"THEY SAID IT" ARCHIVES
November, 2004
Home of the Wildland
FireFighter
| DATE |
|
| 11/30 |
Dear Old Fire Guy
Sorry, I didn't see your post until scrolling down today. I've got my hunch as to who you are and if I'm right, many of us at the FWFSA have a great deal of respect for you. You oughtta join!!!
I think all of us are entitled to at least one diatribe per congressional session although my posts, as usual (at least in my lowly opinion) are for the purposes of educating rather than ranting and raving. Of course after hearing about comments attributed to the R-5 Regional Forester against our Association and its efforts, I guess I'll settle for diatribe.
There are many folks in the FS leadership that have demonstrated their support for their firefighters. There are others who, quite frankly, couldn't tell a firefighter from a nuclear engineer and have even less practical fire experience. You, as an old fire guy, likely have far more practical fire experience than the Regional Forester or Chief.
Nonetheless, I'm sorry if you construed my comments as being inflammatory. I prefer to call them honest and factual. I've never been one to sugar coat or "spin" the information that those I represent deserve to know. Perhaps that was what got me in trouble with the IAFF. They, like many large unions, (and political parties) like to spin their commentary to put out what they want their members to hear. I on the other hand, provide information, good or bad, to those I represent. If my information and data were not accurate, we would not have been able to even get a bill written. You must know credibility is EVERYTHING in this business, especially when trying to get something from congress. It has taken us years and years to establish that credibility.
There is nothing that I have posted with respect to data, information etc., that has not been born out as factual either to members of congress or by them. I appreciate and respect the
toeing of the proverbial "company line" with respect to your comments about appropriations, but I think there are several inferences one could draw from your comments.
As an experienced lobbyist, I know very well that the funds requested by an agency could very well be the sum authorized by congress. I would hope you agree that funds being authorized is one thing, funds being appropriated is an entirely different matter.
I would hope that you would also agree that many agencies submit a budget request only to be provided (appropriated) with funds that are far less than asked for. My point was that the FS requested XYZ dollars for suppression even though they should have asked for ABC dollars. Congress gave them their XYZ money only to discover that the FS was borrowing from other programs to come up with the ABC dollars. There were several instances this session when congressional members criticized the FS for not asking for the appropriate amount of suppression dollars they needed in the first place so as to not have to borrow from other programs...thus a large supplemental appropriation so that the FS would no longer rob other programs. If you'd like just one name of those not happy with the FS financial requests, that would be Congressman Norm Dicks (D-WA). I'm sure I can dredge up some congressional record if necessary.
That leads me to the "deriding" comment. Same guy. As well as others. And he's a Democrat... Fact is, there were those from both sides of the aisle, inclusive of staff from a variety of committees and subcommittees dumbfounded that sufficient suppression dollars were not asked for in the first place. The congressional response was basically tell us what you need and we'll get it to you. If someone appropriating dollars told me that, I'd shoot for the moon...including telling congress "and by gosh, we need X number of dollars so that we can come into the 21st century and properly pay our firefighters like other federal agencies pay theirs..."
I certainly was not attempting to blame anyone for PTP's failure this session. Again, any "experienced lobbyist" knows how weird things work back there is DC. You can have a bill passed into law with 1 cosponsor and a bill with over half the House of Representatives on board as cosponsors doesn't get the time of day. One member of congress can kill a bill, regardless of support. Committee chairmen can literally kill a bill or move it based on their own whim...or what they can get for themselves.
In our particular case, we knew that such legislation would not be a stand alone bill, it would have to go on a must-pass bill. That meant maneuvering towards an end-of year appropriations bill like we did with the OT pay cap in 2000. The leadership had their significant influence this year and it appeared it was easier to insert a lot of spending pork that did not require a change in law as our legislation does.
In the end, I will meet with members of congress to identify the details of what needs to be done next session. I will say without a doubt, that when the Chairman of the House Resources Committee, a Deputy Majority Whip and many others with large forests in their districts say yes to this bill, then the failure has absolutely nothing to do with the
author... actually the congressional member who introduced the bill. The actual authors of the bill are FWFSA members who have worked tirelessly for years in their off time with congress, the Legislative Counsel, Civil Service Committee and others to craft a workable bill. In fact, the primary author is relied upon quite heavily by the FS in
R5... kind of ironic huh?
As you know, the major piece of legislation regarding the 9/11 commission report didn't get passed either because
of... politics. So, we dust off, knowing that our goals and objectives are not only meritorious but reachable and we press on. Even today, I received a letter from the congressman who introduced the bill categorically stating his "commitment through to the end" to see this bill signed into law.
Old Guy, the FWFSA is not the enemy of the FS. I think you know that. In fact, we've reached out to the FS offering our help after it (the FS) asked for our help on other issues. However if the leadership of the Agency in
DC (and yes there is some disconnect between the DC office and R5 I'm sure) and maybe at the Regional Forester level, would stop worrying about their political lives and take an active role in what's best for their firefighters, we could achieve far more than we all realize.
Respectfully,
Casey |
| 11/30 |
Lobotomy,
Like you, I grow weary of some of the whining misconceptions I hear on this site…..especially to the effect:
"They" could guarantee permanent full time work to all firefighters if "They" wanted to.
"They" could give us 24 hour pay (with OT beyond 8).
"They" could set up pay grades that would result in all seasonal firefighters making $100,000 per year.
"They" could guarantee a promotion accompanies every course I complete.
"They" could stop this 401 foolishness that mandates training plus education to become an upper level manager.
"They" could force Congress to give us all the money we want, or just tell us to spend like we had it.
Support the firefighters? I've got 30+ years of firefighting experience, including a southern California Hotshot Crew …so let's not play the "he's an outsider" card.
I do agree that one should always offer a solution, or at least an "idea" for discussion. I think I've done so in the past but let me share some thoughts again.
1. The 401 series might not be the right "number" but I don't care. What it does is set a goal of ensuring our fire leaders have both formal education in resources, and training and experience in fire. I firmly believe that it will result in a safer fire organization.
2. Career firefighter positions. We've seen a great increase in the number of career firefighters in the past few years and that's an improvement over the previous "seasonals only" approach. But, we will always need seasonal firefighters, AD's, the "militia" , our cooperators, and quality contractors (there are many).
3. Fire funding has grown tremendously, but let's be realists…..we will not soon see 100% MEL nor a blank check for all the fuels work we have waiting. Budgets are competitive and we just aren't going to win out against national defense, social programs, etc.
4. PTP? I support a different version. The main argument today seems to be: Hey! There's a lot of government waste and pork-barrel out there. Some "cooperators" or "contractors" are getting filthy rich (and I question that)……and I want to join that elite crowd! Well…..I don't think we'll find a lot of support for adding firefighters to the feed trough. Always the question of "How are you going to pay for this?"
5. Ah yes, the solution???? Again, how about a PTP for 24 hour pay at straight time? Do the math. Current 16 hour shift (with hazard pay) equates to 24 hours of straight time.
a. Advantage: Firefighters make the same $ as if they had a 16 hour shift every day. So….there is no advantage to "stretching" a 12-14 hour assignment. Instead, get back to camp and get rested. = SAFER
b. How are you going to pay for this? (and this question will not go away no matter how hard we wish it). A: Savings from the cumbersome and confusing costs of monitoring timesheets. No need for "red dogs" showing base, night differential, overtime, meal breaks, hazard pay. Gone for 14 days? Gee, 14x24=336 hours of straight pay……4th grade arithmetic. Selling points are Safety, and Cost Neutral.
Agree or disagree. Build or modify my ideas, or come up with your own. I think I've met the challenge of "put up or shut up". Ball is now in your court.
Old Fire Guy |
| 11/30 |
OKFIREMAN,
Please email Ab so we know yer addy. We have some emails with info
to forward on to you, except we deleted ya. Ab. |
| 11/30 |
Hi Ab,
I would like to know of any fatalities while performing the pack test.(2003/2004) I
would also like to know of any injuries. Please include as much information as you
have. I have downloaded all the information as to the tests make up. Thank you for
your help.
Thanks,
John
Here are two: WFF
list of the fallen. |
| 11/30 |
I am interested in volunteering in NC as a Prescribed Burn Volunteer
but am
required to have fire fighting training ("Red Card"
basic fire behavior, safety).
Not knowing if this is a professional course or something I can achieve
in a
volunteer status I thought I would do some research prior to going
any further
with this interest.
Any insight or direction you could give me would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Lynn Hunsicker
E-mail address: gailnlynn@nc.rr.com |
| 11/30 |
centered,
www.fs.fed.us/r5/fire/intel/
Under the Northern and Southern CA lists select Interagency Weather Fire
Center and that is where you will find links to the latest intel.
Hopefully
that helps you out. We have good fire weather folks and this is where
they
put their predictive services information. I don't know much about the
"temporary" sites so I don't know if this replaces them or
what. I just did
some quick geek searching to find this new site.
Hope that helps,
BLMgirl |
| 11/30 |
Dear Mr. Contractor:
Let's get things straight. There are a number of decent contractors out
there who play by the rules, whether they be in the business of fire
suppression of providing the government with some other service.
Unfortunately, some have also identified the Federal Government as a
cash cow and have learned to take advantage of the government. However,
let's not be naive. Contractors are in business to make a profit. You
don't say whether you are a firefighter working for a contract company,
or the owner of a contract company.
If you are a firefighter working for a contractor, if you aren't making
good money for the period of time you are working, then somebody is.
Furthermore, many contract companies fail to provide their employees
with proper benefits, which is why there has been legislation seeking
access to PSOB benefits for contractors who lose their lives on duty.
Frankly, we believe the Contractor ought to foot the bill to properly
cover their employees, not the federal government.
As for making a living...hardly. The FWFSA is a non-profit organization.
Additionally, we are not a union. We are simply an employee organization
working to bring benefits to federal wildland firefighters that they
deserve. Union militancy is the furthest thing from my character and if
you asked anyone who has known me and my union activities over the last
20 years, they will tell you that I did not, and still do not, believe
in militancy. Perhaps you are confusing militancy with passion.
Quite frankly, it is that passion (or militancy if you so chose) for our
Nation's federal wildland firefighters that has allowed me the
opportunity to gain access to both sides of the political aisle to gain
support for our issues. If I was simply a "labor union
militant" there would be no way on earth I could get a Republican
to author a bill like HR 2963 let alone get into his/her office.
Our support from both sides has been a result of years and years of
relationship building, education and factual information. The fact that
we, as a small group were able to get a bill introduced for portal to
portal, and get the OT cap eliminated in 2000 when the large, 260,000
member International Association of Fire Fighters labor union couldn't,
should tell you that we are far from the typical militant labor union
group.
With all due respect to you, the bottom line is that my job is to
represent our members which are federal wildland firefighters. As
federal employees, they are often taken advantage of by their Agency
with respect to pay and benefits. There lies a distinct inequity in the
manner in which the FS pays for suppression. There are too many studies
that demonstrate that contractors and cooperators significantly raise
the cost of fire suppression.
The cooperators are certainly our brothers and sisters in the
firefighting community. However many of them, when on a federal fire,
denounce the way in which our federal wildland firefighters are paid and
taken off the clock. And let's face it, if there was not a dollar to be
made in contracting with the federal government, there would simply be
no contractors.
Haven't you ever wondered why so many feds retire or resign from the FS
and take a job either for, or as a contractor? Wonder why so many
recruits get their training and then jump ship to cooperators?
All that is fine and dandy. More power to them. But not at the expense
of our federal wildland firefighters, who, with all due respect, are the
best in the world at what they do.
As for a captive stable of members, I'm not quite clear as to your
point. Membership is voluntary. There are no "fair share"
fees. There is no obligation to be a member. The FWFSA is simply an
organization working to improve pay, benefits and working conditions for
federal wildland firefighters through the legislative process. My
postings include my phone number and e-mail address. Please feel free to
contact me if you wish.
Casey Judd
Business Manager
FWFSA |
| 11/30 |
Casey,
I have reviewed my decision to join the FWFSA when I did in the early
years of its existence.
What I have found is that my reasons for joining are still extremely
valid!
I wish to thank the FWFSA Officers who continue to be a collective voice
for us working
legislatively towards a better work environment for all wildland
firefighters.
you have my continued support!
Yactak |
| 11/30 |
Everyone,
Casey's post may have the flavor of union militancy, on reread, I see
it is a bit militant, but only because it's provoked by the R5 Forester.
His posturing and threats at the National fire managers meeting last
month ---to shut down the FWFSA--- treads on our freedom of speech. We
are an association following all the rules. If he wants a fight, he'll
have one.
I appreciate the work that FWFSA leaders do for all of us. I hope
more federal firefighters will join up. We'll see who shuts who down if
a line is drawn in the sand by the forester. We have a right to free
speech! Ab, I hope you post this. I know there was discussion and you
all agreed to hang on to some earlier posts on this issue.
NorCal Tom
We support FREEDOM of SPEECH 100%. Ab. |
| 11/30 |
There are a number of air tanker photos from Mike Meadows that I
have put on AirTankers
14 and AirTankers
15 photo pages. Many are quite dramatic.
Also, there are new photos of the Runaway Fire up on Fire
25, Fire
26, and Helicopters
4 photo pages and some Morning Star IHC photos on Fire 26 and Handcrews
16. Here's a special
effect for the night crew photo of the San Bernardino County FD on
the Runaway Fire.
Many thanks contributors. If you have any more info to add to the photo
description pages, please send it in. It's like Christmas when photos
come in.
I have tried to check all links. If you find any that are broken, please
let us know. Contributors, if I have missed any photos, please let me
know. Ab. |
| 11/30 |
Here are a few photos from a burnout using the Fire Quick Launcher on
the Rumsey Fire 2004.
SR
Thanks, I added them to the Equipment
8 photo page. Ab. |
| 11/30 |
Re AD Rates:
If you're interested, this is what I just sent to my congressman:
To the Honorable ...
I worked more than 10 wonderful years with the USDA Forest Service, and
in that time I was well trained to respond to wildfire emergencies. I
left the agency to take care of my family, but have continued to serve
as an AD fire responder, known internally as a "casual"
firefighter and in more bureaucratic terms as an "administratively
determined" fire responder.
Almost all AD fire folks are facing pay cuts as a result of a plan that
was sent out for review November 17 to Regional Foresters and Forest
Service Washington Office personnel.
It appears that the group working on this plan reviewed similar GS
rates, but did not consider that AD firefighters are not paid overtime,
hazardous duty pay or any of the other "extras" we received
when working full time. Previous pay rates were set high enough to
partially make up for this difference.
Frankly, I am baffled by this change. Many of us ADs bring years of
experience to wildfire work and fill top-level, professional positions
at a time when agency cutbacks, mandatory retirements, and other
situations have reduced the number of people available to respond to
fires. Some of us were even willing to respond to another agency's needs
when requested last fall to go to Florida to help after the hurricanes.
The new rates have dropped so much in some of the positions, that I
would not respond if called out, even if qualified to do so. I am asking
you to intervene quickly on the behalf of those of us who continue to
serve our country in this unique capacity. The rates need either to be
set higher, or adjusted to pay overtime and other compensations.
I have taken the liberty to include links to the plan and cover
letter:
www.wildlandfire.com/docs/05adpayplanreview.htm
www.wildlandfire.com/docs/05adpayplandraft.htm
Thank you for your attention to this matter!
J.W. |
| 11/30 |
Ab, the Union Interagency Hotshot Crew is celebrating 25 years of
service
in 2005. Here is our logo for the 2005 season, we will go back to green
and yellow in 2006.
We will be posting updates for our 25 year reunion as details are worked
out.
Thanks,
Dan Fiorito, Union IHC Supt.
Nice logo, Dan. I have added that one and logos from the Morning
Star IHC and the Hamilton Canada Fire Department to the Logo
10 photo page. Thanks contributors. Ab. |
| 11/29 |
I would guess okfireman is from Oklahoma? If so give him my e-mail
address, I have a contact in park service in Arkansas that may help.
They have a S-230, Crew Boss, which is real close to the S-231 Engine
Boss. Missouri will hosting another Big River Compact Academy in June
and S-231 is usually on the schedule.
Hickman |
| 11/29 |
For okfireman:
S-231 in Region 9
www.na.fs.fed.us/firetraining/trngsched.htm
S-230/231 in Arizona
www.azstatefire.org/Train/course_s230_231.html
S-231 In Region 8
www.fs.fed.us/r8/boonefire/academy05/courses/s231_info.htm
S-231 In Region 6
www.fs.fed.us/r6/mbs/psicc/training/training_calender.pdf
New York Wildfire Academy
www.dec.state.ny.us/website/reg1/2004acadcourses.html
Info_Gatherer |
| 11/29 |
Please let "okfireman" that the 2005 class schedule for
Blackbull Wildfire Services will be on the web at www.blackbull-wildfire.com
by the end of this week, and will include several S-231 classes.
Dick Mangan
Permanent link for Blackbull on the Classifieds page. Ab. |
| 11/29 |
okfireman,
Are you in Oklahoma? If so check with Lake Meredith NRA in Fritch, Texas
(near Amarillo). They are really good folks who welcome OK trainees.
They do S231 fairly regularly and I believe they are about due to do it
again.
NMAirBear |
| 11/29 |
Casey,
I read your recent posting about greedy contractors price gouging the
government and nearly fell out of my chair laughing. Perhaps you can
tell my banker how much money I made this year when he calls my loans
next month.
First, our contract rates are to a large extent set by the feds. So you
can quit throwing the prerogative "Greedy Contractor" around
like its a manhole cover.
Second, when have you ever staked your 401k on the success of a fire
contract and hoped that the feds don't change the game while you're
holding the financial bag to the tune of hundreds of thousands of
dollars?
Rain or shine, I'm sure you make a comfortable living from the tribute
you extract from your captive stable of members. If they receive a value
for their dues, then more power to you. But whether you intended it or
not, there is a bitter, condescending tone to your letter. The union
militancy that subtly weaves itself through the lines of your posting
does none of us in the wildland fire service any favors -- either with
the public or politicians.
As a taxpayer and a professional wildland firefighter, I will lobby for
REASONABLE policies that serve the public. There is a bottom to their
pockets and a limit to their goodwill.
A proud fire contractor. |
| 11/29 |
OldFireGuy,
Step up and support wildland firefighters or give your ideas on how to
make the profession safer...... I'm tired of sitting back and listening
to people like you offer half "ideas" on how to solve
the problem.... put up or shut up.....
Lobotomy.... no editing done on this side you <snip>.....
Ooops.... lost control
S' ok, I didn't. Ab. |
| 11/29 |
Last year, many of us took pay cuts when rates were
"standardized." Now
we'll be getting another pay cut just so they can call us by letters
rather than
numbers? Since this is a flat rate, it makes little sense!
Still out there as an AD |
| 11/29 |
AD rates:
How could Crewboss and Engine boss not be an AD5? You can have a crew
boss
(AD4) supervise a C Faller (AD5). And the Demob Unit Leader is an AD5?
Who
makes up these charts? Obviously someone who has never been out on the
line.
Bored Hotshot |
| 11/29 |
Casey,
Wow! You
must be having a bad day. Your
diatribe is far removed from the reasoned arguments we usually see you
post. Yet, since it is
posted, it merits response.
First, no one need question your devotion to
promoting the welfare of all wildland firefighters.
That said, I will take you to task for inflammatory statements
regarding the concern of our FS leadership for firefighters. Here are a couple of points we may agree to disagree on:
1. “…..the FS failing to adequately ask for the appropriate amount
of money…”
- Any
experienced lobbyist knows full well that the funds an agency
requests is the sum agreed to by the current administration
(Republican or Democrat).
2. “…the
FS was derided by members of Congress….”
Again, the Congressional members of the loyal opposition always
take to task the administration’s position.
There is nothing new here, and again you know that.
It appears to me that you are blaming the failure
of PTP on everyone but the authors and promoters of the legislation.
Perhaps if it had been better written, or supported by better
documentation than the assertion that contractors or cooperators make
$100,000 yearly in overtime……
One might conclude that your latest note indicates
a lack of understanding of how political posturing is used to promote an
agenda. Or…..they might
conclude that it indicates that you clearly do understand such
posturing.
Old Fire Guy |
| 11/29 |
Jackson,
Excellent analysis. Your data just proves another point for the wildland
firefighting community. When the folks at the top of the Federal Land
Management Agencies lose touch with their field roots, the very roots of
the agencies begin to rot. If the roots continue to rot, the tree is
going to fall over with a very big bang.
I'm sure the agencies could find some other way to save a little money
rather than take it out of firefighters pockets. At least they are being
consistent - Federal employees, ADs, and contractors are all taking it
in the shorts lately. Maybe next year, they will make the ADs and
contractors have to take biological sciences, forestry, agriculture, or
natural resource management classes before they can "qualify"
to do their current jobs (Tongue in cheek, of course).
Rogue Rivers |
| 11/29 |
MOC4546,
The "plan" is called Competitive Sourcing, and you are mostly
correct.
Surprised that you haven't heard.
In a nutshell, existing, permanent Feds are systematically being
required to "compete"
against the Private Sector for their own jobs.
It starts when they (Gov.) "study" a type of job, like IT, or
HR, or F&A.
Once the work is "defined", the Government asks the private
sector to bid the job.
To make it a fair competition, the employee gets to re-apply for the job
that they already have.
If a private sector company bids lower or flashier than the employee
already doing the job, the employee gets RIFed.
I know this is oversimplified, but that's how it seems to be playing out
so far.
The actual process is much more complicated, but the result is the same.
I'm sure it all looks really great on paper.
Other implications, contractors trying to get paid, or employees needing
HR
help will probably find it easier to settle a car insurance claim.
ALL HR and IT to be handled out of New Mexico.
- Batchmaster |
| 11/29 |
Ab i was wondering about a wildland fire class i need. I need S 231..
I can't seem to find it anywhere; can you help?...
Please email some info..
Thanks
okfireman |
| 11/29 |
Don't bother with AD. Sign on with a small local fire department that
does wildland on the side. You get paid ($50) double or almost triple
what ADs get and the local Municipal fire department also takes home
15%. We do this all the time in socal. Santa M<snip> is a
good little firefighting community. Check er out.
I know some of you former dyed in the wool public servants will balk
at this, but it's the cost of doing business where we are.
Reel |
| 11/29 |
About the proposed AD pay rates for 2005--
I put together a table of 25 commonly used AD positions, comparing the
2003/2004 AD rates with the proposed 2005 rates. It is attached as an .htm
file. (Ab inserted it.) I selected the 25 positions BEFORE I
looked at the rates. I did not select positions based on the change in
the rate.
| Pay
Rate Comparison of Some Frequently Used AD Positions |
| 2003/2004
vs. the Draft 2005 Rates (proposed 11/17/2004) |
|
|
|
| Position |
2003-2004
Classification, (48 States) AD: |
2003-2004
Rate |
2005
Classification (48 states) |
2005
Rate |
Change,
2003 to 2005 |
| Air
Tac. Gr. Supv. |
5 |
$24.00 |
J |
$21.36 |
($2.64) |
| Asst.
Area Commander |
5 |
$29.00 |
L |
$28.16 |
($0.84) |
| Base
Camp Manager |
4 |
$14.60 |
E |
$13.52 |
($1.08) |
| Crew
Boss |
4 |
$14.60 |
F |
$14.76 |
$0.16 |
| Demobe
Unit Leader |
5 |
$24.00 |
F |
$14.76 |
($9.24) |
| Dispatch
Recorder |
2 |
$11.68 |
C |
$11.16 |
($0.52) |
| Div/Gr
Supervisor |
5 |
$24.00 |
I |
$19.40 |
($4.60) |
| Engine
Boss |
4 |
$14.60 |
F |
$14.76 |
$0.16 |
| Equipment
Manager |
4 |
$14.60 |
E |
$13.52 |
($1.08) |
| Faller,
Class A |
3 |
$12.84 |
D |
$12.32 |
($0.52) |
| Faller,
Class C |
5 |
$24.00 |
H |
$17.56 |
($6.44) |
| Firefighter,
T. 1 |
3 |
$12.84 |
D |
$12.32 |
($0.52) |
| Firefighter,
T. 2 |
2 |
$11.68 |
C |
$11.16 |
($0.52) |
| GIS
Tech. Spec. |
5 |
$21.00 |
G |
$16.08 |
($4.92) |
| Helicopter
Manager CWN |
5 |
$24.00 |
G |
$16.08 |
($7.92) |
| IC
T. 3 |
5 |
$24.00 |
J |
$21.36 |
($2.64) |
| IC
T. 4 |
5 |
$21.00 |
F |
$14.76 |
($6.24) |
| Ordering
Manager |
4 |
$14.60 |
E |
$13.52 |
($1.08) |
| Safety
Officer T. 2 |
5 |
$26.00 |
K |
$23.48 |
($2.52) |
| Safety
Officer T. 3 |
5 |
$21.00 |
H |
$17.56 |
($3.44) |
| Section
Chiefs T. 1 |
5 |
$29.00 |
L |
$28.16 |
($0.84) |
| Section
Chiefs T. 2 |
5 |
$26.00 |
K |
$23.48 |
($2.52) |
| Status/Check
In Rec. |
2 |
$11.68 |
E |
$13.52 |
$1.84 |
| Strike
Team Leader |
5 |
$21.00 |
G |
$16.08 |
($4.92) |
| Task
Force Leader |
5 |
$21.00 |
G |
$16.08 |
($4.92) |
| Unit
Leaders (most) |
5 |
$24.00 |
H |
$17.56 |
($6.44) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| AVERAGE
CHANGE: |
|
|
($2.96) |
| (red
numbers in parenthesis are negative numbers) |
|
|
|
Here are some highlights (or lowlights):
Of 25 positions:
--22 of the 25 positions have reduced rates.
--The reductions ranged from $0.52 to $9.24 an hour.
--The changes in the 3 positions that increased ranged from $0.16 to
$1.84 per hour.
--The average change of the 25 positions was a reduction of $2.96 per
hour.
The draft 2005 AD Pay Plan is out for "comment" right now, but
the cover letter says: "Comments should be limited to issues that
might prevent implementation or use of the pay plan." It sounds
like they consider the pay rates to be etched in stone.
The 2003/2004 rates were already very much too low. Now, instead of
improving them, there's an almost across the board reduction--as much as
$9.24 an hour in one case.
What can we do? We can write our congressmen, and also support the AD
Firefighter association.
www.adfirefighter.org/pages/1/index.htm
Jackson
The AD Firefighter Association has a permanent link on the
Classifieds page if you want to find it easily later.
There's a "Practical" link to your Senate and House
Representatives on the Links
page under federal. Ab. |
| 11/29 |
Good morning alll... just have to do a healthy bit of venting. This
place is so perfect for that. And I'm so terrible at following the board
so forgive me if I rehash an old subject...
Well, here's my story - Today I saw a forecast for Santa Anas over 40
mph for S. CA (not sure how accurate it was based on the source) and
thought, "well, surely I can find out if that will be an issue by
checking the south
ops (ca) INTELLIGENCE site! No doubt the latest information on fire
potential will be there." Well, it wasn't, and there was no
explanation as to why. I looked for fire potential graphs, and found
that the latest were posted November 9 although the site says they'd be
updated weekly. I guess it rained, but it's hard to tell what's happened
since from the site. So then I thought, well, I'll look at the monthly
outlook and see what the thoughts were then. The immediate monthly
outlook link from the site takes me to a July outlook. Then I checked
the archives to see if any had been done since July, and the archive
link no longer takes you to a list of reports from the year but to the
October monthly outlook (later than July, so I guess that's good???).
The 2004 seasonal outlook archive link takes you to the monthly archive
page, which is out of date. So the latest monthly outlook I could find
was two months old.
Concluding that no other useful intelligence could be found there, I am
giving up. Lord only knows where the other links go to. I can't believe
in this day and age that this is the state of things in the busiest
geographic area in the country and busiest wildfire zone in the world.
There - I said it, out loud. What's going on down there? (certainly
don't ask the intelligence staff, I guess...)
How long is that site going to be temporary, anyway? Let's see, it's
been, what, two years now? So much for cutting edge!
'nuff said. Be safe-
-centered |
| 11/29 |
The Jobs
page and Series
0462 (Forestry Technician) & Series
0455 (Range Technician) jobs pages are updated as are the 0401
listings (link on jobs page). The Los Padres still has a bunch of
openings but their job listings close tomorrow. Ab. |
| 11/29 |
Ab,
Here's the AD pay plan Draft......... currently out for review.
AD
Pay Plan Draft Review Letter
AD
Pay Plan Draft
ano |
| 11/29 |
Dear DS:
Thanks for your post regarding the portal to portal legislation. Your
comments and concerns are not uncommon among federal employees of all
occupations that are, for the most part, at the mercy of a bureaucratic
agency run by folks with little, if any, practical experience in the
occupations they manage.
For years I helped lobby congress for pay reform for federal
firefighters. For those same years, the Department of Defense claimed to
be too poor, didn't have enough money to reform firefighter pay, let
alone properly staff their fire departments, blah, blah, blah. In 1998,
Department of Defense federal firefighters finally realized some
semblance of pay reform despite DoDs whining and after we demonstrated
clearly to congress the need for such reforms and by also demonstrating
the DoD literally loses (as in "gee, it was here yesterday")
hundreds of millions of dollars each year. We argued then, as we do now,
that if these agencies managed their money properly and re prioritized
their spending habits, there would be plenty of money for everyone.
Even then our efforts were met by some firefighters fearing RIFs,
layoffs, less hours equating to less pay etc. The Department of Defense
fueled such rumors deliberately.
My point is that there is sufficient funds for this. The FS can
complain, but the fact of the matter is your lack of staffing has
nothing to do with a lack of money, it has everything to do with
recruitment and retention and the FS failing to adequately ask for the
appropriate amount of money it needs. Time and again this session of
congress, the FS was derided by members of congress for having to borrow
from other programs because it did not seek the funds it needed. Whether
that was a deliberate tactic by those at the FS in Washington DC who are
political appointees trying to save their jobs, I don't know.
Furthermore, it is our contention, backed up by volumes of data we have
provided to congress over years and years, that properly compensating
federal wildland firefighters will have peripheral advantages, not the
least of which will save the American taxpayer money. That is always
something congress wants to hear. However to illustrate that point, we
must provide them with the facts of how much contractors cost the
government and how much cooperators cost, inclusive of back fill costs,
administrative fees etc.
Our point is really quite simple. If you properly compensate federal
wildland firefighters (i.e. inclusive of portal to portal), whose hourly
rates of pay are already far less than contractors and cooperators, you
make a positive impact on recruitment and retention. Do that and you
start realizing properly staffed units. Do that and the FS is less
reliant on many price-gouging, for profit contractors, and less reliant
on cooperators whose folks can make $100,000 a year in OT courtesy of
the federal government while that same government takes you off the
clock for 8 out of every 24 hrs.
As a result, paying federal wildland firefighters portal to portal while
on emergency incidents would cost less than what is paid for suppression
under the current system and actually save the
government money.
As for bidding on your own jobs...over my dead body. It's unfortunate
that folks like Bosworth and Blackwell have so little practical fire
experience and fail to do what's right for their employees. If they
won't, the FWFSA will. Ignorance is bliss. If you haven't spent time in
any fire service, you wouldn't know that even way
back in the 20th century, professional firefighters were, and still are,
paid for sleep time on duty. Maybe its time the FS catch up to the 20th &
21st centuries!
You deserve every benefit we can get for you and we are convinced our
friends on Capitol Hill will eventually instruct the FS to deliver those
benefits to you. And, if the FS balks or feel they don't want to take
care of their firefighters who risk their lives, we'll be sure to get
involved in the process the next time a FS Chief is selected.
Forget the rumors, join the FWFSA, become part of the solution, part of
the voice. As always, feel free to call me at 916-515-1224 or e-mail me
at FWFSAlobby@aol.com.
Respectfully,
Casey Judd
Business Manager
FWFSA
It is Ab's opinion that wildland firefighters will not have to bid
on their jobs. Right now there is so much going on with the
consolidation of financial services -- moving everyone financial who
knows the interagency MOUs and the liaison folks behind them to
Albuquerque, NM. Fed hands will be full for some time dealing with the
outfall from that. We all know what happens when communications break
down on a major-rager, and it ain't pretty. |
| 11/28 |
Forester:
Thanks for the insight into camp life. I grew up as an explorer and have
talked with
those guys on different occasions but they never indicated it was dead
end job.
Maybe I was too zealous to hear what they were saying. Thanks for
spelling it out
for me.
Rogue Rivers:
Thanks, I'll take that and try to run with it.
A sincere thanks for all the help!
Squirrel |
| 11/28 |
Ab, was 'swirled peas' in your Thanksgiving Day greeting a play on
'world peace'?
I didn't get it until my wife told me to say it out loud. Ya got the
recipe for that one?
Todd
<haw, haw> yep, and we're working on the recipe. It's an
elusive dish but we try every year. Ab. |
| 11/28 |
In DS's post today he mentioned the following:
"In 2006 we will have to bid on our own jobs (FS) just as our
mechanics and IT people already have."
Exactly what did he mean by bidding your own job? I listen to this and
it sounds like either competing with the private sector to fill the
permanent government position, the employee setting his own wages and
responsibilities to compete with someone else for the job he already
holds, or that the employee is expected to undervalue his position in
order to hold onto it.
Can someone give me a comprehensive explanation of this
"plan"? Or at least direct me where to look?
MOC4546 |
| 11/28 |
I have attached the document that I submitted to the Cleveland Fire
Management. You can post it to the Awards page if you like. Everyone
listed received a Battle Ribbon, Poster and a Special Act Medal ( that
Rich Hawkins designed). I believe the other Districts on the CNF did the
same thing, but I don't have that information. The document pretty much
says it. Many, many, many other heroes that I had no knowledge of should
have received commendations.
Rich Hawkins was also awarded a Regional Heroism Award from the
Regional Forester.
Just another Cedar Fire person
Ab did post the info to the Awards
page. |
| 11/28 |
Ab:
Thanks for the "Welcome back", I hope things slow down to at
least a slow swirl wind so's I can do more and look at the posts a
little more in depth. ----- I see Been There also commented on
"delivery" of said water along with some good ground rule
calculations and advice.
This msg. is actually an Oiiiinnnnnnnnnk, Eurrrrrrrrp! (like in oink
oink oink), Thanksgiving was good eaten and bad for my waistline. Oh
well, a couple a days and I'll be back to squeeking.
And many thanks again for They Said. It's a great site and serves a
multitude of good deeds.
Have Happys, John |
| 11/28 |
Happy Holidays all, as Disneyland gave free admission to firefighters
after the california fire, Knotts
is saying thank you to us this year.
Also Mike with Spot Fire Images has updated his web page with some great
photos from Alaska, kind of nice to look at these and pump yourself up
for next season! www.spotfireimages.com
Stay Safe,
RR |
| 11/28 |
Just wanted to express an opinion regarding the letter from FWFSA
Business manager Casey Judd. First and foremost I would love to see
portal to portal pay for federal firefighters. I am one. However, my
concern is this and maybe somebody more in the know than me or someone
from FWFSA can respond.
Almost every forest in R5 this year was over budget due to being
mandated to staff at MEL but didn't receive the funding to do so. On our
district we ended up $200,000 in the red even with multiple vacancies.
Granted portal to portal would be charged to fires but the money still
has to come from somewhere. Will the additional cost of portal to portal
result in an eventual RIF?
I'm sure we'll face one anyway considering the increased staffing
without the funding to support it, but at what cost will we pay for
things like H-pay on Rx burns, portal to portal and so on. Will we cut
crews and engines? I'm not even saying this is a terrible thing if the
people who do stay get what they deserve but sometimes we need to be
careful what we hope for.
In 2006 we will have to bid on our own jobs (FS) just as our mechanics
and IT people already have. Will we be competitive if our cost is
through the roof due to these new proposals? Again, I'm not bashing the
effort, I want portal to portal as bad as the next overworked 1000 hour
OT/season hotshot, just some food for thought.
DS |
| 11/28 |
Does anyone know who manufactures the fire shelter structure wrapping
material?
You know, the house sized rolls of fire shelter material.
I can not find anything on where or who I can purchase it from.
Thanks for any helpful info.
Old Crusty Guy |
| 11/28 |
Firefighting community,
First we would like to thank you for all of your thoughts, prayers,
financial support, care and concern during the past six months, it has
really been a bumpy ride. Fortunately the hospital, neurosurgeon and MRI
clinics have forgiven all of the bills after our insurance and I am
getting donated chemotherapy through the mail.
I started taking an oral steroid about a week and a half ago which has
decreased the swelling in my brain a lot and has stopped the headache,
the throwing up and a lot of the confusion and slowness. I am still
taking chemo once a month, I don't experience any side effects from it
which is nice.
I have decided not to have any more treatments other than oral
chemotherapy. There is no known cure for GBM and I don't want to spend
the rest of my life sick and tied to machines. I had considered a clinic
in Texas but it would have required me to have a central line and wear
an IV pump which would have kept me from FULLY enjoying this winter.
This decision did not come easily but considering this may be my last
ski season I want to take full advantage of it and I am sure many of you
can relate to that. I don't want to stare out the window at the snow all
winter.
My wife, daughter and I went skiing yesterday and had a really good time
and we are going to be going to Mexico together for a week during
Christmas. Who knows what this winter is going to have in store for me.
My main concern is just spending as much time as possible with my wife
and daughter.
We are putting together a journal for Jordan full of photos, stories and
stuff like that so she will have a first hand account of who I am to my
friends and family and coworkers. If any of you would like to add
something to it that would be good. You can mail it to us at: 1216 NE
9th Street, Bend OR 97701. Thanks for doing that it's pretty important
to me. Please feel free to get the message out.
Thank you again for all of your support it has really been nice. If you
would like to get a hold of me directly you can e-mail me at mtaylor@bendcable.com.
In Christ, Matt and Kiersten
Our best to you and your family. Ab. |
| 11/28 |
From Mike
Firefighter
accused of setting 3 wildfires
Blazes in summer were on Los Padres National Forest lands where he lived |
| 11/28 |
The Squirrel, since you are interested in FSA work, the following
might also help you:
BECOME A LOS ANGELES COUNTY FIREFIGHTER
Firefighter Trainee Exam Notification
Exam R0198B
Filing: 12/02/2004 to 12/04/2004 Only
Entry Level Salary: $3,690.17 per month. Great Benefits and Retirement.
Exam Information
http://easier.co.la.ca.us/jobs/cfscripts/Careerop.cfm?ExamNo=R0198B
Application Form
http://easier.co.la.ca.us/jobsinfo/R0198BAPP.pdf
Rogue Rivers |
| 11/28 |
I'm interested in talking w/ contractors who have developed
"new" types of fire apparatus.
For example, what have been your experiences getting this new equipment
used? For example, how easy is it
to get a piece of equipment that is difficult to classify out on a fire?
And does it get used out of
the area? Things I'm talking about are items such as Forwarders modified
w/ water tanks, tracked skidgines,
etc? Again, how are your dispatchers classifying a tracked skidgine?
It's not a skidgine (the yellow
book says skidgines are rubber tired) and it's not a pumper cat -- where
does that fit into ROSS?
Anyhelp /stories would be interesting to me.
Thanks,
-AXE |
| 11/28 |
Chat appears to be back up and functioning normally. Our
server host is vague on the problem and remedy, but I can see that the
file that saves nicknames was deleted. I restored a backup file
from 8/14, new users from before that date and perhaps some regular
users will have to re-register. My apologies to our regular
chatters for any inconvenience! Original Ab. |
| 11/27 |
As many of you have already noticed and inquired about, the Chat
Room is down! Don't worry, we haven't kicked anyone out. . .it
appears our webhost server is suffering a data capacity problem.
Or in other words, the tech staff is busy sleeping off the turkey and
the hard drive filled up. We'll be working on it, Original Ab. |
| 11/26 |
Abs
Along with the good questions you asked on Dick Kahler's note about how
much water is enough there are some other items to look at.
- What is the delivery system? If, like a lot of small systems,
everything is delivered in 2" pipe then quantity may not make
any difference as you can't pump it.
- If the pipes are good what is the maximum flow rate of the engines
from the nearest fire house? Divide their maximum flow rate by the
gallons of storage and if they were to be pumping flat out is that a
long enough time to handle the problem?
- Are there adequate connection points for the FD to tie on to?
- What is the recharge rate of the tank?
- How is it refilled and if by pumps, how well is the power supply
to the pumps protected? There are formulas out there to calculate
the required flow rates for a given structure that will give them a
good answer to the structural side of the question. The local FD
should be able to give them some answers on that side.
They need to look at both sides of the fire picture, wildland and
structural and then think about dealing with both of them at the same
time. If everyone is not doing their firewise activities, they will be.
Remember fire spreads into the wildland as well as into the structures.
Think about a house fire in the middle of fire season with the wind
blowing.
Been There |
| 11/26 |
While this is not specifically a Fire Book, it is related somewhat.
Also
talks about Storm King and other tragedies from Chiefs perspective.
Explained alot to me about the politics of why things happen in the
Forest
Service the way they do. All in all a very good book. I'd rate it 4
saws.
Jack
Ward Thomas: The Journals of a Forest Service Chief
TC
It's on my "to read" list. Ab. |
| 11/26 |
Thanks Abs... and thanks for the 'swirled peas'. I had a good
laugh on that one.
A nephew asked yesterday what I thought was most important
for succeeding in life. I think it's having the ability and wearwithall
to solve problems and the bulldogishness to keep with it.
For thems thats on r&r, have fun, for all others, be safe and as
wheel said, stay engaged.
Tahoe Terrie |
| 11/25 |
The Abs wish all a
Very Happy Thanksgiving.
We have much to be thankful for:
for family of all sorts -- nuclear, extended and fire;
for friends we play with and friends who watch our backs,
friends who teach us, and friends who give us a hug when we need it;
for this country, as omnibus and dysfunctional as our budget process is,
the democratic (republican) process still assures peaceful succession
from leader to leader;
for our health, and
of course,
for this wildland firefighting community;
as well for FWFSA and
for the Wildland Firefighter Foundation
who work on our behalf.
Our thoughts and prayers are with the families of the fallen and
for those struggling with illness or injury. Don't loose heart, extended
family. When you need help, ask. You're entitled.
As we give thanks, please remember our military brothers and
sisters wherever they serve. When their job is done, may they all come
home safely and in one piece to their loved ones.
Thanks for the personal email good wishes behind the scenes.
Oh yeah, and here's to our favorite thanksgiving veggie -- swirled
peas -- May we have some soon.
The Abs. |
| 11/25 |
Re: Dick Kahler, How much water is enough?
I think Ab. suggests some very pertinent questions at the bottom of your
post that go into the How Much Is Enough Water calculation.
Having done some “advisory work” on such matters (in Wildland Fire),
here’s some additional comments, question - answer - thought process
balances you might want to cover.
Above all, there are conditions in which no amount of water is enough.
Amen...
With that comment in mind, delivery systems need to be weighed into your
planning. 50,000 gallons of stored water where trucks cannot make use of
it, or that delivery systems can't reach areas where it may be needed,
don’t do much good. (More on this “in text.”)
Is your water storage on hand to be used by members of your private
community to fight fire or is it primarily for the use of the fire house
people that are 6 to 8 minutes away? (I’m not trying to ignite a “Pro
Vs Non-Pro FF squabble here. I’m just relating situations I’ve been
involved with.) If your fire plan includes “hands-on” by community
members, give thought to at least some domestic type fittings (like 3/4”
garden hose thread) for on-the-spot initial attacks. On more than one
occasion I’ve seen 20 gallons of water on Immediate Initial Attack
make it unnecessary to use that other 49,980 gallons you're keeping in
storage.
For the “hands on” community, wet water and/or foam delivery systems
can turn 1 gallon of water into 2 or 3 gallons of fire fighting
efficiency.
Much of my work involved folks in the rural outback where professional
FF might be an hour distant. Because they had a pond they felt they had
adequate water supply - which in term of gallons they did - but they
were relying solely on the “pros” coming to their rescue. They had
no equipment, preparations or knowledge or training about how they could
make use of all that water in the event the “pros” were unable to
respond.
Hope these thoughts help out with your think tank. Best of Luck.
The Honorable Mouse.
Hi Mouse... Welcome back. Long time no squeek. Ab. |
| 11/25 |
Lots of things I am thankful for, as I'm sure you are too. Nothing
ever is
perfect and we never have enough information. As the agencies keep
changing, pull together and focus forward. We are going to be different,
but we have the chance to craft the result if we stay engaged.
Wheel |
| 11/25 |
Squirrel
I'm glad my info helped, now not to discourage you but the FSA's are a
dead end. There is no promotional potential what so ever. I will start
with the way the camps work. The FSA's are part of the Air and Wildland
division which is part of operations, or the fire side. This division
includes the camps, paid (FSA's), State inmate (CDC), and juvenile
(county probation), air ops., and heavy equipment. The camp foreman are
all firefighter specialists or engineers. They have all come from the
stations. Superintendents are Captains and Chiefs are Chiefs. As an FSA
you can either cut line or be a swamper on a dozer. The only way out is
to take the upcoming Firefighter recruit exam, get hired, do your time
as a firefighter, move up to firefighter specialist, do your time, and
try to get into the camps. The camps are a desirable place to be for
many so there is a lot of competition and most guys that are there don't
plan on leaving to go back to station life. As I said I don't want to
discourage you but that's how it is. There has been Improvements in the
program like safety retirement and the benefits are damn good. There is
even a push for pay increases. I hope this helps.
Forester |
| 11/24 |
LEGISLATIVE EFFORTS ARE SET BACK: Portal to Portal Legislation not in
Congressional Spending Bill
Despite months of effort and last minute meetings between congressional
staff and appropriators crafting the Omnibus Spending bill passed this
last weekend, the language of H.R. 2963, the Federal Wildland
Firefighter Emergency Response Compensation Act was not included in the
final bill voted on and passed by congress.
The FWFSA, the primary sponsor of the bill, had hoped to duplicate its
efforts of 2000 when HR 2814, The Federal Wildland Firefighter Pay
Fairness Act was passed by being "tucked into" the Omnibus
bill of that year. HR 2814 eliminated the overtime pay cap for federal
wildland firefighters. Out of 7 federal agencies seeking to have the cap
eliminated for its employees, only federal wildland firefighters
realized the change in law.
The Portal to Portal legislation received significant bipartisan
support. In fact, although it was authored by a Republican, there were
more Democrats signed on as cosponsors than Republicans. Additionally,
the Civil Service Subcommittee (committee of jurisdiction because the
bill required a change to Title 5 of the US Code) was, and is still
interested in moving the bill. So, what happened?
First and foremost, staff made it very clear to me that this "set
back" had absolutely nothing to do with any opposition whatsoever.
The merits of the bill are sound and understood by congress. Nor did the
potential for an initial cost (the FWFSA stands firm in its assessment
that enacting the bill and paying federal wildland firefighters would
actually save taxpayers money) cause alarm.
Unfortunately, it all had to do with politics. According to staff, the
leadership wanted to pass a bill that appeared to be austere. This
despite the fact that the congress increased the debt ceiling.
Additionally, there were simply too many people wanting too many things
in the bill.
Often, the leadership will look at an issue and say "looks great,
but you'll have to wait for next year." In other cases, "rank
has its privileges". So while funding for animal waste studies,
wild pigs and shrimp and other nutty "pork" made it into the
bill, why not the deserving men and women who protect our natural
resources while putting their lives on the line? The very simple answer
is that the "pork" is earmarked in the budget for various
agencies and departments. It does not require a policy or law change.
Our legislation did require a policy/law change as it would have amended
Title 5 of the United States Code. As staff said, "sometimes these
things take a couple of tries."
One of the differences between this bill and the one that passed in 2000
was that the 2000 bill had a senate version and also had hearings at
which the FWFSA testified. Field hearings for the portal to portal bill
were originally scheduled for March of '04 in Flagstaff, Arizona.
However, as things often do in DC, the schedule changed and it was
postponed to September. In another year, September would have been OK.
However with an election year, there is a quasi-rule put out by the
Ethics Committee that frowns upon (not outright excludes) field (outside
of DC) hearings within 60 days of an election. Some committee chairman
follow the rule, some don't. In this case, the Civil Service
Subcommittee chose to follow the rule and not hold the hearings. Still
further, we simply ran out of time trying to work with Senators Dianne
Feinstein of California and Conrad Burns of Montana to get a senate
version introduced.
All that being said, we are assured the bill will be quickly
reintroduced after the next congress convenes and that hearings will be
scheduled. I will be meeting with the author, his staff and other
congressional members during the recess. While we made great strides and
damn near got this thing done this session, we want all of you, FWFSA
members or not, to know that we are in this fight for the long haul. We
will continue to fight for what you all deserve. Additionally, we will
seek hazard pay for prescribed burns and work hard to ensure that all of
you are properly classified and compensated.
If you know anything about the nutty way congress works, you'll
understand that this is simply a set back, not failure. I personally
believe we have the juice on Capitol Hill to get this done. However we
will need to energize our members and invite new ones to join in and
outside of Region 5 so our voices will be heard from all corners of the
country.
This legislation benefits more than just the firefighters who are
eligible for federal firefighter special retirement provisions. As such,
we hope everyone out there will recognize that the FWFSA is working for
all of you and that you will choose to become an integral part of our
success.
Should anyone have any questions, please feel free to e-mail me at FWFSAlobby@aol.com.
To all of you that I respect and admire so much, have a safe and Happy
Thanksgiving.
Casey Judd
Business Manager
Federal Wildland Fire Service Association
Thanks for your and FWFSA's efforts. Getting any of this done
takes persistence. Carry on. We will prevail. Ab. |
| 11/24 |
LP hotshots Cedar Fire
MH, the only reason I can think of, why Region 5 would give a pat on the
back to the LP IHC is because they felt guilty about all the crap they
gave
that crew over the pictures someone found in their crew carriers.
You are right!! All the crews on the Cedar fire performed well under
really lousy conditions. I know because I was there and saw how they
worked safely and effectively without adequate rest or support.
CedarDIVS
Someone called and said other IHCs received commendations as well,
like the Plumas Shots. Firewolf, what did their citation say? If anyone
knows of awards, we're happy to enter them on the Awards
page. CedarDIVS and others who fought those fires, good work. What a
neckhair-raising time. Ab. |
| 11/24 |
The Building Dept in Trinity Co requires 2,500 gallons per house for
individual interface houses.
Mellie |
| 11/24 |
2002 fire Mt. Baldy
I understand you had a large fire there in 2002. How much water
storage did you have? How much did you use? Was it all from the fire
hydrants?
We live in a private community with our own well and tank and cannot
agree as to how much water we should have in storage. Some are saying
the 50,000 gallons we have is enough; some of us feel that 200,000
gallons makes more sense. We are 6 to 8 minutes from the closest fire
house and there is wild vegetation and oak trees. I cannot imagine a
fire fighter saying "dam*, I have too much water?"
Thank you
Dick Kahler
Sonoma, CA
How big is the community? What is surrounding vegetation density
like? Thick with ladder fuels? Does everyone have defensible space,
fire-retardant roofs and siding, etc, as recommended by Firewise? What
about ingress and egress? Labeling on mailboxes? Readers, anyone know
volume recommendations for communities of various sizes? Ab. |
| 11/24 |
Was looking at your book list and thought a movie/film section might
be
good. One I would recommend is "fire wars" Im pretty sure it
was a NOVA
special.
Interesting site, cool to find an independent site so well put together.
Jeremy
Thanks. We usually announce the heck out'ta films and specials on tv
when the community lets us know. Maybe we'll think about a
specials/films/movies page.
Little bit of wildlandfire.com management "good-old/bad-old
days" trivia: NOVA put in a link to theysaid when the FireWars
program first came on. It was flattering, I guess, as flattering as the
National Geographic and other specials before that. Downside was that so
many new viewers were clicking the link from NOVA that we ended up
getting fined by our isp for going over bandwidth. Bandwidth use is
beyond our control. We've since moved up to a website with a higher
bandwidth ceiling, but those $500+ fines used'ta give us some BIG
stomach aches... Ab. |
| 11/24 |
Greetings on the eve of this Thanksgiving. I hope this
Thanksgiving brings
joy, hope and gratitude to all of you.
Matt's condition is pretty much as
it was when I last sent out an update. He had decided to go to Houston
to
the Burzynski Clinic to get an experimental treatment has shown good
success with brain tumors. Thanks to all of you, your generosity,
prayers, kindness has made it possible to pay for most of the initial
cost
of the $18,000. treatment. Matt and this mother will fly down to
Houston,
due to the work and efforts of Vicki Minor and the Wildland Fire Fighter
Foundation, on Nov 29. They will stay there for 3 weeks, while Matt gets
the initial treatment and gets familiar with the routine of getting it.
They will return after three weeks and continue to receive the
treatment.
Since it is an experimental treatment, Matt's insurance may not pick up
the
additional costs for the treatment until they see if it will be
effective.
The monthly cost of the treatment, after his return will be between
$6000-7000. Matt and his family will take things one step at a time. His
attitude is very positive and he will keep fighting. Please remember him
and others in similar predicaments in your prayers.
Thank you all so very much.
Lance.
Good news Lance. Thanks to all involved including the Wildland
Fighter Foundation.
Ab. |
| 11/23 |
Hello All,
I've gotten caught up with posting photo submissions. There are
new photos up on Fire
25, a very nice one of the Zulu column and several of a night
training brushfire at Ft Lewis. Thanks to Eddie and Ric.
There are also photo additions to Equipment
8 and AirTankers
14 (SEATS and "spotter planes"), compliments of Ric and
Mike.
There's a colorful new logo of Ontario Aviation and Forest Fire
Management from Bob on Logos
10. Always good to hear from the northland.
Thanks contributors.
Ab. |
| 11/23 |
Forester,
Thanks so much for the info. What did you mean by dead end? Aren't there
promotional opportunities and whatnot?
I want to work in wildland, yet it seems impossible to pay the bills on
seasonal work, that's why I applied to County. Any further suggestions
or advice is huge to me right now. Thanks again!
TheSquirrel |
| 11/23 |
Hello, to your knowledge, are their any books out on the cedar fire.
I live in escondido, Ca. and watched the cedar from start to finish. As
a little black smoke on that saturday evening to giant red glow it would
be by 1AM. Any how im in seach of any books or fire reports
available. Can you help?
Thank you.
sean |
| 11/23 |
Grizzly
Alpine insurance in Reno will be happy to arrange insurance for you.
We currently use VFIS, and have used Alaska National, Primedian, And
Lloyds. Insurance is out there. i suggest you call the NWSA and ask
who they currently use. I am sure that there are many other carriers
out there. or contact me directly as we had to cross this bridge a
few years ago.
eric @ pw
NWSA
link with contact info is on the Classifieds page. Ab. |
| 11/22 |
Aberdeen,
Ok let me explain this really simple, i live in missoula and as when you
go to get your mou, they now want you to get personal liability
insurance to give out pack tests. I have talked to every insurance
broker and all say one thing, We have no market for this type of
insurance so in turn we cannot cover your pack test business.
Now if this is true that means who ever is in charge can drive the
private contractors out and that person can give out the pack tests and
take alot of money out of the private sector.
I hope this clears up any confusion
If you dont believe what i am saying, try to put in your apenx A without
insurance and see how far you get.
Good luck to all
Grizzly |
| 11/22 |
Is there a list of all the RHCs etc like the IHC page. I'm after info
on what crews are where and how to contact sup's.
JG
Good job on raising $$ for Matt's treatment. Thanks Ab and WFF. |
| 11/22 |
Ab,
I read your post on cancer and was touched by all that you Abs do for
this community.
Matt Taylor, as most of you know, is going down to Houston, Texas for
more hopeful treatment.
We at the Foundation, behind the scenes with the Abs, were able to help
with some of the airfare and two weeks of motel costs. If we can help
with a credit card - we can make it happen, as our cash funds are very
low.
I knew that Matt and his family will need spending money for food,
taxis, shuttles, and calls home, so I called Levi Brinkley's mom (Levi
is one of the firefighters who perished in Storm King). She told me
"whatever you need, we and the other parents want to help."
She had me call Jon Keslo's Dad, Jon also perished on Storm King. Within
30 minutes the parents of the Prineville Memorial Committee had put
$1000 in our bank account to help Matt and his Mom with their expenses.
I am so grateful to be part of the wildland firefighting community. I am
grateful to know that these families have such open hands and hearts,
after the loss of their own sons and daughters. Many thanks to all of
you who have joined the 52 Club. You have made a difference in people's
lives.
Vicki Minor
Director
Wildland Firefighter Foundation
208-336-2996
Vicki, we need you not to bust yer credit card again this year.
Hats off to the Storm King families and others in Prineville who are
helping.
I have heard that some folks in R5 are working on getting the word
out to various associations, organizations, crews, and teams about the 52
Club as well. The more the better.
A little heads up: Original Ab is working on a Fire Calendar and
suggested a dollar from each sale should go to the Foundation. I agree.
We'll keep you posted.
One thing that all members of the 52 Club could do to help is to
add a note to the bottom of your emails that says: "Member
XX of the 52 Club, Wildland Firefighter Foundation." I think
one member of NorCal II did that first, but I have seen some other
emails with that on the bottom. (You can do that in your email system so
it's added as a footer to all emails.) Visibility helps create an
organization that is sustained by contributions as a safety net for
all.
Firefighters, invite Vicki or Burk to visit your event or training
this winter to answer questions about what the Wildland Firefighter
Foundation is and what it does. Kick in some travel money. They really
are our "funnel" to help our fire family and our extended
family. The "power of one" can make a difference.
Vicki, Thanks for all you, Burk and Melissa do! Thanks Community.
I'm proud of you all. Ab. |
| 11/22 |
Ab,
I find it interesting that the LP hotshots got that award for quote
" slowing the advance...". I happened to be in the area of the
action in question and noticed some other folks doing what I hope was
the same thing. The Plumas, Stanislaus, Palomar, and El Cariso crews
were also in the area. Why does the region not say anything about those
guys. Now don't get me wrong, I know that the LP shots are one of the
best crews out there year in and year out but it is certainly curious
that they get alot of attention. WHAA, WHAA, WHAA!!!! right.
MH
<haw, haw> Right. |
| 11/22 |
The Jobs
page and Series
0462 (Forestry Technician) & Series
0455 (Range Technician) jobs pages are updated as are the 0401
listings (link on jobs page). The Los Padres still has a bunch of
openings.
Mellie has been researching cancer treatments and clinical
trials for several people in the fire community. See her post on Familysaid.
Ab. |
| 11/22 |
Regarding exposure to radiation at Cerro Grande, I don't know
about that, but Kirk worked hand in hand with Paul on that fire.
AZ backburn |
| 11/22 |
AZ Firefighter:
I don't know what to tell you about your frustration with the California
vs. Arizona system. All I can say is that California consistently has a
higher training standard and expectation within the State Fire Training
System than most other states. This is not specific to only the fire
service. The California Peace Officers Standards and Training system as
well as the Credential system for teachers are both more comprehensive
than other states.
As far as the SFMO you talked to, I'm not sure about the acronym. If you
are referring to a Senior Fire Management Officer or something, that is
purely a Federal Forest Agencies rank system (Forestry Tech., AFEO, SFEO,
ADFMO, DFMO, AFMO, FMO). CDF uses a traditional west coast fire service
rank system. (Firefighter I, Firefighter II, Fire Apparatus Engineer,
Captain, Battalion Chief, Assistant Chief, Deputy Chief, Chief). As far
a his rose colored glasses, I applaud him for promoting the level of
training our employees receive, it is true! If AZ firefighters receive
as much or more, great!
Good luck with your endeavors. You seem to hang your hat on the 56 hour
work week. If you are committed to that, don't look at CDF. We work the
72 hour 3 on / 4 off. Most of us love that schedule as it has set days
off all year. Additionally, with a two platoon shift, vs. three platoon,
we only work two more days a month than someone on a 56. Good luck!
CDF TRUE |
| 11/22 |
Ab,
We've added more Cramer Fire documents to the Colorado Firecamp website. www.coloradofirecamp.com/Cramer/index.htm
In addition to the Management Evaluation Report, we now have the
un-redacted Findings section and Appendix E from the Factual Report. The
Causal and Contributing Factors pages are now linked to the specific
findings upon which they are based.
Also posted is the full text of the OSHA investigation citations and the
USFS response.
Here's a topic for training: Both Appendix E and OSHA Citation 2 discuss
the 10 & 18. They agree that all 10 Orders were violated at Cramer,
although they give somewhat different explanations of how and by whom.
Appendix E says only 9 Watch Out situations were present, while OSHA
says 14 should have been mitigated. Which is right?
vfd cap'n
I added that link and Mellie's 11/5 post on the legal
process associated with the Cramer fatalities to our Documents Worth
Reading page. Ab. |
| 11/21 |
Grizzly, The regions canceling MOUs isn new news. In R6 for
Example, MOUs are administered by the ODF side of PNWCG, Ed is merely
cleaning house of all the one person and ill equipped training
associations, that provide training and allowing the reputable
associations play.
They specified clearer MOU terms and ask for more documentation on
instructors, and have the caveat to monitor any / all training they
wish too. Another item coming down the pipeline is RFD training may
not be acceptable to meet position requirements for the Interagency
Engine / Tender Agreement. There is more discussion due, but it
looks like RFD training will not be accepted due to the huge
variation in what one agency does compared to another.
As far as pack tests go for the private side. NPI of NW Washington
was awarded a contract to administer and monitor pack tests for the
R6 Engine Tender Agreements. In the beginning it was abugger with
logistics, but this next year looks like it will go smoother. NPI is
a reputable company and
They also contracted out the Apparatus inspections to two agencies.
One in Oregon, and another in Washington. This was a good
improvement over the previous system. It frees up a hundred or so FS
employees region wide to keep doing their day jobs in the spring and
makes a more uniform inspection process.
10 years ago the R6 agreement data table was a page and a half, and
had 80-90 pieces of gear on it. Now there is in excess of 700 pieces
of equipment listed. I agree that there are major problems with
issuing Emergency Equipment Rental Agreements - EERAs as a
pre-season contract, but the regions are doing what they can to cope
with growing work loads, and shrinking budgets.
This probably helps little but its my two cents worth.
Another privateer |
| 11/21 |
Grizzly - as we used to say in the US Army Signal Corps: SAY AGAIN!!
I couldn't really follow the train of thought in your last posting about
MOUs and the Pack Test.
Can you explain in more detail?
Aberdeen |
| 11/21 |
Hello Ab- I happened across this lately on the Internet...
It's pretty sad.
Have a great Thanksgiving.
Mike
From AboutMyJob.com......... <snip>
Readers, you can go read it if you like, I'm fairly certain the
person has never fought fire and is simply trying to give wildland
firefighters a bad name. Drivel... sure wouldn't waste any emotion on
it. Happy Thanksgiving yerself, Mike! Ab. |
| 11/21 |
Can any fallers recommend good gloves for chain saw use?
Kevlar gauntlets? I'm in R5.
SC |
| 11/21 |
R5r , best of luck & speedy recovery for your friend.
Speaking from experience, sometimes job security needs keep us from
sharing our health issues before surgery or other medical intervention
is
scheduled.
>smoke, fatty foods, genes, etc, stats be dammed. it happens; same
as other unexpected life threatening diseases that no one can get a
handle
on the "why".
To all: maybe we've met, maybe not & it's my loss to have not met
you.
best wishes!
Happy Thanksgiving!
northzone (dislikes turkey more than green ham) |
| 11/21 |
The LA Times on Nov 21 has a cover of Smokey with a Chainsaw and an
article by Lee Green on the FS. Not a pretty picture painted but how
true it is.
Seldom Seen |
| 11/20 |
To all fire fighters and private sector fire fighters,
I have found that certain region people are trying to get rid of us
mou's
in the private sector.
I have been trying to put on pack tests but can not find personal
liability
insurance like they require.
In tail this would put certain officials in a position to gain control
of all
pack tests and we would never know who would be qualified to be on
the fires.
This needs to be stopped.
If you have comments on this or have any information please speak up
so we can stop the senseless deaths of firefighters.
Sincerely
Grizzly |
| 11/20 |
Squirrel
I don't know what is going on with the FSA test but being in band two is
not necessarily a bad thing. I know that the regular county test for
firefighters is now into band three. You also don't know how big band
one is. It may not be very big. Usually the county will go through band
two before running another test. So be patient it could take a while but
I would guess you have a chance. In the mean time the county, that is
L.A County Fire will be accepting applications for Firefighter Recruits
in December. Check the LA County Fire Department web site for info on
filing. Another point to consider is that the last time the county ran a
firefighter test was in 1997. I believe the last FSA test was a few
years old. Also there has been talk of getting FSA's additional points
when they have applied for the firefighter test so apply for it. It may
work to your advantage. The FSA program is a good one but a dead end.
Anyone interested in applying with LA County Fire can pick up an
application at any county fire station or I believe it can be downloaded
from the Department web site. The County of Los Angeles Department of
Human Resources web site will also post the announcement.
Good Luck
Forester |
| 11/20 |
Good Morning Wildland Firefighters.
It's sunny where I am, a touch of frost overnight, woodstove
crackling merrily. I hope all you Westerners are able to wind down from
the season or that you've already made the transition, and that all you
easterners "be safe" as your deciduous woods burn. Watch for falling
snags. Santa Anas when they come in socal, we know they shout watchout.
For those lucky enough to be with family, hug 'em hard, let 'em
know you love 'em. Count your many blessings.
For those going thru trials and tribulations, know that you're part of
this community and we support each other. You're not alone.
The support and information that is passed behind the scenes here
never ceases to amaze me. At this time of the year, what actually gets
posted is like the tip of the iceberg. If anyone has info on increased
cancer incidence in firefighters who fought fire at Cerro Grande, please
email Ab. I know there was a push some time back for documenting
exposure and failure to inform firefighters of risk when the fire was
burning. As people retire, the details could be lost. We need to not let
that happen. I know Paul Gleason was at Cerro Grande, was Kirk Smith
there? Any others with cancer?
Ab. |
| 11/19 |
Hey Ab:
Rich went back into the hospital for the next stage of his heart
plumbing "fixing." I don't know all the details since I wasn't able to
talk with him prior to his going in to the hospital. But it was planned
and necessary.
Privately, he didn't want anyone to know about any this ordeal, but I
have overridden him. And he has been getting a lot of support via cards,
calls, and messages. And I know he enjoys them.
I'll let you know when he's out and how he's doing.
Thanks - R5r |
| 11/19 |
CDF TRUE:
Thanks for the info. I understood the progression of events for CDF FF
II credit. I guess I am just let down to see that for me to really get
considered, I need to go work in CA or become a paramedic. However, how
do I leave my state to go work in CA and make a living for my family and
make all the bill payments, without leaving my 56 hour full time FD job?
As a part of the NWCG and national fire system, I have fought fire in
other states. I have plenty of structural/EMS and HAZ MAT experience as
well. But, my point is, I don't seem to get any credit for it.
Basically, I was told I don't get ANY structure credit, since the CA
SFMO doesn't "recognize" my structural certs. My NWCG stuff does count,
as well as my NREMT. Seems odd that CA has to think the CA system is
"better" or more intense. The SFMO person I spoke with "bragged" about
the level and amount of training their FFs get, yet in my state, we
actually had much more (academy and CE). It seemed that individual had
on rose colored glasses and didn't bother to even imagine there could be
other good/great fire departments outside CA. I am not bitter, I would
just love to work where I grew up, and with CDF, which is where I always
really wanted to work (call me weird). Riverside county would be
great...I grew up there.
Anyway, thanks again for your info.!
AZfirefighter |
| 11/19 |
To AZ Firefighter:
I am sorry to hear your frustration with getting in the door in CDF. I
have worked for the department for many years and have a tremendous
amount of pride in our Red Army. We are not perfect, but it is truly a
great career, with excellent pay and benefits. I will try to offer you
some advice. First of all.........AB......your information is only half
right. It is true that CDF hires alot of Paramedics to work in our
schedule A program (over half our guys work in Schedule A contracts),
and most guys looking for the permanent spot go that route....which
would put you in one of more than 50 Schedule A contracts around the
state. Examples are Riverside County in Southern California, but Nor Cal
holds impressive contracts as well such as Butte County, Cameron Park ,
South Santa Clara County, Napa County, Fresno County, etc.
As far as Foresters moving into the fire ranks, this is a sore subject
with most of us, but in reality, only 16 moved over statewide. Most went
back to their prior jobs. The additional 11 or 12 foresters being hired
right now are on Prop. 40 federal grant funding and are temp. employees
for 5 years with no fire protection responsibilities (Thank Goodness).
The State Fire Training System is a bit of a monster, and although CDF /
SFM operate as one department, State Fire Training has not changed their
policies or procedures. Example....when a CDF employee takes a CFESTES
class, they (or more likely, the department) pays the same fee as a
firefighter from a local government department. It is, unfortunatly, a
system that will not change until there is a major CDF / OES / SFM reorg.
or consolidation. There has to be a dominate player to make the changes.
This may come sooner than people think. (wait until Jan. 1st, 2005)
As far as helping you with career pursuits in CDF, here is what we are
primarily looking for at the FFII / FFII Medic or Engineer Rank. The
supplemental application has areas that are weighted differently, but
here is a rough estimate in order of importance. This application would
be followed by a unit level interview.
1. CDF Experience (Schedule A / B, Helitack)
2. Formal Education (B.A. or minimum of A.S.)
3. Certified California FFI Academy with CSFM FFI certificate ( Butte,
Delta, Dominguez Hills, Crafton, etc.,etc.)
4. ICS Courses (at this level, 200 and some 300 level courses completed)
5. California State Fire Marshal Fire Officer Series
6. CFESTES or FSTEP courses ( Haz Mat Tech, Confined Space Tech.,
Swiftwater Tech.)
7. Volunteer or other paid firefighting experience
You are going to have to bite the bullet and get some California
Certifications if you want to work in California. This will be the same
for us as well as any local government department in California. Good
luck and if you need any help, feel free to stop into any CDF station.
CDF TRUE |
| 11/18 |
Abs
These photos were taken by the Sequoia Kings staff during the memorial for
Dan Holmes in Reedley CA
See attached files:
Awaiting procession & Awaiting Arrowhead-
Lined up and waiting for Arrowhead
Arrowhead crew entering the line of mourners-
From Right Brit Rosso Crew Supt., Delina Burke Dan's mom, Matt
Holmes Dan's Brother, Jules Sautter Dan's girl friend
Arrowhead passing through the assembled personnel-
Arrowhead crew buggy in the line-
Kaage and group-
Sequoia Kings Canyon National Parks FMO Bill Kaage conducting the memorial.
Been There
Thanks, Been There. I put them on Dan's
Memorial Page. I also put links on the photo description page to the
Arrowhead Shots memorial page for Dan and to the DanHolmes.org website.
Ab. |
| 11/18 |
Current optimist,
In many areas the 462 series gets locality pay, 401 does not.
You can see what that will do.
I hope you stay an optimist this org will need some on its downward spiral!
Eternal pessimist |
| 11/18 |
Current Optimist, There is no location or area pay adjustment for
Series 401 like for the Forestry Tech series.
Mollysboy, I appreciate the comments.
Former Optimist |
| 11/18 |
Wildland firefighter community:
Matt Taylor will be going to Houston for treatment after
Thanksgiving - in about 2 weeks.
Thanks to Matt's family, to Lance and the Prineville IHC, to Vicki at
the Wildland
Firefighter Foundation and to the praying, wishing, hoping, dreaming
fire community for keeping hope alive. You can make a donation to the
Foundation to help cover the costs. To do that by phone, call 208-336-2996.
We pray for a success. We are Eternal Optimists in this regard.
The Abs. |
| 11/18 |
Former Optimist: can you please tell us where you got the information on the
401
pay cut? I don't see how an agency can take someone that has been in a job
for
years, require them to get lots of additional training, then cut their pay! That
seems
like grounds for a major lawsuit....
Current Optimist |
| 11/18 |
Another one, going down the road............................
TC
Please find attached the Initial 209 for the Raley Incident.. A final
209 will be posted on Dec 31, 2004.. Go Go Go !!!!!!!
(See attached file: Raley_209.rtf)
Good luck, Ron! Ab. |
| 11/18 |
I heard that Ron Raley (Deputy Director R5) is retiring as are Dan White
and Larry Wright (Plumas).
NorCalTom |
| 11/18 |
To anyone familiar with CDF:
I've been a full time municipal firefighter for over 9 years with 5 years of wildland experience. I am ENBG, EMTB/NREMT, FALA, ICT4(T). I am also a Haz, Mat. Technician, and teach at the junior college level the S-130/S-190 curriculum.
I applied to CDF for a full time job. Yes, even though I have a great municipal job, running 7-15 calls a shift, I wanted to go back where I'm from and try CDF. But, they wont hire me, or give me ANY structural credit. State Fire Marshal doesn't recognize the state certs. from my state next door. I trained in a VERY respected fire department academy for 15 weeks, and got IFSAC and NFPA firefighter I and II certs.
Just curious. I would have really liked to get hired somewhere in So CAL, But, with all my experience, I guess I am still not attractive??
Thanks,
AZfirefighter
As I understand it... Gotta have yer medic cert these days. As the
dept has downsized, they've been picking up the foresters and shifting
them to fire to keep them employed. I probably have incomplete info, so
you CDFers chime in. Ab. |
| 11/18 |
Gordo,
I have a few ideas for you as far a new equipment fire apparatus. In the rural areas of California alot of the VFD and combination depts. are going to a type 2/3 engine basically it is a 4 door cab on a smaller chassis than a normal type 2 but it has all the same large hose bed, ladders, 500 gallon water tank, master stream, and some have up to 1250 gpm pumps.
Its alot of stuff to put on a small truck but it worked great and it is street legal weight wise. I know that I-ONE makes a couple and so does WEST-MARK check them out and see what you think.
They are cheaper than a type 1 and can fight both structure and wildland fires...
NOR-CAL CAPT |
| 11/18 |
Hey all,
I haven't posted in a long while.
If I may impose upon you all for a bit of insight. (since insight and experience run rampant here.)
Does anyone know the situation with LA County FSA hiring? I got on band 2 and am
thinking
I'll never get a call. Maybe I should have done better to earn a call? I dunno. Any kind
of
advice on this is needed greatly. Thank you all so much in advance.
TheSquirrel |
| 11/18 |
Former Optimist - venting is good.....it's what keeps Mt. St. Helens from having a massive blowout......just like us real people!
Another perspective about the firefighter liability issues on wildfires: much of where we are today is a result of what has happened since South Canyon. In 1994, Chief Jack Ward Thomas stood up and accepted full responsibility for the 13 USFS fatalities, even though it happened on a BLM fire; they were his troops, and he was Chief! Ever hear of Harry Truman's sign that "the buck stops here"? That was real leadership, and JWT exercised it.
Fast forward to 2001 on Thirtymile, where the current Chief made the Investigation team re-look their findings relative to the accountability of the folks that died for their own deaths, coupled with the active pressure by the parents & spouse, as well as members of the US Congress. Somebody else was at fault!
Now, in 2003 on the Cramer Fire, Regional Forester Jack Troyer announces to the parents that "your sons did not contribute to their own deaths". So, let's blame someone, and not get the parents or US Congresspeople mad at us!
So, with multiple years of training and experience, the two young men had never heard of the 10 & 18, or LCES; never saw the IRPG and its help in turning down unsafe assignments? Someone else should hang?
I believe that the TOP leadership of the USFS is trying to operate in "blameless mode", but I don't include the folks in F&AM (both in the WO or at NIFC) under that blanket. They're all experienced on-the-ground fire people who have been in similar situations, and did the best they could under the given circumstances. I hope they all recognize the fallacy of trying to assess blame in a constantly changing environment where nothing is "for sure" before you make a decision or take an action.
All that said, I too am taking a hard look inward to decide if I want the increased risk of liability that seems to be the new "norm" on wildfires and prescribed burns. It's not about more pay, portal to portal, motels or any other short term economic gain; rather, its about my willingness to subject myself and my family to the stresses and financial risks that one mistake, omission or bad judgment might bring.
The "right" answer lies within each of us: I haven't found it inside myself yet!
Mollysboy |
| 11/18 |
the GOAT,
The most popular are the Makalu and the Glacier. They meet the standard set forth in the "Red Book" aka Interagency Standards for Fire and Aviation. 8", Leather, Vibram type
sole.
RD |
| 11/18 |
Implications of the Cramer Fire "possible lawsuits" resulting from the
DOJ investigation... and other current "crap" I wonder how far this
process will be taken... Now that its started and plea bargains seem to
be occurring in secret (non disclosure) will that threat of "take our
deal or pay the big bucks and possibly do the jail time" come up over
and over again? Will DOJ repeatedly pressure people into resigning
rather than fight charges they might be found not guilty of? Where will
it stop? Will an engine capt be responsible for their crewmember who
doesn't fasten their seat belt? or a newbie seasonal ff that smokes some
pot or drinks some alcohol and gets themself killed? He*l, with all the
PC human resources restrictions in place you can't even fire
incompetents, slackers, jerks if they know how to work the system. I
heard of a mechanic guy (non-fire) last week who 15 yr ago was busted
for growing pot at home, had stolen electrical things from the FS shop,
and he wasn't fired... he was put on disability! In my observation its
even harder today than 15 yr ago to dismiss loosers.
Ab, sorry for venting. I know I'm preaching to the choir. I just feel
some despair that the system is breaking down beyond repair. There were
close calls during the SoCal Firestorm. We all did the best we could and
followed our training. We did not have time to complete all checklists
or in my opinion someone would of died. If a fed had died I'm sure that
firefighter's supt would be facing the threat of jail time or a
resignation with loss of retirement benefits. A study was done to show
it was our intent to follow our training. The WO has disregarded it.
They are OUT OF TOUCH WITH REALITY. They should not be surprised when
the next fire hits socal if no ICs are willing to fight it. I can see it
now... pull everyone back and watch. Already teams are called in to
fight fires that the forests used to handle. And congress wonders why
the costs are so high. Pay now or pay more later. Support the troops or
none will sign up. A firefighter draft?
SoCal Fed firefighters are moving on to county or city employment.
Did you see the list of openings on the Los Padres? Look at the jobs
page. Mid level Federal wildland firefighters on the interface don't
make enough to buy a house in CA. To become "professional" (Series 401)
you have to take a mandatory cut in pay. Liability insurance is a tax
that doesnt protect you from jail time. FF are expected to put ALL on
the line for our jobs with no backup. The only organizations that really
selflessly support us are the FWFSA, the Wildland Firefighter Foundation
and theysaid. Thanks to everyone helping.
I worry about who will train the new kids with so many going. And I
still feel guilty that when a close call came I lost situational
awareness and in a moment was more worried about loosing my career, my
retirement, my family than about the ff under my command who made a bad
choice.
Ab, sorry again for the venting.
Former Optimist
Yer welcome. Venting allowed. Thanks for your contributions to fire.
What's needed to improve the system, reduce distracting thoughts and
increase retention seems pretty clear. Ab. (We'll be in touch.) |
| 11/18 |
Ab,
In response to the Old Fire Guy:
The narrowband mandate on our Federal frequencies, 162-174 MHz, will
provide us with additional frequencies. The new C7 repeater pair,
additional Air-To Ground channels, and additional Tactical channels are
benefits we have already seen this season. Yes, the FCC will sell or
provide additional channels down below our frequencies when those users
go
narrowband. Our fire and law enforcement cooperators will be the primary
beneficiaries of these frequencies when they go narrowband from 2007 to
2015 depending upon their licenses. They all will be going narrowband in
the future.
The narrowband signals can be received by the wide band receivers
with a small reduction in volume and a slight increase in noise. This
has
not been a problem. The problem occurs when wideband transmitters go
into
narrowband receivers. The wide signal and higher deviation overloads the
receiver causing distortion or even shutting down the receiver.
After December 31, it will be, with very few exceptions, unlawful to
transmit a wideband signal on a narrowband channel. Since 1995, all new
VHF
radios that have been Type Accepted for sale in the United States have
had
narrowband capability, and can be programmed to comply with the
regulations. Currently, most Federal agencies have policies (that, in
some
cases, are not being followed) to replace all radios after 5-7 years of
use. Most of us get a new computer every 3-5 years, and radios are under
the same type of lifetime replacement.
Most of our cooperators like the local VFDs will still be wideband
on their channels and we can have their channels programmed in wideband
mode in our radios. However, they will need to make sure that their
radios
will do the proper narrowband transmit before they can use our
frequencies
in their radios. If their radios are wideband only, then they cannot use
those radios on the Federal frequencies.
Digital is happening. A large percentage of the repeater
infrastructure now in place is running in dual mode. It will pass
narrowband analog as narrowband analog and it will pass digital as
digital.
(if your analog squelch opens with a strong signal that sounds like a
hiss,
someone is using digital). The new P25 radios can decode either signal
if
they are programmed to do multimode, and it would be transparent to the
end
user. As far as propagation goes, it is virtually identical to
narrowband.
It will be totally clear until it drops out. At the signal level that
causes the signal to drop on the digital, analog is too noisy to pass
traffic also. The usual tricks to try and improve the signal work the
same
– hold the radio so the antenna is vertical and above your head; move to
a
higher location; use an external antenna; with your truck broadsides to
the
signal, stand about an arms length away and use the truck as a
reflector;
etc.
Very good point on saying NO to partial communications, after all, if
you remove communications from LCES you get LES(S). Good planning ahead
of
the season, training, system testing and having backup equipment will
help
minimize the effects of the recent USFS ISO system.
NV Jim |
| 11/18 |
Ab,
Along with the other NFs, we're struggling with the radio mandates.
Here
are some points (as explained to me):
- Narrow banding......FCC wanted to sell additional
frequencies. This
was made possible by mandating our move from "wide band" to "narrow
band".
As I understand it, it is sort of like requiring "fine tuning" radio
system
to prevent slop over into someone else's frequency.
Challenge......narrow band radios are supposed to work okay with
older "wide band" equipment, but that's not proven to be the case. We
have
had greater incidence of loss of communications. Solution has been to
make a total change to an entire unit rather than try to mix components.
- Digital.......another mandate for the Forest Service.
Advantage: When you have a signal, it is crisp and clear (analog
can receive a scratchy, noisy signal).
Disadvantage: Works in a straight line......no "bending over the
horizon" like with analog. Bottom line, you've either got a signal, or
you don't.
Additional challenges:
Many of our cooperators are sticking with wide
band, analog systems. Solving that will be on a local basis.
Also, our elimination of IT services may mean we are left with
contracting
out for "radio" service. Assuming some national forests are located in
rural or remote areas (who'da thunk it?).......finding a local radio
service may prove a challenge. Hey, we'll just wait 72 hours for someone
from a metropolitan area to drive up.
And in the meantime........we'll have to be firm in saying "NO" to "make
do
with only partial communications". We'll risk the resource loss, but not
our firefighters' safety.
Folks, feel free to correct me if I've got some of this wrong. I am in
no way, shape or form a communications wizard.
Old Fire Guy |
| 11/18 |
Hutch and Rich Hawkins,
Our thoughts and prayers are with you both! Get well very soon
M. Rohde
"Contract County Guy" |
| 11/18 |
Someone has contacted us asking about the firefighter safety issues
involved in the current push for digital radio technology. Good
communication is necessary for a safe assignment. I know we have had
posts on the subject and I know the issue is very important. I don't
remember the main points. I don't want to search the archives.
Could those of who participated in the discussions or have an interest
or pertinent experience help us out here? Here's the assignment:
Please remind us of the issues and/or let us know about any
problems encountered with digital radio technology that might affect
firefighter safety. Please consider how digital radio use affects
communication among handcrews, engine crews, the air show, overhead? And
anything else you'd like to throw in. Do you think the use of digital
technology at this time is the way to go? If not, what has to be
addressed before it could be?
Thanks, Ab. |
| 11/18 |
Hello, my name is Mike Reekers, I am a student at American University
in
Washington, DC. I am writing a research paper on President Bush's
Healthy Forest Initiative and I am looking for information from
organizations that have extensive knowledge on the policy. I have
written five particular questions on the issue, and if possible I would
greatly appreciate if anyone from your organization could take a short
amount of time to answer any of them.
1) Many groups argue the Healthy Forest Initiative gives free reign to
timber industries to the National Forests and other reserves where fire
control isn't necessary. Is there validity to this claim, and if so what
are some of the details surrounding it?
2) One requirement of the policy is fuel reduction around communities.
Has the policy been successful in addressing this goal?
3) Has the policy had any major changes to environmental law regarding
the national forests or forests in general?
4) What is the appropriate action needed in the thinning process to
reduce the spreading of wildfires, and does the HFI properly accomplish
it?
5) Does the HFI successfully reduce the risk of communities against
wildfires? If not, what could be done to improve it?
If nobody has the time to answer any of the questions, then I would
greatly appreciate any information you could send me on the issue. My
address is 5325 Westbard Avenue, Bethesda MD 20816. Thank you again and
I appreciate the time you have taken to read my letter.Mike
mreekers@scu.edu |
| 11/17 |
Gordo
Contact Chief Murphy from Foothill Volunteer Fire District (NorCal)
at (530)
675-2383. Chief Murphy has a wealth of knowledge in volunteer company
operations, applying for grants and development of fire equipment.
JEAb is passing info behind the scenes as well. |
| 11/17 |
A more recent update on Matt Taylor's condition. I spent the afternoon
with Matt last Wed. His spirits were good, and he was positive. He is
significantly slower in making reasoning decisions, but seems fine
physically, though his energy level is a little slow. At this point in
his
treatment, the oncologist wants to stop the chemo, since it is
apparently
not being effective. He wants to treat the symptoms instead, which will
mean an increase in decline as the brain tumor has nothing to slow it.
Matt's friends and family have noticed a marked decline. About every
fourth meal is being rejected by his body. The latest MRI has shown that
there are definitely lesions on the right side of the brain, and
the
radiologist estimates at the growth rate that Matt has about 6 months. I
believe he can still be cured. I will continue to send him my prayers as
I
know you all will.
Matt is considering going down to Houston to try an experimental
treatment
that has shown decent success. Matt's wife, parents, family and friends
wanted tell me to extend all their gratitude to all your prayers and
gifts
of the heart and generosity you all have shown. Please pass this on to
anyone who has helped, is or may be interested.
Gratefully,
LanceAb note: Donations of federal leave time would be very
helpful for Matt and his family. For info on how to do that, email
Ab. If you want to make a monetary donation to help with his treatment, make a check out to Matt
Taylor and send it to Lance for deposit in Matt's account.
Lance Honda
Prineville Hotshots
3160 NE 3rd St
Prineville, OR 97754
Our hopes and prayers abound for all decisions made by Matt and
his family to continue the good fight for his life. Some of the
experimental work offers profound results and a turnaround is seen in 3
weeks if it is the "right" treatment. This Ab and the
Wildland Firefighter Foundation are exploring ways to help meet Matt's
expenses if the experimental treatment route is taken. |
| 11/17 |
Gordo;
I hear you, my friend…I’m in much the same position. A couple of things
I’ve seen work really, really well: 1,800 or 2,000 gallon
tenders/tankers work great for both wildland and structure. Smaller than
that and it’s not really worth it, bigger than that and you lose so much
maneuvering time it’s not worth the extra thousand gallons. One set-up
I’ve seen a well-trained crew do wonders with is an 1,800 gallon tender
with multiple porta-tanks and Shoemaker (very cool jet suction
device…not sure how widely used they are). Depending on what kind of
flows you’re pushing, you can drop one person and a supply engine at
your fill site (we use a 1971 pumper which doesn’t go very fast, but it
has an amazing 1,250 gpm pump…we just park it by a lake and feed tenders
with it), put one engine and a tank farm at your staging site, and with
some practice and good shoemaker use you can run your entire water
supply with three people, including your driver.
Something I haven’t been real impressed with is the three or four
variations on the 500 gallon quick-attack hybrid trucks I’ve seen. It’s
a case of one size fits all fits no one well. They’re not much shorter
than a Class A, because of the huge pump-and-roll pump set-up, and they
really don’t push the volume you need for structure OR the pressure you
need for wildland. They look nifty for small interface departments, but
I haven’t been impressed in real life. Might work for large-scale hazmat
decon, but how many small rural departments do that often enough to
merit a designated truck?
One thing we’ve found to be great for all-purpose interface stuff is a
fairly standard Type VI wildland engine with a trailer hitch…we set up
two trailers, one for hazmat, one for technical rescue. In addition to
standard wildland stuff, we’ve sent that engine to structure fires to
patrol for spotting into the wildland, we can hook a hazmat decon shower
up to it, and we can use it as an anchor for rope rescue, a rehab
station, command center, whatever. Works good. We don’t have as much
water as it sounds like you do, but it could be cool to set up water
rescue or ice rescue trailers as well, or put a snowplow on the front
and use the Type VI to clear roads for the bigger stuff behind it.
I’m a huge fan of small and modular…I think we spend too much time on
specialized equipment instead of general equipment we can drop
specialized packages onto. It sounds like your department has more money
than mine (I hate you for your paid mechanic), but I think well-thought
out general pieces with well-thought out add-ons works better than
specialized stuff you’ll only use for a few calls a year.
Nerd on the Fireline |
| 11/17 |
Hi AB,
I'm a furloughed tanker pilot. I find myself on a citizens committee at
home tasked with determining the future equipment needs of our Rural
Volunteer Fire Dept. We have a paid chief, secretary, mechanic and PIO.
We have one new station, three bay, and six other smaller stations
spread around the area. Town numbers about 4500 spread over 54 sq.
miles, most of it forested. We do have a large number of summer
residences and the local population doubles in the summer months.
The Captains want new equipment. They bought a new class A pumper, CAFS
equipped, for $400,000. It is so large it won't fit down half of the
roads in our area. Most of the roads are unpaved. Our annual budget for
the coming year is projected at $1.6 million, not including new
equipment purchases.
My question for any of the folks out there who have experience in small,
expensive, rural FDs and VFDs is: What equipment, specifically tenders,
pumpers etc, would do us the most good? What about the fast attack
tenders? Any one have experience there?
I would like to see my local FD purchase new equipment that fits the
job. Almost our entire service area has huge wildland interface
potential. Although we live just south of the Canadian Border, on the
coast where it is fairly damp in all but the summer months.
Any ideas and suggestions you guys have would be most appreciated
Thanks,
Gordo |
| 11/17 |
Texas Canyon Hotshots will be hosting its 50th year reunion on Friday
December 3rd and Saturday December 4th.
Total cost of $50 per person you can share the making of T.C. history.
The fee will help fund a number of events-- photo exhibits, a CD ROM
detailing Texas Canyon's history and a mouth watering barbecue . The
festivities will be divided into two exciting days. Day one will consist
of a banquet dinner at the Sportsman Lodge in Studio City. Day two will
include an outdoor barbecue (Los Cantilles CG) and a station
walkthrough.
Please contact David Nish at (661) 296-8418 to reserve. |
| 11/17 |
hey what model sportiva boots are all the cool guys
wearing, and are they approved?
thanks the GOAT |
| 11/17 |
Northzone,
You are quite a bit off base with your comments. Most Structural FF are crossed trained in wildland fires.
Alot of us receive red cards because of where we work. The only difference is that most of us have to wear our structural gear when we do wildland fires. An advantage that we have in the Midwest is that our water sources allow us to conduct
relay (I've seen 1500 ft relays) pumping to the fire with each pumper putting out at least 1250 GPM, we also conduct Tanker
shuttles (out west they call them tenders) each tanker carries a minimum of 3500 gallons, Another resource we use are our ARFF
P-19s and similar ARFF rigs. We rarely cut break and mostly surround and drowned. Which for a bunch of engine pukes and truckies ain't to bad. I do give all wildland FF
tremendous credit for the jobs you all do. In my opinion you should receive the same pay and benefits that us 0081s get. I hope that some day my brothers and sisters out on the fireline get the same benefits and pay as us!
Midwest Trucky |
| 11/16 |
Ab, we lost another great supporter of both Fire and Prevention this
last weekend she did a lot for both programs on the Angeles and in
Region 5 she will be missed.
Mailrooms - please distribute to employees w/in your region and WO -
thank you
It is with great sadness that we notify everyone that on November 13,
2004 Margie Behm, Angeles NF Prevention Officer passed away after a long
illness with cancer. Margie worked for the Forest Service for 28 years
and will be missed by many.
Funeral arrangements are pending, but we expect to be able to provide
information by Thursday.
In lieu of flowers, please make donations in Margie Behm's name to
The American Cancer Society, Ovarian Cancer Research
20655 Solidad Canyon Road
Suite 17
Santa Clarita CA 91351
phone number (800) 227 - 2345 or (661) 298 - 0886
Cards can be sent to Margie's family at the following address
The Behm Family
19108 #B Valley of the Oaks
Newhall, CA 91351
Condolences. Ab. |
| 11/16 |
dubois leather custom boots in dubois idaho I worked island park for
the forest service this summer. i saw
many people wearing these boots made by dubois leather. I
am wondering if any one likes/hates these boot. some info please
thanks skimore |
| 11/16 |
Quick note on stress and "bad" cholesterol (LDL): Northzone said:
"stress alone will raise bad cholesterol levels."
Clarification: Long term stress has been shown in several
studies to be linked (correlated) with raised blood cholesterol (LDL)
levels. This is an indirect relationship (stress (A) affects
something (B) that causes increased cholesterol (C)). Researchers think
the most likely way that stress may "cause" higher cholesterol is by
affecting eating habits. When some people are stressed, they console
themselves by eating fatty foods which contain saturated fat and
cholesterol, and which contribute to higher levels of the "bad" blood
cholesterol.
Here's a place you can find the basics on the different kinds of
cholesterol, the risk factors, and what you can do to affect your
cardiac health.
FDA on Cholesterol
I must get out right now and do my "kicks" around the marsh!
Mellie |
| 11/16 |
Hutch speaks words of wisdom!
"All those years of cumulative stress, high blood pressure while on
the job, sucking smoke and eating the wrong things will catch up to
you."
Stress related blood pressure elevation has long been medical fact.
Increased cholesterol levels because of stress remains controversial but
more medico's are paying attention. (A decade ago a cardiologist told a
close friend of mine that stress alone will raise bad cholesterol
levels.) Hopefully medicine has evolved to now acknowledge damage to
hearts, not only orthopedic stress factors.
AL, in addition to the History Channel and PBS websites, you might check
MSNBC for "dangerous jobs" (missed the smokejumpers). some documentaries
are repeated elsewhere. Thanks in advance to folk who will alert us
about fire related TV airings in advance, even if it's a rumor.
Todd, remember, presidential appointees must be congressionally approved
- short tenure 4 yrs max, and submit a letter of resignation at end of
president's term. a re-elected president may ignore the letters or
accept them. a new proposed USFS boss must be congressionally approved.
considering the departure of Powell and other national security folk
will no doubt overshadow congress's focus on Mr Conner's qualifications.
geeze, I've given myself a headache *L*
northzone |
| 11/15 |
Hutch,
I'm really glad you're recovered and doing well. I've meant to
email and just haven't. My bad. <smooch>
Mellie |
| 11/15 |
In regards to Todd's post re Ann Veneman's resignation, AP reports the
following speculations:
Chuck Connor - White House farm advisor (not "the rifleman")
Charles Stenholm - D-Tex, who lost his seat in the election
Allen Johnson - US negotiator on agricultural matters
Bill Hawks - Undersecretary (USDA) for marketing
Charles Kruse - Missouri Farm Federation.
Evan |
| 11/15 |
NorCal Tom Thanks for the good wishes. I am doing fine and recovery
from my turn of heart problems is going just fine thanks to the wonders
of modern medicine and medications. The scary thing is that my LDL and
HDL as well as blood pressure (thanks to retirement) were where they
were suppose to be when I had my heart attack. So the message I share is
that it's alot more than a few numbers. All those years of cumulative
stress, high blood pressure while on the job, sucking smoke and eating
the wrong things will catch up to you. The Doctor chastised me for being
a smoker (even though I quit over 30 years ago) as I still had smokers
lung sounds due to exposure while on the job. So be safe and healthy out
there guys and gals, it does catch up to us with age and time.
To Rich Hawkins, best wishes guy, slow down and take the time you
need to heal up, the job will always be there. . .
Hutch |
| 11/15 |
My opinion: The Dept of Agriculture FS fire org is being made
nonfunctional so we'll be reorganized into Interior. First step is
moving
the finance people to ABQ NM.
Strider |
| 11/15 |
Not sure if this was posted earlier. Interesting article. I for one
don't
want to ever be under one of these but that's just one opinion.
Trial by Fire - article in Portland Tribune on Evergreen 747
airtanker
FirenNWater |
| 11/15 |
Todd - no matter who replaces Ann Veneman as Sec of Ag, you can bet
that she/he will be a rancher/farmer who could care less about the USFS,
with the largest number of employees in USDA.
The USDI (Norton, Scarlett) thinks they are the big players in the
federal wildland fire world, and no one in USDA is stepping forward to
contradict them. But then, folks in Washington are always ready to give
up Power to competitors in other departments, right? Just look at the
support to re-align the intelligence community!
Do I smell a conspiracy out there.......?
Aberdeen
Conspiracy, bah. I doubt it... You should see some of the emails
we've gotten that we haven't posted. The last two may have been posted.
Entertaining?
- From Germany in heavily accented german font: "Lots of people think
there was no plane that flew into the Pentagon on 9/11. It was an
explosion from inside. Could you put me in touch with someone from the
fire team that confirm this can?"
- Environmental groups are bringing lawsuits involving treatment of
firefighters against the FS so they can offer to drop them in exchange
for the FS placing more land in wilderness designation.
- The AT contracts were cancelled so MAFFS could take over, followed
by creation of an aerial firefighting force under the Dept of Homeland
Security. Planes could get used for other purposes like hurricane relief
in the off season.
There are some emails that come in that are really strange... Ab. |
| 11/15 |
DOD/NIFC 2004 Wildland Firefighting AAR Hello,
I am a contractor working for USNORTHCOM. We are conducting a wildland
firefighting AAR. Any chance you could forward this to the Western
Regional GACC aviation representatives (Rocky Mountains westward)?
One of our after action review topics (AAR) is to identify and train NG
helicopter crews on bucket operations prior to the fire season. The GACC
input would be useful. I don't have contact information on all the GACC
aviation representatives. Please forward if able.
Regards,
Mr. Eric Bleakney
L3/SY-Coleman Analyst ISO USNORTHCOM J35
Eric.Bleakney@northcom.mil
Mr. Eric, Looking up GACC emails and forwarding all those attachments
is beyond what we Abs are willing to volunteer for. GACC mgrs who are
interested, you could get in touch and ask him for the map, agenda, etc,
etc. Abercrombie. |
| 11/15 |
I heard there was recently a show on the history of air tankers on the
History Channel. If anyone hears of a rerun, would you please let all of
us know? Fighting Fire with Fire (West Glacier, summer 2003) was on
PBS last night. It's due to rerun on 11/20 (Saturday) at 9:30 pacific
time. You can look here for local listings (enter your zip code) for a
day or a week.
www.pbs.org/tvschedules/
AL
Thanks AL. Ab. |
| 11/15 |
Readers,
Please take a look at the photo of the
Type 6 Brush Truck for sale in the Classified ad under Equipment,
Heavy. Never too early to start planning for next season.
Ab. |
| 11/15 |
Ann Veneman is supposed to resign today. Wonder who her successor will
be. Todd |
| 11/15 |
I am constantly hounded by my underlings about signing off on their
Position Task Books. My answer is this, and I am adamant about it – if I
haven’t seen someone perform the task, and perform it well and safely,
then it doesn’t get signed off.
In the past few years we have seen an inordinate amount of contractors
entering into the fray, many of them with little or no experience. How
is it going to be possible to track these folks’ qualifications and
experience? One suggestion I’ve heard is that, within the contractors’
associations, establish a peer review board. Upon completion of a task
book, the individual would go before the board and to the best of their
ability explain why they should be signed off. The board would consider
quantity and quality of the assignments and only after discussion would
they allow final approval. Volunteer departments are faced with the same
dilemma and some are following the same process as the private
associations. With self certification of contractors, it is absolutely
vital that we establish some means of being able to track quals and
training.
Adain |
| 11/15 |
Around 11/9 -- Someone asked about the Wildland Fire
PC game.
Well, for lack of anything better to do (I'm still
waiting for fire season 2004) I downloaded the demo,
so here's a review:
It takes awhile to download; It took about 30 minutes
with my super highspeed DSL. You can download a demo,
which is essentially the entire game -- you just need
an activation code if you want to buy it.
The graphics are excellent. The game also seems to
have a fair amount of depth to it, it's not a cake
walk. I've played it now for about 45 minutes, and
have only been able to complete 1 of the first 3
challenges, and there are 16 total challenges, all
becoming more difficult. The sound is interesting,
too.
The interface is fairly easy to use. I didn't read the
instructions (which is how I normally handle shift plans
on fires -- JUST KIDDING) and was able to figure
out the interactions in about 5-10 minutes.
The only concern I would have, is this: I'm running
the game on a new, pretty high end laptop. I've got a
64 bit processor, operating at 2.00 GHz, 512MB of RAM,
and I think (can't recall) about 64 or 128MB of video
ram. The game seems like it takes a bit of time to
load (About 1.5-2.5 minutes on my system) -- which
would make me wonder how fast it would load on a
slower system.
I would highly recommend it.
Alan |
| 11/15 |
*L* Abs, obviously you didn't have the "pleasure" of working with the
individual I
briefly described. "Peter Principle" was an understatement.
too bad he never articulated nor implied, "Don't simply bring me a
problem; think
about it and bring me at least one solution you can think of as well."
I heartily agree with succinctly stating the problem along with a
probable solution
a good "manager" fosters brainstorming when a situation warrants it;
fortunately
there are many who do and those who do not are eventually sent packing.
northzone |
| 11/14 |
Does the following seem a little short sighted to anyone else?
All the FS financial folks who know the interagency agreements and
the players in the other agencies are being relocated to Albuquerque,
New Mexico! How stupid! No more quick and easy agreements when fire is
scorching those rich citizens and congressionals front doors. Gone.
extinct, kaput, finito, adios, hasta la vista, nonexistent, vaporized,
obliterated, etc. Why don't we take away all the comm units while we're
at it???
AH |
| 11/14 |
Steve L, et al. red card or not
what others may overlook in the heat of "discussion" in this forum is
that those on the line require/depend on knowledgeable support staff -
be it for a timely comm fix-it, a quality GIS map, dispatcher, or
someone to process their time sheet correctly.
Everyone has encountered incompetents & has a corresponding gripe.
some have signed off on a taskbook in the midst of rush on paperwork.
some have refused to sign off on a taskbook they should have.
some aren't doing anyone any favors by putting lives in jeopardy.
I remember a make-me-look-good boss, "don't bring me problems, bring me
solutions" . frustrating and dangerous. (a Peter Principle stereotype)
most heaved a big sigh of relief when he was replaced but sadly his
legacy lived on for a few more years.
life isn't even, nor is the ground we walk on.
be safe y'all,
northzoneI agree with your first two paragraphs, but have
something to add in response to your third.
I'm not a "make me look good boss" but this Ab believes that
if you only "bring problems", it's like
whining or calling wolf. A whine often ends with... a whine or,
worse yet, a whimper. In my experience workable solutions are more easily found if
suggestions are made by the professional who is intimate with the
problem. Problem solving is almost always a collective process even if it's
something like not
signing off a task book and telling the person what they still need to
do.
I
have frequently said, "Don't simply bring me a problem; think about it and
bring me at least one solution you can think of as well." Often to
solve a
problem, the dialog - from brainstorming to laying out viable options - has to start somewhere. A brain is required... or
as someone I know has said, "YOU have to 'show up'." |
| 11/14 |
Well another year done and another year done safe. My heart goes out
to Rich Hawkins my fmo from the Cleveland NF, Im done for the season but
his battle goes on. Even though im done working hard for the season i
will not forget how hard he is working for his life. Rich will fight
this harder than he's fought any fire ever. I hope that he recovers soon
so he can lead us through another safe and educational fire season. He
is in my prayers and will not be forgotten. Rich, get well soon from the
firefighters on the trabuco rd, cnf . ff |
| 11/13 |
To all and any involved in taskbooks.
When we are discussing taskbooks, let's not forget that not all
positions are line-fighter positions. I won't even try to figure out,
beyond FF2, how to fight fire. I don't need to. I am an AD Comm Unit
Leader with an extensive, non-wildfire tactical and strategic
communications background that dates back to 1975. I put in working Comm
systems and keep them up. That's how I work to keep my firecrews safe -
by providing working comm systems.
When I was first getting into incident management, I knew a lot about
radios and communications and only what my old man taught me about fire
(he was with the Chilao Hotshots when I was born). My first assignment
had me assigned as a technical expert COMT. When the Incident Management
Team found out I had never had a taskbook and was on my first fire, I
was treated like I didn't know a battery from an antenna. The COML had
put in a 'system' that wasn't working for the Team or the firecrews. I
recommended a fix to the COML and was told "I have more experience at
this than you do so don't tell me my job". His comments were backed by
the LSC2. My 25 years of daily experience didn’t count for squat against
the county GIS supervisor that did it 6 weeks a year. After that Team
was replaced, I went to the new IC and Log Chief with a fix to the 12
day old comm problem. A short helo ride and 15 minutes ground time
later, the system was working. The COML had a completed taskbook, I
didn't know what one was.
I have worked within the system to become a fully carded Communications
Unit Leader. Yes I still carry RADO, INCM and COMT as well as COML.
Getting through the system, even with 29 years experience, took me 4
years. There doesn't seem to be a method of transferring non-wildfire
experience to the Red Card system.
The taskbook system has a lot of flaws. In areas where the system is
supported, the taskbooks are a great evaluation tool. In areas where the
system is given the 'good ol boy' shuffle, it doesn't work and is
misused. I don't support getting a taskbook signed off completely at a
single event any more then a evaluator holding back a deserved
signature. It takes a lot of faith in the system to withhold a sign-off
when you see someone not performing up to par. A signature is a sign of
your confidence in the trainee and the reward for a job well done.
Do your part as an evaluator or trainee or taskbooks will be just
another rubber stamp document.
I, for one, vow to never rubber stamp a taskbook.
EVER.
Steve L
LCES COML-COMT-INCM-RADO |
| 11/13 |
AZfirefighter, you are a rarity :
"...I am actually a city structure FF, who LOVES wildland. I get the best of both worlds by having a summer fire season, and a year round job that takes care of my family well. Because of this, I have a lot of fire experience on both sides. I know the two are different, but you have to admit, you learn a lot for EITHER side by doing both."
This may be off topic, but unfortunately too few structural FFs are prepared for wildland status on Fed lands unless they are protecting some structure. the other side of that coin is that our Fed FFs are too often ill prepared or trained for all hazard disaster response.
Considering this ever evolving occupation and the growing risk factors, we can only hope the folk in DC are paying attention to safety issues when they allocate $$s. Parity would be nice too.
northzone |
| 11/12 |
Backburnfs:
Bro here!!
I agree with you on many of your points. In Arizona, the state fire units are trying (slowly) to put into effect, a time frame/experience level for qualifications. I do agree with you on gaining valuable experience, and many go too fast. What I don't completely see eye to eye with is the "years" concept. I understand why some think it a good idea, but sometimes I think it can be a hinder in some ways. Here is my thought:
1. Some people are just good, and pick up fast, but hold on, consider...
2. AMOUNT of experience in a season...
3. TYPES of fuels and fires
4. COMPLEXITY
5. Background experience
6. Employment specifics.
I really hope I am not losing your previous support. I still COMPLETELY believe there needs to be personal, STRONG accountability with Taskbooks. My reason for those 6 items are simple. I have worked with some people who "just get it." They are "naturals" when it comes to fire skills, understanding, and a personality that stays calm under fire, we all probably have. If you have someone like that (we probably all have), you put them into the system, and get them out on assignments, and they get better and better. As the gain #2, experience, they refine their skills, LEARN fire behavior, and really polish their natural understanding of fire fighting.
AMOUNT: 3 - 5 fires in a year, or 20, or 30+
Our state system is trying to account for fire TYPES, as well as time in grade. I think TYPES make a lot of sense. We must account for several fires in the different fuel types, i.e., grass,
brush/chaparral, timber, etc. Further, we must log these fuel types by being deployed to X amount of Type 4, 3, 2, and 1 fires. We are trying for 3 of each type (type 1 or 2 are the same). So, you must get out to several BIG fires in various fuels, and on down. Hope this makes sense.
Unfortunately to some, I am actually a city structure FF, who LOVES wildland. I get the best of both worlds by having a summer fire season, and a year round job that takes care of my family well. Because of this, I have a lot of fire experience on both sides. I know the two are different, but you have to admit, you learn a lot for EITHER side by doing both. This helps too. This is where BACKGROUND experience and
EMPLOYER comes into play. You might be employed full time, but how many fires do you really go to?? I run on my truck in the range of about 3,000 calls a year (7 a shift, if that math works). I work in the ICS system everyday, and multi agency on almost every call. I have gained invaluable experience by being a firefighter, an acting engineer, and an acting captain.
I know this is long, but I hope it makes sense. I think moving up the rank does take time, but I don't know if specific years is completely the way to go. It might limit someone very capable of some positions, especially when there might be some high attrition rates soon. By no means should anyone be a single resource boss in 1-2 years, but lets be objective and look at the whole picture (it took me 4 years, after being a full time firefighter for 5 years already).
Basically it should look like this:
TIME (years / # assignments) + FUEL TYPES + COMPLEXITY = EXPERIENCE
If you sign taskbooks, its YOUR job to make sure that trainee performed correctly, professionally, and safely. If not, suggest more time. If you are a trainee, don't be mad because you need more time. EXPECT it. It takes time to gain experience and learn. I tell every trainee, and TRAINER, I don't expect to be signed or to give a signature. Please only sign, or expect a signature, if I completely fill the expectations. Its for ALL our safety!
AZfirefighter
(would love to hear others comments on this) |
| 11/12 |
There are some good points being raised about taskbooks. Some people don't
like taskbooks and others think they should be much tougher. I think it's a good
system, but could use some refining.
I believe in the taskbook system and I think it does a good job of making
individuals have at least a minimum of experience in a position. I now work in
the structural fire world and we have no system for ensuring an individual's
level of experience. To get promoted in my dept, all someone needs to do is place
well in the testing process. There is no method to ensure the person has any
experience in the position. In fact, my dept has no procedure for a person to
get experience in a position until they are promoted into it. Firefighters
become lieutenants without ever having an opportunity to supervise anyone, even
in practice. The taskbooks, if used correctly, do a great job of exposing an
individual to a position without giving them the sole responsibility for it.
Of course, the evaluators must truly require the individual to complete the
tasks to get that experience, which is a big problem. I know several evaluators
who will sign off pretty much anything an individual wants them too,
regardless of accurate that is. That creates a major problem when an individual who is
in a given position doesn't have the experience or ability to fulfill the
responsibilities of that position. On the other hand, I know some people who make
taskbook completion so difficult that it becomes almost impossible. I
personally went through this. I got hired on with the USFS as a former FFT2 qualified
AD. I never completed a taskbook as an AD. My supe suggested I complete an
FFT2 taskbook, so he initiated one for me. Then after several fires on which I
managed to complete all the tasks, he told me the district ranger wouldn't sign
off on it as it was only open for less than a month. This was after having 7
years as a red-carded FFT2 with over 110 operational shifts.
Everyone involved in a taskbook must take their position seriously and
consider the ramifications of their actions. Taskbook initiators and evaluators
should only sign off tasks that have been correctly completed and that fulfill the
requirements of the position. On the other hand, they should not withhold
signatures on tasks or taskbook completions when they are deserved. Most of all,
trainees should make every effort to fulfill the requirements of the position
they seek, especially the taskbook. Completing the tasks, even multiple times,
will only make you better in the position you seek! We as a wildland fire
service need to work together, fairly & honestly, to ensure trainees are as
prepared as possible! In this climate of accountability, being responsible in
administering taskbooks could help protect trainers and trainees from liability as
well!
As always, Thanks Abs!!!
On_Fire |
| 11/12 |
Others retiring in R5:
Scotty Vail, Don Studebaker (altho I heard that's on hold because of
Hawkins
being out), John Wendt, Becky May up north and others I'm sure will come
to
me as soon as I hit send.
I'm adding my prayers for Rich Hawkins and his family for the best
outcome
and his speedy recovery.
I hope Hutch has made a full recovery as well.
NorCalTom |
| 11/12 |
Task Books
AZfirefighter, hats off to you cousin, don't know if you are boy or a girl (Rebel,
Rebel) so cousin will do. Anyhow making the hard decisions is what training and certification are all about. Too many people are getting rubber stamped through the Task Book process because trainers don't want to take the time to honestly evaluate an individuals performance.
It amazes me to see 2nd and 3rd season firefighters issued single
resource boss task books and getting them signed off. There needs to be a minimum experience requirement written into the qualification system some thing like 5 seasons for crewboss, 7 for ST/TFL, and 10 for DIVS/ICT3. Those numbers are too long for some and not long enough for others but would at least get us back to people having to have some actual on the ground experience to go along with the task books.
Accountability
The Cramer fire accountability/liability thing has raised it's ugly head again and this time it is out in the open where everyone can see. But none of us can get the whole story. Speculation on who/what/why is just that so who can say for sure what the punishment should be for an IC if someone is seriously injured or killed on their fire. There were many fatalities on the Cedar fire and the CDF and FS IC's are still around, in fact the CDF IC got a big promotion after the 2003 season.
I think the firefighters and their immediate supervisors have more responsibility for their actions than an IC could ever have. No one can force me to accept an assignment. I have to agree to it after I have gathered all the information I can about the assignment and insured that LCES and the other safety issues have been addressed. My accepting an assignment has to remove at least some of the
liability from the shoulders of those above me.
I guess accountability like beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
Backburnfs |
| 11/11 |
Will whoever sent in the photo from the following link, way back in
early 1997, please contact Ab? We have an urgent request for its use.
The photo is on the Fire Photo 2 Page called Guest 11, the direct link
to the photo is here:
http://www.wildlandfire.com/pics/fire2/guest11.jpg
Thanks from the management!
Original Ab. |
| 11/11 |
Alan,
I know a little about BAMs, (Big A$$ Maps) so if the questions are
indeed simple, I
can help. If they are beyond me I have contacts.
You can find me on Fire Chat fairly often, or we can figure another way
to correspond.
BB |
| 11/11 |
Is anyone keeping a list of all the fire Folks (State and Fed) that
are retiring at the
end of 2004?
I know Jerry Williams and Buck Latapie (USFS-WO), Rod Richardson and
Greg
Greenhoe (USFS-Northern Rockies) have signed up; any others joining the
mass
exodus?
Aberdeen |
| 11/11 |
I'm trying to find someone who has experience building
the "big maps" at fire camps. I just have some simple
questions I'd like answered.
Ab: If you could just forward a reply to this
email...Thank You.
Alan
Will do. Ab. |
| 11/11 |
Abs,
It is said that no job is finished 'till the paperwork's done. Well, no
fire is finished
'till the hose is rolled. (Busy firefighters are happy firefighters!)
Kitsap Structure Protection Team, DP-18, Fischer Fire, Wenatchee
National
Forest. August 2004.
EAW
Thanks E. I put it on Equipment
8 photo page. Ab. |
| 11/11 |
The Jobs
page and Series
0462 (Forestry Technician) & Series
0455 (Range Technician) jobs pages are updated as are the 0401
listings (link on jobs page). The Los Padres has a bunch of openings.
New photos of helos from Hickman and Mike Evans on Helicopters
18. Photos of Rock Creek Memorial NV (at bottom of page) from
Winslet and the Monument statues at Boise (near top of page) from the
Wildland Firefighter Foundation on Monument
& Memorials photo page. Thanks contributors. Some new
logos on Logos
10 from and lookout at Sanhedrin MNF on Misc
2 photo pages from CZ. Please read the photo descriptions for the
full info.
I hope everyone is having a fine holiday (if yer off). Thanks
vets.
Ab. |
| 11/10 |
With respect to the Cramer Fire situation, I'd like to weigh in with a
few points!
My primary concern deals with the lack of accurate information. All most
of us have to review is a heavily redacted Cramer Investigation report
that is very difficult to read, much less comprehend and study. We also
have news articles from a variety of sources, perhaps edited or at best
written with a reporter bias.
So, now we know that the Incident Commander has resigned, austensibly
due to a plea offered him by the US Attorney in lieu of seeking a <snip>
indictment. The cost of defending a felony charge is probably six
digits, with the outcome uncertain. IC Hackett was faced with a very
difficult choice, one that would squeeze the strongest of us into
submission. Faced with resigning or mounting a defense....not really
much of a choice!
Now we are to move forward with limited knowledge and information
regarding why the government chose to proceed with this course of
action. Even the best of us cannot help but wonder what will happen in
future fatality fires. Unless we have a better understanding of what
prompted these actions so an informed IC can evaluate this information
in light of his/her situation, most of us will assume the worst. In
other words, what happened here is merely a precedence for what will
happen to the next unfortunate IC, Duty Officer, District Ranger, Fire
Staff, FMO, Forest Supervisor, or.....!
I hope Forest Service leadership is developing a strategy to deal with
the unintended fallout from this tragic situation. The men and women
firefighters in this agency are waiting and watching.
GET
Ab note: I clipped the indictment because we cannot confirm that.
Thanks for the post GET, many are wondering. |
| 11/10 |
Regarding the signing of Taskbooks and quals:
We as a fire service need to watch each others backs, both on the line
and off. To watch each other off the line, we need to make some hard
decisions in regard to taskbooks.
I have been on an engine crew for several years, and am now in a
position where I am signing people off. One of THE HARDEST decisions I
have made in my career, is to have to DENY someone a signature for a
taskbook. However, I felt it was called for, and that is was a SAFETY
ISSUE. This person was not only on my crew, but also a friend. I had to
explain that it wasn't personal, but that he needed more work, more
effort, and more assignments before I felt he should have things signed
off.
I justified this because he was working towards an engine boss position,
yet when we were doing fire attack, he was staying with the truck, and
not following my directions, let alone leading as a trainee. It caused
much grief later, and to this day, things are not as friendly between
us. However, I tried to explain my feelings to him, and let him know he
could continue to train, but needed to work on these issues.
I guess with today's society, people are too quick to get upset about a
critique. Any position of leadership, and where decisions are made which
can result in injury or death are very serious. I do not intend to get
any of my crew hurt or killed, and I want to pass along that trait to my
trainees. A true professional will understand that, and the role of
leadership, and not get bent out of shape because someone feels they
need more experience, or improvement prior to getting a signature.
I hope others out there reading this post, who are trainees (aren't we
all?), will agree, or see the light, that a taskbook signature
eventually leads to more responsibility, and decisions which affect
peoples lives. Don't take it so personally when someone suggests
improvement. Those suggestions are for your benefit, and the safety of
others.
Be safe,
AZfirefighter |
| 11/10 |
BLMgirl,
Yes, sorry, I should have included that the first time:
Richard D. Hawkins
Fire Management Officer
Cleveland National Forest
10845 Rancho Bernardo Road
Suite 200
San Diego, CA 92127
Thanks for the email follow-up Ab.
R5er |
| 11/10 |
R5er,
Where can we send cards, etc to Rich Hawkins? He is a true standup guy
who
endured way too much during Cedar. After working for him and CA Team 5
on a
couple of type 1 fires, he has my eternal respect.
BLMgirl |
| 11/10 |
CM,
No interest in getting fat here. Yeah, I know how I sound.
As a Veggie, I know you get more than your fair share food
grief.
Personally, I'm not a Veggie, but I know many who are.
They all tell me that the Veggie choices in camp often suck.
My favorite is when they tell me how frequently they get a
Beef & Bean burrito or tuna sandwich in their Veggie sack
lunch. As much as I get sick and tired of mummified baked
potatoes, they get sick of beans, beans, and more beans.
I guess my bitchin comes from hearing about what we are
paying. A buddy showed me last years (2003) prices for
sack lunches. The average price was almost $15.00 each
per lunch.
- Batchmaster |
| 11/10 |
What if they had a wildland fire and no IC came?
Todd |
| 11/10 |
Westin Glass
Give me a shout, we are always looking for quality candidates here in
Northern California.
SRJS
AB, if he replies back could you forward my email address to him?
Yep, I will. Ab. |
| 11/10 |
Fire Line Candy
Hotshots flinging dirt
working for their vittles.
Wolfing down plastic bags
of sugar coated Skittles.
Engine crews eating M&M's
in air conditioned rides.
Showing a hard exterior
but all soft inside.
ICs strutting through camp
noshing on a bag of Nerds.
Like a sheepdog tending
a herd.
Air Attack flying high
sticky Milk Duds in their teeth
keeping a watchful eye
underneath.
DIVS marching the line
munching on Snickers.
Pointing out the obvious
even the little flickers.
Candy on the line for comfort
sugar induced highs
while back in camp
Logistics is getting
bigger thighs.
Oliver
Good response to the Skittles post with image from Bored Hotshot
that we had up on theysaid over night. Appreciate the humor. Ab. |
| 11/10 |
Hi there,
My name is Westin Glass, and I am hoping to be a wildland firefighter
next summer.
I completed the Wildland Firefighting course at my community college in
Albuquerque, New Mexico in Spring 2002, resulting in a red card. For the
past three summers I have applied online to every fire job I could find
in the West and Southwest--literally hundreds of jobs--and I received
absolutely no response at all.
I just moved up to Seattle, Washington, and I'm hoping to find a ranger
station, fire crew, or anywhere at all that I can volunteer this winter
and spring to hopefully build relationships and prove myself, so I can
have a better chance at getting a fire job in summer of 2005.
Any advice on places or people I can contact in Washington, Oregon,
Idaho, or Montana to volunteer?
Thanks a lot!
Westin |
| 11/9 |
A longtime member of the wildland firefighter community, Richard
Hawkins,
Forest FMO of the Cleveland N.F. has recently suffered a heart attack
and
is in between critical surgeries. Thoughts and prayers are with him.
Letters
and well wishes would undoubtedly be appreciated.
In short... Life is short.
R5er |
| 11/9 |
The liability issue is already affecting staffing.
On my unit are three individuals. Previously identified as quality
candidates and groomed for several years to move up and become an IC or
burn boss -- given accelerated development and preferential training
assignments -- only to refuse to step up and assume the responsibilities
when the time came.
All three gave the same reason. "I'm too close to retirement to
risk it."
I do not blame them one bit. I had several positions removed from my red
card because of the management climate.
Agency leadership is way past due for some serious soul-searching.
Gordon. |
| 11/9 |
I've been reading the post on the liability insurance
and the others on Type 3 I.C.s and I have to agree
with alot of the points. The question I have though is
how many of our Type 3 I.C.s got their quals without
getting the proper experience. I'm seeing more and
more people getting quals with very little time on the
line. Now I know that too be a Type 3 IC you have to
be certified now, but when your own Forest and friends
are doing the simulation how many people are going to
get qualified because someone didn't have the heart or
they aren't going to fail a friend.
I just came from a forest where the Type 3 IC's were
being qual'd on small Type 4 fires. I also seen
people getting signed off as Task Force Leader after
one shift of mop-up. Just because someone has a
completed Task Book doesn't mean they are qualified.
So when are we going to start making Forests or the
people signing off Taskbooks a little responsible if
the person isn't ready and someone gets maimed or
killed. This job is to dangerous to put people with
minimal experience in key positions. I know there
are a lot of people out there that I wouldn't want to
be in charge. There still are to many accidents
waiting to happen because of lack of experience. We
can train people to death but without the experience
and first hand knowledge what good is it.
Now whats happening over on the Salmon/Challis is
wrong and I feel bad for Alan and it's a sad state of
affairs when our own agency won't back you.
Thanks for letting me vent AB.
PYG |
| 11/9 |
Re: sack lunches....quit yer bitchin. As a hotshot and a vegetarian, i
get more than my share of the short end of the stick. It is.....part of
the ethereal experience of wildland firefighting. If you don't like it,
stay in town and get fat off dennys.
CM
Some of us might agree, except that one of the food contractors
asked about firefighter likes and dislikes so we're entitled.
My two most memorable gustatory experiences:
a small container of raisins and peanuts -savored one by one- at sunset
with pink light glinting off the mountains in the distance and valley
fire burning in the dark below;
my third day in firecamp and the closeout dinner entre was a standing
rib roast cooked to perfection with horseradish, almost crispy little
veggies, little potato chunks, Joe, Joy and Al. Ab. |
| 11/9 |
It's both encouraging - and discouraging - to see the in-depth
discussions about firefighter liability that is currently being cussed
and discussed.
At the risk of being viewed as a pessimist - I truly believe that you
give new definition to "Fool" if you do your best serving in
ANY fire management position and believe that your Agency will stand
behind you when something goes wrong. It ain't gonna happen!
After the politization of wildfire fatalities by Senator Cantwell and
Congressman Hastings after "Thirtymile", no one who serves in
any responsible position on prescribed fires or wildfires is protected
from the threats of lawsuits and/or criminal charges. Long gone are the
days when a FMO who experiences fatalities on his District after failing
to perform up to standards can expect a cash award at the season's end.
So, what to do? First, consider the benefits and risks, both to you and
your family, from serving in positions where firefighters and/or
civilians might die, or where property might be lost on a prescribed
burn. If you decide to fill those jobs, get good liability insurance as
has been described in earlier posts.
It's a new day in wildland fire, girls and boys! No longer are we the
heroes in the white hats that are never held accountable when things go
wrong. Wildland fire is, in my opinion, still equal parts of art and
science: we'll never know for sure that our decisions will always turned
out as planned.
So, err on the side of fiscal prudence and, as the Boy Scouts say,
"Be Prepared".
Mollysboy |
| 11/9 |
Batchmaster,
I wrote this awhile back in my attempts to point out the culinary
deficiencies in fire camps.
I support your suggestion to ban Skittles.
Mop-Up Article 5... Sack lunches
Fire managers and supervisors complain about fire fighters complaining
about sack lunches. In this article I offer to document the problem and
be a mediator to help solve the sack lunch complaints.
To mediate a responsible reaction to the fire fighters complaint seems
fairly easy to me. Make the food unit leader eat a sack lunch instead of
making a trip through the salad bar at base camp!
Another thought is to change the obvious practice of the food handlers
using sack lunches as pillows and <snip> cushions prior to
sending the lunches to the line. Pressed duck may be considered fancy
fare in some cultures but pressed white bread and processed turkey
sandwiches are banned in third world countries.
Why even send the condiment packages out to the line? I defy anyone to
separate the white bread slices to apply the mayonnaise or mustard. Dry
white bread sandwich... followed by a can of tart orange juice....mm...
mmm good.
There needs to be a new ICS position attached to the teams. I would
offer the acronym BIUBTDUL (best if used by this date unit leader).
Personally I like Grandmas cookies. Here's a hint for the new BIUBTDUL,
the cookies are better if they have a best if used by date that at least
coincides with the first Bush administration.
Seriously it would be nice to go through a complete fire progression
without a sandwich recall. These recalls are usually announced just
after mid-shift. After a sandwich recall several years ago I made the
mistake of asking... over the command channel... what was wrong with the
sandwiches. The reply I received and by everyone else scanning the
command frequency was short and to the point... " the meat may be
tainted". This announcement started a series of rather unpleasant
events on Division D.
It seems most of the crews had already consumed at least one of the
pressed white bread sandwiches. In an attempt to apply tainted meat
prevention efforts, a 20 person crew decided to perform self induced
purging. An adjacent 20 person crew was watching the first crew and not
knowing that this was a prevention effort their stomach's reacted
violently to this rather unpleasant scene and they started vomiting.
I think you know where this headed... the next crew up the line seeing
the second crew vomit and having heard the tainted meat broadcast also
started reinforcing the hand line with chunks of pressed white bread and
turkey slurry. Before I knew it I had six 20 person crews loaded up and
headed for the medical unit to be checked for Sam and his friend Ella.
This story has a happy ending, the meat most likely wasn't tainted and
for 2 shifts we had ham on wheat bread sandwiches instead of processed
turkey on pressed white bread.
Look for a future article on why "Eggs Britannica" shouldn't
be served at fire camps. Ok...ok... incident base camps. You know what
they say about old dogs and habits.
Oliver Moore...Ask the difficult questions...be safe |
| 11/9 |
Has anybody tried the new Wildfire PC game yet? I'm thinking of buying
it, but before I put my money into it I'd like some input. At least
there's no liability being the IC on these fires! You can download it
at www.catdaddy.com/wildfire.html
Nepper |
| 11/9 |
DW and BB, re: Food
I've never experienced Growlersburg, but I agree with you about Hog
Heaven. Sometimes you get one that makes you wonder if you are a guest
on Fear Factor. Had a kitchen once served breaded country fried steaks
cooked in (smothered in) BBQ sauce. Really gross looking and tough.
I HATE soggy bread in my sack lunch! When I make my own lunch at home,
my bread doesn't turn to mush by noon! What gives?
I HATE Skittles! Please, please, please, for God's sake, NO MORE
Skittles in sack lunch!
How about a beef steak that I can actually chew? Come to think of it,
how about doing the same for chicken? The last chicken I had in camp
tasted mummified.
How friggin hard is it to cook a damn burrito BEFORE you put it into a
sack lunch? I know that sometimes I can cook it on the line, but why
should I
have to?
Canned food in a sack lunch?!?! Gee, I forgot my can opener. Cold canned
corned beef hash tastes like dog food! Canned macaroni tastes like
vomit!
There are other condiments besides ketchup and mustard! Anyone ever
heard of steak sauce or pickle relish? How about garlic powder or onion
powder?
Orange juice in cardboard or plastic looks and tastes like orange juice.
Orange juice in a can looks and tastes like battery acid.
Does Turkey stop being a meat after Thanksgiving is over? Beef, chicken,
pork, beef, chicken, pork, beef, chicken, pork, beef, chicken, pork,
AAARRGGH!!
What ever happened to fish for dinner? Or Pot Roast? Or Ribs? I like
Burger Bundles. StoveTop stuffing inside a ball (baseball size) of
hamburger (with worstshire) topped with beef gravy and mushrooms.
How many different ways are there to make potatoes? "Wow, we get
baked (mummified) potatoes again! Yeah!"
No more blue Gatorade or anything else that tastes like fictional,
made-up fruits like Crappleberry, Tangerspleen, Burpleberry, Razzamellon,
Pukecherry!
Omelets are eggs too.
More Snickers (candy bar) in sack lunch, Less Gummysavers or Starburst
(candy).
Sound Off! Good, decent, edible food is important. Some of these jokers
need to get a clue and remember why they are there.
- Batchmaster |
| 11/9 |
Ab,
I would like to update everyone in the wildland community about the
status of Matt Taylor, the Prineville Hotshot sff, who is suffering from
a
brain tumor. Things have been pretty much up and down this summer for
Matt
and his family, as in good news-bad news-good news-bad news. About two
months ago the MRI showed another tumor on the right side of his brain
(the
left side was where the original tumor, surgery and radiation were
done).
Matt received radiation on the new tumor, and will have another MRI soon
to
determine if the cancer has spread or has regressed. He is still taking
chemotherapy to the tune of about $2000.00 a month, and his insurance is
covering about half of that. Thanks to all your kind and caring
generosity, we are able to cover the rest so far. According to the
radiologist, there may likely to be more spread of the cancer, due to
the
new growth on the right side of the brain. What happens next is the
deterioration of brain function, which Matt is starting to show some
signs
of. His biggest need at present is for more leave to be donated. At
present, his total is about 253 hours, which adds up to around 31 days.
Matt will be needing more than that, since I do not foresee him
returning
to work, and we will keep him on the payroll as long as he has leave.
If you have any leave you could donate, that would help tremendously.
If you
are not familiar with the process, you use an AD 1043 form. The
directions
for the procedure are on the form itself. You can get the form at your
local office or pull it off the "forms" site in the FS
directory. I will
also include a copy in this email. (If you need one, contact Ab.)
I also want to send my thanks, the gratitude of Matt, his family, and
the
Prineville Hotshots out to the entire wildland fire community, to
everyone
who opened their hearts, pocket/check books, auctioned things off,
passed
messages, donated a fund raisers, said prayers to help and support Matt,
Kiersten, Jordan and the rest of his family. Your response has been
overwhelmingly generous, heart warming, and awe inspiring. I just feel
so
tremendously proud to be part of a community that acts on its compassion
in so many supportive and caring ways. It is my hope that you all
experience the blessing that giving to others in need provides.
Gratefully yours,
Lance Honda
Federal employees, in these days of "Use it or loose it"
this would be a very meaningful donation.
Some have asked about a monetary gift to help with the costs of his
medical treatment. Here's the account info.
If you're in Oregon, the direct deposit account number with Bank of
America is 2884010802 .
If you're in another state, you can direct deposit into Bank of America
OR2-134-01-01.
If you'd rather pop a donation check in the mail, make it out to Matt
Taylor and send it to Lance for deposit in Matt's med treatment account.
Lance Honda
Prineville Hotshots
3160 NE 3rd St
Prineville, OR 97754
Here's that sweet photo of Matt
and his daughter. Ab. |
| 11/9 |
Ab,
I have to weigh in on Alan Hackett’s behalf. I don’t know the man,
but I feel sad today for him, his family, and our Forest Service family.
Don't get me wrong, I also grieve for Jeff & Shane, and empathize
with their families and friends. But Alan is unfortunately facing the
nightmare that all incident commanders worry about; someone getting
killed on a fire you are managing. From the moment he first learned that
two of his firefighters were missing, Alan joined the infamous list of
ICs who were unlucky enough to be at the helm when events took a bad
turn.
You may wonder why I say unlucky, because when you read the Cramer
investigation report, it is obvious that Alan made mistakes managing
that fire, some of them significant. But I cannot think of a single Type
III incident that I have IC’ed in the past ten years where I did not
make some mistakes and in which people were not placed in a close
proximity to hazards. It is the nature of what we do. We do our best to
recognize & mitigate hazards, then, we go to work & hope that
everyone on the incident has enough training, experience, brains, &
luck to avoid getting maimed or killed by whatever hazard they are
facing on their portion of the fire.
On a Type III or larger incident, the IC has to rely on the skill &
training of the firefighters assigned to the incident. That doesn’t
absolve an IC from doing everything possible to provide a safe work
environment. But a rapidly growing fire is somewhat like a battle
unfolding; as a commander, your priority is to maintain the big picture,
predict what the enemy (fire) will do & where it will go, determine
how many troops and resources you need to win the battle (control the
fire), and direct the general placement of troops and resources. How
accountable should an IC be for events that occur on their fire but not
under their direct and immediate supervision?
There is a real danger in applying punishment to working people like
Alan and not looking beyond the proximal causes of the accident. How
about investigating the system that spawned the accident? In many ways,
Alan is a victim of a system that failed to properly train him and
others to recognize the gravity of the situations they were facing. He
was also victimized by the failure of managers to staff critical
positions on the forest, which left him floundering as an overworked
AFMO trying to IC one fire and manage several others at the same time.
And, I dare say, he was victimized by years of Forest Service WO
directives to do more with less, combine ranger districts/forests, give
more collateral duties to fire managers, etc.
Potential civil & criminal penalties elevate Alan’s predicament to
a whole new level. How many mid-level FS fire managers & Type III
ICs are currently asking themselves whether they can continue to do
their jobs if they can expect the lion’s share of the liability and
blame when the stuff hits the fan? Forget whether Alan manages to escape
civil or criminal penalties, the fact that he is being forced to defend
actions taken in the course of his job, in the interest of the agency,
and apparently in good faith make this a landmark case. I hope he at
least has liability insurance.
If we are going to start chopping people’s heads off for making errors
in judgment, then we might as well quit fighting fires. No one should
have to face jail or losing everything they own because someone was
killed on a fire they were managing, unless there was malicious intent
or absolute recklessness. If the Forest Service will only defend its
employees in court if no rules are broken and if it is in the best
interest of the agency, Type III ICs will soon be harder to find than
wolverines.
Giving us more checklists and firing employees who make errors in
judgment are not going to end fatalities on wildfires. Until we quit
applying band-aid fixes and take a NASA-style introspective look at our
entire system, we are guaranteed to continue experiencing fatalities on
wildfires. One big step in the right direction would be legislation
protecting wildland firefighters from criminal or civil litigation if
they made errors while performing their jobs in good faith, much like
the Good Samaritan law for EMTs.
Misery Whip |
| 11/9 |
Ain't it a sad world when everyone has to go out and LAWYER UP?
in order to serve... And then your family might still loose everything.
Tahoe Terrie |
| 11/9 |
The liability conversation is interesting. When I completed S-420 ten
years ago I was advised to purchase personal liability insurance to
cover my backside. Agencies will tell you that as long as you are
working under the scope of your job duties the employer will cover your
actions. This is where nuance is important. Imbedded within policy,
position description and agency guidance there are literally hundreds of
"working within your scope of duty" minefields waiting for a
lawyer's interpretation
It's amazing that so many of us are still willing to take on the risk of
criminal and civil actions because we choose to work in a leadership
position. My stance has always been that each fire fighter has the
responsibility to perform their job safely. IAPs, briefings and
supervision all provide direction to establish LCES prior to engagement,
that ALL personnel will comply with the 10 orders and 18 watch outs and
how to properly refuse a fire line assignment.
Beyond this leadership goes to great length to identify and describe the
influences on the fire ground. Fire weather and fire behavior forecasts,
setting incident objectives and performing an Incident Risk Analysis.
This holds true from IA to large fire management.
So where are the failures occurring?
At the leadership and supervision level?
At the individual fire fighter level?
My suspicions are that if you dig deep enough and do enough Monday
morning quarterbacking you can lay blame at the feet of whoever you
chose.
The good news is that we have a lot of dedicated, educated and motivated
fire fighters and fire leadership positions at the fire ground level and
we continue to enjoy a high degree of success with the majority of our
assignments. The sad news is that if we let the perpetual efforts to
attach the failure label to a person, due to agency fears of liability,
we will continue to be blind to other causes and solutions in our
efforts to develop a safer work assignment for fire fighters.
Fire fighting is a tough job... if it was easy every one would be doing
it.
Oliver...remember insurance started out as threats of extortion...hmmmm |
| 11/9 |
For Fuels Guy
Not only can you be sued by employees, you can be sued by the
public. I worked around some very litigated recreation sites and
there were fatalities and live long injuries occurring with some
regularity, along with lawsuits pending almost all the time. I
would guess that once a plaintiff was denied an administrative claim,
then sued the government, they could come and sue you also, as a private
person. Whether the government would defend you (Office of General
Counsel and U.S. Attorney) would probably depend on the merits of the
plaintiff's case.
Can you imagine a burn boss or IC being sued for a decision that
resulted in the loss of structures? I'm sure they would be defended by
the government. But then again, what if they weren't. Most District
Rangers and other line officers I worked with had this insurance.
RR
|
| 11/9 |
Not sure why you think the lytle spot photo is fake.
I looked at it closely, and was on that fire.
Nothing seems out of the ordinary to me.
And I am sure FFEric would not fake anything!
BB |
| 11/9 |
Mellie
Here is some info I dug up on the Personal Liability Insurance, It's
not a plug for these guys, just some general information about it. I
would highly recommend getting it, the cost of it VS the actual Lawyer
fees is well worth it. It's a fact that people die on fires and
unfortunately this will happen again and again.
Watch your ass.
MG
--------------------------------------- Especially designed for
Federal Employees
Lawsuits against Federal Government employees are increasing at an
alarming rate. Members of the public, even fellow workers, can bring
personal lawsuits against you. You are at risk whenever you are acting
within the scope of your job including:
* delegating assignments
* making staff evaluations
* working at your desk
* meeting with the public
Away from your desk, you could be exposed to even greater risk of
lawsuits from private citizens. Frivolous or not, it could still cost
you thousands of dollars.
Effective October 1, 1999, all Federal agencies are required to pay half
the premium cost for most employees up to $150 per year.
The Federal Tort Claims Act states that the government can choose
whether or not to defend you. It cannot cover any monetary damages
awarded against you personally. Even if the Justice Department refuses
to defend you, this plan picks up the full cost of your legal defense
and pays covered damages awarded against you (up to the $1 million
limit).
This Professional Liability Insurance was specially designed to protect
Federal Government employees. You are protected anywhere in the world
against losses from lawsuits stemming from the performance of your
official federal duties.
This article offers a brief description of the Professional Liability
Insurance plan. Details can be found in the Certificate of Insurance
which will be mailed to you upon enrollment.
ELIGIBILITY Any full-time employee of the Federal Government working at
least 17.5 hours per week is eligible for Professional Liability
coverage
DESCRIPTION OF BENEFITS
* $1,000,000 of professional liability coverage for judgments arising
from acts, errors, or omissions committed by you within the scope of
your employment.
* Administrative legal defense coverage up to $100,000 to pay the costs
of defense and monetary penalties associated with administrative
proceedings for acts committed or alleged within the scope of your
employment. Coverage is provided for Internal Agency Disciplinary
Proceedings; Criminal Proceedings; and Judicial Sanctions for any
monetary penalty.
* Protection against judgments involving personal injury, bodily injury
and property damage within the scope of your employment.
* Protection against lawsuits that existed before the effective date of
coverage provided as an insured that you had no knowledge of such suits
and no othere insurance is in force.
* A discovery period of 36 months is effective the day you retire.
This plan pays for your defense cost even against groundless or
fraudulent suits. This is in addition to your liability limit and is
without limitation. There is no deductible, and where allowed by state
law, this plan pays punitive damages up to your coverage limit.
EFFECTIVE OF COVERAGE Coverage is effective on the first day of the
month following receipt of the application and payment, except if paying
by payroll deduction. Coverage will then be effective on the first day
of the pay period for which your premium is deducted.
JUSTICE DEPARTMENT CONSULTED IN DESIGNING THIS COVERAGE This program was
developed with the advice and consultation of attorneys in the Torts
Claims Division of the Justice Department tmattrovide the fullest
protection possible for you as a government employee. They work in the
field daily and are more acutely aware of your needs than anyone else.
You should feel confident knowing this is the only professional
liability policy developed with the advice of the Justice Department.
EXCLUSIONS Coverage under this plan does not include:
* Any obligation for which the insured or any carrier as his insurer may
be held liable under any workers' compensation, unemployment
compensation, disability benefits law, or other similar law.
* Damages arising out of willful violation of a penal statue or penal
ordinance committed by or with the knowledge or consent of the insured,
or damages arising out of acts of fraud committed by or at the direction
of the insured with affirmative dishonesty or actual intent to deceive
or defraud.
* Liability assumed by the insured under any contract or agreement.
* Bodily injury arising out of the ownership, operation, or the use of
any land motor vehicle designed for use principally on public highways,
including any machinery or apparatus attached thereto, or any aircraft
or watercraft.
* Property damage to:
* property owned occupied by, or rented to the United States Government
or insured;
* property used by the insured;
* property in the care or control of the insured or as to which the
insured is for any purpose exercising physical contact (not applicable
to property of persons in custody or property under lawful control).
* Any liability for hazardous substances, including asbestos.
* Bodily injury or property damage resulting from accidents caused by
nuclear materials. (more)
|
| 11/9 |
Proof is in the pudding.
The local shop guys working off just maintenance records tell us:
1) Chevys are high maintenance; Consumer Reports says the opposite, but
they deal in pavement pick-ups.
2) The bigger (3/4 ton up) Fords are pretty decent, and none of the rigs
we've seen can keep up with a big ol' high off the ground 6-pak Ford
long bed in a foot or two of snow.
3) Dodge produces the least problem rigs on one of the largest FS
Districts with plenty of wash boarded roads.
Hot Shot crews ain't what they used to be. With all the new crews
someone is going to have to go to tie dye shirts.
Of course, CDF inmate crews have dropped in quality too. Former Governor
G. Davis sent all the illegal aliens over to Fed Prisons in a midnight
run and the gang felons just can't keep up with former crews of south of
the boarder guys just trying to send money home to family. But the
bangers do have high return rates that help with the experience issue.
Any good baseball stat keeper knows you cannot compare players from
different ages. Then to go a step further; current 20 person shot crews
vs. 15 inmates vs. 25 man IR crews that weren't weighed down by shelters
and a space stations worth of gear. I still remember what assistant
foreman Bill Stewart said about the 'Shot crew attitude coming out of
California; "They're worse than jumpers."
Woa now. I'm just saying high maintenance is part of both the mechanical
and human equations.
Concerning beer. I must request that all beverage evaluations be
confined to rice and corn free products. And we all know what watered
down means in our profession. Some dang engine crew. Even though they
handle more fires than any other group.
Fuels Guy |
| 11/9 |
Several things here:
IH vehicles were and are far superior to the big three for torque,
longevity, and toughness.
The 401 push is misguided, even with its quals standards, it will push
the FS into a bad place.
Module leader responsibility is key, and when retention problems erode
that, we are in trouble!
Fuels Guy said:
Concerning beer. I must request that all beverage evaluations be
confined to rice and corn free products. And we all know what watered
down means in our profession. Some dang engine crew. Even though they
handle more fires than any other group.
I agree!
The Dodge P-up I used to drive was junk, tranny problems, big turning
radius, and could not walk it's way out of any thick stuff! I am not
really a Chevy guy, but my Tahoe is much better. My Scout kick butt on
either of them though!
Respectfully,
BB
|
| 11/8 |
There is something out there that from what I remember
is called Personal Liability Insurance.
Basically it's insurance to get an attorney
It's a yearly 1000ish cost that gives one an
astronomical amount of money towards lawyers and such.
From what I remember, this is for Government
employees.
I know some people out there have this and can more
than likely provide more information on this. When I
was in fire I used to carry this.
I'll try to dig up some more info on it.
MG |
| 11/8 |
Ab,
I have received an email from a firefighter friend requesting
financial assistance for FS employees who may need to mount a legal
defense without bankrupting their families. A number of people - from
contractors to ICs to groundpounders - have expressed a need for
this kind of fund. I agree. Just as our Wildland Firefighter Foundation
supports families of fallen wildland firefighters in their time of grief
and loss, a legal defense fund helps ensure fair representation and
helps defray trial expenses if it comes to that. The post is self
explanatory.
I am sending in my contribution.
Mellie
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This is a fund that has been established to assist the
FS employees involved with the Cramer fire.....who have the possibility
of facing criminal charges.
Cramer Legal Defense and Employee Assistance Fund
November 1, 2004
In July of 2003 a wildfire claimed the lives of two firefighters on the
Salmon-Challis National Forest. This tragic fire impacted the lives of
many people; including, fallen firefighter family members, survivors,
and many other employees.
The accident was investigated by the Forest Service, the Office of
Inspector General (OIG) and the Occupational Safety and Health
Administration.
Disciplinary actions are moving forward by the Intermountain Regional
Forester against several employees. The US Attorney in Boise, Idaho has
paneled a Grand Jury to review the facts. Criminal indictments could be
returned on one or more individuals.
A legal defense and employee assistance fund has been established to
provide financial support to Forest Service employees who need
assistance to respond to administrative and potential criminal charges.
Contributions can be made to:
Account No. 1000015584 Cashmere Valley Bank
Cramer Legal Defense Fund P.O. Box 5040
127 Easy Street
Wenatchee, WA 98807
This fund will remain open until April 1, 2005. The Fund Administrator
is G. Elton Thomas with assistance from several others. Funds will be
distributed on the basis of demonstrated need. Any funds remaining in
the account on April 2, 2005, will be donated to the National Fallen
Firefighter Foundation, Emmitsburg, MD.
A copy of the Fund Charter can be obtained upon request, by writing:
Fund Administrator, 1031 Canal Blvd, Wenatchee, WA 98801.
This is a privately established and managed fund that is not sponsored
or endorsed by any government agency and it does not have tax exempt
status.
Cramer Legal Defense and Employee Assistance Fund
Charter
November 1, 2004
Purpose: The purpose of this fund is to provide financial
assistance to employees (current or former) involved with administrative
and legal proceedings resulting from the Cramer Fire.
Process: Contributed funds will be distributed by a three member
Board of Directors, one of whom is G. Elton Thomas, Fund Administrator.
The Board will have sole responsibility for these funds and shall
develop controls to account for fund distribution and management.
Records shall be kept and made available for review.
Distribution: Requests for funds shall be made to the Board in
writing and shall be limited to those named in administrative sanctions
by the Forest Service and/or are the target of potential criminal
charges resulting from the Cramer Fire. Monies from the Fund will only
be distributed to current or former employees. Written requests shall be
submitted to:
Fund Administrator
Cramer Legal Defense and Employee Assistance Fund
1031 Canal Blvd
Wenatchee, WA 98801
The written notice shall detail the specific reasons for the request.
All decisions by the Board are final and are not subject to appeal or
litigation.
|
| 11/8 |
Ab: I think you’ve been had. The photo on Fire 25, Lytle Fire Spot,
appears
to have been altered. I don’t believe the spot fire is real.
jam
Maybe the photographer can confirm and bring forth witnesses? |
| 11/8 |
I was at FireTech Reno last week at the Reno Convention Center and
while there I visited the Wildland Firefighter Foundation and spoke with
the person staffing the booth.
He was very professional, he spoke about the benefits to both government
and private contract wildland firefighters, the booth was very well set
up and comprehensive in its presentation.
I am a structural firefighter now, but spent many seasons fighting fire
to pay for school and the way that the government will discount us if we
are seriously injured or killed is shameful. There needs to be a better
support system for those in the wildland field when disaster strikes
provided by the government. But in the mean time this is the best thing
going if the need arises.
I want to encourage all of you who read the They Said board, be it
Government or Private, paid, seasonal or volunteer, regardless if you
are a first year Firefighter or a 30-year Chief, to join
the Wildland Firefighter Foundation and support the mission they
have taken on. There may be a day when someone you know will need the
support to get through this horrible time, and it is good to know
someone has.
MOC4546 |
| 11/8 |
Ab,
According to the Warbird Registry, the Grumman F7F Tigercat
flown as N6177C Tanker 31 crashed in 1974. There is a color
photo of the aircraft and more information here.
www.warbirdregistry.org/f7fregistry/f7f-80397.html
Fedfire
Thanks, Fedfire. Interesting bit of history. Ab.
|
| 11/8 |
Lookouts going away?
High-flying firefighting
Remote-camera
surveillance gives crews a bird's-eye view of wildfires
HPWren site the article talks about: http://archive.hpwren.ucsd.edu/cameras/
SoCal CDF
Goldfinches on the feeder birdcam... almost looks like Original
Ab's backyard feeder. Ab.
|
| 11/8 |
Rogue Rivers,
Actually I will have to have a waiver under the the new medical
standards when they are implemented in my geographic area but no I am
not totally blind.
I don't see it as a long term problem, only a short to mid term one. If
these folks affected want to retire or stay in current positions, so
what. There will be plenty of people willing to move around, over, and
through them. The policies driving our business has been changing every
year and this is just another change, with 5 years to full
implementation. Get on board or you will get left at the dock.
See going Back to school's post below. This is the kind of attitude we
need........
I'd give you my "Life is all about choices, and you can always make
a new one if you don't like how things are working out." speech,
but it would take to much room here.
CD |
| 11/7 |
Friends:
I finally have to weigh in regarding the GS-0401-thread. I retired a
couple of years ago as a GS-0401-12 Fire Management Officer. I retired
with a really great firefighter retirement deal in my 50’s. I remain
active as a retiree (FBAN/ATGS) and love every minute of it. I will do
it as long as I can. This is a great profession!
Old Fire Guy said:
“Enroll in a 4 year degree in a natural resources field. I'd
suggest "forestry", but others will do. Pay for college by
working on a fire crew or engine crew etc. Continue in fire getting
all the training and experience you can. Demonstrate a good work
ethic. Become a leader with both education and experience. We need
that.”
AMEN! Bravo OFG! That is exactly what so many of us did for so many
years to get to where we are now. I started when I was 18. I would not
take back a minute of the professional development of my career
including both ground-pounding and education. We worked our way through
college, took a lot of government sponsored training, and had a blast
doing it. We also made a lot of friends along the way.
Experience and Education, the 2E’s, are essential prerequisites in
every vocation, every profession. This is certainly the case in land
management agencies, especially for wildland fire managers. The wildland
fire manager position now requires someone very well educated in the
scientific aspects of wildland fire i.e. fire ecology, botany, biology,
etc. as well as the political aspects of same As a wildland fire manager
you will go mano-a-mano with those dreaded Ologists on the
interdisciplinary battlefield. Without the knowledge and credibility of
a science-related college education and a whole lot of experience the
wildland fire manager simply loses the argument and firefighter safety
is compromised. There are many examples of failed wildland fire programs
out there for exactly that reason. And firefighter safety is
compromised!
Now, all of that having been said, I absolutely believe in the concept
of a professional wildland fire management series for GS 9 and higher
wildland fire managers. I do not believe, however, that either of the 2E’s
should be relaxed from those required for any other federal professional
natural resource manager positions. In the aftermath of South Canyon we
identified lack of proper management education and planning in wildland
fire as a primary cause of tragedy fires. Professional wildland fire
managers must be properly educated in both the planning and execution
aspects of their responsibilities and must be comparably educated to the
rest of the interdisciplinary community. We must do away with the 0401
series for wildland fire management and professionalize into a separate
Wildland Fire Manager series to give us unique and equal representation
at the table! Yes, redcard qualifications must continue to be a major
part of the prerequisite for these positions. We said this in the
aftermath of South Canyon almost 10 years ago! Why is this taking so
long?
Casey: Keep listening. We need you!
Thanks BLM Bob for website information!
Going Back To School: Enjoy going back to school!
Wags: You have great focus and spirit! Keep it up!! I would like to
get you talking to my 21 year old son!
This Summer I had the great fortune of working with a great group of
folks on the North Rim. We all studied wildland fire together and looked
out for each other for days on end monitoring WFU’s and executing Rx
burns (thanks Ed and Dick; MSO Jumpers Bobby, Jen, Rocky, “Axe
Murderer” --going back to school?). We all agreed that, as Paul
Gleason said it so well, we must all continue to be “Students of Fire”.
If we do that we will not only be doing what is best for ourselves and
the Earth we will also under our watch keep all firefighters safe.
NMAirBear
|
| 11/7 |
This photo was taken at the Ukiah Air Attack Base in
Ukiah California in Aug.1972 and I think the pilot's
name was Harry Chaffy and operated by Sis Q Flying
Service. Thanks Leroy Zwicky for the photo.
cz
Thanks cz. Interesting old black and white. Any more info on it? I
posted it on AirTankers
14. Also posted some more photos taken by Mike Evans photos of Lead
88 and T-21 on the Fred and Waterfall Fires. Ab.
|
| 11/7 |
I have posted new photos on the Handcrews
16, the Engines
12, and the Fire
25 Photo pages. felling a tree, the images of Faith, the little
engine that could, and some fire from R6. Thanks, Brian and other
contributors. Ab. |
| 11/7 |
Fire Fighter Memorial at Bass River State Forest.
Memorial location: N39, 40’, 06.3” by W74, 26’, 27.4”. Greenbush
Rd. near the intersection of Stage Rd.
1977 fatality location: N39,37’, 16.8” by W74, 26’, 21.7”. East
of Allen Rd. near the intersection of Oswego Rd.
I’m currently unsure of the 1936 fatality location; if I come up with
something I’ll update this.
The Bass River Memorial was originally dedicated on May 25, 1976 to
commemorate the 40th Anniversary loss of 5 fire fighters (two State Fire
Wardens and three Civilian Conservation Corps fire fighters) who were
burned over while fighting a forest fire near the Town of Warren Grove
in 1036.
On July 22, 1977 four Volunteer Fire Fighters from the Eagleswood
Fire Company were killed when their engine was burned over on a fire
several miles from this memorial. In 1982 a plaque remembering these
fire fighters was added to the existing memorial. Another memorial stone
was placed by the fire company in front of the Forest Office.
Bill Edwards
Section Forest Fire Warden
NJ Forest Fire Service
Thanks Bill, I put it on the Memorials
page with a link to the memorial
photos page from there.
Readers, while you're on the memorial photos page, could you
remind me who sent in the photo for the roadside memorial to Shane &
Jeff and where it is? Ab.
|
| 11/7 |
Lytle Fire, San Bernardino NF 2003...nice spot fire taking off below
the main head of the fire.
Grand Prix Fire, San Bernardino NF October 25th 2003...This photo shows
how great the the Santa Ana's were pushing the fire into the urban
interface. The hills in the lower part of the photo would be the point
of origin of the Old fire in just one hour. I took this picture just
before heading into my station...little did I know we would be fighting
to save thousands of homes in sixty minutes.
Old Fire, San Bernardino NF October 25th 2003...Took this photo one hour
after dispatch. After several hose lays failed we resorted to falling
back to the homes and burning out. This is Hwy. 18 just north of San
Bernardino. Fire is about to reach the city limits and burn several
hundred homes.
Ab,
I haven't sent photos in before so I was quite sure of which format you
wanted, but here you go anyways. Thanks for the great site.
Photos compliment of FFEric
Thanks Eric, I posted them on the Grand
Prix/Old/Simi Fire photo page, about halfway down. Ab.
|
| 11/7 |
BLM Bob said:
"- the 401 series will not affect firefighters at a GS-7 and
below. Read
the ifpm site."
Yes it will, it affects everyone down to GS-5
"- during the broadcast, one of the panel members stated quite
unequivocally
that OPM was _not_ open to creating a wildland firefighter series.
That
would seem to indicate that the roadblock is at OPM, not the
agencies."
There is evidence to the contrary!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
On the inmate crew thread... Old CDF Capt said,
"With over 30 yrs with CDF, 18 yrs as a Crew Capt, I have
worked with IHCs on many fires. Some CDC crews are very good type 1
crews and some are not. Some IHC crews are very good and some are not.
But to answer the final question, are CDF crews type 1? Just ask the
Fed ICs who need crews at intial attack when their own resources are
not available. It seems that CDC crews are always type 1 crews. So
what is the problem?"
Nope, Look at the NWCG standards! ICs will take what they can get.
Face facts, CDF Inmate crews DO NOT meet the standard!
TS
|
| 11/6 |
I am a long time lurker and just have to put in my two cents re: the
new fire quals/401 stuff.
I am in an encumbered position, so I have to come up with a college
education. I have been a long time agency employee and I don't agree
that a my having a degree is going to make the folks I work with safer.
But......There is an FMO on a neighboring unit that scares the heck out
of me. This person got their job thru the old 401 series and has no fire
background. I could write an essay on the stupid decisions I have seen
made by this person. A good thing about the new qualifications system is
it will weed out folks like this. It is going to be way easier for me to
get educated than for this FMO to go from no fire quals to those
required in the new plan.
Sign me,
Going back to school................... |
| 11/6 |
CD, you are correct. People affected by the 0401 series have a choice
to make.
Unfortunately, the choice that I'm hearing from many fire managers on my
forest
is that they will just retire or refuse to promote.
CD, are you blind to the long term safety hazard this creates?
Rogue Rivers |
| 11/5 |
Long time lurking, but following the news on Alan thought I'd finally
jump in with the following:
Cramer: The OIG report has been finished and delivered, however it is a
report for the Chief and Regional Forester, not one that is produced for
public distribution. You can bet that the Cramer IC's employment status
changed because of this report. We'll need to see if the Ranger who is
responsible for everything on the district and/or Forest Supervisor who
is
responsible for the Forest will have similar life changes. I'd bet not,
besides a change in location they're still collecting GS 13-14 wages and
can probably look forward to retirement when they choose. If the IC is
held responsible, so should they!
IFPM: everyone gets tied up with the 401 issues involved, it's a lot
more
than that. Don't overlook the experience and qualifications requirements
that go along with each position identified, they are in reality much
more
important to everyone's safety than additional college credits!
Stay safe in all you do.
Ol' Pogue |
| 11/5 |
A photo came in entitled "Mike-on-pot3.jpg" with this
description:
On the pot at Sanhedrin Lookout. The tower survived
the Mendenhall fire (87) but the outhouse did not. What
!! No privacy ?
It's pretty funny, we Abs wish we could share it, but we won't;
we've heard that Homeland Security has recently raised the terror alert
from “yellow” to “conservative". Thanks cz for the laugh. Ab.
|
| 11/5 |
So here we go down the road of accountability and a “professional”
Fire Manager with a family and I assume excellent safety record up to
Cramer is out of a job. I just hope I can make it to retirement before
someone on my watch gets themselves maimed or killed. Some of the
responsibility has to lay with Jeff and Shane’s direct supervisor, who
failed to keep watch over his/her charges and must have approved of
his/her firefighters being placed on the hill above the head of an
uncontained fire. As well as the two deceased firefighters who accepted
the assignment.
Litigation, Legislation, OSHA, OIG, 10/18, LCES, IFPM, Medical
Standards, Pack Tests, Two-One and on and on and on it goes.
The CDF IC on the Cedar Fire got a promotion after it was all over
anyone remember how many fatalities on that fire? Where is the
accountability on that one?
30YRSONTHELINE |
| 11/5 |
Lobotomy,
BLM Bob pretty much covered where you can find the info I cited, and I
will try to cover the other points you asked about.
If our "overworked" employees don't want to spend any more
time away from home to deal with these new requirements, then they have
a choice to make. It's up to them.
If the employee at the lower grade levels doesn't already have incentive
to stay in wildland fire, then I don't believe IFPM will persuade them
one way or the other . If they don't want to stay, they have another
choice to make.
My district has taken the position that we will help the employees who
want to become 401 qualified. This will benefit those at the lower grade
levels.
I do think the 401 series is OK for now. I think we will all be under
one fire agency before long and that may be a better time to pursue a
Wildland Fire Management series, although I am not totally convinced we
need one.
CD |
| 11/5 |
Reading that we have lost another good firefighter with Alan's
resignation I
couldn't figure out how to write up my thoughts to come to his defense.
JD
covered everything I was trying to convey. You summed it all up in a way
that, knowing Al personally for many years, I wholeheartedly agree with.
I
would still fight fire with him and would still work for him if he were
an
IC on a going incident.
Anybody else remember being trained to not count on aerial extraction as
an
escape route because I sure remember having it hammered into my head
when I
was in the shot world?
Joe |
| 11/5 |
The Jobs
page and Series
0462 (Forestry Technician) & Series
0455 (Range Technician) jobs pages are updated. Also fiddled with
the 0401 listings.
I posted 2 new pictures of the Mendenhall Fire ('87) on Fire
25. Some new photos helos including one of the Chester Helitack crew
on Helicopters
17 and Helicopters
18. Chester logo is posted on Logos 10. I posted photos on Handcrews
16 of a furry tarantula friend and a handcrew member on Cabin Creek.
Thanks contributors.
Ab. |
| 11/5 |
jd and all
jd, good comments all around. Thank you.
Let me make it clear that my informational post about the legal
process is simply that, an informational post. In no way shape or form
do I want to crucify Alan or anyone. That said, I feel that Fire
Managers of today need to understand the cumbersome legal processes and
growing personal & family risks associated with fighting fire (and
managing homeland security incidents). Just as there are more mandated
checklists to attend to in the midst of hot interface fires, so also are
there new mandated investigations with legal recommendations by OSHA and
OIG when things go wrong.
Some questions that have recently crossed my mind:
What happens when somebody dies because the fire manager was busy doing
mandated paperwork when fire behavior changed? What climate is created
when fire managers get blamed but line officers do not? How do you
identify or "take to court" systemic forest issues -- say,
those involving past management that influences the current condition of
the fire program there? There are human factors issues, too. This stuff
is not black and white. It's the color of cheese, swiss cheese.
Mellie
Refs:
Carson
on the Swiss Cheese Model
Accident
Investigation Guide (pdf file)
|
| 11/5 |
Before there is more comment about the Cramer
Fire, let's remember that these people that we read
about on this post, in the official investigation
reports, and in the newspapers are real people. Alan
Hackett is a real individual, Jeff and Shane were real
guys.
Not to ever take the focus off Jeff and Shane, I think
it's important to know the person that is so easily
crucified. Let me tell you about Alan Hackett. Alan
cares a lot for the people who work for him. He goes
out of his way to help people. He is honest, kind,
and optimistic. He's a good father. He is a good
friend. Alan has integrity. Alan has taken more upon
himself than we could ever heap on him. And Alan
makes mistakes, but he doesn't run from them.
The reports and articles are out there, and there are
things to learn from them. Let's make sure we're
looking at the actions of folks and not the quality of the
man.
jd |
| 11/5 |
Hi Tahoe Terrie, last time the question of legal process came up, I
did a some
research, but decided not to send it in it at that time. Seemed only
fair to let the
process take its course. Here's what I found out in early September:
"Can anyone fill us in on the process? with the 3 reports (FS,
OSHA and
OIG)? What's next legally?"
my answer in September that I never sent in:
Following the Cramer Fire deaths, there were 3 reports which were
mandated:
- The USFS Report with the many controversial redactions
imposed by the
Office of Personnel Management (OPM);
- The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Report after
which the Forest Service paid a fine; and
- The Inspector General's Report on whether the handling of
the incident
should result in criminal charges of wrongful death brought
against an
individual or individuals overseeing or related to the incident.
This
was required as a result of the 30 Mile deaths and before that, of
Storm
King. The Inspector General's Report has not yet come out (as of
September).
Here's the legal process that usually occurs following
release of an Inspector
General's Report. The Inspector General oversees the Office of the
Inspector General (OIG):
The OIG report makes recommendations regarding criminal liability to
the
Department of Justice (DOJ) which is then obligated to act upon them.
The OIG report may recommend no further action or it may recommend
that
charges of criminal negligence be brought against one or more people.
If the OIG report recommends criminal charges be brought against
someone, DOJ first asks the state if they want to take the next step
in
the criminal proceedings.
If the state says yes, a Grand Jury is convened to see if there's
enough evidence to take the case to trial and the process proceeds at
the state level.
If the state says no, the DOJ must take the next legal step and the
process proceeds at the federal level. The DOJ issues an arrest
warrant
and a notice to appear before the Federal Magistrate. Federal marshals
may come and lead the person away in handcuffs. The Federal Magistrate
then follows a legal evaluation similar to that of the Grand Jury, to
see if there's enough evidence to bind the person over for federal
trial.
If either the Grand Jury or the Federal Magistrate decides there's
enough
evidence, the case goes to trial in state or federal court,
respectively.
If the person is not represented by the Agency lawyers and
cannot afford a personal lawyer, starting when charges are first
brought, a public defender is appointed by the state or federal court.
Doesn't the Forest Service have lawyers to defend its employees
against
criminal (or civil charges)?
They do, but sometimes employees do not get that defense. The FS
lawyers
are from the USDA Office of General Counsel. To determine if they will
represent an employee, it must first be decided if the liability
should
be borne at the personal (individual employee) level or at the
governmental (employer) level. Agency legal representation is
available
only if the employee is considered to be working "within the
scope of
their employment" when the incident occurred. As I understand it,
working "within the scope of their employment" means that
when the
incident occurred, the person was doing what they were supposed to be
doing to fulfill their job.
Are the families of the fallen involved creating this court case
and process?
No, absolutely not. This process occurs completely independently of
the
families' wishes. The DOJ and the state are working on behalf of the
fallen who cannot work on their own behalf. In fact the families of
the
fallen may greatly oppose criminal charges being brought and this part
of the legal process would proceed anyway. However, a family can
decide
to file a civil suit against individuals (or the Forest Service if the
employee was acting "within the scope of their employment"
and the USDA
defends them) for up to 3 years following the death.
What is the difference between a criminal and a civil case?
There are many differences. In a criminal case, a jury must decide
unanimously that a person is guilty. The guilty verdict results in a
sentencing process and may result in jail time. In a civil case there
needs be only a "preponderance of guilt" for a guilty
verdict, ie, it
takes only seven or more jurors, not all 12. Civil suits that result
in
a guilty verdict often require a cash settlement to the family and
there
is no jail time. In civil cases in which the FS lawyers determine that
the FS employee was acting "within the scope of their
employment", the
FS legal team takes on representation of the individual who is no
longer
at personal financial risk for a guilty verdict.
As you can see from the arrangement that is reported to have been
reached, the process is
not cut and dried. What Hackett's "leaving the USFS" means
legally, I don't know.
Mellie
|
| 11/5 |
Lobotomy,
It only took me about 30 seconds of reading the IFPM implementation plan
at:
www.nifc.gov/training_quals/IFPM/implementationplan/IFPMStandardImplementationPlan(fullversion).pdf
..to find that on page 2 it reads:
"FUNDING
It is the responsibility of each bureau or agency to ensure every
employee
affected by the IFPM Standard meets the minimum qualification
standards by
October 1, 2009. This includes paying for training and associated
costs as
well as providing employees with work time to complete the
training."
There are a lot of issues and challenges with the IFPM, but everyone
that
reads this site could save a lot of time and effort and focus their
energy
better if they would just "read the directions." The web site
URL has been
posted here a couple of times.
Incidentally the question about paying for the costs for incumbents is
also
answered in two places in the IFPM FAQ pages.
As far as training priorities being set to help people meet IFPM,
remember
that doesn't mean that _all_ the training resources will be directed to
that - the "GS-4/5/6/7/8 and some 9 folks" that you mention
will not be shut
out of training. Think of it like multiple fire priorities - the fires
that
have lower priority still get resources and supplies, and they often
move up
in priority as the others get handled.
I'm going to hold you to your promise to tell us why the problem with
the
wildland firefighter series isn't with the OPM.
BLM Bob |
| 11/5 |
Does anyone know the federal legal process, the reports, or what
Hackett's
resignation means for the rest of us?
Tahoe Terrie |
| 11/5 |
For lack of anything better to do on a Friday morning, I’ll wade
into the CDF/IHC foray. I’ve had good and bad experiences with CDF
folks, but it seems the least palatable are the ones that stick with
you. Last year my wife and I were vacationing in Southern California and
I stopped in at a local CDF/county station with the intent of perhaps
swapping a t-shirt. Upon seeing a firefighter rolling hose, I inquired
if he was indeed interested in swapping a t-shirt. He looked me up and
down and with an air of superiority sniffed “No, I don’t think so.”
I turned around and walked out.
My first experience with CDF was in 1994, working the fires in Northwest
Montana as an engine boss. On one side of a ridge was the Yaak Complex,
which I was assigned to, and on the other side was the Koocanusa
Complex. We had just arrived at our assigned area, mopping up, when a
pick-up came flying up the road, dusted us out, and came to a screeching
halt. My engine crew and I were scratching our heads as to who this
might possibly be as he came from the other direction of travel we came
from. When the dust finally cleared, I got my first look at the driver,
the lone occupant, and immediately recognized the CDF shoulder patch on
his nomex shirt. Before he did anything, he adjusted his rearview
mirror, checked himself out, shook his honey blond hair, donned his
aviator sunglasses, and climbed out of the cab. He sauntered over to us
and without any introduction told us to initiate a hose lay down the
opposite side of the ridge, approximately 2500’, to tie in with some
hand crews he had coming up from the bottom. I then asked him who he was
and he proceeded to tell me, as if I should already know, that he was
DIVS whatever on the Koocanusa Complex. I politely told him who I was,
that we weren’t assigned to his division nor were we even assigned to
his dam*ed fire. And with that, he blinked a couple of times, hopped
back into his truck and sped off down the road, leaving us again in a
cloud of dust, never to be seen again.
I have since worked with a number of CDF’ers and found them to be
quite good at their job and consider several of them as good friends. We
should never let one or two bad experiences guide us in our opinions of
others – there are always exceptions. I’ve worked with good and bad
shot crews, good and bad Type 2 crews, good and bad engine crews. We
accept what we get and find ways to work around and with them.
By the way, I finally got my t-shirt. A good friend of mine, a retired
battalion chief from Navarro County, secured one for me after he heard
my story.
Adain |
| 11/5 |
From Firescribe:
AP Wire release
Manager
of deadly Cramer wildfire leaves Forest Service in deal
SALMON, Idaho – Alan Hackett, the U.S. Forest Service incident
commander when two firefighters died in the Cramer fire in 2003, has
left the agency, but officials declined to release details of his
departure.
|
| 11/5 |
Casey,
I heard you talk about the next session of Congress. What exactly will
the FWFSA we going for now and how do we look as far as the firefighter
series, portal to portal, and Hazard Pay towards retirement go? I know
there are several plans on the table for what kind of portal to portal
we will try for, but what do you think we will get if we get anything?
What seriously are the our odds of getting something passed this time? I
guess I kind of want an update on it all, so I can pass it on to my
fellow workers to help encourage them to join the association.
SRJS,
I totally agree with you about the JAC program. I'm getting a feeling
that people feel if they do the minimum requirements to advance to the
next level then the are owed that job. Some have even talked about
filing a grievance if they don’t get it because they have been passed
up for it before. Why can't they just understand that upper management
feels they don't exhibit the firefighting and manager skills that are
required of it. I'm guiltily myself. I sometimes think that it will be
easy to move up the chain of command if I just do the tasks books and
take the courses. Just cause I've got four good seasons in now doesn't
mean I know fire how I should. All us youngsters need to do a lot of
listening and learning from the old crusty ones. It perhaps is better
than any training course ten fold.
Thanks....
FFEric
Proud FWFSA member |
| 11/5 |
CD, re: your reply to Casey....
I read the implementation standards and didn’t see exactly where it
said that the government would "pay" for all the required
training for the 0401 series. Could you tell me exactly where it is?
Also, with the already overworked employees, how will their families
feel about even more time away from home as part of the continuing
profession?
If the priority for the 0401 training and funding will be incumbents,
why is there any incentive for our GS-4/5/6/7/8 and some 9 folks to stay
around?
Regarding not discounting the "resources side" of wildland
firefighting..... CD you are right and resources is an important part of
wildland firefighting. Having a wildland firefighter series would not
change the importance of resources management but enhance it.
Biologists, botanists, foresters, rangeland management specialists, soil
scientists etc... are all resource management professionals with their
own very unique series that accurately accounts for the duties,
education required, and complexities of the profession. Is there a
problem with wildland firefighters having their own series and being
properly classified?
Lobotomy
P.S. - Don’t swallow the talk that OPM kept the agencies away from a
firefighter series as described in the 0401 webcast... there are some
folks who know the truth.. more on that in the future. |
| 11/4 |
Casey ......
In response to your post regarding the GS-401 series .......
During the IFPM webcast week before last, we faxed in the question of
whether or not the agency should pick up the tab on paying for folks to
go back to college to obtain the 24 hours required to meet the GS-401
standard. The answer from the representative for Human Resources /
Forest Service Washington Office was that yes, the agency would indeed
pay for folks in immediately affected positions (all GS-11's and above
and some GS-9's) to go back to college, or attend Technical Fire
Management, or meet the NWGC quals, or a mixture of NWCG and college.
They could attend college classes on government time as well. Because
they could potentially be removed from their positions if they do not
meet the quals by October 1, 2009 they fell into a different category
than those employees that are not in immediately affected positions such
as Hotshot Superintendents, Helicopter Managers, Engine Module
Supervisors, etc. For folks such as these that are not in immediately
affected positions, the agency would continue to pay for TFM or the NWCG
classes, but probably not college. I do know of one Forest that is not
paying for an employee to go to college, but they are working with her
to have a very flexible schedule so that she is able to do that and
still work 40 hours per week.
On our Forest we are looking at both groups (immediately affected and
not immediately affected) and working to develop Individual Development
Plans tailored to help folks get where they need or want to go. The list
of qualifying NWCG classes is fairly extensive, and we are trying to get
folks in critical classes that can assist them in meeting the quals.
Because the GS-401 can be met with a mixture of college and NWCG
courses, some of our folks are looking at doing a little of both where
they can. There is no easy or correct answer on how to make all of this
happen, but we are trying to adapt as quickly as possible in assisting
our affected employees that must meet the 2009 date, and in
"grooming" our other employees that have their sights on
future fire management positions that will be moved to the GS-401. The
longer we wait to get going on this, the harder it may be for our
employees.
Out of all of this I do see one very positive thing ...... the new IFPM
Standards and Guides have Red Card qualifications tied to each position.
On our Forest, up to this point, we have not been able to advertise jobs
stating that a person must be qualified, as an example; an ICT3,
Division/Group Supervisor, and RXB2 to be a District Fire Management
Officer. Throughout the webcast different folks kept saying that the
implementation of the IFPM would enhance safety. While I personally
don't agree that having 24 hours of natural resource courses under my
belt will enhance safety, I believe the Red Card quals tied to each of
the 14 identified positions in the IFPM will. Thanks for allowing me to
comment.
R3 Forest Fire Management Officer
Thanks for writing in. Ab. |
| 11/4 |
Casey Judd,
Read the Implementation Plan for IFPM. Its available on the NIFC
website. It says that the government is responsible for paying for folks
to meet the IFPM requirements. This includes both the 401 credits and
fire qualifications requirements. The only caveat I can find is that the
employee must be the incumbent in one of positions that is required to
be 401, and is responsible for taking advantage of every opportunity to
meet the IFPM requirements. If they don't take advantage of the
opportunities and meet the qualifications, they will eventually be
removed from their position. Sounds like a pretty good deal to me if the
feds are going to prioritize certain positions for both fireline
training and college credits.
The folks that are going to have to fund some of this on their own are
those who are in a non 401 mandated job that eventually want to be in
one of the 401 positions.
It's yet set to be seen how this will affect training budgets. I would
imagine some of the budget will be funded locally and some will be
funded at the state/regional level.
Don't discount the 401 series as the correct place to have these
positions classified for now. Remember that the resource side of the
house is what drives our Fire Management Plans.
Remember that the 401 requirements are only part of IFPM. There is also
a list of fire qualifications that goes with each of the 14 key
positions.
Let's see.......... Hmmmmmm........... IFPM............... Interagency
cooperation under FPA......... Can you say precursor to one Federal Fire
Agency.
CD |
| 11/4 |
Everyone,
I am trying to get up to date on the Memorials/Monument
Sites page. I split out the Memorials/Monument
Photos (from Miscellaneous photo pages) and put them on their own
page, to be referenced by the Memorials/Monument Sites page. The photos
page is also linked to photo
descriptions with credit given to photographers. Please check your
contributions to make sure I have correctly given credit. If you have
any more info to share, I'd appreciate it.
I am currently adding the pictures and info that you've sent in
during the last year. If you do not see photos or information you
contributed on those two pages and the photo description page, please
email me. Winslet, Bob K and Kathy B, I have your photos/info to add.
If anyone has corrections or additions, please drop me a line.
Thanks, and thanks to new contributors.
Ab. |
| 11/4 |
Casey,
I think we are in violent agreement. My suggestion to Wags was as a plan
for students, not current pft employees. I too believe that an agency
should pay for and allow time for mandated new education requirements.
Old Fire Guy |
| 11/3 |
I can attest to the professional attitude of Growlersburg MKU-45. As a
CDC food
service person, I've interviewed the lieutenant in charge of camp #21
and found
him to be a truly knowledgeable food service professional, even though
he's a
custody officer and has no food service training. MKU-45 is a top-notch
operation. It's too bad CDC doesn't have any food service folks in the
camps.
If it did, I'd be knocking on Growlersburg's door for a job to run the
camp
kitchen and MKU-45.
prison cook |
| 11/3 |
Wags:
With all due respect to "Old Fire Guy," if the FS is going to
ram 401 down your throat and discount any experience you have to date,
it should be incumbent upon the Agency to pay for your upgrade training.
Its kind of like an "unfunded mandate" by the federal
government to the states. They tell the states they have to do something
that costs money but then don't give them the money to do it.
Don't know if NFFE was asleep at the switch with this 401 thing but for
a youngster coming up in this business, it should be the responsibility
of the Agency to attract and retain talent that will stay in the service
as a career. You don't do that by taking them off the clock for 8 hours
in any given 24 hour period while on assignment and you don't do that by
mandating education and expecting the employee to pick up the tab.
The FWFSA will do everything in its power politically next session of
congress to ensure that Congress gives the Agency a mandate..."you
want them educated...pay for it...!" Of course we're not convinced
401 is the way to go. In fact, although many of our members may already
be in compliance, it puts an undue burden on younger folks. There has
simply got to be a better solution for all concerned. Unfortunately,
bureaucrats take a bureaucratic approach to solving these things and, as
we all know, that isn't always where the common sense lies.
This all refers us back to the fundamental, inherent argument of what
wildland firefighters are, or should be. Recognizing there is a
"season" of firefighting and that in order to retain
employment, you've got to do something else through the remainder of the
year, all we ask is that the employees, the firefighters, be able to
have a voice in their future.
Casey Judd
Business Manager
Federal Wildland Fire Service Association |
| 11/3 |
BLM Bob & SRJS & Old Fire Guy,
Thanks for your help with the 401 series, that
website was just what I was looking! SRJS, I share similar concerns as
you, I want to see experienced not just educated fire managers in
place. However, as a student NOW it is important for me to ensure the
degree I'm working towards will support me further down the road. In
10-12 years I don't want to have to go back to school because I failed
to look and plan ahead.
Thanks everyone, take care
wags |
| 11/3 |
Wags,
Enroll in a 4 year degree in a natural resources field. I'd suggest
"forestry", but others will do.
Pay for college by working on a fire crew or engine crew etc.
Continue in fire getting all the training and experience you can.
Demonstrate a good work ethic.
Become a leader with both education and experience. We need that.
Old Fire Guy |
| 11/3 |
Re Series 401
Wags,
Get on the ground experience and after crewboss, with 8-12 years of fire
experience on the ground, maybe less in the hotshot world, then worry
about the GS 7 and above, but until then just sit back and learn as much
as you can from the ones who will be retiring in the near future. In my
humble opinion this probably the biggest problem with the apprenticeship
program, that a large amount of new apprentices just want to know how do
I move up, and what classes are needed to move up. With all of the
retirement projected in the next 5 - 10 years we will have a lot of
"educated" fire managers out there without tons of actual fire
experience.
SRJS |
| 11/3 |
Re Series 401
wags,
Here you go - pay particular attention to the FAQs:
www.nifc.gov/training_quals/IFPM/ifpm.htm
Or the short version: get some sort of natural resources BS degree and
lots
of fire experience and training.
hth,
BLM Bob |
| 11/3 |
MG
The original reference is:
Brown, J.K. 1974. Handbook for inventorying downed woody material. USDA
Forest Service Technical Report INT-16.
You may be able to find one in a University Library.
Down Woody Inventory Manual:
http://ncrs2.fs.fed.us/4801/dwm/local-resources/documents/dwm-field-manual.pdf
FC180 |
| 11/2 |
Ab,
As a college student and seasonal fire fighter looking to make fire
my career I was wondering if you or anyone could give some
clarification regarding the 401 series. What do we need as fire
fighters to advance beyond a GS 7? What are the educational
requirements? Is the 401 series the series all federal fire positions
above a 7 will be going to?
Thanks,
wags |
| 11/2 |
Ab, if you could post.
The Laguna Hotshots are in the process of building
a training/day room. We are looking for old crew photos to hang around
the
training room. Here is the years we need: 1974 to 1979, 1980 to 1989 and
1992 to 1999. We would also like, if possible, location where the photo
was taken and crew members names in photo. Photos can be mailed to:
Laguna Hotshots
PO Box 418
Descanso, Ca 91916
You can either send a scan version or we can scan an original and return
to
you. Our email system will only allow I believe 25MB attachments. So
depending on the size you can also email to: dbaldridge@fs.fed.us.
Any
assistance would greatly be appreciated. It would be great to do this
small tribute to our past Laguna Hotshots.
Thanks,
Laguna Hotshots
If anyone wants to send some here, I can make sure the shots get em
in the right form. Ab. |
| 11/2 |
Ab,
Just a quick note to let all know that the L.P. Hotshots based in the
Los
Padres National Forest, will be recognized (not sure of the date) for
their
outstanding work during the devastating fires a year ago in Southern
California.
The Los Padres N.F. Forest Supervisor (Gloria Brown) said the Regional
Forester's Special Act Award is given only to firefighters who have
shown
outstanding leadership and who have worked aggressively to control a
wildfire helping to significantly limit the fire's threat to human life
and
property.
The citation accompanying the award notes that the Los Padres Hotshots
were
instrumental in slowing the advance of the 280,278-acre Cedar Fire last
October as it approached the towns of Julian and Pine Hill in southern
San
Diego County. The crew's efforts allowed sufficient time for additional
firefighting resources to arrive and protect the towns from the quickly
advancing wildfire.
It’s good to see the Hotshot community get some positive and well
deserved
recognition for all their hard and dangerous work. Outstanding job LP,
and
a big congratulation from this old hotshot!
V Calvert
Good job. Ab. |
| 11/2 |
Ab,
Here is a photo of the firefighter
memorial for Denis Lee Cullins who died on September 29, 1987 on the
Lauder fire. Denis was a Helitack crew member on Copter 102 from
Kneeland Helitack in Humboldt Co. California. I was part of the rescue
team that treated and medivaced the crew off the fire. This process took
several hours from locating the crew to treating their burns and placing
them in burn kits. Then a Coast Guard helicopter with a cable winch
raised each victim one at a time off the fire and flown to a waiting
medical helicopter and flow the the burn center in Chico, CA
Bob Zwicky
I put a link to it on the Wildland Firefighters' Monument
and Memorials page (under Mendocino NF, Lake Co CA). |
| 11/2 |
Ab,
Judging from the increased traffic on the Firecamp servers, the Cramer
Fire report images are a popular item. I hope they are put to good use
in training presentations or informal discussions in fire stations,
dispatch centers and FMOs around the country.
When the Cramer report first came out in January, I was one of the
Theysaid readers who complained about all the redactions (white-outs of
names, places and actions), the text quality and large size of the .pdf
files. As far as the redactions are concerned, I am satisfied that the
July version presents the details the fire community needs to know.
The Management Evaluation Report (MER), in fact, now is not redacted at
all. But, the copy on the USFS website is still a poor-quality scan of a
printed document, which is hard to read and is not capable of
cut-and-paste copying. With about six hours of work, we have created a
webpage version of the MER at www.coloradofirecamp.com/Cramer/index.htm.
Our hope is that more people will read, share and learn from what
happened.
My wife thinks it's weird that I get up in the middle of the night to
work on this stuff. I can't really explain to her why I'm doing it.
On Sunday, I'll fly out to Emmitsburg, MD to attend an ICS
train-the-trainer class at the National Emergency Training Center. I
suppose I might gain some personal insight when I visit the Fallen
Firefighters' memorial to find the names of Jeff and Shane.
vfd cap'n
Thanks for taking on the project of clarifying the report and for
bearing the expense of greater bandwidth use. (Be careful you don't get
fined for going over bandwidth.) We Abs know both the expense in time
and the monetary cost that can result from making information more
widely and clearly available. Thanks for providing the service. Ab. |
| 11/2 |
Please Everyone, go VOTE.
Ab. |
| 11/2 |
Best vs better, Proof is in the pudding.
The local shop guys working off just maintenance records tell us:
1) Chevys are high maintenance; Consumer Reports says the opposite, but
they deal in pavement pick-ups.
2) The bigger (3/4 ton up) Fords are pretty decent, and none of the rigs
we've seen can keep up with a big ol' high off the ground 6-pak Ford
long bed in a foot or two of snow.
3) Dodge produces the least problem rigs on one of the largest FS
Districts with plenty of wash boarded roads.
Hot Shot crews ain't what they used to be. With all the new crews
someone is going to have to go to tie dye shirts.
Of course, CDF inmate crews have dropped in quality too. Former Governor
G. Davis sent all the illegal aliens over to Fed Prisons in a midnight
run and the gang felons just can't keep up with former crews of south of
the boarder guys just trying to send money home to family. But the
bangers do have high return rates that help with the experience issue.
Any good baseball stat keeper knows you cannot compare players from
different ages. Then to go a step further; current 20 person shot crews
vs. 15 inmates vs. 25 man IR crews that weren't weighed down by shelters
and a space stations worth of gear. I still remember what assistant
foreman Bill S said about the 'Shot crew attitude coming out of
California; "They're worse than jumpers."
Woa now. I'm just saying high maintenance is part of both the mechanical
and human equations.
Concerning beer. I must request that all beverage evaluations be
confined to rice and corn free products. And we all know what watered
down means in our profession. Some dang engine crew. Even though they
handle more fires than any other group.
Fuels Guy |
| 11/1 |
MG
The accepted way to get tons per acre is
"Brown's planar intercept for dead and down fuels" however I
believe it's
currently out of print.
Another way is to use the FMAPlus program which can be purchased at:
www.fireps.com (I think the page is currently down
though................)
TC |
| 11/1 |
MG... try this link out.
www.odf.state.or.us/DIVISIONS/protection/fire_protection/Daily/ACOST/ACOST.HTM
Oliver |
| 11/1 |
How does one measure "tons per acre" I am looking for
the formula for all fuels types (stuff on the ground).
Know of a good website?
MG |
| 11/1 |
Hey Everyone,
I am also asking anyone from the Waterfall Fire or
anyone from, or close to, Diamond Mtn. IHC to nominate
Walter for the Stihl Award (See Mellie's message from
10/30). I had heard of the incident, but did not
realize it was Walter who did it. And like me, if any
of you know him, you were not surprised. He is
selfless, hard-working and a natural at this business.
So if you have information on him or the incident,
please step up & nominate him, Lord knows he did.
Thanks
Molly
Readers, please be sure and read my comments on 10/30 welcoming
Stihl back as sponsor of theysaid and requesting you send in nominations
for their Heroism Award. Thanks, Ab. |
| 11/1 |
With over 30 yrs with CDF, 18 yrs as a Crew Capt, I have worked with
IHCs on many fires. Some CDC crews are very good type 1 crews and some
are not. Some IHC crews are very good and some are not. But to answer
the final question, are CDF crews type 1? Just ask the Fed ICs who need
crews at intial attack when their own resources are not available. It
seems that CDC crews are always type 1 crews. So what is the problem?
Old CDF Capt |
| 11/1 |
A couple of quick notes on the 401 series issue:
- the 401 series will not affect firefighters at a GS-7 and below. Read
the ifpm site.
- during the broadcast, one of the panel members stated quite
unequivocally
that OPM was _not_ open to creating a wildland firefighter series. That
would seem to indicate that the roadblock is at OPM, not the agencies.
BLM Bob
However if you do not plan ahead, and get to GS-7 without 401, you
might wonder how you arrived at such a dead end regardless of your fire
expertise, people managing skills, etc. Ab. |
| 11/1 |
Ab, I ran across some interesting documents on the Fire Leadership
website.
Lynn Biddison Interview and Bio
www.fireleadership.gov/toolbox/documents/L_biddison.html
Region 5 Fire Director Biddison Letter to the Chief and to Forest
Supervisors
www.fireleadership.gov/toolbox/documents/Biddison_1982_Letter.pdf
Lobotomy |
|