"THEY SAID IT" ARCHIVES
FEBRUARY 2001
| DATE |
|
| 02/28 |
Ab,
A few more thoughts on contractors.
Although the Federal scene MAY slow down for private fire suppression
contractors due to an increased level of funding and a corresponding
higher level of staffing no one seems to be addressing the lower level of
fire staffing that states may experience due to their "emergency
hire" AD types being "siphoned" off to the new fire
positions being created by the Feds. Our states’ Dept. of Natural
Resource "fire program" head stated that "we’ll be
stripped" when asked for his thoughts on what the Federal funding
would do to Minnesotas’ ability to find/hold onto qualified wildfire
fighters.
I also seem to remember that when the funding first came through many
regional managers were feeling that it would take several seasons before
they could fully staff the new positions...has that changed? It would
appear to me that the current "snafu" , if not simply
attributable to bureaucratic inefficiency, works perfectly to
"lateral" existing non-ADs into the best positions rather than
opening positions up to everyone in a genuine effort to beef up our
national fire suppression forces as the 100%MEL was intended to do.
Regardless of how the shells are shifted there exists a national
shortage of experienced wildland firefighters...and there is no quick fix
for that...experienced firefighters cannot be created as it takes seasons
to accumulate experience. While a vast pool of experienced firefighters
may exist in the former ADs’ that have chosen to no longer fight
fire...I see no effort currently being made to lure those folks back.
Someone please tell me I am wrong!
Fireronin |
| 02/28 |
If you haven't tried the new *wildlandfire news page* (link at top of
theysaid), I urge you to do so. Right now, one article (Seattle Times part
3 of 5 parts, "In Wildfire's Way: Keepers or Loosers") is about
the Concow Fire that burned last summer in the Sierra foothills near
Oroville CA. When you link to the current installment, go to the end and
read parts 1 and 2 first if you havven't already. It's a well-written,
gripping story, one the public and Congress (and GS-rating certifiers)
need to hear in making decisions about how to make homes firesafe, at what
level to fund fire, that all structures can't be saved, and how to
acknowledge and pay firefighters fairly.
Mike-- Storm King weather (Go to the links page for weather, click on
one of the programs, enter the location (Glenwood Springs CO in this case)
and you've got it): -- www.weather.com/weather/local/USCO0162
Firescribe |
| 02/28 |
Mellie, Rio Bravo is a Kern Co. Fire Dept. Hot Shot crew and as far as I
know they are type 1 rated.
Ab here's an address for the Bear Divide Engine on the Angeles
WWW.Beardivide.4mg.com/.
On another note about all the hiring. I did not hear a thing from the
Forest Service on a job offer, but was contacted by the NPS on my interest
at one of the parks I applied for and was told I was at or near the top of
the list. Go figure. The day after I sent in the NPS application I was
contacted for employment with yet another agency (non fed)for a position
that is not totally fire related but is year round and better pay. It's
nice to have options for once.
Options |
| 02/28 |
Might I suggest Njine 19 { www.beardivide.4mg.com/
} in the L.A. River Ranger District @ the Bear Divide Station of the
Angeles Nalt Forest? Super site.
Danny |
| 02/28 |
Hey, Ab,
Here's a little "Mellie
adventure" for ya, from last summer -- but just got around to
putting it together...
Mellie
PS. I hope the desk audits for the GS-8 Engine Captain are going well with
the classifiers.
<fingers crossed> <candleometer lit><vortex
awhirl><sure to draw attention of the gods> |
| 02/28 |
Have not posted lately, but continue to be impressed with site. Usually
read right after fire weather forcast. Like all the new additions and
upgrades. Keep up the excellant work.
adftr |
| 02/27 |
Just wanted to bring you up to date on a few bullets about Florida --
- Florida has issued a burn ban for all types of open fires (including
recreational) south of a line running from Jacksonville over to the
south end of Dixie County - which means all of Peninsular Florida.
- Many areas in Florida have not seen significant rain since September
- some none at all.
- Many cities are finding their water resources are now not only in
short supply but simply gone - no water for lawns, bathing, and in
some cases drinking (water is being shipped in containers to some
locations).
- Organic Soil fires are becoming the norm - yesterday we had a 10,000
acre fire on the Brighton Indian Reservation in Broward and Hendry
Counties.
- 12 miles of I-4 between Orlando and Tampa has been closed for over a
week - opened today.
- Climatologists have indicated that we can expect below average rains
through the summer (our monsoon begins on average about mid June).
- Fires and acres have already exceeded (by several orders of
magnitude) the same time periods in 1998-2000.
James D. Brenner
Fire Management Adm
Florida Division of Forestry |
| 02/27 |
Jobs page, Series 462 and 455 are updated. UT is looking for some
flame-n-go type engine folk.
Ab. |
| 02/27 |
It were back in 85 or 86, I think. Me and the crew were cutting some
scratch line over the top of a ridge and down the other side of a not too
steep point under some shady pines.
I was up front of the crew by about a hundred feet or so trying to
figure how we were going to link into a rock outcropping. I heard a bunch
of yelling and cuss'in coming from back of the line and turned to look.
Here come one of my boys a runn'in to beat the band! Damned if there
wasn't another of my crew a chas'in him. He too was yelling, but he was
swinging a shovel like ta chop the other guys legs off.
I started heading towards 'em in a big hurry, but right 'fore they got
up to me, here they went off in another direction. That guy in front was
screaming like the devil was after him. Soon's I got close enough, I saw
what looked like a piece a rubber or something a hanging off'a his boot.
It was a flop'in and a dragg'in, but I then saw that it seemed to be a
moving by it's ownself.
Right after that I seen what looked like a snake done attached to the
guy. Well. . . I finally got the guy with the kamakazi shovel to quit
chasing him and then got close enough to talk the runn'in man slow down a
bit.
Turns out there was a little rattlesnake done got disturbed and tried
to take a bite outt'a the poor feller. Christ, poor little rattler wasn't
nearly a foot long. Instead of getting a bit of flesh, seems like the poor
snake got its little teeth hung up in the nomex.pants. So, the guy looks
around to see what hit him in the boot (yes, they still can hit ya hard),
sees it's a rattler, and takes off running. So they guy in back of him
sees his distress and thinks he's a go'in ta chop off the snakes head. So
there they went, the poor little critter just a hang'in on and flopp'in
all over the place. Must'a ran over a couple hundred feet fore they got to
me.
Well, ya think now that everything is done after I came into the
picture, that all is well. Not yet son. Now, a runn'in down the hill
towards all of us is this other person a scream'in and yell'in. Who the
hell can that be? Turns out, it was the Safety Officer who only saw that
there was one screaming person chasing another with a swinging shovel.
One of the funniest things I have ever seen. I hope they read this.
Old Crewboss
Good one. Anyone else with a tale to share? Ab. |
| 02/27 |
Mellie,
I believe RIO BRAVO is a Kern Cnty crew {7} located @ station 72 in Lake
Isabella. They may also be a mixture of Federal & Cnty personel. I do
not know if they are a flight crew. I also believe Kern Cnty Fire placed a
new Helicopter in service last summer but I do not yet know where it is
positioned. I also believe there is yet another crew located @ the base of
the mountain @ the Keene station, I know there was a helicopter there last
year, I believe BLM.
Danny |
| 02/27 |
I am looking for any info. that anyone might have on hiking Storm King
Mt. in a couple of weeks. How much snow should I expect, how long is the
hike, etc. Thanks.
sec: I remember the milk drinking contest. I also have some good pics.
I'd like to see yours as well. Were you with Baker or Bitt?
mike
Go to photos, then miscellaneous. Mellie and some firefighters hiked
that hike Christmas of '99. If you click on the description under one of
the photos she describes the trail length, steepness, etc. Maybe a reader
can fill us in on current weather/snow depth conditions or point you to a
number to call in Glenwood Springs CO. There's a memorial park there also.
Ab. |
| 02/27 |
BLM Bob,
Sooner is now. Contracts have already been signed for broadcast burning
by private contractors on Federal lands.
Stu |
| 02/27 |
Mellie,
Rio Bravo is a Kern County Hotshot Crew listed in the California Mob Guide
as a Type 1 Hotshot Crew. They are configured the same as fed IHC's with a
superintendent & two foreman, a supe rig, two crew carriers and lots
of radio's. In the last few years they have been in the rotation for
dispatched as the rest of the R5 IHC's. A hardworking professional crew.
Tony |
| 02/27 |
Sorry to rehash this again, but could someone please clarify the date
that apps must be postmarked and received by in order to be considered for
yes, you've guessed it friends and neighbors....Round 2 of the hiring
circus? I have heard 2/28 and I have heard 3/14.
Anyone? Anyone?
Thanks in advance and good luck to all.
K.
Depends on what category of hire you are. Here it is again. MELmadness
Look at the top schedule for the permanent MEL and other jobs. A Job-FAQ
page should be done in a day or two. This schedule will be available
there, also. Ab. |
| 02/26 |
Readers, we put in a link to our *new* "Current
WildlandFire News" Page at the top of theysaid. This media
firenews page provides links to newspaper articles on wildlandfire. It is
updated every time you open it in your browser window, so it is always
current. Click on it. It takes about 20 seconds to download. Catch a
glimpse of that the media says is happening in wildlandfire around the US
and the world.
We greatly appreciate the news reports and other info that Firescribe
has provided so faithfully to the theysaid community over the last 6
months. We hope these contributions will continue and that this will make
Firescribe's job easier.
Happy reading!
Ab. |
| 02/26 |
To BLM Bob,
Great response to AZ Trailblazer. Your reply was good information and a
well-thought prediction of fire contractors' future. These next few
seasons will be tough on the private sector. Competition will be very
intense for work. Many contractors have new vehicles and equipment
additions coming into service this season, after a couple of good summers.
The private sector has invested money and invested in more equipment to
help meet the Nation's wildland fire suppresion needs, in a huge way, over
the past 10 years. I hope that the powers that be realize the validity of
contracting fire companies and that we are still able to fight fire a
couple of years down the road.
Rock |
| 02/26 |
Those of you who had trouble with the scannable Schedule C from
Avuedigital on the FMO/AFMO/contracting/public affairs/computer
specialists permanent positions, and were granted an extension until Feb
28 to get that in (even though the MELmadness
schedule said earlier), there may be yet another extension in the
works. The forms are not yet available in their complete form, so we folks
may get a few more days before the final curtain drops.
Stay on top of it! Get your forms and get them in as soon as you can.
Don't let opportunity pass you by.
Brinkley |
| 02/26 |
Ab-
That list of Hotshots didn't include the Flame-N-Go Hotshots. They are
no longer a prison crew. I think after the two members on the Flame-N-Go
type 2 crew were killed last season- they have disbanded all of the
Flame-N-Go crews...the Hotshots, the Engine Strike Team, and the Type 2
handcrew. The engines are being used throughout Utah, the Hotshots are
still a crew, just not inmates, and I think the type 2 crew is obsolete.
They were a good crew- I worked with them on the Salt Lake Desert
Complex, and on the Swain Fire.
Brett- |
| 02/26 |
I do not know why it is always misspelled but it VANDENBERG HOTSHOTS,
VANDENBERG AIRFORCE BASE. Any way my two cents.
Seldom Seen |
| 02/26 |
Tim (who did the airtanker photos) please e-mail me. Someone's
interested. Thanks Ab. |
| 02/26 |
Here are a list of the new and old hotshot crews. The existing groups
have a link. If you click on it, you get address and e-mail of the contact
person. New ones don't have a link yet, but you can see where they'll be
located. www.fs.fed.us/fire/operations/crews/IHC_index.shtml
I think there's another small group (Rio Bravo? maybe 13 people, not
enough to qualify size-wise?) that's affiliated with Kern Co or
Bakersfield. Anyone know about this group?
Mellie |
| 02/26 |
Ab,
I don't see the Vandenburg Hotshots on the list of IHC's. They were the
only hotshots on the Manter Incident for several days. They are located on
the Vandenberg AFB in Santa Barbara County California. They are a national
resource. In my past experiences with Vandenburg they have done a great
job. Their Super, Mark Smith, is a strong leader and a great person to
work with.
Hunter
Back from your hunting trip? I'll add it. Ab. |
| 02/26 |
To AZ Trailblazer,
First, congratulations on the new baby. That's great news.
As far as your rumor about contractors, AZ State Lands is not likely to
send contractors to federal fires because there is a provision in the
state constitution that prevents deficit spending past a certain low
amount. Because of the reimbursement time lag, ASLD went unconstituionally
deep into the red sending out contracted resources to fed fires, even
though the bills got paid eventually. They got called to accounts by the
state beancounters and will not be providing contracted resources for the
feds.
As far as the feds go, they will be signing EERAs as usual, but one of
the side effects of the new fire money is that many feds aren't interested
in contracting resources and will only sign up resources on EERAs. This is
not to say that private resources won't be asked to go out, but they will
probably be dispatched under EERAs rather than contracts. And there will
be less demand for them as the ranks of regular federal fire resources is
replenished.
This new National Fire Plan money will probably change the game for
contractors. Since the feds are going to full MEL, there's going to be a
lot less call for suppression contracts, BUT I think there's going to be a
HUGE increase in fuels work contracts. There's going to be a lot of
chainsaw work thinning and clearing, but sooner or later the feds'll be
looking for contractors that can do broadcast burning. There are some
policy/liability issues with that last one, but eventually... BLM has been
told that we are expected to spend 80% of the new fuels money on contract
work. There's some controversy about that, but the intent is clear.
BLM Bob |
| 02/26 |
firepup21:
The ArcView symbol set named forestry.avp contains some of the ICS
symbols. You will find it in the Av_gis30/ArcView/symbols subdirectory.
The application mentioned in jw's response is the Incident Command Mapping
Application ArcView 3.1 Extension. The version I have is 2.6 from April
16, 1999. There is a Users Guide developed by Ventura Co. Fire Department.
I would suggest you contact them for a copy or the USDA Forest Service,
Region 5, Fire and Aviation Management. Good luck.
rm
Firepup, if you find what you need and you think others could use
it, maybe we could post it here at wlf.com. Ab. |
| 02/25 |
I'm sure all who are interested must know that the National IHC Workshop
is meeting Reno (the Nugget) from Tues to Thrus (2/27-3/1). It would be
nice to have a report from someone who attends. The agenda is online:
National
IHC Agenda
Here's a nice homepage provided by a hardworking engine crew, FS Engine
65 out of Dry Lake Station, on the Doublehead Ranger District, Modoc NF
(northeastern CA). If you want to see the varied work that an engine crew
does and where, take a look at their Crew Photos. (Also note their
hard-earned GS ratings. Here are people in-the-flesh that a downgrade
would affect. It seems logical that if the GS-8 engine captain ratings are
reduced, so must the GS ratings of the other crewmembers: the
"boss" does not usually have the same responsibilities or
supervise those of equal status. As others have said, the implications
here are staggering.)
Nice job Engine 65 and a very nice website (the only FS engine crew
website I could find -- a "first" for the IMWTK list?):
Engine
65 Homepage
Firescribe
Here's one more, Laufman Engine
14 on the Beckwourth District on the Plumas. Anyone know of others?
I'll be adding the shots and engine pages to the links page soon. Ab. |
| 02/25 |
Hey Ab,
You forgot the Tatanka Hotshots (USFS) out of Black Hills National
Forest.
Thanks-
Digger
Tatanka-- I added it. (We have your Tatanka
Logo on Logo3.) The hotshot list will be a'changin this year. If we
left anyone else out or we could add any new crews, let us know. Any new
shot logos or others to add to the collection? Ab. |
| 02/25 |
Diamond Mtn Crew Member ---
Were you on the crew last season? If so, do you remember the milk
challenge on the helispot at Clear Creek? We got some great photos of the
event......
sec |
| 02/25 |
Re the hotshot crew list:
I would like to see the list for the new hotshot crews. If you can post
the names on theysaid, I'm sure a lot of people would be stoked. Its hard
to move up on a hotshot crew. Need to look into a new crew outside Region
5 to move up and have a good say in the rebuilding process.
Hawk
Send em in. I'll post them. Here's a list of the existing
IHC. Ab. |
| 02/25 |
Stung,
Just the fact that the agency would even consider downgrading an
already underpaid wildland firefighter is enough to make me puke and
wonder why anyone would stay with such a "professional" outfit.
Or maybe that should read "dysfunctional"?
Tony |
| 02/25 |
firepup21;
I can't pinpoint a source for you on ArcView symbols, but there is an
ArcView mapping program used by CA command teams that have ICS incident
symbols. It may have been developed out of L.A. County. I saw a demo some
years ago at the FIREWEST conference in San Jose. CDF's Forest and Range
Assessment Program (FRAP) in Sacramento is the lead GIS shop. The USFS
research station at N. Arizona U. has an excellent GIS shop whose work
I've seen, they may have some files available.
jw |
| 02/25 |
Actually two new shot crews in CO. BLM crew out of Craig, and a FS crew
on the Arapaho-Roosevelt in Ft. Collins.
Also the new Rogue River Crew. Some of you other old timers may
remember the old Rogue River IR Crew. They were shall we say
"colorful". Wonder if they plan to revive the old traditions?
(Many administrative types are now saying "gawd I hope not".)
Any of you old Rogue River Rats lurking out there?
bw |
| 02/24 |
As of yesterday, the GS-8 captains problem expanded in to the GS-7
engine operator realm.... members of the GS-7 community were also called
in for the "desk audits" by WO human resources and OPM
classification folks...
Here we are, two days before the audits, and additional captains and
NOW ENGINEERS are being called upon to give "desk audits" for
their positions.... and are not prepared.... The results of
non-preparedness are expected... We were led in to an ambush......
The next targets are the HOTSHOT positions, as they were graded on the
same merits. All the upgraded positions of Helicopter Manager, Hotshot
Superinendent, Asst. Helicopter Manager, Asst Hotshot Superintendent, Fire
Engine Operator, AFEO, and Senior Firefighter are all graded with the same
factor level 1 and factor level 5 requirements.... And some with the GSSG
factor 6, item 4. This is a snowball effect and will spread to all areas
of the wildland community if it continues....
The GSSG factor level 6, item 4 .... Physical Dispersion... should be a
GIVEN....... How can you compare workers and a supervisor in a warehouse
as GETTING THE CREDIT FOR FACTOR LEVEL 6 ITEM 4 when you dont equate the
same dispersion exists with "a 5000 foot hoselay with employees of
varying experience deployed over 5000 ft. from the supervisor performing a
variety of wildland fire tasks in support of the forestry and fire
management professions (ie. hoselay, spotfire suppression, equipment
maintenance, etc...) exists...
All of these contested positions are members of a group of
PROFESSIONALS that are rated as technicians or aids in the biological
series (specifically 0462 - Forestry Aid and Technician) even though their
duties are PRIMARILY wildland fire, prescribed fire, and visitor
protection services. (GS-0025/0081 or a new Series to Be Determined)
The Forest Service mission is "Caring for the Land, Serving the
People" ..... With the changes away from " multiple uses and
sustainable yield" the FS in R-5 has basically become a national park
system... "recreation and maintenance".
If I respond to someone's car fire, their accident, their medical
treatment, or some other problem, AND I AM TRAINED AND MY CREW IS TRAINED
AND EQUIPPED to abate this problem, is this not within the MISSION of the
FOREST SERVICE of "CARING FOR THE LAND AND SERVING PEOPLE"? I
value the knowledge and service my crew can give as first responders and
emeregency medical technicians and in "....SERVING PEOPLE".....
I am sure the public feels the same way, at least in my area where we
respond on over 100 vehicle accidents, several hang glider crashes,
several medical aids, and a few search and rescue assignments a year as a
FOREST SERVICE ENGINE and have HELPED HUNDREDS OF PATIENTS PER YEAR
.....And have protected hundreds of homes and people from wildland and
urban intermix/interface fires and problems...
"Caring for the Land and Serving People" http://www.fwfsa.org
Support proper classification for the proper position in the Federal
Service. Federal Wildland Fire Service Association.
~Rookie-Capt~ |
| 02/24 |
Re the hotshot list: as time permits would you send me a copy of your
list of all shot crews including {new ones}?
Thanking you in advance
Danny
D952@mohaveaz.com |
| 02/24 |
Re private contract crews and engines in AZ:
I have not even heard of this happening in any states, but if this is
the case, they're going to bite themselves in the rump. Private
contractors provide the same service as Hotshots or engine crews.
Personally I have done both. Now I belong to the private sector and I
wouldn't go State or Fed ever again. No disrespect, I just had a bad
experiance with one State organization in which, as soon as the season
ended, gave us no warning, no thanks, they just walked up to you one day
and said, "See you next year, take the rest of the day off." And
if all you were in that organization was a fire dog, well if you walked
into the front office, the permanent people in there wouldn't even say
"Hi" or give you the time of day.
I found this occurred in most places. Plus after 4 yrs with one
organization, I was getting only 8.75 an hour as an engine boss... Well,
needless to say, I went to a private contractor and he pretty much hooked
me up. Now I basically make enough in any given summer to take the rest of
the year off. GO FIGURE......
Sorry, I digress, as far as that new contract. If the fire season that
they're calling comes to ground, I bet that AZ will allow private
contractors to come in and help. They will just wish that they had done it
sooner.
DD |
| 02/24 |
About the hotshot crews, there is a new one in Cedar City -Utah, Salt
Lake City-Utah, Elko- Nevada, and one in Colorado somewhere? In Salt Lake
City the old prison Flame-N-Go hotshots aren't affiliated with the prison
anymore. There are with the Utah Division of Forestry Fire and State
Lands.
new crew member of Diamond Mtn. |
| 02/24 |
Ab, Judd, and the rest of the gang;
Judd,
Sorry to have missed your request for an interview regarding the AZ State
fire suppression delema. As some may know, the wife and I are now the
proud parents of a bouncing baby boy. Of course with a new baby at home,
my "real" fire job @ Camp Verde, and my "hobby" FMO
for the BIA/Yavapai Apache Tribe, no real time to get on the computer and
lurk. One of my firefighters gave me a copy of your article in the
Republic. Nice job....a lot of questions are being raised by local fire
departments regarding thier state cooperative agreement as a result of the
article. Seems quite a few fire districts out there were not aware of the
financial problems of the ASLD.
Another problem has arisen in the Arizona scene, and thought I'd throw
it out there just in case some of our private contractor brother and
sisters may be having the same problem. Rumor has it, and this is simply a
rumor, but the word out on the street (being passed around by the USFS
here in northern AZ) is that private contract crews and engines WILL NOT
BE ALLOWED TO SIGN STATE OR FEDERAL CONTRACTS THIS YEAR HERE IN
ARIZONA!!!!!!! I have not had a chance to confirm this information with
the State or Feds.
Has anyone else heard of this, and are the contract companies from
other states going to have a problem with the feds this year???
AZ Trailblazer |
| 02/24 |
In regards to the post from the WO on Feb. 20, 2001.... I am a federal
employee of THAT agency and have not recieved THAT info as of 02/23/2001
and it was addressed to ALL EMPLOYEES.... and I am a directly affected
group...
To Phyrodactyl: there is an item to replace the old probeye... its
called the firefinder... it has its problems though....I have had two at
my station and I have had to send both back for re-calibration since I
bought them 2 years ago... They work great when working properly but then
they go "basserk"... they are useless after that until fixed..
so far the company has fixed all of the problems at no cost..... They
assure me that the new model doesnt have those problems..
R5-Capt |
| 02/24 |
Hey Abe something simple and not cotroversial this time I hope. I am
looking for a mouse curser file that is a drip torche. If anyone has one
out there has or knows where I can pick one up I would appreciate it.
Please send to dripptorch@yahoo.com
Thanks in advance,
Dripptorch |
| 02/24 |
Hi all I just writing to let you know that it is a very confusing to me
about how to proceed with applying for later rounds of hiring under nfp. I
called boise today at 2:49 cst to ask them if I needed to apply again for
round 2 if I did not get an offer in round 1. They said , "you do not
need to reapply for later rounds."
The reason I thought Id share is because I have read from people that
are doing hiring at the individual forest level that we should reapply for
later rounds.
The place I called that told me that I do not need to reapply for later
rounds is under this phone number in my application packet:
usda forest service
Automated staffing program
1249 s vinnel way suite #108
Boise ID 83709
Voice 877-813-3476
Im just a guy trying to break into the profession I figure the only way
to get started is to get hired in the first place. Id be happy just
putting coats of wax on fire trucks; but with all the contridicting info
out there who knows what will happen. I would hate to think that even my
slim chances of getting hired where messed up because I did what i was
told and my application was dropped.
-confuused wannaba searching for enlightenment |
| 02/24 |
Hawk --
I have a buddy of mine that just accepted a PSE on Rogue River - a new
shot crew out of Southern Oregon. Other than that, I have a tentative list
of all the shot crews, including new crews, I can pick out the new ones if
you're looking for something in particular.
In my list I noticed they're adding a shot crew in Illinois -- thought
that was a bit interesting.
Alan |
| 02/24 |
For Rookie Capt:
The most complete documentation of wildfire fatalities is the
"Historical Wildland Firefighter Fatalities, 1910 -1996" pub put
out by the NWCG Safety & Health Working Team (NFES # 1849 thru NIFC
Pubs).
For the complexity of the fire situation in California, they've had a
remarkably low number of burnover fatalities over the past 30+ years
(since Loop). The record doesn't show much specific to Engine operations.
All entrapments/burnover/deployments, both fatal and non-fatal, from
1976-1999 are discussed in the MTDC pub "Wildland Firefighter
Entrapments 1976-1999" that Steve Munson and I did last year. (MTDC
0051-2853).
It shows that 22% of the entrapments involved engines of all agencies,
no Type specified. There were 40 total events, with 19 of them in an
Wildland-Urban Interface situation. Nationwide, the USFS and BLM had 44%
of entrapments; CDF had 17%.
Looks to me that it will be hard to make a case for grade based on
these numbers, except to turn it around and claim the numbers are so low
given the total exposures BECAUSE of quaility leadership at the Engine
Captain level?? Good luck with your effort!
Dick Mangan |
| 02/24 |
WP..yes I would be interested in 330 ppt! ...am still interested in 290
ppt as well, what ever happened to that?
Pulaski |
| 02/24 |
Old Fire Guy,
Thanks for the info on the hiring. I couldnt get that amount of info
from my own forest, glad to see someone has it figured out, AND actually
have something positive to say about it!
One question I have is the "quality vs eligible" issue, Who
or What rates you as quality or eligible, is it the panel that actually
looked at the resumes or the computer that scanned the form C's?
I was told by one person that the computer did it all and by another
that the panel made the rating. Maybe you can shed some light on that,
since you were doing the hands on work.
Example Question: A current GS-7 is rated as a GS-8, but indicates the
willingness to lateral GS-7, wouldn't the GS-7 position garner a
"quality" rating considering the GS-8 rating? these are
successive positions, same function, ie. FEO vs SFEO.
To All R5 fire capt's, Good luck and thanks for your dedication to your
jobs and all your crews, but as far as I am concerned with the downgrade,
if it happens, there goes my next rung in the ladder, might stick it out
for the 2 years to maintain pay, but with no promotion potential, I will
look for a new agency to work for... sad, but loss of pay HAS to be
considered with a mortgage and kids to feed.
Stung |
| 02/23 |
Thanks for the info on the R5 engine incident. ~Rookie Capt~
If anyone else needs this information to address the
"knowledge" and "scope and effect" of the engine
captain's position, please e-mail and I will provide it to you. |
| 02/23 |
For all of those involved in the engine positions fistfight, keep in
mind a couple of salient facts here:
- Some people see this as a battle between R-5 and the rest of the
country.
- Q: Is the job different in R-5 from the "equivalent" job
in other regions?
- A: That is not relevant to this discussion. Don't let anyone tell
you it is.
- Some people will claim that the upgrade some time back should be
undone.
- Q: If other engine positions in other regions do the same work for
less pay, why should R-5 be special?
- A: That is not relevant to this discussion. Don't let anyone tell
you it is.
- Some say the California guys are not special and they shouldn't be
any different from the engine guys in other regions who are doing the
same thing for less pay.
- Q: Should the California engine positions be downgraded?
- A: The better question is, why weren't the other regions upgraded?
There are a lot of people out there trying to make this a California
thing. What happened some years back (upgrade) was both valid and
validated. This is a stupid time of year for a desk audit - not too many
personnel specs can or will follow engine crews around to realistically
see what they do. This time of year won't give them a realistic picture
like August would.
But don't let anyone tell you that what's going on in other regions
affects this. It does not. Rather than examine the downgrade in R-5,
people should be looking at an upgrade in other regions and why that
didn't happen.
R-OTHER ENGINE GUY |
| 02/23 |
For those of you who do not think the Engine Captain decision affects
you, here's a little parable for your consideration:
“I must get this written and uploaded before it’s too late. I hear
vehicles in the street, the shouts of angry men, and the thumping of
boots on the stairs.
When they came and took away those with brown eyes, I said nothing.
Not my problem I thought to myself. My friends and I don’t have brown
eyes. I kind of thought those with brown eyes were arrogant anyway.
Maybe they had done something wrong.
When they returned to take away those with green eyes I felt bad. I
liked some of the green eyes. But I said nothing. After all, they still
weren’t bothering me. So I remained silent and thought of other
things.
They have returned for the blue eyes. They knock heavy at my door.
They have come for me.
There remain few to witness. Would that I and my neighbors had raised
a fist and stopped them when we were strong. Who will protest for me?”
Blue Eyes
Two easy things to do:
1) Join FWFSA Only $10 a pay period.
2)Write, call or e-mail your congresspeople. (Get your neighbors, friends
and relatives to do the same.) To find your reps: http://www.visi.com/juan/congress/
Go down to the zip code option. Fill yours in. You'll get your three reps.
Tell your congressional reps
- engine captains should not be downgraded from GS-8 to GS-7.
- the current reevaluation of engine captain rating is the result of
an arbitrary reinterpretation of a decision that was made and
validated in 1997 at the highest levels.
- GS-8 was and still is the level comensurate with the knowledge,
duties, authority and responsibility required for engine captains to
do their jobs (if you want to get into it, review the SoCal-Capt
post that cites the requirements on which they're being
re-evaluated [knowledge and scope & effect] and provides links to
documents).
- evaluating engine captain duties next week in the non-fire season
prevents those re-evaluating the rating from seeing first-hand what
knowledge, duties, authority and responsibilities are required for
this position.
- at a more general level, pay for federal firefighters is already
substantially less than pay for state firefighters doing the
equivalent job.
- such arbitrary decisions affect morale and hiring at a time when
we're trying to attract and retain good people to meet
Congressionally-mandated MEL staffing goals and fuel reduction targets
associated with the National Fire Plan. We loose a lot of them
already: www.wildlandfire.com/docs/recruit.htm
- a reduction in GS captain rating will cause a reduction in GS
ratings of positions below the captain level, making it difficult to
hire and retain new people.
- go back and read Mellie's
post and, when contacting your congresspeople, cite Clyde Thompson
(Deputy Chief for Administration) and Steve Nelson (Director of Human
Resources Management) as the bosses in the WO who did not stop this
arbitrary re-interpretation when it was suggested by a HR chair-sitter
out of touch with reality.
You don't have to include all these points, but please contact your
congresspeople. And join FWFSA!
Ab. |
| 02/23 |
hey everyone,
I am looking for a website where I can download a set of GIS wildland
fire map symbols for Arcview. Any suggestions?
Hey Ab, Maybe once we find them we could add the link to the programs
page?
Thanks in advance,
firepup21 |
| 02/23 |
My personnal opinion is I would not trust NFFE to back me in the region
5 debate about the engine down grades. NFFE had a hand in getting the
review started. I asked the question to two stewarts of NFFE and one
stated "we are doing everything we can" and the other stewart
had no clue as to what I was talking about. I put my buck behind FWFSA.
Brushboy |
| 02/23 |
We get requests for photo use all the time, sometimes from abroad.
Here's one from our south of the border neighbor. Ab.
How are you, a like to ask for authorization to use some photos of your
web
site in our web site, I represent a Industrial Committee ( C.I.A.M.S.)here
in Mexicali Mexico. we dedicate to trainee industrial firefighters to help
each other in emergencies, we work under authorization of Mexicali Fire
Department.
Please visit our web site and tell us if we can use your photos.
tks
Victor |
| 02/23 |
any info on the new hotshot crews throughout the nation. I know Klamath
and Modoc in R-5, but what about the others?
Hawk |
| 02/22 |
FMO's, AFMO's, Captains, Engineers, AFEO's, and ALL:
I am looking for information that directly affects the wildland fire
community. I know the subject is touchy, but it may, in my view, have a
real effect on the outcome of the R-5 Captains issue.
Can anyone please tell me or give me the location to find the last time
that there was a fatality or major injury directly related to fire
behavior, tactics, or strategy on a type 3 fire engine supervised by an
R-5 (FS or BLM) engine captain. I am having a hard time finding any info
on the internet or internally and it is directly related to the items 1-5
Knowledge Required and 5-3 Scope and Effect of the GS-8 Captains' Issues.
The most recent info I have found is from the 1970's. Any help would be
appreciated. Everyone -- thanks in advance.
~Rookie-Capt~
Does anyone have access to a database that contains this info? Does
anyone remember such a situation? Please let us know asap and we'll pass
it on to the Rookie Capt. Ab. |
| 02/22 |
Next week, members of the R-5 Fire and Aviation
Staffs, WO Human Resources, the OPM, and several captains will be meeting
to conduct "desk audits" regarding the possible downgrade of the
GS-8 SFEO (Engine Captain) position. The meetings will take place on
Mon.-- Wed. of next week. I have been told that there are two main areas
of discussion.
1) Classification of two items (mainly item 1-5 Knowledge Required and
5-3 Scope and Effect.) These items are graded from statements in the
Position Decription (PD) and applied to standards found in the "Grade
Evaluation Guide for Aid and Technical Work in the Biological
Sciences" dated Dec. 1962. www.opm.gov/fedclass/gs0400.pdf
2) In the classification of the position under the "General
Schedule Supervisory Guide" www.opm.gov/fedclass/gssg.pdf,
the factor in item 6 subfactor 3 physical dispersion was being questioned.
Specifically, it was felt that there was not a "physical
dispersion" producing a more difficult situation for supervisors. The
Captains contend that they definately meet this requirement and it has
been addressed THREE times prior to this issue and each time was afforded
as a factor by previous classifiers. I'll just present one example but
there are several others.
A Captain is supervising a type 3 engine with other engines on a
rapidly developing wildland fire. They have been working the fire now for
two hours and the captain is 5000 feet away from the engine on a hoselay
and away from the supervision of the Fire Engine Operator. Scattered along
this hoselay are members of the engine crew who are returning with more
hose. Some of these members have radios and some do not. The engines run
out of water and they begin to shuttle water from a source that is ten
miles away. The engine captain is still supervising this whole operation
WHILE HE OR SHE IS PHYSICALLY DISPERSED FROM THE WORK BEING PERFORMED but
still responsible for that work performed and the safety of crewmembers
performing it.. One example in the GSSG states "a supervisor working
in a large warehouse or factory where physical dispersion makes
supervision difficult". How could any classifier not realize that
physical dispersion does exist with these positions. For anyone interested
in the matters of the classification, please read the two above guides and
relate them to your official PD. That is how these positions were
classified and certified.
SoCal-Capt |
| 02/22 |
WP and his crew have created a S-330 powerpoint. That's Task
Force/STL. He says it's large and has several parts. He can zip it and
send it to us. If we put it here, would anyone use it? (It takes up a lot
of space, so it would need to be used to make it worth storing here.)
Ab. |
| 02/22 |
Thought you would be interested in this story, which appeared in the Feb
21st, 2001 edition of The Arizona Republic online.
"Rule risks mutual fire assistance" An obscure section in
state law may keep Arizona firefighters from leaving the state this summer
- and may threaten part of the basis of fighting wildfires in the West.
www.arizonarepublic.com/news/articles/0220fire20.html
AZ Trailbazer mentioned this a few weeks ago. Good to see it in the
"news". Ab |
| 02/22 |
Hey Ab, I sent my application to Boise Back on January 1st. I never
recieved a confirmation letter or anything. Finally after some dismay I
called them to see wuz up? They said they were still assessing my
qualifications, etc. Nearly two months later it is still
"pending" Why did I rush through my app to meet the postmark
deadline only to have it taking up memory/dust in someone's p.c. or
serving as a coaster on someone's desk. And people wonder why they can't
get any good help......................................... So anyway I
need to go do a few things :
1) Check the telephone connection
2) Check the cordless battery back
3) Unscrew the antannae and put it back
4) Wipe off the foresaid antannae
5) Adjust the antannae in the base
6) Call myself and leave a message
7) Repeat steps 1-6
Rocky Mountain Reject ??
Hang in there, Rocky Mt. I can understand your frustration, try
again, as Old Fire Guy said. There are glitches in the system and some of
our qualified folks slipped through the cracks in the rush to fill such a
big demand. It's worth trying again. Go after Boise much sooner. Don't
think of yourself as a reject, but as a persistent and cage-rattling job
seeker. We can all learn from the First Round. Ab. |
| 02/22 |
after seeing the pic of my old nj rig, i had to send another showing the
front and of our little sister brush rig. the smaller one follows the
bigger one. of course the big one came from my station ! our sister
station couldnt handle the "big one!"
bcdavis
I put it on the Engines2
Page Ab. |
| 02/22 |
These are fun times, huh? I have a question for the group if we can take
some time out from the good discussions on NFP hiring, GS-8 downgrades and
union stuff.
My forest is looking to replace/upgrade our hand held-infrared units.
We currently have Probeyes and a Zadar unit. I am interested in what this
group knows about current technology in compact heat detection devices for
wildland firefighing. What do people like, dislike, what are the
associated costs in dollars and maintenance needs. Any suggestions will be
appreciated.
I think They Said is a terrific forum for sharing truths, starting and
correcting rumors, and staying on top of our fast moving profession.
Pyrodactyl |
| 02/22 |
A reader sent this in. Maybe the engine captain question will be
resolved soon.
This memo
went out to all employees late on 2/20...
Ab. |
| 02/22 |
Effective 2/16/2001, the Department of Interior lifted the hiring freeze
for "Permanent and temporary appointments, reinstatements,
promotions, transfers........to critical fire fighting, prevention,
planning and management positions covered by DOI's National Fire
Plan." Firm job offers are going out! Information about NATIONAL PARK
SERVICE fire jobs can be found at:
http://www.fire.nps.gov/jobs/index.htm
A Parkie |
| 02/22 |
tahoe ted --
From your last posting --
"Example: A Firefighter on the San Bernadino has a wife, 2 kids and a
house he owns....wife has a "real" job....he want s a perm job,
but because he used his 9 forest choices he gets screwed because he is
only offered 1 position, at a location that is 12 hours from his home. If
he want a permanant job...he has to take it....and try to get back....or
uproot his family and life to move....This in itself will make a hardship
claim fiasco. This process is a bottemless pit full of problems.....I
would figure that 90% of the people that get jobs are planning on not
staying there.....at least if youo have to apply for a particular station
or forest chances are the applicants want to really work there. "
To my knowledge, there is no "rule" that says you have to
make nine selections. If someone doesn't want to move to that particular
forest, don't make it a location selection. Just pick the one location you
want instead of all nine.
If anything, I should be unhappy (I'm not, however -- and I didn't get
an offer). I really don't care where I work, and I'm allowed to ONLY pick
9 locations. I'd pick every location in the system if I had a choice.....
I may be the only one, but I actually think this is a pretty good
system. It saves me from applying to 168 different locations.
Something that seems to have worked fairly well for me is the concept
that I call everywhere I'm interested in, even if it is not one of the 9
location picks. If I find out I have a shot at one of the locations that
is not on my list of nine, I simple email the crew at Boise asking them to
switch my current location of XXX to YYY. Since I'm in contact with the
individual forests, therefore giving my an idea of where I stand in their
hiring process, I know which of my location codes are not benefiting me
and which ones are.
I used this system last year, and it actually worked.
sec |
| 02/21 |
Well, round one is over. Overall I was much impressed with how it went.
Yes there were glitches, but with 15,000 applicants to be reviewed for
1600 jobs, there had to be. Had we had the old system of hand written
applications, we would have even more mistakes. Here's the process I
participated in.
- Forests received "certificates" of candidates ranked
either "quality" or "eligible" (quality being a
higher rating).
- Veterans had preference and would receive job offers for wherever
they qualified.
- Forests had to choose from the quality list unless that list had
less than three candidates.....then they could go to the eligible
list.
- Each forest identified their top candidate for each position. Second
and third choices were also identified.
- Forest representatives (FMO's) met to work out duplicate selections.
- If candidates were selected for a higher GS position, that had
priority.
- Next, the forest with the longest guaranteed tour of duty (permanent
full time vs 13/13) had priority.
- Allowing a candidate to stay at "home" was next. (Why ask
a candidate to move from forest "A" where they had worked 3
seasons to forest "B", only to hire someone else to take a
position at forest "A".
- Efforts were made to contact all candidates as to location
preference. Not all candidates were reachable. Forests with duplicate
selections shared this information so as to avoid every forest calling
every candidate.
- Once we had resolved any duplicate selections within a region, we
repeated the process between all regions to eliminate duplication.
Q&A's
Q/Why didn't I get a call from every forest I applied to?
A/ You might not have been their top candiate, or you might have been a
duplicate selection, and only one forest called to check your interest or
preference.
Q/ Why did I get a job offer from a forest I did not want to work on?
A/ You asked for a job on that forest. Don't ask for jobs you don't want.
Q/ What happens if I didn't get a job offer (I'm highly qualified)!
A/ You may have been highly qualified, but there were more candidates than
positions this round. All of my selections were seasoned, quality
firefighters. I left on the table 9 additional firefighters that I would
have been proud to walk the line with.
Please, don't give up! There are going to be more opportunities. More
rounds of hiring are scheduled and you could well be within the next
group.
FACT: Within a year, many of these firefighters will have moved into other
postions as foresters, biologists, technicians, fisheries specialists
etc....... Think about all the folks you worked with who have great fire
talents, but are really looking for a foot in the door for another type of
position. Now is not the time to throw in the towel in disappointment.
A big thank you to all who applied. You are still in the running! A big
welcome to the folks who said "yes" to our recent job offers,
you have a great adventure ahead.
Old Fire Guy
Well said. Ab. |
| 2/21 |
D-Torch,
it won't really scre anything up...it is already there. Qulaity people
are losing oout for unfair reasons....
Example: GS-6 seasonal.. with 10 seasons....4 years Army Jumper, 4
years Marines Jumper, Time in Helo, hotshot, and Engines. Not offered a
position anywhere. I have seen his application and know his quals...
Class action lawsuit would force them to revert to the old hiring
method.....you send an application if you are interested in a particular
position....the present way will force some people to take jobs they do
not want...I fell that is the case with most of the people..
Example: A Firefighter on the San Bernadino has a wife, 2 kids and a
house he owns....wife has a "real" job....he want s a perm job,
but because he used his 9 forest choices he gets screwed because he is
only offered 1 position, at a location that is 12 hours from his home. If
he want a permanant job...he has to take it....and try to get back....or
uproot his family and life to move....This in itself will make a hardship
claim fiasco. This process is a bottemless pit full of problems.....I
would figure that 90% of the people that get jobs are planning on not
staying there.....at least if youo have to apply for a particular station
or forest chances are the applicants want to really work there.
tahoe ted |
| 02/21 |
The original Ab asks a QUESTION upon reading the statement from the
NFFE president below. He asks: WHAT ARE YOU and the "union"
DOING FOR THE ENGINE CAPTAINS AND THOSE BELOW THEM IN R5??? |
| 02/21 |
While not regarding fire directly, this has some good observations about
fed employees, salaries, and the new administration. Also, see near the
end of this page, "End of Partnerships".
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/politics/fedpage/columns/federaldiary/A27460-2001Feb19.html
I actually agree with this decision. There were way too many meetings
that included way too many people who did not understand the issues.
Critical, time-sensitive issues were often delayed until another meeting
could be held or all parties could make their X on the paper.
WO Watchdog |
| 02/21 |
To all that are interested in the Captains/ Engineers/ and AFEO's
possible downgrade issue, please don't rush to blame the Model 42 engine
captains or folks in other regions. Their intent was not to have this
problem develop but to get their positions better classified. It's the
same process that we GS-8 captains had to undertake for our initial
upgrade, with the exception that we had support from the R-5 Regional
Office.
Probably one of the most significant classification appeals, as it is
related to our current problems, stems from a valid complaint from R-3.
You can view a copy of this complaint at www.opm.gov
and go to "classification appeals". The appeal number is
C-0462-06-01. Its under GS-0400 Biological Sciences and then GS-0462.
We are all working hard to remedy this classification problem and it
hopefully will be settled soon. There are primarily three areas of concern
and each of those areas has been reviewed time and again and the
classification was certified on 04/21/1997 by an assistant director at the
WO. After this next week, the positions will be reviewed and a final
ruling issued by classifiers of the WO and OPM. Hopefully that ruling will
be in our favor.
**SoCal-Capt.**
Thanks for the info, **SoCal-Capt.**. I simplified things. This is
where the status of the appeal is located, the first one under General
Biological Sciences (C-0462-06-01):www.opm.gov/classapp/decision/table.htm#0400"
Right now there is "no change".
and here is the link to the pdf decision file itself: www.opm.gov/classapp/decision/1998/04620601.pdf
Ab. |
| 02/21 |
In response to a previous message: The major Union in the FS is the
National Federation of Federal Employees (NFFE) which is affliated with
the International Assoication of Machinists and Aerospace Workers
(IAM&AW). There are nearly 100 NFFE Locals in the FS. (There are also
one or two AFGE FS Locals). The NFFE Locals form a "consolidated
bargaining unit" which is governed by the Forest Service Council. The
FSC negotiates with the FS on Service-wide issues. The FSC has Regional
Vice Presidents as well as VPs for Research and the Job Corps. These VPs
negotiate and address issues within their corresponding administrative
units (Region, R&D, JC ). Locals are autonomous and deal with issues
at the level of their administration (eg., Forest, Station, JC Center).
Through elections, NFFE has obtained the status of exclusive
representative, which means that legally only NFFE can represent the
bargaining unit. To find out if your unit is covered by NFFE, log on to
the FS IBM system and go to the WO Human Resources intranet site at
http://fsweb.wo.fs.fed/hrm/. Click on "Labor Relations"; then
click on "Master Agreement August 22, 2000"; then click on
"Master Agreement Between the Forest Service and NFFE"; and,
finally, click on "Appendix A NFFE Consolidated Units". Once
there, you can look at each Region and you'll be able to see if your
Forest or unit is in the BU.
An easy alternative is to ask your coworkers or your Personnel Office.
If you are not "Unionized," you have no formal or effective way
to be heard on many workplace issues. If you want a voice, contact Mike
Bunten (mbunten@fs.fed.us; 530 926
9626) Sec/Treas, FSC, for more information about the Union.
The matter of not exactly knowing the number of FS employees is
explained in that FS management actually determines (by applying legal
tests) who is in the BU. While each Local can ask for a list of BU
employees, the FSC has not kept a running total. One reason is that the
total number of represented employees (whether it be 12,000 or 14,000) has
no bearing on labor-management issues. Also, the total is very much a
moving target, as it changes every day when employees enter and leave the
FS workforce. While it was stated in the earlier message that the FS has
40,000 employees, that is also a guess (and it seems quite high).
Generally the FS does not talk about the number of its employees, but at
the end of each fiscal year it calculates the number of "FTEs"
used (FTE = Full Time Equivalent).
It is true that the FSC does not know how many firefighters it
represents in the FS. It is also true that the Council does not know how
many secretaries, foresters, chemical engineers, editors, carpenters,
electricians, law enforcement officers, technologists, receptionists,
computer specialists, laborers, statisticians, biologists, etc., that it
represents either. The Council has never needed to quantify employees by
occupation to fulfill its responsibilities. The Union represents all
employees in the bargaining unit, PERIOD.
NFFE is very much a bottom up organization - the members call the
shots. Elected officers serve at the pleasure of the membership and can be
reomved or not re-elected. NFFE members care enough about the Forest
Service and its mission to be actively involved in shaping workplace
decisions through their elected Union representatives. I invite all
non-member FS employees to join us to working with Forest Service
management to improve workng conditions and to improve our Agency.
- John R. Obst, President, NFFE Forest Service Council.
Thank you for the clarifications. Ab (but not the original!)
The original Ab echoes the thanks for clarification but adds: What
are you DOING FOR THE ENGINE CAPTAINS and those below them in R5???
Ab. |
| 02/21 |
With regard to tahoe teds remark-
"I think everone that applied under the National Fire Plan should
file a class action and injunction to halt all hiring under this plan as
it is discriminatory based on the fact that the nature of the selection
process was not even know by Boise (evidently) at the time of initial
closing."
Please ted don't screw up a screwed up thing any further than it is or
we will never hire anyone PERIOD. We have been looking this gift horse in
the mouth until it hurts. I say feel greatful that you at least have a
shot at what many people never had the opportunity to even try. Here's a
hiring tip that you can bank on in the future.
IF A CAREER IS WORTH HAVING- IT'S WORTH APPLYING FOR WITH A NEAT HARD
COPY- SUBMITTED ON THE FIRST OPEN DAY OF THE ANNOUNCEMENT, WITH PLENTY OF
TIME FOR CONFIRMATION AND FOLLOW UP WITH PERSONNEL.
With regard to GP's comments on training and promotion- you are right
on. This is a rebuilding time for the wildland firefighting profession as
a whole. If we don't hire and create the future of our profession, we are
HISTORY as a profession.
D-Torch
President of the
W.D.N.N.B.F.W.P.O.P.T Society
(We Don't Need No Bar Fly Winos Puking in Our Pumpkin Tanks) Society. |
| 02/21 |
Ab, et all-
Well yer Pup is pleased to report that he and Mellie have updated your
acronyms with newfound wisdom? There are some new links there also.
Slowly but surely the Pup is getting trained in FF1 certifications..
stilla while until the local county Firefighter Academy, but I think I'm
making good progress.. Turnout/Bunker gear and SCBA's are fun.. but theres
something just a bit more appreciable in the yellow and green Nomex of
wildland fire.. Here's hoping for a safe season for all.. I might get to
join ya next year, provided I can worm my way into the S-courses
somewhere.
Take care all.
As Ever,
Tiny, the R-6 Fire Pup
Thanks TinyPup for your unflagging service (and I like the way yer
practic'in up on referr'in to yerself in the 3'hird person.) Ab. |
| 02/20 |
Jobs page, 462 and 455 series are updated. I've added photos to
Engine2 Page,
Handcrew3 Page
and
Logo3 Page.
These are pictures of BC Davis NJ pine barrens brush truck, that he left
behind when he moved to Nevada. Also put up a retardant drop photo on the
Kirk Fire '99 and the non-pc sticker that used to sometimes be awarded
after completion of FF1. Thanks contributors.
Ab. |
| 02/20 |
The Grand Canyon National Park is offering a helicopter academy. Follow
the link for more information. It is a great opportunity for folks to get
quality hands on training.
www.ihogman.com/GRCA/
Jim |
| 02/20 |
The existing Engine Captain GS-8 upgrade is not supported by the
"union" (for a lack of better word) because those who are in the
union are not able to receive this upgrade...either because they are
management...Capt or better or they are in other functions/positions
(patrol, fuel)...
As I understand it, in CA in 1996, the upgrade was based on span of
control.... a type 4/6 engine does not have the span of control as does a
Capt on a type 3. Captains on type 3 engines were given upgrades along
with folks down the chain of command to reflect that they supervise 6
personnel. Type 3 engines in CA are 7 day modules with 5 people on per
day.... I have always thought that other region personnel should get the
same increase as they do the same work, but often with less crew....
I am not sure where this controversy started, but unless it came from a
type 4 engine capt as was mentioned in another post, I doubt it came from
a R5 Capt. Chances are it may have come from another region...
Also as I understand it, Big Brother will only be able to take the
grade away. Future Captains may not get it... but those who have will
keep, if only in increased steps.... their wages will be protected.
Also I would like to know, were only Very Qualified individuals
contacted by forests when checking on interest? If this is so, why were we
only contacted by certain forests and not by others.
Where were these ratings done?
If it is true we must reapply for round 2, why is it called round 2 and
why was nobody told of this before?
I think everone that applied under the National Fire Plan should file a
class action and injunction to halt all hiring under this plan as it is
discriminatory based on the fact that the nature of the selection process
was not even know by Boise (evidently) at the time of initial closing.
One final note....the JAC program....does it entail having a valid
driver's lic.?
tahoe ted |
| 02/19 |
Mellie,
Well, I suppose you can hear alot of folks snickerin at ya (all in good
fun of course) but...FUBAR is an old military slang for "blankity
blank beyond all recognition". Certainly you did not catch the movie
Saving Private Ryan as it was one of the topics in that movie.
...and alex? ..thats alex trebeck (?spelling) of the game show jeopardy
fame...guess youve missed that too:)
All in good fun of course, Im greatfull for your interest, concern and
motivation on the behalf of the wildland fire community!
Pulaski
Yes, Mellie got a lot of mail on that one. I cut and pasted the
responses and forwarded them on to her. Ab. |
| 02/19 |
SOUTHERN AREA:
Fire activity is picking up in Florida due to a lack of precipitation,
the KBDI values are between 500-700 through most of the state. Due to the
fire activity in Florida, SACC is in the process of activating Tanker-12
and plans on placing it at the Ocala Tanker Base in Florida.
No precipitation is expected across the South today. The next chance of
rain through the South will be on Thursday. High temperatures today will
range from the upper 50’s in Tulsa, Oklahoma to the high 70’s in
southern Florida. We can expect that the high temperatures in the South
will be 3-10 degrees warmer tomorrow. The cold weather will return on
Thursday were the highs will be in the 40’s and 50’s for most of the
South.
The State of Florida, State Emergency Operations Center web page has
reports on the current fire and drought situation as well as information
on burning restrictions, weather and road conditions:
www.dca.state.fl.us/eoc/ .
As of February 9, 2001 the Regional Forester for the Southern Region
(Region 8) of the Forest Service has temporarily suspended the work
capacity test for all firefighters.
Arkansas is looking for miscellaneous timber positions to assist with a
large-scale salvage sale due to a devastating ice storm that moved through
the area. Please view SACC resource request list for open positions:
www.r8web.com/sacc/resourcerequest.htm
SACC will be staffed from 0700 to 1900 hours seven days a week.
For fire weather information for your area, check out:
www.boi.noaa.gov/firewx.htm
Jim |
| 02/19 |
Thanks Kelly... What do you mean when you say you'll "take
bureaucratic BS for a thousand"? I know the BS part, but who is Alex
(a union guy?) and why for a thousand? Yeah, and while I'm at it, I don't
know what FUBAR (post on 2/16) and PSE (Permanent Seasonal Employment?
post on 2/18) stand for either.
Mellie |
| 02/19 |
"Re the engine captain pay controversy: I heard that some
"union guy" (I'm not including his name) on the Shasta T started
all the stuff that got the WO- HR people riled up. Like did he threaten a
suit or something?"
Mellie, if you can successfully chase & capture the paper @ the end
of the trail on this subject, it might make for some very interesting
reading! Keep us posted as to any results.
Da |
| 02/19 |
... Mellie surely gets the award for best question-asker in the fire
community. [grin] I'm sure there are others more knowledgeable than I out
there, but I'll take a stab at a few of the union questions.
- -- What is the "USFS union"?
That would be the Forest Service Council, one of several councils
under the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace
Workers, also known as the National Federation of Federal Employees (NFFE).
- -- Do they actually represent firefighters?
I asked the president of the council the other day how many people who
work in fire are actually in the union and he didn't know.
- -- Does everyone in the FS "have to" be in it?
Nope. Of the approximately 40,000 USFS employees, something like
10,000 are in the union. But they have an agreement that says that
they can speak for all the employees.
- -- How many fire people are in this "union"?
I don't know. The president doesn't know, either. Check the OPM
listings for ff jobs for the statement "no bargaining unit
status." Mary Lynn Waite, who died recently in Mississippi taking
the walk test, was not in a bargaining unit.
- -- Does the union speak for you whether you belong to it or not?
yup.
- -- Can you say you don't want them to speak for you?
There's an interesting concept. I wonder how many firefighters were
wanting the pack test suspended when the union asked for it.
- -- Re the engine captain pay controversy:
The "union guys" I've spoken with do not support the
existing GS-8 upgrade in R5.
- -- If the "union" does not represent many fire folk but
they do speak for fire folk with *HUGE* consequences, whatsup with
that?!!
I'll take bureaucratic BS for a thousand, Alex.
kelly.
|
| 02/19 |
TO: JA
Yes you only get one offer. Take it, your name is removed from the
application process wether you do or not. You will need to reapply for
round two also. On a CDL, it all depends on what type of engine you are
on, some engines do not require them, but if they do you probably will.
Hope this helped.
WL |
| 02/19 |
Can someone clairfy somethings for me? What is the "USFS
union"? I know they're not the FWFSA. I don't even know their
acronym. I've heard from local ff that the "USFS union" doesn't
really do anything for issues relating to fire folk. Do they actually
represent firefighters? Does everyone in the FS "have to" be in
it? Like are there automatic deductions from your paycheck made to it, as
teachers must do? How many fire people are in this "union"? or
what % of fed ff? Does the union speak for you whether you belong to it or
not? Can you say you don't want them to speak for you? Can you say you
don't like what they're saying? (i.e., can you tell them to shut up?) How
are they related to HR?
Re the engine captain pay controversy: I heard that some "union
guy" (I'm not including his name) on the Shasta T started all the
stuff that got the WO- HR people riled up. Like did he threaten a suit or
something? I guess I don't know what is fact and what is just rumor beyond
a certain point. I haven't been able to research this because of the
holiday. If the "union" does not represent many fire folk but
they do speak for fire folk with *HUGE* consequences, whatsup with
that?!!! Please give me some starting info so I can research this further
this week.
Thanks,
Mellie, who thinks people should join FWFSA (link is the logo above) which
I know *does represent* firefighters' interests and with an awesome
persistence! |
| 02/19 |
Ab - can you put this out on "They Said"??
We'd really like to get lots of well-grounded fire folks to talk and show
their stuff at the Safety Summit. This is NOT a "research-type"
conference!!
Dick Mangan
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Call for Papers
5th International Fire Safety Summit
Missoula, Montana
November 6-8, 2001
The 5th International Fire Safety Summit will be held in
Missoula, Montana on November 6-8, 2001. The main focus of this safety
summit will be to consolidate issues and concerns raised at previous
summits, and develop actions to resolve them.
We are seeking the submission of papers and posters focused on the
following topic areas:
- Staying Safe on the Fireline (LCES, Fire Shelters, Avoidance, etc);
- Safety in the Interface for Homeowners and Firefighters;
- Health and Fitness in the Firefighter workforce;
- Making a Safer Firefighter (training, lessons learned, human
factors).
To submit a contributed paper, send a 1-page abstract including the
author(s), affiliation(s), title and body of the abstract to Program Chair
Dick Mangan at 11400 Kona Ranch Road, Missoula MT 59804; or by Email to: blackbull@bigsky.net.
Abstracts are due not later than May 1, 2001; final papers are
due NLT September 1, 2001. The Conference Proceedings will be available on
CD-rom format at the Safety Summit.
For further information, contact Dick Mangan @ 406-543-0013 or blackbull@bigsky.net.
Hey Readers, it's good to plan ahead. The WISDOM needs to be shared.
Ab. |
| 02/19 |
For T2crew: Yes, the USFS union did request a pack test moratorium. The
chief said no.
k-bob. |
| 02/18 |
JA,
If you look at that Mel Madness hiring schedule from AL a few posts back,
you'll see that the last offers of Round 1 were made on Friday or possibly
Saturday and that final decisions are confirmed on Tues. So there should
be no more offers for Round 1 unless something has changed.
JD |
| 02/18 |
Greg Eiden,
Go to Firewise I think you will
find all the information you need.
WP |
| 02/18 |
Greg:
re protecting homes from wildfire. Visit www.firewise.org ..more
specificly go to www.firewise.org/pubs/fwl/ovw_frames.html
for a direct link to the firewise landscaping page. Another item you can
look for at the firewise is the "Firewise Communities" page (www.firewise.org/communities/)
These are worshops that are being put on around the country. I was able to
attend one last fall, very worth while. There are a few left scheduled for
this year.
Pulaski |
| 02/18 |
So I heard today that there's a moratorium coming on the pack test
because of the death in Mississippi (someone taking the light duty test)?
What's up with this? Didn't we go through this about 3 yrs ago? Is it me
or is it dejavu? I thought this was settled.
If the feds do another moratorium, how's that affect state ff's?
T2crew
The woman who died wasn't even doing the pack test. She was walking.
From post about Feb 8 Miss.
death press release Ab. |
| 02/18 |
I got the application and hiring timeline from a friend and decided I'd
share. Here are the Timelines for 3 different groups of hires:
Note that the Round 1 permanent positions are decided by this Tues 2/21,
at the same time the two other categories of positions are being reviewed or
qual'd and panelled. I guess I didn't appreciate the complexity of this
multiple-stage process that I see when I look at this tentative schedule.
For the second and third rounds of hiring, does anyone know whether OPM
or aview or someone else is handling the applications, whether the
scanable forms are restocked and whether applying online is reliable? or
should we go the hardcopy route (which doesn't help if a database failure
bumps out a lot of quality people like happened ROUND1 for perm MEL
postitions). Also, do we need to resubmit or do applications go back into
a pool?
AL |
| 02/18 |
I have until Tuesday to reply to an offer for a Senior FF position. Have
all of the regions made their Round 1 offers by now? Is it best to accept
this offer, though probably my last choice, or is there still a chance
that offers may still come from other regions? If I should turn this offer
down, will my name be removed from the list for further onsideration?
Also, is a Senior FF on a Type III engine required to obtain a CDL?
JA |
| 02/18 |
Hi,
My name is Greg Eiden and I'm working on a book called "NW Basic
Training."
It contains all kinds of useful information for Northwesterners. I was
wondering if you could tell me what the 5 or 6 keys to protecting your
woodland or prairie home from wildfire might be. For example, keep the
brush
and dead grass clear around the perimeter of your home. Since we get quite
a
few lightning strike fires here, particularly in our high desert country,
my
readers would love this kind of information.
Thanks,
Greg |
| 02/18 |
It's no wonder that Florida is burning. Look at this!
Keetch Byram Drought
Index Map
IN THE NEWS:
Fire in Florida.
CNN
- Fire threat
CNN -
Fire today
It's not just Fire and it's not just the Forest Service with troubled
personnel systems.
Washington
Post
Fire crews face pay cutback.
Record
Searchlight (Redding.com)
Firescribe |
| 02/18 |
In regards to the mass hiring to fill positions for the NFP, we need to
be patient and prepared to begin a two-to-five year intense training and
employee development project to bring the DEMO candidates up to successful
performance standards. I truely hope all supervisors and program managers
realize the immense task that awaits us. Employee development needs to be
a priority to invest in the future to ensure a qualified and SAFE
workforce is ready to FFABPFSF. (see fire
order #1 (of the 10)). I heard, through a very reliable source of two
fine examples. An employee, with 5 part time seasons of experience on an
engine module with a relatively low IA workload, has been offered a GS-7
full time handcrew leader position. YIKES!! Example #2, a DEMO candidate
with a 4 year degree and ZIPPO fire experience is offered a GS-5 senior FF
position. YIKES AGAIN!!
That's the current system, so, we need to treat the problem as a
training and development issue and do our very best to ensure we all
adhere to qualification standards and don't promote new employees until
they are FULLY qualified.
GP |
| 02/18 |
With all the excitment about the new positions (I'm convinced I'll get
offered a PSE when I'm 95 years old....also, on a similar note - if anyone
needs info on private health insurance policies and retirement programs,
let
me know. State Farm looks pretty good, it only costs about $1,000,000 a
month for coverage.)
Anyway, I'm curious as to if anyone has some excellent off-season
workout/fitness programs that they have tried in the past. I am currently
in
the middle of a program, but it feels like a dramatic deviation from what
I
normally do and am concerned with what I'm going to end up with at the
end.
Just wondering if anyone has or knows of some killer programs.
sec |
| 02/17 |
Thanks for the PowerPoint training. I had to teach 130 last month and I
downloaded the PP and looked & felt like a real pro giving the class
with this kind of help!!! Thanks to all involved!!!!!
MG
Thanks to Pulaski and Hickman and some others for making the powerpoint
programs available (programs page). They are slick! Ab. |
| 02/17 |
I have read many responses in regards to the R5 possible downgrading
from the GS-8 on down. I was at first concerned, seeing that I am a GS-7
trying for a GS-8 Engine Captain. But, after looking at all angles, I
cannot phantom the thought of this ever happening. OPM would be opening
themselves to the LARGEST grievance in history. Every R5 Captain,
FEO, AFEO and Senior Firefighter would be involved. Just the cost factor
on OPM would be tremedous in the end result. I do not forget however, that
I work for the government (I'm here to help), so if this did happen, our
wages would be protected, giving us time to gain ammunition. This is why
we all need to be involved with FWFSA,
we are seeking Pay Fairness, not going backwards!!
R5FEO
Ab sez, click the link and join up! |
| 02/17 |
Many of you may have gotten this website www.concentric.net/~R5mc/,
the Male Class Website through the mail system. It stirred up some
controversy obviously. I have to admit, when I first opened up the site I
too thought it was for White Males Only. But after reading into it,
realized it had alot of facts non-related to gender but to firefighters.
One example showed how a High School drop out could get a job that would
pay the same annual salary of a GS-7, Scary! I am amazed at how many folks
assumed and even found this site offensive, based on its name. Yet, if it
was a different gender name it would have been accepted, probably even by
the agency. Is Free Speech only for selected groups, and Hush Hush for
others, even when fact based?
One of the Hush Hush!! |
| 02/17 |
I applied for Jobs this year through both the BLM and USFS. I have to
admit that BLM has their act together as far as online apps. go. It was
very user friendly on the BLM side. The Forest service online application
was a lot more complicated than it needed to be. One difference may be
that the Circus incorporates OPM (Other Peoples Money) into the process.
These agencies need to work together for the common good. Do the troops
count for anything anymore?
As far as the private sector looking good right now, I disagree. The
job situation the private sector gets bleaker every day. A government job
is looking better and better.
-Earl- |
| 02/16 |
Jobs page, Series 462 and 455 are updated.
Ab. |
| 02/16 |
I received a call from a forest in R2 considering me for a perm engine
assistant. They said they have contacted R6 where another forest was also
wanted me. They left the decision up to me. With all my experience in R6
and never been to the other forest I chose R6. It has been three days ago
and still no call. I am about to give up with circus and go back to school
if this CF is going to go on the rest of my career.
WL
PS. Whites boots are wonderful to my feet, but I have to rebuild after
each fire season. I haven't tried another boot yet. Goggles fogging up?
There is no way around, go to bugeyes. |
| 02/16 |
Ab,
After reading the comments on applications, hiring, downgrades, etc.
for the last few weeks, the private sector looks mighty inviting!
Stu |
| 02/16 |
This is in regard to the down grades that are being discussed. I am an
employee of the BLM in Region 5 and from what information we are receiving
we are also looking at the same fate as the Forest Service captains. We
understand that the reason this was brought about was some other regions
outside California are complaining about the upgrades in Region 5, because
no other region has followed suit. What people don't understand it has to
do with amount of personnel supervised and 7 day staffing, plus the fact
that Region 5 fire program doesn't shut down during the winter. Engine
Captains for both the F.S. and BLM have a lot more duties other than fire
suppression, but not to say that we all don't deserve to get paid more,
because we all no that the Federal wildland firefighter is way under paid.
Good thing we love the job!
Cap3133
Yeah, I venture to say that this will end up being a HUGE issue, if
not resolved immediately. The downgrade of engine captain will affect
grades of engine positions below it, at least 3 or 4 GS levels, and will
not be confined to the Forest Service. Just think about it. What if every
administration that came into power reinterpreted the rules? Having the
three branches of government (legislative, presidential, judicial) puts
checks and balances on that happening in our country. But within
government, what is the process to prevent arbitrary reinterpretations,
especially when we cannot speak publically to the issue without it being
considered lobbying? The public is already involved and that will grow. I
predict that soon what will happen here is that someone will get the
judicial/legislative branches involved. I see the steps leading to that...
One friend asked the other day if I had any contacts with a Washington
Post writer or anyone else who would lay out the issues and consequences
of HR's action. I don't, but others in our fire circle do. Wouldn't be
surprised if an insightful journalist hops on this story soon.
Just look at this situation for PUBLIC INTEREST appeal. Fires of the
summer, Congress doing the right thing in funding at MEL, some peon in
Forest Service HR making an arbitrary decision that fouls up a hiring
process that would let us better protect against a repeat of fires next
summer. His bosses continuing the course of action. (Why? Politics,
defending their hiring turf, "to hell with R5", "to hell
with the Forest Service fire folks"?) A look at the widening effects
across positions, across regions and across agencies throughout the entire
US of A. Unfairness to the mainstay of the "fire troops of
summer". Yep, a lot here if HR continues the threat/actuality of the
downgrade. I could go on and on. See my comments and letter
to my Congressional Representatives and Mellie's
comments. Readers, it takes very little time to make a difference,
even if you just e-mail your rep and say, "This is wrong!"
Right now NO ENGINE CAPTAINS OR ANY OTHER PERSONS ON ENGINES ARE BEING
HIRED. As you know, aside from helitack, this group of hires is OUR
GREATEST NEED.
Ab. |
| 02/16 |
As far as trying to get on AVUEDIGITALSERVICES.COM tonight... seems
like every page (if you finally get connected) gives you the message....
Error 500 - Internal Server Error from RFC 2068 Hypertext Transfer
Protocol -- HTTP/1.1: 10.5.1 500 Internal Server Error
The server encountered an unexpected condition which prevented it from
the request.
Seems the solution as provided by ASAP for the lack of the "bubble
scanable forms" has been a flop..
If you haven't been able to apply through the processes on the
application, please send an e-mail to fsjobs@fs.fed.us and let them know
that their system isn't working... I have sent a few messages and only get
auto mail replies... Those auto mail replies will be of great help with my
grievance and hopefully yours if you dont get your application in on
time.... there is a big problem here and the FS needs to hold up the
hiring on the FMO and AFMO jobs until there is a good system in
place.....I have worked for the FS for 18 years and can honestly say I
havent seen a hiring process more flawed... the e-mail letter I received
even states that there is a problem but states they will carry on with the
process.... my attorney loves it...
Chaparral Skeleton |
| 2/16 |
What is going on in region 5?
I hear that all GS-5 and up positions are being held up due to the 7/8
question.
I also hear that since this is being held up they are going to lump
togehter those of us who were on the ball enough to get our apps in on
time with those of round 2. Nice to be rewarded for actually doing
something right and on time.
guess that is whats wrong....some of us are just too good maybe.
Why doesn't mgmt see that this whole system is FUBAR and go back to
individual or small group announcements.....then at leat you know you get
applicants that are interested in working at your module or at least
forest.....
Also if things are par for the course.....alot of the applicants that
don't have prior agency experience were lied to like a recruiter lies to a
17 year old high school kid.
I know of one Capt. who flat out lied as to the activity and
description of his station to a new out of state firefighter. This
individual bailed mid season because of it.
lets get in gear here folks.....
tahoe ted |
| 02/16 |
I heard a silly little rumor the other day.
The BLM may just forget this whole hiring thing, because they think that
the funding will be mostly dried up by next year.
Evidently ol GW liked it better in the old days when anyone who ever
dreamed of a career as a wildland firefighter were told to try the Army
instead.
That light at the end of the tunnel that we have waited for could be a
train after all.
Enjoy the wreck.
Old Dude Who Still Remembers |
| 02/16 |
Just to clarify, avuedigitalservices.com is not a Forest Service
internal enterprise. Avue Technology is a high tech firm in Tacoma, WA. I
know because my brother-in-law works for them. They produce software for
employers. I checked out the avuedigitalservices.com website when I saw it
on theysaid, and it is a part of Avue Tech. I don't know their deal with
the FS, but it is a private company.
Tim |
| 02/16 |
Problem with Fogging Goggles:
Ab and all:
I recently purchased 5500 UFO Galaxis goggles made by Bouton for my entire
crew. We all love the style, feel and functionality of the goggles but are
now running into a problem since the temperatures are getting colder
outside and they sit close to your face - FOGGING UP! I talked to a couple
of friends who are underwater welders and each one had a personal
preference for antifog spray. They suggested: KleerVu, Fog (by Onyx
medical supply), and Z'Fogless. I was wondering if anyone out there has a
favorite they use or can strongly suggest one of the above listed
products. I've tried "over the counter" remedies and store
brands but none seem to work! Any help ya'll can give me is greatly
appreciated!
Thanks!
Anvil |
| 02/16 |
To Hardcopy Hal and others:
The remedy to follow regarding submitting your application hardcopy would
be great. The problem once again lies in the Forest Service didn't have
enough scannable forms available. I received an e-mail today 2/15 from
ASAP telling me to apply on-line since the scannable forms weren't
available. I requested forms over 3 weeks ago. They did say that if you
dont want to use AVUE then you can submit a hardcopy by Feb 16 and submit
the scannable form by February 26 (I think that was the date) to still be
considered.
Now how can I apply on-line if it isnt working and how can I apply with
the scannable form if its not available. The only other way is the
"old fashioned way" by filling out the resume and then
addressing each KSA individually.
Looks like lots of problems are going to be coming down the pike.
Desert Phoenix |
| 02/16 |
What I know about FS round one hiring, and answers to some of the
questions and frustrations. Your right the system does suck. Or at least
sometimes for some people. Some of my peers I have been talking to seem to
think the system is working well. I have mixed feelings. It seems to be
working well for the bases that are just hiring their own or moving people
up within their own ranks. For me that is not the case and it has been
somewhat frustrating.
I am very sure that I may be passing over some very good applicants.
The problem is, the process that usually takes us a month or more to
review applications and check past supervisors and references, was
compressed into just a few days. We just did not have time to look at all
the applications, much less check up on them. I had eight pages of names
for just the GS 6 and GS 5 positions available on my crew. If you were not
calling us before hand, expressing your interest level, or sending a copy
of your application for us to look at beforehand we just did not have the
time to consider you.
If you have not recieved a call about your interest from a forest you
selected, you can assume they are not considering you. The final list is
pretty much done and offers began today (tue). It took most of the day to
make all the GS 9 and GS 8 offers. Offers for the GS 7 level began in the
late afternoon. I would expect that the GS 7 and GS 6 offers get done
tomorrow. The list for GS 6's and GS 5's is very long and may take awhile.
You will have 3 days to consider an offer. As others have said, be
carefull about turning down an offer. You can't count on round two, there
is a good chance the the position you really want will already be filled.
I think a better strategy would be to accept, you can still submit another
application and reapply for round two. Keep in mind that there will not be
as many jobs available in round two, mostly just the positions that
forests did not get the request in on time for round one and the positions
that became vacant due to round one.
The rules we are going by right now were developed by personnel with
the input and blessing from the Union. If you do not like the results I am
not sure what recourse, if any, an applicant may have. Contrary to a few
posts, I am not aware of any decisions that have been made based on
financial considerations. Mostly it has been based on which forest needed
an applicant the most or, more often, who has already made a substantial
investment in the applicant's developement and training.
The good news is that everybody realizes that the current system and
rules are not perfect. ASAP office has been hammered and has not always
been able to provide the level of service that they would like to,
especially for the applicants. Some of the ideal that are being kicked
around: Letting us still hire and make offers from the round one list
until the round two list is out. Maybe even letting this happen at the
local level. Also possibly hiring for round two at the local level. This
does open the possibility of multiple offers, since job offers would not
be coordinated between forests or regions. These are just a few of the
ideal I know are being talked about.
WG. The information you got from personnel does not seem totally right.
Avuedigitalservices.com was contracted by the Forest Service for the
automated hiring process but only for certain jobs. They are doing the
automated applications for the FMO and AFMO postions and certain non-fire
postions. The automated applications for the GS 9 through 3 positions
should have been through the OPM site.
Talon. If you were not contacted about the GS 7 position it could mean
one of a few things; there was a problem with the system and your name did
not show up on their list (though unlikey because you showed up on another
one), you did not show up in the quality group and they could not reach
you, that forest may have been a little slow or behind the other forest
and already put you on their tenative selection list which would have
removed you name from consideration on other list in the region. Though I
would have thought that if you were very up front with them about your
perferences they would have let you go. Anyway I wish you good luck.
A word of caution about those interested in helicopter positions in
region 5. I have heard rumers from an HOS in another region that R5 is
having funding problems with helicopter contracts. Because of some
unforseen circumstances in the insurance industry, the cost of contracts
has increased dramatically. In some instances $500 - $600 per day for a
type 3 helicopter. Some of the cost I have seen for these has been around
$2700 per day, in most cases we were planning about $2000 per day. My
region has managed to come up with the funding for the increased cost. If
your wondering why you are not getting calls form some of the forest you
were counting on, that may be the reason.
A few last words of advice. Try not to get too discouraged about all
this hiring stuff. All these new jobs means more opportunities for all of
us, even though they may not come now. Sorry for those of you pushing 35
that really need a job now. Hopefully the 37 year limit will become a
reality. Many of you should have been on the quality list but were not.
Please resubmit your application for round two and give yourself the
credit on the KSA's that you really deserve.
Name withheld to maintain
Plausible Deniability |
| 02/16 |
About the Department of Interior hiring freeze..... Secretary of the
Interior Gail Norton said today (Feb. 15) in a satellite conference that
she had lifted the DOI hiring freeze (at least partially). There were no
details given, and there's been nothing distributed in writing yet to the
agencies.
An interested observer |
| 02/15 |
Hey AB,
This is for Barbara regarding gear,boots, for wildland firefighting. The
rule is quality not quantity when putting together a red pack. Just
remember you're the one who has to carry it!! As far as boots go ...I had
Redwings which I trashed in Idaho/Montana. They were OK but didn't hold
up. Since then and the lesson learned last summer I have faxed my feet to
oregon and purchased a pair of White's which were built for me. Putting
them on was somewhat of a religious experience..I have never had anything
so comfortable on my feet! They are pricey but well worth it. When you
have been on the line for 20plus hours let me assure you the price becomes
relative!! Your feet are your livlihood in wildland firefighting so be
kind to them and they will not let you down!! Boots are one of your most
important investments and I have found the White's to be great. There are
also other well made brands which are comprable so go to the web site of
Drews Boots or Nicks boots to find the right one for you.
Firebabe |
| 02/15 |
Ab,
In response to Barbara's question, I'll go on record as one who is very
fond of White's Smokejumper boots. Some folks swear by 'em, some folks
hate 'em, but mine have been through a lot and are holding up nicely.
Also just want to echo Ab's appreciation of Mellie and her devotion to
this page.
Thanks, Mellie.
Kibby |
| 02/15 |
Chaparral Skeleton, NorCal Tom, WG,
The FS sent out letters on Feb 5 (USDA FS letterhead, Washington Office
signed by Steve Nelson, Director of Human Resources Management) asking
people to apply online with avuedigitalservices.com, but the ASAP staffing
people don't have records of all the applicants who ARE in the system with
avuedigitalservices.com.
Oops, disconnect! If the application is in avue's hands, it's supposed
to be in the hands of FS Personnel and in the files of OPM... Not
necessarily so...
Skeleton, you said you thought this is an enterprise outfit. It's not.
I'm sure the FS did a contract with a "professional firm" to do
the applications for this most current category of hiring (FMO, AFMO, a
few non-fire). (We don't have the computer expertise/personnel to do it
ourselves. OPM has done the first MEL permanent hire applicants.) I did a
little research. The group doing the online application for this FMO and
AFMO group is a private company in Tacoma WA www.avuetech.com/.
They have a *very large* list of fed clients. Maybe they've done ok by the
others, but they've got a major problem with this.
Those of you in this category of hire (FMO, AFMO, a few non-fire) who
thought you were done with this application process, best reapply in
hardcopy by tomorrow if you want in on Round 1.
WG, I heard some of the GS-9 (on down) applications didn't get to
forests because of a database glitch. That's an OPM problem (I think?)
Those folks (MEL permanent hire category) who fell through the cracks even
after they were on certif lists and were called are supposed to
automatically go back into the hopper for Round 2.
Hardcopy Hal
(My current littany is "trust in computers, but send in the paper,
then use the phone to check with God" and you can tell by my moniker
wherein lies my greatest faith...)
PS. By all reports, the BLM application process is a breeze. |
| 02/15 |
I have heard from a few people that ASAP (Automated Staffing Application
Program) has blown it bigtime. If you have sent in an electronic
application on Avuedigital.com for a FS job that requires a postmark
deadline of tomorrow, take the time right now and redo your application in
hard copy and mail it in to meet tomorrow's deadline!
Do not take a chance on this!!!!
NorCal Tom |
| 02/15 |
Dear Ab, please post my following to the person who talked about the
AVUEDIGITAL SERVICES.COM and the Forest Service Hiring.
If someone at A.S.A.P. told you that 'Avue' was a private company they
may be right and they may be wrong. Even though they told you that that
Avue was not FS and there was nothing they could do about your application
being missing, CALL THEM ON IT. IF THE FS UTILIZES A SERVICE TO PROVIDE AN
APPLICATION PROCESS THEN IT IS THEIR PROCESS. If the FS does not
acknowledge your concern and says that it's not their problem, they are
wrong. If the Forest Service advertises a service (a first that I know of)
in a VACANCY ANNOUNCEMENT to provide an application to them, that service
is a party to wit with them. As such, they have accepted responsibility
for that party to provide properly completed applications.
I recommend an immediate call back to ASAP and a name taken for future
reference. You have grounds for both an internal appeal/grievance and a
Merit Systems Protection Board Appeal.
Now my personal opinion, even though I don't know its true, I believe
Avue Digital Services is a Forest Service internal enterprise (an internal
business within the Forest Service for streamlining and profit). FS
internal enterprises have existed for a few years and looking at the
quality of the site (its poor quality , poor reliability, and lack of true
service to those who would like to call them for info) makes me believe
that they are Govt. sponsored. I have tried for the last 8 hours to submit
an application and am giving up. I cant believe that my agency has gone
with such a screwed up product.
Anyone else who has used this application process, please speak up. So
far, we are two application processes in a row that are a flop... how many
more!!!!
Desert Phoneix |
| 02/15 |
Hey how is everyone? I am looking for some information about getting on
the contract list for Engines. I am interested in building a type 6 Engine
within the next few years and I am starting to get info on everything I
need to do to get on the federal list. I would be grateful for any help.
Keep enjoying the down time fire season is coming soon.
ECS |
| 02/15 |
I am truely in a state of shock....the FS is making
Apprentice offers to folks that have 5 and more
seasons in as temps in the GS-5 and GS-6 level....many
of these folks already have the training for single
resource boss but have not been placed on the training
assignment rotation due to their temp status..
Someone please tell me the logic in spending good
money to retrain people and reduce them in grade and
responsability....when Mgmt is crying about not having
qualified people at higher levels.
Tahoe ted |
| 02/15 |
REMINDER: The timeline for Round 1, FMO, AFMO, Contracting, etc
Permanent Positions (non-MEL) is this: applications must be postmarked
by Feb 16, tomorrow, the regions will coordinate selections beginning
March 12 and offers will be made no later than March 20.
One who doesn't want well qualified people to miss out. |
| 02/15 |
This Dept of the Interior hiring freeze is getting old. Does anybody
know
when they are going to get an exemption to start filling fire positions?
Also, to my brothers and sisters in the Forest Service....What idiot would
even THINK UP the lame idea to bump Engine Captains from 8's to 7's?
People
in DC are so out of touch with what goes on in the REAL WORLD! Whats next,
bumping shot sups back to 7's? Sorry to vent but just had to get that off
my
chest. I hope everybody is typing their fingers to the bone to keep this
INJUSTICE from happening.
Sign Me,
Fired Up |
| 02/15 |
Greetings from the East. Been having some small fires back here in VA,
not very big but enough to keep you on your toes. Anyway, I've been
listing to the talk about jobs and the diffrent rounds of hiring and
passing over people because they turn down a job. I have applied for jobs
with the BLM and FS. I know that they are separate agencies but if I turn
a job down with the BLM because I can't get out of college till May will
my applications be passed over too?? Will I be demoted till the next round
in hiring?? What kind of guidelines is the BLM using in it's hiring
process?? Thanks for providing this forum AB. Just by reading over the
archives I can get anwsers to questions that I would never have thought to
ask untill it was too late and had to learn the hard way. Keep up the good
work. Oh yeah, in response as to what to carry in a pack, try a small
package of babywipes. They are a great Multi-Purpose cleaner :)
Matt |
| 02/14 |
Greetings,
Thanks to Shooter and JW for you input on the Station wear issue. Still
working on our uniform issue, and any input was welcome. Just curious,
does anyone have any contacts with GSA? I heard a rumor that they were
considering buying blue nomex and I would like to squelch it.
To Uncle Bob,
Here in Nevada, NDF (Nevada Division of Forestry, for those like me who
like to abbreviate) we hire seasonal FF's, and will start to accept
applications in late March to early April. Just go to www.state.nv.us and
go to the personnel department page and look up the job listings. You
should find the announcement and a downloadable job application with the
address to send it to.
Thanks all, and stay safe......
Al
If you go to NV state url above, you can't use your back button!
Here's | |