"THEY SAID IT" ARCHIVES
December, 2002

Home of the Wildland FireFighter

DATE
SUBJECT    (Previous Archive: Nov-02) Return to Archives Page
12/31 Happy NEW YEAR you east coast wildland firefighters!

NorCal Tom

12/31 Ab, for IMWTK, regarding fire shirts and PPE.

I was on the del Rosa Hot Shots in 1964. We had to provide all our own personal gear (pants, shirts, gloves, boots). Many of us were forestry majors from Humboldt, Oregon State had already rationalized our first pair of "Whites." Part way through the summer a few crewmen were asked to test what became the orange fire shirt by the San Dimas Equipment Development Center. When our guys washed their shirts the buttons came off.

Regarding hard hats: Prior to aluminum there was full brimmed hat made from bakealite or similar material.

John S
Napa, CA
12/31 In reading the Inquiring Minds Want to Know (IMWTK) questions and answers, I have the following information to add:
  1. We were required to have our fire shelters on at all times when I was with El Cariso (So. Calif.) in 1972, so I suspect that that was the year they became required, possibly even a year or two prior to that. NOTE: The big push for testing and research for firefighting PPE (especially fire shelters and such) started after the tragedy of the Loop Fire on the Angeles N.F. where 12 firefighters from El Cariso died (several others severely injured).
  2. I'm almost positive orange or yellow Nomex shirts came in 1969 or 1970. I remember I was fighting fires in regular clothing (khaki shirts and Levi's) in Region-4 during the summer of 1968.
  3. El Cariso Hot Shots and the other R-5 crews were required to be wearing plastic hard hats during the summer of 1973. We used orange-colored metal ones the year before that. I remember thinking at the time that the bright yellow plastic ones were quite stylish compared to what we were used to.
  4. We definitely used drip-torches in 1973 to light backfires on the Cougar Creek Fire (Nez Perce N.F. in Idaho), and I think I saw them in use on the Klamath N.F. the summer before that.
Thank you for starting and maintaining this website. I have enjoyed it.

Harv Dabling
'Believe In Your Destiny - Chase It with Your Heart and Mind'

Harv, your thanks are much appreciated. We always enjoy incorporating information for additions to IMWTK and other pages. We Abs have learned and continue to learn a lot from our fire community.

Readers,
I have updated the IMWTK page. I added a few more questions that people (kids, students, ff) have asked. Anyone have questions they have wondered about? Also, if you all would take a look at the page to see if you have answers to the questions -- or if you contributed one of the bits of info, we'd appreciate it. We missed giving credit to contributors early on. I know one or more of the comments came from Pulaski. We'd like to credit the others. Please let us know. Also, I recall that Jackson added a comment that never got put up. Remember what that was, Jackson? (Yah, he's probably off playing in the snow somewhere.) One of the CDF folks corrected the Char and Chatten authors of the Principles of Forest Fire Management. We never added that to IMWTK. Please send it again. We will be more diligent in adding to this IMWTK page.

Hey ALL,
Be Safe as you usher in the New Year. Aussies, your fireworks over Sydney Harbor were awesome!

Ab.

12/31 Okay, I'm no dispatcher, but this MIRPS/ROSS/WILDCAD debate is getting
interesting. For those of us groundpounders out here in lurk mode,
would one of you dispatcher gurus mind explaining what each these
programs do/how they work and how they differ?

I'm sure I'm not the only one who'd like to know.
The Nomad

PS Happy New Years everybody!
12/31 My 2 cents on ROSS/MIRPS/WILDCAD,

MIRPS I have worked with in R5 in early stages and recently. Much better then before. SOPS thing of processing more orders? well maybe so BUT a large number of orders get cancelled within 10 min of ordering. I know, I worked there. ROSS is going to have problems, they know that, but it is the First nationwide agency wide program!!! First year or so will be great for availability, similar to "overstat" BUT better. Some GACCs are using it to send availability to NICC already. Very helpful and cut ordering time. ROSS will be a great system in every agency all across the nation that uses it, including R5.

WILDCAD is a great program, have used it in R5, but again it is only a tool --one that has yearly maintenance with updates. BLM is now suppose to be also using it. R3 in training this winter for use next summer. Problem with some areas -- in BLM they have no response plan!!!! (believe it or not) So WILDCAD will not be much good except as an incident reporting system.

All the programs are just "tools" to assist in getting resources to incidents as fast and safe as possible. They also rely on good dispatchers to operate the programs. Good dispatchers are getting hard to find these days, so if you have good ones on your forest or district feel yourself lucky!!!!

Aircraft Dispatcher (ex-R5, now R3)

12/31 Howdy, first Greetings from Germany/Düsseldorf to all of YOU.
Your Site looks very great, and it is very interesting for me.

I wish YOU and YOUR Familys

"HAPPY NEW YEAR"

Stay Safe!!
best regards
Anja

Please visit my little Sites about Firefighters, and please sign my Guestbook on
http://www.anjaseite.com
12/30 Any system should be an improvement over what it is replacing. MIRPS is not. There have been, and continue to be, delays in processing orders for firefighters in the field.

There was no additional support (personnel) provided for this system.

MIRPS needs to be fully funded and operationally supported.

"Another CDF BC"
12/30 Howdy and Happy New Year!

Took a minute to read the latest and can't help but put in my 2 cents on the
MIRPS thing, and on R5/CA being progressive or not.

First, I have to agree with SOCAL DISPATCHER on the MIRPS/ROSS issue.
Yes, it is clunky and has created problems. I don't think MIRPS can be blamed
(solely) for an hour-long aircraft delay. Yes, it has gone down at crappy
times, etc. However, it does some really amazing things as well that no
other system can do at this point, including ROSS. Like SOCAL dispatcher, I
think ROSS will be good when it works, but it clearly is not ready to handle
the sheer volume of traffic that R5 has. Rumor has it that the Southern CA
GACC processes more resource orders per year than the National Interagency
Coordination Center (NICC) in Boise. Adding that kind of traffic (and
including northern CA) to a temperamental and highly un-tested system such
as ROSS is a BAD idea. AND, very unfortunately, two other items seem to
lurk... 1) the USFS has supposedly put a ton of money into MIRPS yet it
appears to be heavily directed/controlled by CDF, and 2) ROSS was clearly
inspired by MIRPS, although rumor has it that the ROSS folks do not listen
to any of California's "lessons learned" in avoiding the same disasters of
MIRPS with the ROSS program. Those who do not follow history are bound to
repeat it, so my feeling is that while the rest of the country stumbles
through ROSS thinking CA has been left behind, we'll at least be using a
program we finally got to work.

As for the other issues, I will say this. The WildCAD thing sounds like a
huge mess from all angles, and I have to agree with ECC1 on a lot of that.
I'm not sure I agree, however, that R5 is far behind the rest of the country
in general... on this one I'll agree with Rocky Mtn. It seems to me that
CA/R5 has better interagency agreements, dispatch centers, and mutual aid
systems that any other part of the country, including the world OUTSIDE of
wildland fire. Hell, the new initiatives after September 11th are
requiring/encouraging the rest of the country - all fire/EMS/LE - to do
start doing things that have been going on for years in California, at least
in the wildfire world. As Rocky Mtn said, they roll pretty smoothly in
California. As for the politics and the leadership and who spends what
money, now, I have no knowledge of how all of that shakes out. Furthermore,
it's not all sunshine and flowers... while we are better integrated than
most places, there are still ALL KINDS of interagency "issues". People who
know me can't figure out exactly how well the "interagency" thing really
works since half the time I am going on about how well it works and the
other half I am griping about some interagency drama. However, at least we
are talking and working together on an every day basis - that seems to be
half the battle.

Well, just had to drop in my opinion as I have been out of touch for a
while. Y'all be safe and have a merry new year!

--FREEZING
12/30 hey ab and all,

been a while since i dropped my opinion in on anything on here. fire season was slow for me and then i got involved with my boys and their football season. no one told me teenagers can be so much work ! at least they are going to the gym with me to help me get into better shape. just turned 40 and it doesnt seem to be getting easier to get into shape. well got to continue to hook up all the brats electronic stuff ( i hope i dont burn the house down ) before i get more grief from them. everybody have a great new years and please be careful while celebrating. we lost way too many brother and sister fire fighters ( structural and wildland ) this past year to lose more doing something stupid while bringing in the new year.

BC Davis
12/29 ECC1, CDF BC, and anyone else who cares about this little problem....

I just need to vent a little about this continued heartburn with MIRPS. It WAS a horrible program when it first arrived (believe me, as one of the first sites to get MIRPS, I know what I'm talking about). It was buggy (read bonus features), it crashed frequently (usually at the very worst possible time), and it was incredibly difficult to navigate through (what do you expect from a product built by committee?). Over the last few years it has gotten more and more reliable, and has not had a "huge" crash since 2001. It is still incredibly difficult to navigate, but like any other program, can be learned. And it beats the heck out of hard cards, from my point of view, because I can at least read a MIRPS printout. I have spent many aggravating hours trying to decipher some dispatcher's "chicken scratch" in order to sign off on a billing issue... and that's only if the dispatcher bothered to fill out the pertinent information. It's not perfect, but how many of you want to go back to what we were doing before? (What's supposed to go in all those little boxes again?)

CDF BC, to address the problem with your airplane request, an hour is unacceptable in any realm and I strongly suspect that there were a whole bunch of other problems happening. It's always so much easier to blame the program and not the system. There is NO reason that aircraft could not have been ordered within the 5 minute time frame without it being in MIRPS, and the GACC will not withhold aircraft because it's NOT in MIRPS. We have a perfectly good intercom system and all dispatchers are supposed to know how to order aircraft on it.

ROSS isn't even close to being ready, and when it is, I want it to be perfect. I've already lived through one set of "beta-testing", I'm not ready to do it again. California will put a huge load on the system, and ROSS needs to be able to support our needs. For those of you dispatchers that haven't been to the site yet, you might want to visit http://ross.nwcg.gov and take a look at the product, it is very different from what you have become used to. ROSS isn't even out in production yet. I think three years is optimistic for roll-out to R-5. When it's ready, I think it will be wonderful, but don't call me till it's ready.

And on another note, where is the forest service support and input to the ECCO academy at Ione? At the present time it is the ONLY organized training class for wildland dispatchers, and there is almost no FS participation on the teaching Cadre or in sending adjunct instructors. I hear the same complaints over and over about how it is a "CDF" class and they teach only what's important to CDF, but that will never change if we don't get strong support from the FS dispatch community. At the present time, there is only one FS dispatcher on the cadre (that I know of). As few as three years ago, it was split almost 50/50 FS/CDF and there was a strong feeling of "interagency". If we want our folks to be given the best training possible, we need to support this class. Look at the curriculum and make suggestions, sign up to spend some time there as an adjunct or as an instructor.

I have more to say about the CAD systems, but I'll get off my soapbox for now,
SOCAL DISPATCHER

12/29 I am new to the computer world, started in Jun, but have followed your site very close. I put my 2 cents in before on the pack/vest test. I'm the old man of the dept. carry a red card at 66 and am a certified firefighter. Also am a Volunteer. In our area everyone is locked together on amutal aid system and we work well with the Feds and the State. Do not know of any emergency service opeation that does not complain about dispatch. In the 17 years I have been in this type of operation. Law, EMS and Fire all think that the other is getting a better time on the dispatch, but it all comes out of the same console, at least here it does. All I can say is quit complaining and start making suggestions, good ones, not wild ones. We all have to work together whether we like it or not its the way things go. None of us can get along with out the other. So all of you that do only wildland, start running so you can do the pack/vest test with out all of us having to listen to you complain. 3 miles aday for about 6 days a week for the rest of the winter ought to do it.

Remember, Keep it Simple and Keep it Safe
The old man of the Dept.

12/29 There are some new fire photos up on the Fire 15 photo page. Read the details by clicking the name under the photo. Thanks to Brad for sending them in. Ab.
12/29 Good points you made! You must remember the Job Announcement that made history
back in the CD era. It was for a Fire Dispatcher Job on the Six Rivers. The announcement
stated in large bold letters: "ONLY UNQUALIFIED APPLICANTS MAY APPLY" job
announcement went on to say: "Must have the ability to speak english within six
months"... :)

Bob
12/28 Dear Ab,

On the hostility from ECC1 about the FS dispatching in R-5. I worked in R-5 south zone from 1988-1995. I currently work in R-2 and to hear that R-5 is so far behind the rest of the nation is makes me laugh. At least back in R-5 the agencies honor their mutual aide agreements and although there is friction, the ground pounders still shake hands out on the line. Out here there is hardly any communication, and what I have seen since I have been here is a great deal of animosity. Much of CO is covered by volunteers, (not saying anything bad about them, as I was one myself), but things rolled smoother in R-5.

Honestly I have never dispatched before, and cannot relate to the programs issues, but did start my career in the aftermath of consent decree and do concur with leadership having suffered as a result.

Rocky Mtn

12/28 Any word on where the FS is going with the case they tried to make against Bonehead and the crew?? All appearances are that they finally figured out they don't have a case.

Thanks,
JWA

12/28 AB and ECC1:

Be comforted in knowing that the field firefighters of CDF assess MIRPS in the following manner: IT SUCKS.

Unfortunately for most of our ECC personnel, they have been instructed by CDF management that there will be no negative comments referencing that computer system.

Last summer, there were initial attack delays of aircraft (one I heard of was nearly 1 hour) to a fire directly attributed to this system. CDF can not IA dispatch and operate MIRPS. No new positions were authorized to operate the terminals -hummmmmmm.

Incident call volume has steadily risen each year with the same bodies in the command centers -hummmmmmmm.

Computers were supposed to help reduce the workload -hummmmmmmm.

Time to return to the magnets and the boards ...

"Another CDF BC"
12/28 Hello Abercrombie & All,

I'm feeling a little anger, some embarrassment, and feel the need to ask a couple of questions and comment on a couple of items. It's a multi-issue situation and deals mainly with dispatching, so those readers who don't work in a dispatch office may lose interest. However, if you are ever dispatched to fires in Region 5, you may just want to stick around. Those of you outside R5 can also leave now, or what the heck, stay to point your fingers and laugh. I don't have any say in R5 policies or procedures, so I won't feel too bad.

Number one question on my list: Why has R5 failed to promote or implement ROSS? I know some work is being done in the background to help us get ready, but WHY the 3-year foot-dragging? Other regions are so far ahead of R5 that R5 has had precious little input into how the program has been developed. Yeah, I know there are a couple retired R5 folks on the staff of ROSS, hopefully they will remember and help save us.

My answer to my own question is: The USFS in R5 is so far behind the rest of the nation because it is bound too tightly with the California Department of Forestry. That's CDF to most of you, the second largest firefighting department in the world. CDF wants MIRPS, CDF wants Alteris. Those of you who don't know what MIRPS is are fortunate. The frequency of MIRPS breakdowns are legend, the program functions are handicapped to anyone outside an inter-agency center and even the inter-agency centers have such simple problems as printing reports. Bugs (undocumented features) have existed since its beta tests and after repeated feedback remain uncorrected. R5 management, however, continues to support the shared cost of this abortion refugee and wants us to pretend all is copasetic.

Alteris is CDF's concept and promotion of a new computer aided dispatch program. This program, similar to the way MIRPS was hatched, is being rammed down R5 dispatch center managers' throats. The old CDF computer aided dispatch program (CALCAD) has met few of the R5 forests needs over the years but, being good partners, we tried to adapt. I hear rumor there is still one forest located within an inter-agency dispatch center in the region that uses an old tub-file dispatching system rather than use the CALCAD system. A major point in all this is that CDF isn't sure, but it may cost USFS centers who aren't co-located or inter-agency $750,000 per center to have the new Alteris system installed. Just in case any of our Washington based financial leaders are viewing this, you may want to stop nodding off and pay attention here! I said it MAY cost a three quarters of a million dollars per dispatch center! CDF isn't sure because stand alone centers weren't included in the original contract. It might be more! Nobody seems to know, so why don't we go ahead and do it, let's be good partners. It doesn't seem to matter that we already have a great new (USFS friendly) dispatching system in WildCAD already in use throughout the region which only costs a couple thousand dollars per center. BLM has already obtained a national site license, they know a good thing when they see it. But, how much influence does BLM have in an R5 "inter-agency" dispatch center? About as much as the USFS as I see it. Not much.

One last item on my list is the newest update to the MIRPS system. Now I log on to the handicapped, when it works, bug-infested program and get to view a nice little login screen shot of a CDF pickup sitting on a road with a flame front about to pass. Nice. The photo itself isn't a bad shot, it's much better than the old 8 bit image of a cartoonish, pixilated, anonymous gray airtanker. But. . .with an inter-agency, co-dependant system, wouldn't it be better to have a multi-agency representative photo? Way to go not-say-anything-USFS, way to not even ask, CDF. Actually, I have no idea if CDF asked the USFS what they wanted on the photo, I just guess they didn't. This is a small issue, but it supports my main concern.

It appears to me that CDF is dictating to the USFS in R5 about how the fire suppression game will be played and with what programs and communications systems they will participate. Past negotiations and concessions by weak USFS leaders and the willingness of current leaders to accept the status quo have reduced the effectiveness or obligated R5 dispatchers and firefighters to subjugate themselves to the whims of CDF. There was a parable I once read about putting too many of your eggs in one basket. . .the other person might just take possession. I believe the leadership of R5 must refocus on what is best for not only our region, but how they will integrate their responsibilities and obligations to the rest of the nation. R5, who so long appeared at the front for positive change and defined the cutting edge of wildland fire suppression, has become dulled. It's as if the Consent Decree of the eighties and the continuing litigation has taken the willingness to fight out of our regional leadership. Then again, maybe the reason R5 lacks aggressive leadership is due to the effects of the Consent Decree.

Regardless, the future is now being honed and shaped by other Regions across the land and we are being left behind. Being on the cutting edge of philosophy, technology, or strategy means to me that you may view your own blood occasionally. The only blood and sacrifice I see lately are at the middle or bottom of the organizational chart. While I don't necessarily want to see any of my leaders suffer or bleed, I would like to know they are as willing as I am to do so. But I don't think they are. I think their priorities are elsewhere. I wonder if they're too busy eye-balling some nice cushy job after retirement (OES comes to mind) and dislike being viewed as an agitator or malcontent.

My apologies to any of my CDF or other regional USFS brothers and sisters in arms who walk the fireline who take offense at this post, this is not an attack on you or your leaders, it's about my leaders. I merely state my personal views and voice my concerns in the hope that my leaders are made aware of just a few of the ramifications of their decisions, or lack thereof, affecting the women and men who work for them.

ECC1

12/28 CDF has only purchased a few of the CDF Model 25 so far. It is considered a type 2.
North County Fire in Fallbrook, Northern San Diego County just purchased 2 CDF Model
25's with some upgrades. International with Pierce build up. They seem to be happy with
them, call them up. The guy who runs their shop seems to know whats up with the
engines, his name is Dan.

Signed} Wildland BC
12/28 Ab,

Thanks for advertising our GPS for the Incident Command System training
courses. We received over 90 nominations and, sad to say, had to decline
several due to space limitations. I know that some of the applicants found
out about the course through your website. For those folks who would like
to download our training materials, the following locations may be helpful:

maps.oes.ca.gov/GISTech/
www.nps.gov/gis/fire/

We currently have the course Pre-work CD posted. The workbook,
presentations, lesson plans etc. are being updated from last year and will
be available for download by mid-January.

I hope this information is useful for those individuals who got new Garmin
GPS receivers for Christmas and can't wait to go out and map a fire!

Tom
12/27 Special thanks to Mike Lynn. Excellent essay on Retardant. Post it - so
the PAO's can get it right!

ghostload

Ab will add the description to the photo description page for future reference.

12/27 I e-mailed Mike Lynn asking who flew Tanker-22 on the Missionary Ridge Fire (CO) in 2002 for our photo records. (Photo by Ben Croft.) He commented on what a nice drop it was and, when I asked him to elaborate, went on to offer this, which I found interesting. Thanks Mike. Ab.

The pilot flying T-22 on the Missionary Ridge Fire was Doug Griffen. Great guy. We flew a lot together on that fire.

Nice drop. It shows how the head wall of the retardant gets sheared by the forward velocity and wind. Those small sheared layers show the end of the forward movement. The drop then starts to rain down in into the vegetation as it should. Good drop height.

The P3 (T-22) tank system is what is called a "constant flow" system. It maintains a constant flow rate and head pressure on the retardant as it leaves the tank. You want the retardant to come out at an even, constant flow so that it will be applied on the ground in a consistent coverage level. This then allows the vegetation to be coated in such a manner to help retard the fire. If the retardant comes out of the tank in an uneven manner, there could be gaps in the retardant line or weak spots at lower coverage levels requested and this too could allow the fire to burn through. There are tankers that have a variable flow system, but it acts in the same manner as the constant flow system. It is just designed different and uses a different gating system than the constant flow system. End result for both systems is that you get an even, constant and consistence coverage level of retardant on the ground.

On both systems when the gate or door firsts opens, there is a small amount of retardant that gets caught by the wind and air flow from the aircraft that is called feathering. It is the light mist of retardant that you see trailing the main body of retardant when it first comes out. It consists of about 3 gallons of retardant. It looks like more, but it is really very little. You can see the same feathering too as the last of the retardant comes out. This is because the retardant has lost it's head pressure suddenly and dribbles out. It again is a small amount of retardant.

All retardants as they come out of the aircraft get caught in the slip stream of the aircraft, outside air turbulence and the forward movement of the aircraft. This air breaks up the retardant and is called shearing. Depending on the type of retardant and how it was mixed will depend on how much the retardant is sheared. All in all though the retardant stays together and you will have a consistent drop. When the retardant hits the ground, that is called a footprint. The footprint can change due to wind speed and direction, aircraft speed, tank system, terrain, turbulence, drop height, bank angle of the aircraft and the type of retardant. All of these factors are taken into consideration with either the leadplane pilot, ATGS and the tanker crew. They then will adjust several factors with the aircraft and tank system to give the fire fighter the proper coverage level on the ground. The key being what the fire fighter wants on the ground. Those of us in the air are there for those folks on the ground.

Happy New Year,
Mike Lynn....

12/26 Puffin II,

I had 16 years of CSRS when FERS was offered up to switch. I switched and ended up with 16 yrs. CSRS and 9 yrs. FERS which let me retire at age 45...under Firefighter Retirement. I left when I reached 45.... :) My monthly retirement is a combination of CSRS/FERS/ANNUITY SUPPLEMENT ( If you retire under firefighters retirement under FERS you will receive the ANNUITY SUPPLEMENT till age 62). I had another job set up before retirement so I now pay only into Social Security which will increase my monthly retirement once I reach 62 (which will be when the Annuity Supplement will cease). My earnings WILL BE tested (even firefighters are subject to this test) annually when I reach age 55 (plus a few months) and no doubt I will lose that supplement because I will exceed the IRS threshold. Switching to FERS with 16 years of CSRS under my belt really help keep by retirement calculation ($$) up. The final decision for switching to FERS was it allowed me to retire with full benefits at age 45.

BG
12/26 Is there a list and information regarding the burn overs that have occurred in the last 30 ++??
years, I could not find anything on the web??

Battalion Chief Don Zimm
Hanford Fire Department
12/26 Yesterday and Today in the Ozarks:

Just like I say....It's a beautiful day in the Ozarks....and it was today. Snow is starting to melt and temps were in the 40's and sun shined all day. Now next week could be something else.

Have a good'n
Hickman

12/26 Hey Mellie! Happy Hootin' Holidays. And a Merry Season to all you fire folks and the loved ones who care. I'm hoping the quality of these holidays are used for resting, caring, sharing, and joyful laughter. This is not the time to be groveling or abusive because maybe there ain't no work, or funds are getting low, or you're thinking how in the hell are your knees going to take another round of (oh my god) the pack test. Don't even want to think these things when there's ballgames, old movies, dynamite DVD's and a slew of random thoughts popping into mind now that the smoke is out of collective lungs and after all - we still can contribute something positive to make our days more festive and meaningful. Hug a tree, but not a snag - especially if it's afire!

TRULY - I WISH YOU ALL JOYOUS HOLIDAYS with a little prep spiel to get you all working on being prepared for new issues. Things that are going to slap us around as soon as the first smoke is spotted and "initial attack" is redefined as blind men walking to the heat of life. In this period of non-control and if you're young and ain't thinking no more fire ask yourself if a middle eastern beach is more your pyre. 'Nuff said. Be jolly. Run a mile for me (you old guys make it two!). Then send me a message. It's a good time to camp in your favorite tree - (even if it's raining.)

Mellie - you are such a dear. Regarding Dollboy aka the Jumper-ho - Nope, the doll is not real, too clean, too plastic, and when you drop it real hard the same dumb smile sticks to its face. Funny thing though, that the producer put a big USFS emblem on the box and touche I hear a square shuffle entering the wind! Alas, - There was a guy who wanted to do it right and we told him make them real - make them female - cause any dirt firefighter will take a firebabe anyday. Besides, anyone who has ever played with a smokejumper knows that long hair, burly beards, and big snuggily arms - are what they really have to offer. When Talking Barbie says "toga party!" bring that action super-hero! Wish I had one I'd make sure it got hung up in a moon tree!

Seriously now -- Anyone out there really believe the 2002 fire season was the record setter? I thought that was 2000? 1996? 1994? Yelled&stoned '88, Silverdated '87? Question: is an acre affected by fire really an acre destroyed? Think that one over if you're looking to lay down a homestead? Me - I'm gonna go look this spring for some over-cut, burned over blackline acres that have been destroyed to call my own; I can only imagine what the cost of one destroyed acre goes for these days, but I'll take 40 if the price is right! I'll cut up my escrow money like a puzzle and pay in the mosaic fits. Anyone out there know the going rate and appraised cost of an acre destoyed? If the price were right I'd choose a blackened clear-cut; doesn't everyone need a piece of fragmentation to humble occasionally about what really is out there. Dear friends of mine on the Oregon coast tell me the predominate color of ground is red but it fades fast in a flurry of repollination. Red. It's a color I hear from Rudolf's reindeer nose. And thinking of something read - what's with the sudden oak blight? Now there's a challenge on extended attack - a south facing old growth tan-oak stand with Redwood on the north and a biting wind of east. Beautiful sunsets over the ocean. Man I just love northern California! (Can we sign those wilderness fire plans now please!)

Well, I woke up the other day and couldn't remember if we were heading into 2004 or 2003! I had to really stop and think about that one. Whew. This getting older stuff is a ...... Okay, here's my point for writing. Have you seen the long green line of folks walking out the door? The tide is swiftly ebbing taking some of our best in the backwash. What are we going to do when we need to water down the poopdeck? Breach on the Beach? Paradigms? For twenty cents Pandora's box has already opened. News at five. Shift change at four. Are those people really leaving or are they just tired pogues with their heads slung down walking backwards? The role is on and it's really getting hard to watch the march of greenling into retirement. "The long green line." Some come back (long green slime) and then at year's end have to be told to go home - realizing that they have no place to go - almost a shame but true.

(I DO believe I'm gonna buy some destroyed acres? Then I can finally plan the best years of my life. People who look at the forest and can only see green trees and birds singing are like those that don't understand that because I can walk I am not hurting? HA! I remember the only time I ever stood on an unemployment line, an old jumper bud ran into me at the state office and said "gees, what a line!" When I said yeah, "haven't stood in a long line in a long time" he said that was something dragonslayer would say. And then many moons followed. Oh for the rush of sheer enjoyment from standing in a line....with both feet evenly.

Well I got lots to say but most of ya are probably too busy to read this sap and I have got to remind myself to keep it light so the spirits in the rear of the load keep smiling. But I really want to say - for those that come back - please come back healthy, come back clean, come back smarter, but don't come back mean. Come back wiser - and come back a little less green. We need you and maybe together we can resuscitate a destroyed acre or two million. Soon enough we will engage a teetering time inside the curl of a "tactical wave" hidden between the swells fire fighting and the wide, open hollers of fire management. Standing on the back deck, crossing the bar, watching PM10 shoot-up the sunrise like a black tar fire junkies basking in the paradise after another good day of line. The Gods ain't made but angry still, curling water spouts just like fire whorls, a thousand eyes watching the "sport" unfurl. Let's not this season let it angry be, just step away and reassess. Always ask: "Why am I here?" When you don't know - it's time to be gone.

The Dragon chooses carefully. So do we. Merry Christmas, Kwansa, Hannukah, Praise Allah. Shalom. Feliz Navidad.

The spirits are getting pithy, please hear our echos, we hear your shout in the wind and it is good, fly on!

ghostload.

12/26 Sittin in the Snow,

My "sittin in the back seat" two cents on the Model 62- the earlier model, the Model 61, had a bench seat in the back as opposed to the 62's bucket seats. I say go for a bench seat- more versatile, you can actually lay down in the back, and the SCBA's are mounted on the inside of each rear door.

Maybe this isn't not the most important commentary, but it's what mattered to me when I was stuck on an assignment staging for 10 days straight.

-Nomad
12/26 Merry Christmas Ab and All,

Here are some more photos. I took these during the Hunter Fire, Mariposa County Aug-Sept 2000. No joke... it had drizzled on the way to this line assignment, cloud cover to the point the airtankers were grounded, copters were up though, RH 50%. We, the firefighters from ST, were about 2500-3000ft into a 5000ft hose lay. When we started, this column was very small, we didn't even think twice about it. Picture 4 is prior to the fire jumping the dozer line, Picture 5 is the fire after it crossed the line.

Brad

I put them on the Fire 15 photo page. Happy holidays to you, too. Ab.

12/26 Yo Ab(s)!

Please send along my Christmas (oops, I mean Winter Solstice) greetings to Patty at the sanatorium for me! It was sad to see her disintegrate that way, but it was a foregone conclusion. I knew she was going to snap anyway when she received my request to accommodate my group of atheist, gay, vegetarian recovering alcoholics.

CDF Mike from AG
12/25 Merry Christmas Everyone!

Old Fire Guy, I'm doing pretty good! You're a dear to send such a sweet card. I do hope that someday our paths will cross! <big hug> Thanks to Todd, Larry, Steph for cards too. Some of them followed me home.

Let me take a moment and thank everyone I can think of for the support you've given me! I know your thoughts and prayers contribute to my well being and healing. When I came out of surgery that midnight, I "awoke" to a vision of a circle of yellow-clad firefighters laying on hands in the midst of much light. It was comforting and welcoming. You just can't imagine how welcoming. Many of you I don't know in person, but your collective presence filled the room. Then I realized you were all in clean nomex and I wondered if I was in heaven! One of the recovery nurses who looked like a hotshot (but probably was just a buff SF gay guy) laid a hot flannel sheet over me and wrapped a folded section around my head, commenting that I looked like a nun. I told him, not so, never a nun, although sometimes I employed a <little madonna smile>. Rather I told him that the wrapped part was my firefighter's helmet, visor and shroud and that I would never "abandon the line". He thought that funny, but was kind in his laughter. He wanted to know what I did with my life and I had fun verbally sparring with him (not printable) and the others over the next 2 hours.

Thank you all so much
for the thoughts.

backburnfs and firewolf thanks for the healing circles. Thank those who participated, please. I feel blessed. <smooch>

Hickman, thanks for the Firefighter Angels pin. I love it. You're a good friend. (I hope your tornadoes and snow have not been too taxing... Jeez, living in the armpit of the USA, and coming west each summer, what a life!)

An R5er, Fire'n'Water, Hornie, SoCal Capt, Ray, Pulaski, AL, John, Tahoe Terrie, Firehorse, WP, NorCal Tom, JW, ECC1, Curious, Renee and Vicki thanks for the good wishes, the words of encouragement, e-mails, phone calls. Oh my, I'm probably forgetting someone. If so, please forgive me. I tried to e-mail some of you with fs.fed addys from the hospital, but the system sent them back. Probably thought my messages were spam since I was using a remote server. What a day and age to have access to theysaid from a hospital room! (They banned my laptop but I snuck it in! Even now, the docs have limited my typing time. What's with that?? So I lurk...)

Terrie, the wildland firefighter doll is marvelous! Thank you! Do they all look a little cock-eyed, or just mine??? I like how the web gear/pack is dirty nomex and the shirt is clean. Fusee in the pack, a whistle! Amazing detail and larger than I thought it would be. My family got me the smokejumper, too for Christmas. Ghost Load, you'll need to tell us how authentic that one is. Face doesn't seem young enough or "academic" enough to me and he looks a little heavy to be a jumper.

Fire'n'Water, Hornie the flowers were lovely, lillies and hyacinths, beautiful. They smelled so much I immediately threw up in the trashcan. I don't mind a good hurl every once in a while. Sure had the nurses jumping! They took them away for 2 days. When I was finally up later and was doing my kicks around the hall I tracked them down by smell -- in the solarium overlooking SF. I really appreciated them there and so did everyone else. Brought them home with me too. I'm down to the last two lily buds with their whiff of aroma. Thanks! <hug> Fire'n'Water thanks for the call, too.

Many thanks to the two people (unknown) who called to ask if flowers were allowed before sending them. Of course the nurses said no after my first experience! <chortle>

Finally, I want to send a load of LOVE to Original and the other Abs. I love you m'dears! Can't imagine my life without you and this whole theysaid crew, lurkers and all.

May your Christmas be as blessed as mine.
Mellie

PS Nomad, I will mail the videotape in a few days when the mail settles down.

PSS For those of you who are looking for the donation to make before the New Year hits us, please consider the Wildland Firefighter Foundation. You can even donate by credit card and it's tax deductable. Foundation funds are low and a new season - with all its risk to life - will be upon us all too soon. Supporting our own is the right thing to do.

Welcome back Mellie. Rest up. Ab.

12/25 Hey All, here's a good one from the CDF side of things. hahaha MERRY CHRISTMAS. AL

CDF MEMORANDUM
December 1st
TO: ALL EMPLOYEES
I'm happy to inform you that the company Christmas Party will take place on December 23rd at Luigi's Open Pit Barbecue. There will be lots of spiked eggnog and a small band playing traditional carols...feel free to sing along. And don't be surprised if our Chief Deputy Director shows up dressed as Santa Claus to light the Christmas tree! Exchange of gifts among employees can be done at that time; however, no gift should be over $10. Merry Christmas to you and your family.
Patty <snip>
Human Resources Director

December 2nd
TO: ALL EMPLOYEES
In no way was yesterday's memo intended to exclude our Jewish employees. We recognize that Hanukkah is an important holiday that often coincides with Christmas (though unfortunately not this year). However, from now on we're calling it our "Holiday Party." The same policy applies to employees who are celebrating Kwanzaa at this time. (CDF Mike from AG, you and your atheist buddies should party too.) There will be no Christmas tree and no Christmas carols sung. Happy Holidays to you and your family.
Patty <snip>
Human Resources Director

December 3rd
TO: ALL EMPLOYEES
Regarding the anonymous note I received from a member of Alcoholics Anonymous requesting a non-drinking table, I'm happy to accommodate this request but, don't forget, if I put a sign on the table that reads, "AA Only," you won't be anonymous anymore. In addition, forget about the gifts exchange -- no gifts will be allowed since the union members feel that $10 is too much money.
Patty <snip>
Human Researchers Director

December 7th
TO: ALL EMPLOYEES
I've arranged for members of Overeaters Anonymous to sit farthest from the dessert buffet and pregnant women closest to the restrooms. Gays are allowed to sit with each other. Lesbians do not have to sit with the gay men; each will have their table. Yes, there will be a flower arrangement for the gay men's table. Happy now?
Patty <snip>
Human Racehorses Director

December 9th
TO: ALL EMPLOYEES
People, people -- nothing sinister was intended by wanting our Chief Deputy Director to play Santa Claus! Even if the anagram of "Santa" does happen to be "Satan," there is no evil connotation to our own "little man in a red suit."
Patty <snip>
Human Rat Races

December 10th
TO: ALL EMPLOYEES
Vegetarians-I've had it with you people!! We're going to hold this party at Luigi's Open Pit whether you like it or not, you can just sit at the table farthest from the "grill of death," as you put it, and you'll get salad bar only, including hydroponic tomatoes. But, you know, tomatoes have feelings, too. They scream when you slice them. I've heard them scream. I'm hearing them right now... Ha! I hope you all have a rotten holiday! Drive drunk and die, you hear me?
The Bitch from Hell

December 14th
TO: ALL EMPLOYEES
I'm sure I speak for all of us in wishing Patty <snip> a speedy recovery from her stress-related illness. I'll continue to forward your cards to her at the sanitarium. In the meantime, management has decided to cancel our Holiday Party and give everyone the afternoon of the 23rd off with full pay. Happy Holidays!
Terri <snip>
Acting Human Resources Director

HAW HAW. Ab.

12/25 Happy Christmas to all
And to all a SAFE night...


Aircraft Dispatcher
12/25 Best wishes for the day and have a safe holiday with your families.

NorCal Tom

12/25 Hey Nuke

Tell JP from Guam
Merry Christmas to him and his family. The hotshots at home are
thinking of him and his family during Xmas and New Years. As for the rest of you in
Guam......Merry Christmas and Happy New Year. We'll see ya home this summer!!!!

Sawmonkey
12/25 Merry Christmas from Down Under

Dear All,

Well this is a much better change from what happened last year in Sydney.
Weather has been cool with scattered showers since Sat. It seem that even West
Australia and Victoria might be getting a Christmas break with an easing of the weather.

To all that have helped by replying with advice to my questions and for all of those
who have unknowingly provided me with insight and knowledge in wildland interface
firefighting issues (I lurked a lot for the first 4 months), I would like to say
a VERY BIG thank you

I hope you all have a very Happy and Joyous Christmas and a great New Years
Eve. Please take care on the roads, watch out for the drunks and wildlife and for those in
snow country watch out for the black ice (I spent some of my early years in Montreal,
Quebec, Canada).

I have just finished our Christmas Dinner (Cold smoked ham and turkey and host
roast pork with crackling YUM YUM YUM. Pudding and custard later on).

Catch you all in the New Year.

To all of the AB’s.
Great Job and thanks for the help and advice. Keep up the great work.

For the Aussies that are reading this,
Thanks for all of the effort for so early on this season and as it has progressed into
the true fire season, please watch out on the fire line.

Best Wishes to All,
Aussie CFU

12/25 My department will be spec'ing a Type 3 engine in the next year and I was wondering if
anyone could give me their comments on the following engines: The CDF Model 25, the
BLM Model 14 & 15, and the USFS Model 62. If you could let us all know what you would
change if you had the power to do so, I'd really appreciate it.

Sitt'in the snow in Southern California
12/24 Fireball:

Your response on the Blue Cut was interesting to read. Were you a member of that investigation team? I read the "Green Sheet" and found the document to be somewhat lacking in specificity. In fact, after reading it again a second time, I was unable to get a sense of what happened. The map that you speak of is interesting in that it references two battalion chiefs, yet, none of their actions are mentioned in the document-a slight omission in my opinion.

While I agree that the green sheet is to prevent accidents and list "fact," the more important issue is a standardized format of questioning and gathering of that fact. There is no such standard inside CDF presently. Each team assembled is free to put together the document in any manner they wish as long as time limits are met (24 hours to issue a preliminary summary).

Overall, I would rate the green sheets as a "C-" for content.

"Another CDF BC"
12/24 To: THE NUKE
No wonder you never answer your phone/e mail/etc.
Happy Holidays!
y'dusty dog.

KD's dad
12/24 Merry X-Mas from Guam.

There are about twenty folks from R-5 here working the MOB center for FEMA , shipping and receiving supplys for this and several other islands. Some of the island has not had power, water, or phone service since the typhoon hit.

I helped deliver water to several shelters this week and they all averaged 30 families or more living there. Other folks were able to move in with family members that still had homes or roofs. Got to back to work now but Happy Holidays to all back on the mainland. Our 30 days will be up Jan 9.

The NUKE

Merry Christmas. Ab.

12/24
MERRY CHRISTMAS  TO  ALL  AND  A  HAPPY NEW YEAR


An-R5er
12/23 In response to Fireball XL 5 (Bluecut Burnover map):

The big problem I have is this: The top of the map reads: "Approximate
location of resources as firing operation nears completion." This is
wrong as it relates to the location of B3512, he left that location
early on and went passed us (4465) to the crossroads intersection south
of the powerlines. It implies that 3512 was in that location during the
burnover, which he was not. I don't want anyone thinking that he was
that close to the burnover, and didn't do anything to help. Please don't
look too much into the small factual errors. A better title of the map
would have been "Approximate location of resources both immediately
before the burnover and immediately after the burnover."

B

12/23 Killer, Have you gone rapport?

As for the union, before there was so much in fighting, They were a big assistance Goverment ended up owing me money as I was doing more than my position description for awhile. Now I,m not represented by a union, Do to being management. The union on our forest is considered a joke, there used to be big support for it with alot of people involved, but with the petty infighting people were frustrated and left.

R-5
as I said before you can hype the fwfsa but until results happen there will not be a broad base support. Also I have no intention of getting in a so called"pissing match". But sometimes you have to say the truth.

ab, I understand about the e-mail process no problem.

Hugh
12/23 An-R5er,
Pissing match?

I prefer to call what Hugh and I have just engaged in as "meaningful dialogue". Hugh has every right to his opinion and the freedom to express it in this and other forum's.

I was merely offering my opinion on the subject. As to having the last word........probably a genetic defect on my end............

Killer
12/23 The Jobs page and firefighter Series 462 and 455 pages are updated. There's a new Alaska hotshot job listing on the jobs page.

There's also a new ad on the Classifieds page.

Ab
12/23 Hugh,

Good point re: the GS-5. Hopefully the GS-5 will one day be a GS 8,9 or beyond and it will help. I spent quite a number of years until recently at the GS 5 and 6 level. Not too many years ago (1996) as a GS 6 Hotshot captain I made less than the GS-6 SQUAD BOSS's are making today.

Portal to portal? Obviously not yet. My point was that if you don't keep going after it, it surely won't happen! Anything that the FWFSA can do to improve both the present wages and retirement will benefit all grades.

The FWFSA continues to work these issues and more to improve our lot. Numbers are obviously needed. Nothing happens overnight, nor is it for free.

Govt. employees have historically been treated as second class citizens depending on the mood of the administration. Generally it entails smaller cola's than expected (as happened recently), but has also has included doing away with the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) and replacing it with FERS (I am one of the lucky ones who did not switch). In the early eighties OPM arbitrarily reduced all Govt. employee health benefits from 90-100% to 70 - 75%. This was an across the board cut in benefits.....an attempt to balance the budget on the backs of the federal employees. I could go on with other instances of Govt rollback of Federal Civilian pay and benefits but I think you get the point. In order to keep these types of things from happening we need a STRONG voice in congress. The FWFSA has the potential to be that voice with it's affiliations.

"Keep doing what you have always done and you will get what you always got"

be safe,
Killer
12/23 Hugh,

Killer's point was, has your local union gone to bat for you on this subject? Did your local union just go to Washington D.C. to lobby for portal to portal? I would put money on it and say NO.

Yes they did good things for the higher grades to get them true overtime, but you need to be patient when it comes to portal to portal. If you have been around as long as you say you have then you should already know how long it takes to get stuff passed through Congress.

We will see portal to portal and when it happens, even though you are not a member, you will be thanking the FWFSA for fighting for you and everyone else for finally getting some benefits for the lower grades.

Yes the FWFSA has some improving to do on updating and keeping people informed on the issues, but I think they are doing a good job and are willing to improve.

If I can give you a bit of advice, don't get into a pissing match with killer, because he will always have the last word and you will not find a more informed person on the issues than he is.

An-R5er
12/23 Hey Mellie!
How the heck are you?

Old Fire Guy
12/23 Re Bluecut Burnover

So where was 3512? Investigation teams do not produce the Green Sheets based on fantasy. (The Green Sheets are the CDF tool to get the facts out about any fatal or near miss incident within 7 days of the incident). The Green Sheets are just the facts based on corroborated statements from multiple witnesses or interviewees and or physical evidence. 3512 may have been in that position immediately prior to the burnover and left during or after. Please do NOT impugn the credibility of he Investigation team without some facts of your own. Believe me they would rather be doing anything else than investigating deaths and injuries. They can only produce the FACTS as they become clear from interviews and physical evidence. They were not there and they did not cause the accident. You only undermine all of our ability to learn from these incidents by implying that the Green Sheets are not factual. If there are inaccuracies that bear on the conclusions and sequence of events, then take them up the chain of command properly. We'd all like to get the real story. Otherwise please refrain from this kind of invective.

Fireball XL 5
12/22 Here's some cartoon fire humor:

Smokey's take on the new mascot, Reddy the Squirrel.

DF
12/22 just wanted yer f.f's to know thnks for all the help u gave us, especially u colorado guys.....I fought in some of the biggest fires in Alberta history, I sure do love them cobra birds u use, me sure like to take one for a rip around in the skies.....I sure hope that your govt will ask for our help when u are swamped, i was so surprised that that did'nt happened........i remembered fighting alongside Americans on the fire of 98 that surrounded our city of Fort Mcmurray in Alberta, sh*t that fire kept pushing us back and back......it is an honour , and i hope to see more of u guys again , hopefully!........see u on the line, breathing smoke and hotspotting....

Duke

12/22 Bob G and Firehorse,

FERS retirement is even more dismal than you describe. If you meet the
requirements for an immediate annuity (such as 55 years old with 30 years of
service, 60/20, 62/5, or in the case of the firefighter retirement system -
50 with 25 years service), and retire before you reach 62, you may be
(operative words - may be) entitled to an annuity supplement. Although it is
calculated in a similar manner, the supplement does not mimic the Social
Security you would receive if you were 62. Rather, the supplement is based
ONLY on your contributions to the SS system as a FERS employee. Assuming
that you also had some non-FERS Social Security contributions, your
supplement will be considerably less than your eventual Social Security
amount. The supplement also does not provide any type of COLA. That is, the
amount of supplement you get at pre-62 retirement will be exactly the same as
you will get at 62 - regardless of inflation. When you reach 62, the annuity
is shut off and Social Security kicks in (assuming of course, that you apply
for Social Security). Finally, the supplement is means-tested. That is, if
you take a part time job to make ends meet, and exceed an IRS threshold, the
supplement will be reduced. The only saving grace is that most of these
limitations are not placed on employees who retire with firefighter
retirement.

Puffin II
12/22 In response to concerns about firefighting crews being exposed to radiation during the Cerro Grande fire, I initiated a search of public information regarding radioactive contamination in the Los Alamos National Laboratories area. As a result I ran across a 1963 LANL memo which indicated that since the possibility of undetonated explosives existed in Bayo canyon Indian Forest Fire Fighting crews should be used to search for and collect it.

It appears that in response to a DOE request the USFS did provide the requested crews as part of the "clean up" process in Bayo Canyon. Two 13 man crews supplied by the Santa Fe office of the USFS spent 3 weeks collecting debris in the area. Though the debris "was considered radioactively contaminated" the only protective gear supplied to the crews were film badges and gloves. The "tremendous amount" of contaminated debris was placed in burlap bags by the crews who walked "elbow to elbow" in the "heavily contaminated area". According to this memo the crews collected about " 90 truckloads" of debris from the Bayo Canyon test site (TA 10). Previously Indian Forest Fire Fighting crews had provided the service of searching for unexploded ordnance on military firing ranges. I wonder why the DoD did not want to use military personnel for this.

A LANL press release on the effort (falsely) indicated that no explosives were found on what was described as an "explosive impact area" and that only "one truckload" of scrap metal and harmless practice shells" were collected.

I found this info on the DOD/DOE site dealing with documents relating to "Human radiation experiments". The crews were from the Zia and Jemez Pueblos. I have a list of most of their names.

If these folks were exposed to radioactivity in 1963 and were unaware of it they should be contacted. I do not know how to do so but hope that you may. Given the tendency of LANL to withhold and cover-up information which could expose LANL to liability (which continues to the present) I suspect that they were not completely truthful with the crews that were employed in the TA 10 clean up effort.

To find the documents go to http://hrex.dis.anl.gov/ and type Bayo Canyon Cleanup in the search box. Although these are public documents use of the site is recorded and monitored.

Can anyone help me contact these firefighters? Upon request I can supply their names.

Dana
danalinscott@yahoo.com

12/22 Just heard on the news that that because the government spent so much on fire suppression this past year they are going to take money back from firefighters who made overtime…did anyone hear this? This seems so unrealistic, too take money away from us that we earned with our sweat and sometimes blood! Someone please enlighten me on what is really happening….

------------ next e-mail
Well I found some more information, I love how local news never makes anything clear. The only ones who were ordered to payback money were firefighters who earned more than $ 121,600, which is supposedly the max limit on their salary. I guess it affected two dozen federal employees, fire mangers and other forest supervisors. Even though myself and other ground pounders will not be affected I still feel that those men and woman earned that money and should not have to payback money.

FFEric

FFEric, this was discussed a bit last week. I see there's an article on the fire news page. Ab.
12/22 Re CDF Cutbacks:

The USFS is hiring, go to USA Jobs.com

JB

12/22 Ab , to clarify I have 18 seasons with the Forest Service. I have E-mailed a couple of times. Killer, Have you seen Portal to Portal ? all I've seen is Wait tell next Year. I did e-mail my congressman with the form letter awhile back asking for there support. The point still remains THE PEOPLE WANT TO SEE RESULTS AT THE LOWER LEVELS TO HAVE A BIGGER BASE OF SUPPORT. To a gs-5 a gs-9 making full wages does not impact them.

On another note, the R-5 Aviation team program is a good program. I encourage people to apply.

Hugh

Sometimes my spam filter puts things in a junk folder that I later delete. If you did e-mail, it may have ended up there. I think I did pull your last message out of the junk mail... as I recall... Ab.

12/22 First offer CDF cutbacks

The information I heard from a CDF Asst. Deputy Director is:
- All Lookouts
- Ukiah and Porterville Air Bases. The three airtankers to be reassigned
       and the two OV-10's to be used as spares.
- 20+ bulldozer units (I don't remember the exact number)
- 80 engines (almost 4 per Unit)
- 28 camps (56 to about 100 crews).

All of these are preliminary based on Gov. Davis' request for a projected
20% cut from all agencies. The legislature will deal with the actual
numbers in the state budget, usually due on June 30th and usually late. Stay
tuned, the count and the amount will probably change.

JW

Resources the interface Public can't afford to loose. Ab.
12/22 www.hawkesburyrfs.com.au/

Abs,

This is the web page from my adjoinging district. This is the thermal
image of the fire at 19.00 when the fire started around 15.30.
www.hawkesburyrfs.com.au/downloads/thermal.jpg. The 2nd is a
more comprehensive map of later when the 3 (the thermal was of the
"Chilvers" fire) fires we had finally came together at
www.hawkesburyrfs.com.au/downloads/redgables.jpg 2 days later.

Merry Xmas

OB

Merry Christmas to all you Aussies. Be Safe. Ab.

12/21 Hope you all are enjoying your families. Ab.
12/21 nm_fire_gypsy,

I have accumulated quite a bit of info on radioactivity in the Los Alamos area which you may be interested in. It may not be appropriate to post here. I have maps which might help you determine if you are working in an area which could be abnormally hazardous, I also have links to declassified DoD and DOE documents regarding the area.

Since LANL actively engaged in misinformation campaigns in the past (for national security) much of the "public info" may be inaccurate or confusing. It may be up to the individual firefighter to make certain he/she is not being put in harms way. In areas that may be salted with radionucleotides even once the fire is out the danger of being "burned" may remain.

I would suggest that at the very least you may wish to research the history of TA 49/ the Helitac base.

I was going to suggest that you may wish to purchase your own film badges since they are not being supplied to you. But it is not that simple. Film badges only measure x and y rays. One of the great dangers in working in areas where there may be airborne particles of radioactive material is inhalation or ingestion. Film badges don't measure that.

Anyone that is interested in more info should feel free to contact me.
Dana
danalinscott@yahoo.com
12/21 Dana/Ab:

Well I am one of those firefighters who is currently
working on various mitigation projects in and around
Los Alamos on a daily basis. We have been doing
extensive "Bug Kill" removal and Hazard tree removal
(the County was given several Million dollars post
Cerro Grande to deal with all "dead" trees and fuels
removal). While we are not the ones in Bayo Canyon
(that was contracted out)...I have become concerned.
Most of the folks who have mentioned concern were on
the Cerro Grande. Most were there for only a
relatively short period of time; in going back and
counting the days we have worked in Los Alamos on
projects, it has totaled more days than most folks
spent up here for the fire.

I have heard stories from various VERY reliable
sources of Canyons in the area where personnel are
REQUIRED to wear felt soled boots, due to the fact
that if a rock got caught in a lug sole (for example)
and created a spark with another rock, it would cause
an explosion.

The Helitack base is located on TA-49 where explosions
and testing still occur frequently and this is where
FS helitack and NPS fire personnel PT; in this area
there are metal pieces from these explosions strewn
across these trails near the Helitack base.

Los Alamos County firefighters are required to carry
badges with them that measures how much radiation they
have been exposed to on a daily basis and through the
length of their career. They are given a bit of a
briefing of what they may be exposed to while employed
there. For those of us who are required to work up
there (because it is part of our district and that is
where the work is..aka that is where the $ is); we are
putting ourselves at a similar level of exposure over
the short term and long term. Yet we continue to go up
there with out the slightest clue, in most cases, of
what we are being exposed to. We have to same right to
know as the County Firefighters.

Dana, thank you for that bit of information, I
certainly appreciate any information I can get to
support my concern.

nm_fire_gypsy
12/21 Ab-

I installed netscape 7.01 on my computer and I lost all my emails,
email addresses and bookmarks. It has taken a few days of computer work
by me to fix the problems. I'm working on scanning more pics to put up
on the web site. One quick thing... if you look at the map of the
bluecut burn over, notice where B3512s vehicle is located. This is an
error on the part of the investigators, I personally raised hell because
he was NOT in that location during the burnover, but the final report
had been done.

Also, for the person wondering about the CDF budget cuts,
I have heard of, but not seen, the email detailing the closure of ALL
lookouts, (doesn't include lookouts paid for by industry i.e. logging
companies) and the closure of Ukiah AAB and the closure of the
CDF AAB stuff at Porterville, i'm sure there will be cuts in
engines/dozers/crews but not yet.

Thanks
B

Here again are the bluecut burnover photo (you can see the 2 firefighters and the engine in the middle of the flames on the large version) and the green sheet investigation. B, NorCal Tom asked about any lessons learned from that incident. I'm curios too. Ab.
12/21 To everyone in Region 5,

There is talk of putting together another Region 5 Aviation Training Program next year. The applications, my guess would be available in January or February and the first class's might start in March.

There might be some requirements this time, such as Single Resource Boss and Helicopter Crewmember. Those of you who are interested keep your eye's open for the announcement. This program is well worth it, you can not beat the training and experience.

An-R5er
12/21 To the doubter of FWFSA (post of 12/20 to ANF),
Do you call true OT no results? Hopefully you will be in a position soon to benefit from it. About an 8 step 6 in So Cal (Captain Level). Do you think that the Forest Service gave that to its employees out of the goodness of its heart?

3% at 50 is a wonderfull goal that will benefit all........Reading some of the previous posts concerning retirement it is easy to see how important this would be...

Portal to Portal.......hmmmmmmmmm is the Forest Service or OPM going to give that to us out of generosity? NOT!!!!!!!

The folks who have and do make up the FWFSA are not paid, have real jobs, real families and lives. They have worked tirelessly for the benefit of all wildland firefighters.

The FWFSA will continue to have my support...........


Brushmonkey,
Got a call from a partner at PTV last week. Seems CDF is pulling out of Porterville T-Base. Sounds like they will relocate the S-2 (T-76) to Fresno and I am not sure whether or not they plan to staff AA-410.

Killer
12/20 Happy Holidays,

With the state budget cuts here in California can any of the CDF folks tell me what this is going to do to the staffing levels on the state equipment and if there are going to be cuts of engines, dozers and any cuts to the air show. At 34B$ it's hard to imagine CDF not taking at least some cuts. Any info would be helpful.

Merry X-MASS
Brushmonkey
12/20 Got a note from an Aussie friend with the CFA (Country Fire Authority) in the area north of Melbourne: they're expecting temps at 108F, RH of 5%, and winds of 40 kph.

As we sit back in the rain/snow/cold over the Xmas holidays, keep our Aussie mates in your thoughts! And tip a cold brew to their safety, too!!

Dick Mangan
12/20 anf, This is why fwfsa has not had major suport, lack of timely information, and just a bunch of promises but no results for the lower grade folks. the only way fwfsa will get major support is if they have positive results, and not just token crumbs handed out. the way it is now people just don't beleive it warrants alot of attention or time to join. Hugh

P.S hey ab how about a post none of my others comments have made it. no I.m not a rookie 18+ seasons in the service

We have gotten no other e-mails from you. Are you a federal employee? Ab.

12/19 To anybody who went to the (fwfsa) meeting in Sac on last Sat. let us know what the talk was about any good or bad news. Been looking on their web site and nothing has been updated.

Signed ANF
12/19 Ab,

Here are some pics of various fires throughout the 2001/2002 fire seasons. My name is KC from the Prairie Band of Potawatomi Nation Type 6 Engine Crew in Kansas.

Thanks, great site.
KC

Some nice photos, KC. I put them on the Fire 15, Heli 8, Handcrew 7, and Engines 5 photo pages. While on those pages, look for the other really fine photo contributions from BWC and from "Just Another Driver". Check also AirTankers 6 for a great T-22 drop photo from BWC. Some terrific photos for sure. Christmas is coming. [Little Santa jig] Ab.

12/19 Hi Ab,

These are a couple of pics from the McNally Fire on the Sequoia. One is of the plume coming towards our structure group that we were protecting and successfully did so. The second was of our engine drafting from the Boy Scout camp pond when look who showed up to join us... quite windy for sure.

Have a good one,
Just a Driver

Nice photos, Just a Driver. Check my note on the post above for the links to the correct pages. Ab.

12/19 Well, the power has been out for 4.5 hours. Thought it might be a whole 23.99 hr that PG&E is allowed before fines kick in. Phew, back up and running. Ab.
12/19 Bob G made a comment in his 12/18 post that needs some emphasis from a retiree.

For many of you just starting out with an appointment as a federal employee, retirement is the last thing on your mind. It was on mine until I was within 5 years of retirement. Boy were my eyes opened wide when the first check came in! It ain't that much folks. You better have all your big bills (house, car, etc...) paid off and no kids to send through college when the day comes because if you are relying solely on your retirement to live on, you are in for a very rude awakening!! This is especially true if your spouse does not work, or you have no other source of income. Depending upon where you live, in most cases you will have to find another job to supplement your retirement check.

What I am trying to tell you is plan now, when your career starts. It does not take much to secure your future 20-30 years down the road. $25/month in investments will pay huge dividends in 30 years. Will make the difference between living comfortably and having to find work to make ends meet. The feds have a pre-retirement session. Inform your supervisor you want to go. If you supervise someone, send them.

Don't make the same mistake I and many other retirees have made because we could/would not look beyond the next fire season.

Firehorse
12/19 Nepper,

If you are worried about heat then you don't want a pair of Kevlar pants. They are hotter then the regular nomex pants and when you first get them your skin gets irritated a little.

I have a couple of pairs of Kevlar's and I am happy that I got them, I feel they give me more protection and they don't have that thin feel that the new nomex pants have.

I got mine from a company out of Porto Rico, I got the number from an ex-jumper. The company is called JG Industries, you can contact them at 1-787-834-4477

Hope this helps out.
An-R5er
12/18 All the publications from the USFS T&D Centers in Missoula and San Dimas are now available on the Web to all users at
www.fs.fed.us/t-d/
The user name: t-d
The Password: t-d

Good stuff, not only in Fire, but in all aspects of Forestry and Natural Resources Management...... and free for the taking, too!

Mollysboy

I put it on the links page under federal so's ya can always find it even if ya forget how. Ab.
12/18 Forest Service employees under FERS or FERS/CSRS OFFSET retirement systems need to beware of whats happening with this Region 3 Overtime pay back!

As a fers or fers offset employee if you have any pay limitations put on you (now or in the future as you climb the pay ladder), such as a hourly, pay period or annual limit, IT WILL AFFECT YOUR MONTHLY RETIREMENT INCOME! For some this seems way down the road, but today can affect your retirement 20 years from now.

Being under fers or fers offset means you pay into Social Security per pay period. Depending how much you pay into S.S. depends on how much you will get monthly for that part of your retirement income. You cannot collect your S.S. until your 62 but if you retire earlier lets say 45 (as I did) the Forest Service has to pay you monthly what S.S. should be paying you. In other words the Forest service must make up that monthly income amount until you reach 62. The calculation on how much you get is BASED upon what you paid into S.S. !! Bottom line... don't let someone in D.C. put a limit on how much you are DUE of what you actually earned hourly, per pay period or annually! IT WILL affect your retirement!

Bob G
Retired Captain
Engine 11
12/18 SEAT v. Airtankers
SEAT's are airtankers
This isn’t an A v. B issue. It is single engine airtankers as part of the
aviation fleet. Many of the original airtankers were…single engine
aircraft! N3N’s (up to 300 gallons), TBM’s (600 gl), and Af’s (1,000 gl),
to name a few. As requirements changed over time the desire for two engines
for safety drove the use of S2’s, B-25’s, B-26’s, B-18’s and others for
light (Type 3), and medium (Type 2) airtankers. Type 1 airtankers evolved
from the old “heavies”, B-17’s (2,000 gl), DC-4’s (1,800 gl), C-119’s (1,800
and 2,000 gl), DC-6’s (2,400 to 3,000 gl) and DC-7’s (3,000 gl). We are
still using many of these aircraft along with the “new” large airtankers.

What has caused “recent” interest in single engine Type 3 and 4 airtankers
is the airtanker deployment and management system. The out-of-date National
Air Tanker studies (NATS 1 & 2) focused on large airtankers at widely
separated bases for the cost efficient delivery of cargo over long routes.
I don’t know what window of opportunity was established as the initial
attack containment factor.

States that don’t have reliable access to, or the ability to pay for,
federal assets have developed air programs based on what they can afford and
what will work most of the time. Agricultural aircraft of various sizes are
plentiful and fairly inexpensive. They are designed to carry and dispense a
powder or liquid cargo from the air, sounds like an airtanker to me.

Federal agencies feeling that they aren’t being serviced by the national
airtanker system went “under the radar” to rediscover the small airtanker.
Why? Access to the resource, control of the resource, and cost.

The SEAT program suffers its own problems mostly due to it origins and use.
As an ATGS in the “mainstream” I see some problems that are preventing a
smooth incorporation of SEAT airtankers into the total aviation community.

Pilot training
What is the firefighting experience required of the SEAT pilot? To be
certified (carded) as an IA airtanker pilot in the federal system takes
about five years. In the CDF system there is a one-year dual pilot training
program and part of a second year flown with a “standardization” pilot for
final certification.

Aircraft capabilities
Type 1 and 2 airtankers have to have certified tanks that meet coverage
levels (flow rates) determined by retardant scientists. What coverage
levels required of the small tanks? An important point is that the National
Airtanker Board has never enforced its own requirement that large airtankers
should have constant flow tanks. They still grandfather 1950’s style tanks
as acceptable.

In the wake of the large airtanker groundings many agricultural aircraft
were signed up as SEAT operators. What was the quality control process and
do the aircraft meet firefighting needs?

Interaction with other air resources
How are the SEAT airtankers managed and controlled? I recently spoke with
one SEAT operator, who has worked on both sides of the airtanker fence, that
says that it is like the Wild West on SEAT operations.

We have always had some type of vertical separation between aircraft types
(copters and fixed wing) which has been restructured as the Fire Traffic
Area (FTA). This air traffic control system puts aircraft in specific
locations for safety. The biggest complaints I’ve heard about, not
personally experienced, are SEAT pilots operating in the helicopter
altitudes and communication problems with other aircraft. Under the
operating standards if contact with an aircraft over a fire cannot be
accomplished all air operations are to stop. Does this meet the needs of
the ground firefighters?

Let’s stop the A v. B mentality and work to incorporate single engine
airtanker program as one of the resources in the total mix of air program
resources. Note that the theme of cost runs through most of the decisions
made. There are other ways to measure success and suitability.

For an interesting concept of managing the airtanker program go to the
following link written by William B. Scott; Rocky Mountain Editor, Aviation
and Space Weekly. He is one of the members of the Blue Ribbon Panel on
Aerial Firefighting. The Jim Hull who wrote a response is Texas State
Forester Jim Hull, also a member of the panel.
www.airtanker.com/wwwboard/messages/2375.html

The BRP report is available at the NIFC web page.

JW
12/18

[Image] White House Shield
The White House
Washington DC
December 2002

To the Employees of the Federal Government

I send greetings to all Federal Employees and your families as you celebrate this holiday season.

The men and women who dedicate themselves to Federal Service help strengthen our Nation. Federal Employees carry out countless essential responsibilities that include maintaining critical government services, ensuring economic growth, and supporting efforts to extend peace and freedom around the world.

Laura joins me in thanking you and wishing you health and happiness in the year ahead. May God bless you and your families, and may God continue to bless America.

/s/ George Bush

12/18 Here's a link to an AZ Central article sent in by Firescribe:

Fire managers with too much OT getting billed by feds
www.azcentral.com/news/articles/1217Firepay18-ON.html

Thanks. Good one. Ab.

12/18 Ab, a few comments on SEAT's from an Australian perspective.

Single Engine Air Tankers, known here as 'fixed wing bombers' have been an integral part of Australian firefighting for a number of years now. We have never had successful use of multi engine bombers, but the likes of Air Tractors and Dromaders have been very successful when used in conjunction will our light and medium helicopters with buckets and bellytanks, and of course more recently the 3 Erickson AirCranes, "Elvis", "Georgia Peach" and "Incredible Hulk" who have excelled in doing the heavy stuff. Thinking back over the last 10 years or so I cannot recall any loss of life of pilots or aircrew or major accidents involving firefighting aircraft in Australia. I suspect that should the era of multi-engine airtankers come to a close in the US, in a few years time SEAT's and rotary wing aircraft will have more than competently filled the gap.

Regards - Peter T.

Thanks for your observations, Peter. However, our needs in the US differ somewhat from yours in Australia.

Readers, please read the beginning or all of John Watt's letter to the Blue Ribbon Panel regarding use of air resources on fires. There are reasons why we need all resources available and he spells them out quite well. Ab.

12/17 Ab

I am trying to find out about some management teams that you don't have listed on your Type1 and Type 2 IMT links pages. If anyone knows anything about or is a member of the any of the teams listed, below, I am trying to contact people from:

Meuchel's Area Command Team
Gage's Type 1 IMT
Edrington's Area Command Team
Praytor's Type 2 IMT
Carr's T2 IMT
Smith's T2 IMT
Furlong's T2 IMT
Ostman's T2 IMT
Ziemann's Natl Park Service All Risk Mgt Team

Thanks
-The Nomad

Things do change in 2+ years. Steve Gage rotated off as IC of CIIMT 3 last year and Joe Wood took over. Joe has since retired, but we've left his name as IC, for the moment. I think Edrington's Area Command Team had a website last summer but I can't find it right now. Area Command Teams coordinate multiple teams on fires and complexes so as to insure appropriate flow of resources.

If only Mellie had made these team lists sooner and we had them archived somewhere, they'd be easier to track. HAW, good job Mellie. Readers, can you fill us in? I noticed the NPS teams are not on any lists. We should add them. Anyone have info and links on those?

Ab.
12/17 Some comments on SEATs

RE says, "Altitudes have nothing to do with SEATs." That's like saying elevation has nothing to do with pumps. The amount of retardant that the SEAT can carry will be limited by the density altitude and runway length.

In answer to ECC4U question the length of the runway will depend on the type of aircraft you are using. The minimum length for the smallest SEATs would be 2800 feet. The larger SEATs like AT802 need longer runways to operate at their maximum capacity. We look for runways of 5000 feet or more. We have shut down asphalt roads to operate SEATs from on some west Texas fires.

SEATs are not a magic bullet, however they do fill a need and RE is correct in that they work best on initial attack.

r3taz you say you have used SEATs a lot, but were they all the same? There is a big difference between a Trush with 300 gallons and an Air Tractor with 800 gallons. To most folks all engines look alike, but we know they all have different capabilities and tank sizes. It's the same in SEAT operations, all aircraft are not equal. So you need to know what type of aircraft you are working with.

ECC4U would suggest you contact the BLM state aviation officer for more information on SEAT operations.

"Boo"
12/17 The Jobs page and firefighter Series 462 and 455 pages are updated.

If you're in need of gear or Christmas presents, please check our classified vendors. They help us pay the expenses here at wildlandfire.com.

Ab.
12/17 With the new fire shelters coming, many fire packs need to be retrofitted to the new size of shelter. The dimensions of the new folded shelter are: 9" x 5 3/4" x 4 1/2" Depending which pack design you have, pack manufacturers and smokejumper bases should be able to sew up a new fire shelter pouch to get your packs ready for the new shelter.

Jumpr
12/17 My "two cents" on the SEAT vs Tankers.

All pieces of equipment have their time and place on fires. Small planes, large planes, Type 6 engines, Type 2 or 3 and don't we have four types of hand crews more if you count trainees, and three types of helicopters and categories under that. Again it is closest available resource and then order more if you don't catch it small.

SEATs have their place, but I agree with others it is sure great to hear and see those heavys coming in, but I would take anything close if a firefighter is in danger. I have ordered a type III helicopter to do drops on jumpers that were getting run out because the heavys were reloading, 1/2 turn around time.

Remember use the "tools" you have on hand then order things you need, that is the dispatchers job to get the fire folks what they need and want.

Aircraft Dispatcher.

12/17 NCCrew,

How are you supposed to access the system if you don't already have an
account? It gave me some message that I needed to access it "through an
agency page" to start a new account.

A little confused.
The Nomad
12/17 NC,

After talking to you on the phone today I played around with the new application process. I found that you can apply to a specific Forest. After going through the steps and you come to the location portion, all you have to do i keep scrolling down the page and you will come to all the different Forest's you can apply for. Click on the Forest you want and you are done, the only thing I didn't do was try and select more than one Forest.

Hope this helps you and everyone else who is applying for a seasonal position. For those applying for permanent positions the old process, going through ASAP, is still in effect until round 15 is over. The new application process is only for seasonal positions. Happy job hunting.

R-5 recruiter
12/16 Hey AB(s) and ALL,

Being the eager seasonal hopeful that I am, I have waited ever so anxiously for the new hiring system to replace the Form C. You can see the new system and apply yourselves at: www.avuedigitalservices.com/usfs/applicant.html.

Most of the fire jobs opened up today (Dec/16).
Pretty neat setup, only you can't apply to a forest, you can only apply to a region.
Anyone out there know all the IN's and OUT's of this new system? Like how do you know if you being considered and such.

-NCCrew
12/16 I'm interested in purchasing the Kevlar/nomex tan pants I see some of hotshot crews wear. Is there a GSA contract for such a item? Can anyone tell me why the government chose the color green for pants. I'm tired of working in 100 degree temperatures in colors that attract heat.

Great web site AB,
Nepper

12/16 Hello all..

I just want to let ppl know... I would rather have a Seat come in on IA.
Were I am at it takes 1 hour to get a heavy there. Might as well use the
seat to go for it til the heavy gets there.. and after the heavy gets there
lets keep the seats goin cause its a 2 hour round trip for the heavy to get
back.. Alls I know is that the 2 Seat planes saved my life when I was in
danger.. I got burned over in 2000 and they stayed there and dropped on the
first sign they saw of me... they are capable of flying into tight spots
and landing in tight spots. Altitudes have nothing to do with a seat.. They
just don't have the power to drop up hill.. I wouldn't even want a Heavy
trying to drop up hill... And Seats don't need a lead plane..

thanks for reading..
RE
12/16 EEC4U,

My information maybe dated however SEATS can operate from unimproved roads. I have heard of some regions using modules of water tenders and support vehicles and operating near the fire off dirt roads that meet the take off and landing criteria. So your airports should be no problem to operate from. As far as altitude that could limit the payload they carry.

It will be interesting to see how the USFS is going to fill in the gaps of those tankers bases they are going to close. I can see the use of more Type I modules and SEATS to fill in those gaps. Time will tell.

RC

12/16 Ab,

Last week I sent in a loooong post regarding radioactive contamination of Bayo Canyon. I realized it might be inappropriate in its entirety and encouraged you to freely edit or even not post if you felt it was over the line. You chose to not post. In retrospect I think that was probably best.

But...
There was a link to a map of known "contamination sites" in the Cerro Grande area that might be useful in helping firefighters determine if they may have been exposed to radioactivity during that assignment. The map is not the best quality and so I also included two other links to help show where these contaminated sites are, relative to roads etc.

Interactive map of contaminated sites around Los Alamos lab (LANL)
http://www.lasg.org/mda2_b.html

Two other DOE maps of the area

http://www.em.doe.gov/bemr96/gif/lanl4.gif

http://www.em.doe.gov/bemr96/gif/lanl1.gif

I have reviewed maps of the burned area and am unable to find a map which provides a very good "overlay". Unfortunately it appears that more than a few of the contaminated/disposal areas noted on the first map are well within the perimeter of the CG fire.

Feel free to pass these on to anyone that is concerned or post them as FYI to firefighters that fought the Cerro Grande Fire or participated in remediation later.

I hope this is useful and appropriate.
Dana
12/16 Dear Abs,

Gotta jump in on the conversation with this one. The dispatcher is correct in a lot of ways about SEATs but I think a little confused when things get hot and go beyond a single tree or 1/4 acre fire. Its a welcome sight to have a wide load come in on the deck with a capacity to do a job. I have used both types of aircraft extensively in many different applications and can say that SEATs are not the cats meow when it comes to coverage. Big birds serve their purpose well and should not be taken out of the picture....however I do agree that safety issues need to be addressed which may include upgrading the fleet.

I hope we are not working up a debate on who's who when it comes retardant application!

r3firetaz
12/15 I'm a dispatch manager in a forest that has some lighter fuels areas. Can anyone tell me what the parameters are for take-off and landing for the SEATs? Like how long the runway needs to be, elevation concerns, etc. We've a few smaller county airports within the forest. I think they'd do great. I've always thought so, but I haven't had much (any) support.
ecc4u
12/15 Dear Ab and All....

As for all the AT (Air Tanker) talk... As of now, all c130's pb4y's, jump planes (minus Casa's), and barons (Lead Planes) are not looking so good. .......FOR NOW! Who knows what will be down the road. It's really political for now -- thank goodness it's "off season" for most. The www.airtanker.com is a great source for anybody interested in ships. Please go there to keep up to date. They are unique and great individuals on that board. Feel free to "lurk". As for SEAT's (single engine air tankers).....they are awesome as one of the "tools" in the toolbox. We have dealt with them for several years and whenever we call on them they are awesome and well received. As for them replacing the heavy's.......come on! Hello! That's like saying that Type II crews are going to cover for Smokejumpers because they don't have a jump ship. I think that SEAT's are going to increase in the near future because we need to "keep them small" and SEAT's are used most for Initial Attack -- think about it -- what will our focus be in the future -- KEEP IT SMALL. They are an Initial Attack tool that are very effective. They are not huge like a heavy, but they are a tool and if used quickly they can help ground crews out. Bigger is not always better.... Please folks, be careful what you say in these times of great changes in aircraft.....they are in a big transition with the Blue Ribbon Panel Report and can use all the support you can give them.

Thank you....

"a dispatcher"
12/15 Reading your last post about The Single Engine Air Tanker.. I have worked with them for the last four years and I can honestly say they are very very effective. They are more moveable than a Heavy, They don't need a lead plane unless they are over 800 gallons. SO most of the seats you will see they are either 600 or 800 gallons. The 800 gallon tankers are goin to load 799 gallons so that way they can fly with out a lead plane and it cuts down on the wait for them to get there.. They are capable of spliting the load. I have a few friends who are pilots and they fly seats and they think they will be the thing of the future.

Fight Fire
12/15 Curius,
I have it from a reliable source at NIFC that there will be far fewer heavy airtankers 03'
In their place they plan an expansion of the SEAT program, not a lot of details, but thats what i am told.
eric
12/15 curious,
Check out the Airtankers Assoc. Message Board for comments on the BRP. Go to LINKS then AVAITION then ASSN AIRTANKERS PILOTS. The AAP page is the same kind of page as this but all about and dealing with the air world, mostly airtankers.

Aircraft Dispatcher
12/15 I read Jumping Fire two years ago during the 2000 fire season. I thought the book was terrific. GN
See the rest of GNs review here: Jumping Fire
12/15 Been waiting but I have not read any postings about the Blue Ribbon report. Sounds like there might be some big changes in aviation, especially in Region 5.

I have been hearing rumors of 5 airtanker bases being closed next year because the planes that were there have been grounded by the FS indefinitely. What will they be replaced with? or will they be replaced at all?

curious
12/15 Dear Wildland Fire,

I am a singer/songwriter in the folk music field who is putting out a CD of
my songs, called "After the Fire." I am looking for information about a
particular photo, which appears on the National Fire News page (see
attachment). It is the third one down on the page, with the forest floor
and upright trees burning. Have you seen it, and if so, do you know who the
photographer is? I would like to use this for the cover of my CD, but I
want to give credit.

I would greatly appreciate any help you could give me.

Yours truly,

Paul Kaplan

Paul, you may have more success asking the NIFC folks (phone-208-387-5457). Here's a link to the photo you referred to which is on the NIFC National Fire News page.

12/14 So with that jumper doll, is there a cord you can pull that says "NO ROAD ACCESS"?
It would only be appropriate if you were standing on a designated U. S. Interstate!

Palos
12/14 re: the jumper/firefighter doll

HA, HA....I was thinking the same thing..great prop for numerous gags! Or to get for little jonny/janie who thinks its so cool that their dad/mom is a firefighter. Now y'all dont forget to buy it after you linked to amazon from wildlandfire.com!!! (hey Ab, do I get brownie points fer that????)

oh yea, Speakin of MRE's, I just recently used one of those heater bags for the first time just to see what it was like (...SHADDUP! Best you could get back when I was humpin the line was the beenie weenie in the C-ration box!....and Im not even gonna mention hair nets!) It was pretty cool I thought...the heater bag that is.

Later
Pulaski
12/13 Greetings all,

Every once in a while I stumble onto a software program that makes me sit up and take note. In this case, it was "why didn't I look for this before?". As I was sitting and talking with the Reno Nevada NOAA meteorologists last week preparing for our soon to become reality change in how we receive our fire weather forecasts, they mentioned that they provided updates through the day for any changes in their forecasts. Especially significant wind/thunderstorm events. They asked how I would like to receive the announcements. I mentioned email, but they said that there were those who already said they didn't want it because they didn't want any more out-dated email clogging their boxes during times they were absent.

They said it sounded like the dispatch centers they had already talked to preferred to have a fax sent. Well, I don't like faxes, I think they are way outdated and a waste of paper and ink. Don't get me wrong, I still enjoy cutting down trees just to watch them fall. But when I get busy doing my little initial attack dispatching or MIRPS thing, I don't have time to, can't hear, nor do I have the luxury of getting up and checking the fax machine. I didn't mention the possibility of using the DMS system, wherein any dispatcher could be alerted and retrieve the updates, but I told them I had seen somewhere of a software program that can monitor websites for page updates.

You non-dispatchers stay with me here, I'm getting to the good part. So I went looking for the kind of program I had seen somewhere prior. Here's what I found after researching and trying quite a few different programs: WebMon

It's easy to configure, very small footprint (memory), and best of all, it's free! You tell it which specific web pages you want to watch for changes, which specific parts of the web pages you want to monitor, then it sits in your System Tray and lets you know by visual and/or audio alerts whenever it happens. You can have it check from every minute up to hourly time periods. It will watch different pages and allow different time settings.

Why am I telling you all this? Don't you want to know when They Said has been updated? We're using it in our shop now to let us know when the Redding Fire Weather Forecast is posted. It works like a charm. No more guessing and wasting our time.

The home website for the program has lots of info and examples on how to set it up. Here tis again:
http://www.markwell.btinternet.co.uk/webmon/index.html

If you still need help, ask Ab to forward a message to me and I'll try to help ya set it up.

ECC1

Thanks ECC1, I downloaded it and tried it for a couple days before posting your message. It seems to work as well as you said, and as they state on their website, there are no advertisements and it doesn't appear to have any "spyware" attached! I also like the ability to click on the "alert box" and have the monitored page open up automatically. Ab.

12/13 Cerro Grande Radiation

Abs & All

As you may have noticed, I have taken some strong interest in this Cerro Grande radiation business. It's the journalist in me, really. Here's what I've found out- Bayo Canyon was the site of explosives testing from 1944-1961. The area contains Uranium, Plutonium, and Strontium-90 (a derivative of uranium) leftovers in the form of soil, vegetative matter, and shrapnel. This is some seriously bad shit. Although there was a cleanup effort in 1995-1996 to remove the Strontium-90 shrapnel from the site, all the vegetation in the area contains concentrated levels of the radioactive materials from 4 decades of sucking up the radioactive nutrients in the contaminated soil- hence the decision to prohibit logging in the area. The shrapnel was buried somewhere on site at Bayo Canyon, which may or may not explain BA's remark about green goo covered by clay tiles 8 inches under the surface.

I made some phone c