, it is what the season is all about, sure we all love the flames, getting filthy and sucking up the soot. But at the end of the season, and you're boosting about how much overtime you've racked up, you don't ever say, except those 50 hours waiting don't count.       And interestingly enough, it never ceases to amaze me, all the fun and excitment the spouse left at home seems to get away with, while your gone on your fire assignment, which in our house, means the longer the better for everyone. The kid gets a new bike, the wife goes shopping, the husband gets a new set of golf clubs...and everyone is happy.       And how many of you firefighters, who have done this for years and raised familys, see your children hauling around red bags, no-mex and wearing whites? Something tells me, we'll be no different.     MTWO
07/11	The Los Alamos Fire Dept. is tracking for life thier firefighters, who were inside the Lab's fence. Tests were done on soils, only contaminated results were inside the 4000 acre Lab compund. Agency wildland firefighter weren't inside the fence at LANL.  You weren't at Cerro Grande were you Dana?  Mike
07/11	RE: hazmat surprises on fires, just be glad you don't have to fight fire in Nigeria, what with its black market in fuels. See story online from the Washington Post.  hazchick.
07/11	To Dana.. very good questions? I saw the dam being constructed above Los Alamos, it's going to be a 100 foot high to stop any downstream ash/mud flow off the burned over rad site. And in Washington, that place was a nuke dump before anything else! In fact several old and filled areas were burned over. Now there's a problem with the gov't diving into this and getting behind the idea that there MIGHT have been exposure. Anyone remember Agent Orange? Gulf War Syndrome? My advise as dinosauric as it might be, but based on my experience, is for the feds wildlanders to fill out a CA-1 or is it a 2, if you where exposed to the smoke at either of these two incidents. Now! Even months after the fact. Just fill it out and get it into your OPF. Then, the spirits forbid, if 10, 20 years down the road, your last chest x-ray shows spots, or what hair you have left on your balding head (I'm sorry it's a male perspective) seems to be coming out in clumps .. you've covered your ass. Sounds alarmist? Not really. I once walked through a huge brush field one afternoon on the side of a mountain, near a place called An Khe. It was dying, leaves nearly withering before our eyes. The tree branches still glistened with moisture. The platoon I was medic for spend three days walking through this "denying the enemy cover" area. To this very day, as paranoid as it sounds, I recall that little excursion and keep a close eye on all moles and skin spots on my body. To Utah Wife .. you've got it pegged! I think you guys are doing okay. To California Husband. Right On! It took me awhile to learn those lessons. For Moc4546 I'll try and find the answer about the temporary retirement question. But my first guess, it's buried somewhere. Our wheels of legislative remedies grind slower than a contract nurse tanker's turn around time.  Maddog
07/11	Just a short post. Is anyone else worried about the possible exposure to "hazardous materials" of firefighters at Los Alamos? Is anyone tracking the firefighters that may have been exposed? Were any measures taken to safeguard them? Did they even wear film badges? Heres why I ask.  Last night on the national news it was reported that containment structures were being built to prevent possibly radioactively contaminated ash and soil from washing into Los Alamos when it rains. The pictures they showed of the construction workers showed they were all wearing disposable suits and masks. The spokesman for the Los Alamos Labs who was present was not wearing a disposable suit when interviewed...but you could clearly see that he had been wearing a mask by the outline around his mouth and nose.  Clearly everyone who works at or for Los Alamos seem very concerned that the dust may be hazardous...enough so to take measures to not inhale it or take it home on clothing. This is, I presume, the same dust that firefighters were exposed to during suppression and remediation activity. Were they provided the same protection? From all indications THEY WERE NOT! Please tell me I am wrong!  From what I know of Hanford it makes Los Alamos look like a clean room. Were any measures taken there to monitor exposure and/or prevent unnecessary exposure? If not we, as firefighters, have a very serious problem.  Dana Linscott
07/11	I don't know who this guy is that claims to be the wife of a Utah firefighter. But my hat's off to you sir. That was brillaint. My side is still hurting from laughing so hard. But of course eveybody knows that they rarely get any big fires in utah, Not like California, which has the hottest action in the world.  Pearls of wisdom from: ~A one eyed fatman~
07/10	EVERYONE     FIRST OF ALL I HAVE BEEN WITH HIM FOR 9 YEARS. I MARRIED HIM JUNE 99. HE BECAME A FIREFIGHTER IN SEPTEMBER 99. ALL I WAS TRYING TO SAY IS THAT HE SAT AT A HOTEL WITH NOTHING TO DO. IT WAS A STAGED FIRE CREW. I LOVE MY HUSBAND. I WILL NEVER LEAVE HIM NO MATTER HOW LONG HE IS GONE NOR HOW OFTEN. I WAS JUST SAYING GIVE MY MAN SOMETHING TO DO WHILE NOT FIGHTING A FIRE.  I LOVE TO HEAR ALL OF HIS STORYS AND ADVENTURES. I JUST AM WORRIED BECAUSE THE LAST TIME HE WAS OUT ON A FIRE HIS DRIVER DROVE TO CLOSE AND ALL OF THEM SINGED THEIR HAIR. IT JUST SHOWED HOW DANGEROUS IT REALLY IS. RIGHT NOW HE IS IN GRANDJUNCHIN IN A TENT. I SHOULD BE VERY HAPPY THAT HE ATLEAST CALLS ME EVERYDAY. WHAT I MEANT ABOUT 'FIGHT FIRE OR COME HOME' WAS IF HES CALLED OUT ON A FIRE ONLY TO SIT IN A HOTEL, WHY CANT HE SIT AT HOME AND WAIT IS ALL. I DONT WANT HIM TO GIVE UP FIRE. I LOVE THAT I CAN TELL PEOPLE WHAT HE DOES... I THINK IT IS A WAY COOL JOB.  MY HUSBAND WOULD NEVER MAKE DEMANDS. WHEN THE LOVE IS STRONG WITCH IT HAS BEEN FOR THIS LONG BUT WILL BE FOREVER HE WOULD NEVER DO ANYTHING TO UPSET ME OR HURT MY FEELINGS ON PURPOSE. IM A HAPPY WIFE, JUST LONELY WHEN HES AWAY. JUST SOMETIMES I DONT UNDERSTAND SOMETHINGS LIKE HIM SITTING IN A HOTEL FOR A WEEK ....BUT I ASKED HIM ON THE PHONE