"THEY SAID IT" ARCHIVES
March, 2005

Home of the Wildland FireFighter

DATE
SUBJECT    (Previous Archive: Feb-05)

Return to Archives Page

3/31 Nor Cal Tom,

I agree with your post in regards to Bosworth.

I hope a lot more firefighters than you think back off in the W/U and say
" _ _ _ _ it " when the dung hits the rotors. Why do we think the W/U is
so much more dangerous than a wilderness or roadless fire? Most fatalities
in the last 10 years have not even been in the W/U. South Canyon, 30 mile
and Cramer were all far removed from any structures, with South Canyon
being the closest. I think the W/U can actually be a safer environment
because it causes our Situational Awareness to raise a few notches.

Every wildland firefighter would do well adopt the attitude that
"STRUCTURES ARE JUST ANOTHER FUEL TYPE". If we do, we will not
be tempted to perform some supposed feat of heroism and get ourselves
injured or killed trying to protect a stack of lumber.

I am sorry for all you ignorant people who think you have to build your
dream home in a pucker brush patch or at the head of a canyon on a dead end
road. I am not going to risk my or my firefighters lives to save your
junk. If you do your part and develop some defensible space with decent
access and egress I might hang around a bit longer. Otherwise I will toss
out a red rock in your driveway and move on to your more intelligent
neighbor's residence and save their part of the "American Dream".

Backburnfs
3/31 the cynic

I can't believe you would say that if more I.A.s get
away so what. Give me a break. Also no one said that
less money would translate to a less safe operation,
but if more I.A.s get away then people are more
exposed to larger fires which increases the chances of
people being hurt or killed. So I suggest you
re-think some of your thoughts. Maybe if more people
stood up to what is right and not just sit back and
say oh well "what can you do" things might get better.
It's time we start trying to make things better and
not just take it as in years past.

DM
3/31 Cynic,

The last time it played out forests on the Salmon Challis merged, there was a
reduction in fire (and other) positions and a chronically unfilled Forest FMO position
that led to fire manager overload and contributed to deaths on the Cramer Fire. Fire
managers have too many expectations placed on them by people who don't
understand fire and who don't understand human factors in stressful situations like
IA --- like Manager Bosworth who could give a rip about firefighters. He's
not a leader, he's simply another appointed not-educated-in-fire MANAGER, playing
his role in setting up the next tragedy. Interesting how no one at his level is ever held
accountable for HIS HOLE in the swiss cheese.

Now we have criminal negligence insurance. Big WHUP, we can proceed as before.
Clearheaded and focused on the task of fighting fire knowing we have a stable of lawyers
backing us up. Will people die? Probably, specially if it's a bad W/U fire season and people
are stretched. How many times on the W/U interface do firefighters step back and say we're
going to let it burn because we're short on resources?. What can really be done to
mitigate the causes of fire manager overload and a lot of inexperienced firefighters on
the line?

You spout the party line. Give me a break.

NorCal Tom

Ab, please add. I think I'm more angry at acceptance of the status quo expressed by Cynic
than I am of Bosworth's letter. At least Bosworth has an excuse for not seeing the bigger
fire setup.

3/31 I have to admit I am getting a bit of a kick out of the posts related to budgets and Bosworth's letter. This same scenario has played itself out countless times through the decades. Although I am not a fan of Bosworth's, he certainly is not the first Chief to send out a rah, rah do more with less letter. I suspect just about every chief has done so, some several times. I would be surprised if Bosworth is not aware of the impacts already. To indicate he is not concerned about firefighters safety is blasphemous at best and I would hope such statements are the result of frustration. Should we bemoan the facts to our supervisors, absolutely, we would be derelict not to do so. They need to be made aware of the impacts, but after that it is time to figure out what will be accomplished with the paltry dollars that do show up.

I do not buy the argument that less money translates to a less safe operation. If anyone really believes that I would suggest it be re-thought.

We take the money we get and figure out how many of a given resource we can finance, meeting the standards for those particular resources. It is a fact we are not going to have as many, but that does not absolve us of the responsibility to ensure the ones we do have are well trained and meet the standards for their particular position. Now if there are supervisors out there that are saying we are not going to meet the standards that is scary and needs to be addressed, and I would ask that it be put in writing on official letterhead. I saw nothing in "the letter" that indicated we were to compromise standards.

Neither have I seen anything that indicates we will lose a significantly higher percentage of fires on IA. I don't think the facts bear that out, the percentage of fires lost on IA has not changed significantly in the last 15 -20 years. But if we do, so what? You do the best you can with what you have.

The "do more with less" axiom has been around much longer than any of us and is not likely to go away in our time either. That does not mean we have to like it, but it is a fact and and just like anything else we deal with it. I know I don't lose any sleep over it anymore.

the cynic
3/31 Hey anybody know what's happening with the new generation fire shelters?
Are the old style shelters facing extinction any time soon?

There's a slightly larger sized P-38 (more like a P-47) I bought at a Army/Navy
surplus store that rips through a can of sardines pretty quick and still fits on a
key chain.

thanks,
firewall
3/31 good poem by a long time fire guy. DF

well folks, i'm on short final with flaps and wheels down and looking
forward to a loooooooong run out... it has been great and i wish you all
the best G Elton Thomas

End of the Line
By
G. Elton Thomas
April 1, 2005

It's the end of the line,
I can see it so clear!
I wasn't so sure that
I'd ever be here.

The journey just started,
So it seems to me.
And now it is over, but then
That's how it is supposed to be.

The Malheur National Forest
On Vinegar Hill spire.
Mom and dad
Spent the 1940 summer looking for fire.

After the war, dad
Began and ended his career
Wallowa-Whitman National Forest
LaGrande District Fire Control Officer.

I grew up in the Forest
Hiking, huntin' and fishin'.
Wanting to follow dad's footsteps
A second generation tradition.

My career has been awesome,
It was simply the best.
Covering much of Oregon and Washington
In the Pacific Northwest.

A precious wife, son and daughter
Joined me on the journey.
A grand adventure
Each with our own special memory.

The people we've met
And the places we've seen
Combine to fulfill
The most incredible dream.

Union, Baker City,
Lakeview and Toketee.
Portland, Winthrop, Portland again
And finally to Wenatchee!

Montana, California and New York City,
Forida, Nevada, South Dakota and New Dehli
Fire fighting and emergencies
Took me where I never expected to be.

42 years in the Service
I have been blessed beyond measure.
There are a few regrets
But lots of memories to treasure.

Each one of us is given
A few significant events
That intersect a life, where only
Divine intervention makes sense.

A day to live over,
July 10, 2001, for me.
Four young firefighters,
Never more to see.

Their lives speak to us!
Live each moment as though it's the last,
Appreciate the present, look to the future
And remember the past.

I've learned a few things
The most important I cheer.
It's relationships with people,
Cherish and hold them dear.

Well, the curtain is drawn
This act has come to a close.
With the help of family and friends,
I'm ready to face what only God knows.

3/31 In response to Dale Bosworth’s Letter;

I respectfully disagree with "your take". Congress and the Administration may expect a comparable level of preparedness as last years, however without the funding there is no way we will be able to provide that. On the District where I work we are reduced in preparedness effectively 50%. We are also in deficit spending NOW, and fire season hasn’t even begun.

As far as complaining about budgets; I feel that it is MY responsibility to let those in charge know if we do not have sufficient resources to SAFELY accomplish the task at hand, and that includes "complaining about budgets". Perhaps Dale is hesitant about approaching Congress or the Administration to explain the situation and ask for additional funding (didn’t Congress agree to fund Fire at 100% MEL just a few years ago). If so that tells me that he is not as concerned about the safety of Wildland Firefighters as he should be. Perhaps Dale would rather personally talk to the Families of those Firefighters who die in the coming years and try to explain why the resources to fight fire were cut, resulting in increased exposure to those left to fight the fires that got away, than talk to Congress.

I am more than a little upset when the money that is supposed to go towards suppression is diverted towards something else (such as funding the HR consolidation), then we are told to produce more with less resources. As a supervisor my first duty is the safety of all my crew-members ( from myself to the lest experienced of them), then it is providing the resources (tools, training, funding, whatever) needed to safely complete the assigned task. If I cannot provide the necessary resources, then I need to go to my supervisor ad find a solution. Perhaps the solution is to leave the task unfinished, perhaps it is to find a way to acquire the needed resource. At ay rate it is the Supervisors responsibility to ensure adequate support and resources and to not just say "do more with less".

Lead, Follow or Get out of the way!

Pyroman
3/31 Hey everyone

It has been years since I have written but I was wondering if anyone knows where I can find 2005 predictions for the season or predicted weather patterns? I have checked out the NIFC site and also the Eastern Great Basin Dispatch webpage. I can't find what I am looking for, although I don't exactly know what I am looking for. I know in the past I have found "predictions" for the season but I can't find one for '05. An OT prediction would be perfect though....

Hoping for a hot season..
NP

3/31 Hi Abs

In response to GGF and Beth, I recall reading concerns about complete
fire control from earlier than the 1940s. 1928 is stuck in my mind, and I
think the concern was first expressed from an academic source rather than
an agency source. Although I can't remember where I read it, it's probably
buried in the Forest History Society web site.

FHS is a fine resource for those interested in such things, with a data base
that's become mind boggling in the past few years. www.lib.duke.edu/forest/

SITL

3/31 Oliver,

I believe you summarized our points of difference and agreement well enough. It sounds like you should well consider attending the 2005 Timber Faller Roundtable Dec. 9/10 at the OSU LaSells Stewart Conference Center. The Faller Roundtable will provide the opportunity for all kinds of varying viewpoints to come together (from throughout the U.S. and from private industry and state & federal agencies) to discuss the issue of commercial fallers on the fireline. And, regardless of our differing views, I am very much convinced polite (yet spirited and even occasionally passionate…) dialog educates and serves to break down needless barriers. Discussion doesn’t always bring different perspectives together. It does, however, give us an opportunity to share them, and perhaps how we came about them and understand views that are different from our own.

My project is not a “research paper” – it’s a graduate level 12-month research project that is the precursor to the creation of a commercial timber faller cross training program to prepare fallers for work on the fireline. If you’re not jazzed about the S130-S190 requirement, well I don’t suppose you’ll be all that excited about the cross training program either. But that’s okay. I can deal with that.

Regarding worker comp – state coverage is different than federal coverage. Also, though state pays overtime, federal agencies do not. That is because the state operates under a different employer jurisdiction than does the federal government. Self-coverage – which is what federal coverage is – is not handled in the same way worker compensation is handled. To illustrate this, we could discuss how fallers/sawyers have been treated in regard to their injuries over the past decades – both agency and private sector. I’m sure Krs <snip> would be happy to speak to this. Also, until the award of PSOB benefits to faller Allan Wyatt’s family last year, commercial fallers weren’t considered firefighters under the AD program, but support personnel. And so, if an AD faller was killed on a wildland fire, their family did not qualify for death benefits. The DOJ appeal decision to award Wyatt’s family death benefits last year, changed that. It was a precedent setting case. Commercial Fallers working on the fireline are now consider “firefighters” per the Dept. of Justice definition. Under that definition, fireline fallers should then receive adequate basic firefighter training (S130-S190).

I’m not sure what doesn’t “add up” for you regarding the Faller Module program. But, truthfully, it’s more important that it “add up” for the commercial fallers who work under it.

I also have this question for you. Why is employing fallers on the fireline “brokering,” and employing them in the line of timber harvest somehow more acceptable to you? A word of caution…terminology has a genetic-like finger print on it. You’ve used a number of terms and references that suggest something bad will happen if guidelines are established for commercial fallers working on the fireline, or if they are trained in basic firefighting principles. Now THAT logic doesn’t add up in my mind. You mentioned OROSHA and OSHA with an air of warning in your recent post. I believe both of those agencies are concerned with keeping workers safe. I would hate to think you have a problem with that. Whether working on the fireline or on a timber harvest project, fallers deserve fair pay, sufficient training and adequate insurance coverage. Under the AD Faller program they have none of these things (the rub here between us, I believe, is that you think adequate training is being provided. The message I’m hearing loud and clear from fire management and operations folks is that fallers are often ill-prepared in this regard). I find it interesting that you discuss the inadequacy of the AD Faller pay but then brush it off in a fairly cavalier manner. You also mentioned fallers are willing to work on the fireline as some sort of community duty. Oliver, for the life of me, I can honestly say I haven’t talked to any fallers anywhere (that would include throughout about 5 states ) who are rushing to do community service in the way of wielding their chainsaws on fire. Usually, one of the first things I’m asked is “How much are you paying?” …which seems to be foremost on the majority of fallers’ minds. I think it has a lot to do with filling their transfer tanks with fuel and feeding their families.

Your comment regarding fallers depending on fires for part of their annual income is a common disqualifying remark I’ve heard a number of times, but primarily from state personnel. It appears to be a fairly common theme, and a way to disregard attempts to improve the fireline faller hiring program. The fact is, Oliver, I think you might want to take your pen knife and widen your peep hole a bit. Or, I have about 8 chainsaws in my garage that might do the trick. The commercial timber faller workforce is diverse, and widely scattered. While you have a view of how things operate in your neck of the woods, things don’t work that way in all other areas. For example, there may be pockets of timber harvest capable of keeping “local fallers” working pretty much full time. This occurs in areas such as parts of Douglas County, parts of the Willamette and in Western Washington. Fallers are able to stay close to home…and their families…and work. However, other areas don’t offer the luxury of timber related falling jobs year round, or with any semblance of regularity. So, many fallers must travel to where the work is. We’ll call this part of the faller workforce “transient” – because they are. Now, some areas of the country have a fairly active fire season, and when the humidity drops (and temps rise) and fire danger peaks, jobs are often shut down unless waivers are issued to continue work. In these cases, fallers are laid off. These fallers, though they cut commercially when and as they can, look to fireline falling to supplement their income. To discredit them for doing so is short sighted. Suggesting they should consider a career change is trite. Suggesting any of this while not working as a commercial timber faller yourself is unacceptable in my view.

Using the term “local faller” to discredit fallers willing to travel to work is unfair and unwarranted, and it is another method used to discredit fallers who seek fireline employment as somehow being inadequate. I have a great book I’ve read to my kids over the years. It’s pretty dog eared now. It’s a Dr. Suess book about Sneetches. Dr. Suess was a brilliant philosopher who managed to give us lessons about such things as bigotry and prejudice in the form of children’s stories. The Sneetches story is particularly apropos here.

Perhaps you think I’m being a bit harsh. Dealing with the timber faller workforce is harsh. Doing so while some in agency employ disqualify attempts to improve working conditions and pay for fallers – while they personally have regular salaries and benefits – is frustrating. Regular pay and knowing your children have health insurance doesn’t exactly provide an empathetic viewpoint of how many fallers live. These are some of the issues I’ll be exploring in my nationwide faller study. I’ll be researching the extent and condition of the faller labor force throughout the U.S., including Alaska. Perhaps this information will help in the development of a program that truly does consider the best interests of commercial fallers. Fortunately, there are some solid agency folks – both state and federal - who are committed to improvements in this area. I can’t express how thankful I am for them.

Shari Downhill
3/30 Here are some timber felling web sites that could be of some use. The OSHA
site has some possible training use.

www.osha.gov/SLTC/etools/logging/manual/felling/felling.html

www.loggingsafety.com/lco/LCO14.pdf

www.lni.wa.gov/wisha/rules/loggingoperations/default.htm

DF

3/30 ncbrush6 - your "shorts and sandals" volunteer fire chief is probably
too dense to understand the risks (was he smoking an unfiltered "Camel"
while talking to you??).

So, a few suggested phrases to throw at him in an attempt to get his
attention: felony negligent homicide, involuntary manslaughter, personal
liability lawsuit.

Maybe that will start him thinking about the implications to him
personally when something goes wrong with the "good ole boys"
under his command and control?

Mollysboy

3/30 “Old Sawyer”

If you are looking for procedural info on falling, D. Douglas Dent’s “Professional Timber Falling – A Procedural Approach” is excellent. Doesn’t cover fire specifically, but his video series does (although the series will cost you the equivalent of a Stihl 660 to purchase!). Of course, as an “Old Sawyer,” I am sure you have read/seen these…

Was Ex-R2LY, now StumpShot
3/30 A bit of humor to share...

Scientist have discovered a new element - The Heaviest Element - Governmentium

A major research institution has recently announced the discovery of the heaviest chemical yet known to science. This new element has been tentatively named "Governmentium".

Governmentium has one neutron, 12 assistant neutrons, 75 deputy
neutrons, and 224 assistant deputy neutrons, giving it an atomic mass of 312. These 312 particles are held together by forces called morons, which are surrounded by vast quantities of lepton-like particles called peons. Since Governmentium has no electrons, it is inert. However, it can be detected as it impedes every reaction with which it comes into contact. A tiny amount of Governmentium causes one reaction to take over four days to complete when it would normally take less than a second.

Governmentium has a normal half-life of four years; it does not decay but instead, it undergoes a reorganization in which a portion of the assistant neutrons and deputy neutrons exchange places. In fact, Governmentium's mass will actually increase over time since each reorganization will cause more morons to become neutrons, forming isodopes. This characteristic of moron-promotion leads some scientists to speculate that Governmentium is formed whenever morons reach a certain quantity in concentration. This hypocritical quantity is referred to as "Critical Morass." You will know it when you see it. When catalyzed with money, Governmentium becomes Administratium, an element which radiates just as much energy since it has half as many peons but twice as many morons.

Were they studying the R5 hiring process when they discovered this? Ab.

3/30 Ab,

How do we get in touch with Doug Campbell?

R2 FF

Take a look on the Classifieds page for a link to his website and contact info. Ab.

3/30 Old Sawyer,

The BC folks participated in the 2003 Timber Faller Roundtable and were a bit miffed we didn’t hold a 2004 version. I believe they intend on being at the 2005 Roundtable. In 2003 they brought with them their Hazard Tree Fallers Assessment Course. I’ll be asking them to bring it again this coming December to Corvallis. Also, though its not at a hazard tree faller caliber yet, the first version(s) of the “Up the Ante” program are available at www.fs.fed.us/r1/projects/haztree_index.shtml and address hazard tree identification and assessment, though not falling . The site provides related hazard tree links, as well. Paul Chamberlain from the Missoula Fire Depot worked on this project, which is evolving. Paul also presented at the 2003 Roundtable.

Shari Downhill
3/30 Scott Vail, Type I IC and FMO on the Eldorado NF,

HAPPY BIRTHDAY, and Happy Retirement. Or am I a month early???

Thank you for your contributions.

Ab.

3/30 GGF re fire in the natural scheme of things:

I did a paper last year and I'm pretty certain it was George McDougall an asst park naturalist NPS in 1943 (? probably Yellowstone?) who is credited with first publicly suggesting that fire burning in the environment was important part of ecosystem cycles. What guts! I looked in my notes. It wasn't until 1972 that Yellowstone began its Wildlife Project Management Policy -in which lightning caused fires were allowed to burn. I heard this created only 1 acre of burned area the first year and 2 acres the second year. Generally lightning busts are accompanied by rain to put fires out. It was explained to me that the combination of fuel loading due to bug kill, blowdown, drought etc and ignition without much rainfall to put it out (continued drought) only make for serious burn years like 1988 every 300-400 years. And that burning is critical for releasing nutrients back into the environment and releasing seeds. Things don't decompose there like they do here in coastal OR where I am, because it's too dry. They burn instead.

I've wondered if most of the firefighters who participated in that summer of Yellowstone fires have retired by now. I sure would like to hear some stories. I don't recall that anyone died even with all the extreme fire behavior craziness. Could that be right? I bet there were some close calls.

Beth

PS. missing the smoke.

3/30 Hey Ab,

Could you enlighten me as to why the USFS has an age limit to qualify for a permanent "FIRE" position. I came to wildland firefighting later in life, I truly love the work and am fully devoted to the cause. I have to say though I've never heard a good explanation as to why there is a magical 37 years old cut off. I have seen several very qualified folks go through a lot of grief and lose sleep over this. It seems to me we shouldn't penalize folks with experience who left for a few years or those who spent time in other fields and come to wildland firefighting later in life. I realize there are only so many permanent "FIRE" positions available but maybe the creation of a professional Federal wildland firefighting agency would create more positions.. just a thought…

forever a "seasonal"….
hotcut

Thinking is that to get in the 20 years before mandatory retirement at 57, firefighters must start before 37. Ab.

3/30 For those of us who fall trees outside the fire context and will never get
the training, there is an informative handbook, the Fallers' and Buckers'
Handbook, available to download from the British Columbia Workers'
Compensation organization at this site:

http://forestry.healthandsafetycentre.org/s/FallingAndBucking.asp

Does anyone know of a similar handbook for Fallers working fires?

"Old Sawyer"
3/30 For temps looking for jobs

I see on some of the posts that some people are having
a hard time finding temp jobs. I just wanted to let
people know that we are having a hard time finding
people on the Six Rivers, Mad River Ranger District.
We are looking for GS3-GS5. We are going to pull more
certs from Avue later in the week or early next week.
Call Dale 707-574-6411 for any info. That number is
also my fax machine so if you don't reach me the first
time try again later.

Dale

3/30 Shari,

I accept your challenge ...but only if we use the same working definitions for qualified and competent. I've always stated that I was speaking from my little peep hole into the world. . I have always found enough qualified fallers to do the job. Not only were they qualified to do the job but most were competent as well. I'm using my thirty three years of experience using fallers on the fire line to quantify my observations to meet your challenge.

I have never argued that the pay scale for fallers is adequate. It's true I said we don't have a problem hiring qualified fallers at the AD rate but I personally don't agree with the AD pay they receive. The spin you put on other payroll issues don't add up. The fallers I use are already employed elsewhere in the timber industry. Falling hazard trees on a fire is not a regular job for them. That is, they don't derive the majority of their pay or benefits from this occasional work. And the fact is AD employees are covered by workers comp and they are paid OT. We are talking about a shift or two of work as an AD on most fires where a faller is needed. I know... I know... larger fires will have far more shifts and a felling boss will be assigned to direct and evaluate their work and provide the oversight necessary for safety.. and they will spend at least three shifts rat-holed in a staging area. If fallers are depending on fire season for employment I suggest they consider a career change. The fallers I know don't want a job on the fire line but most are willing to answer the call when needed.

Organizing the fallers may produce access to a few more competent fallers but I think the success rate will still be in the 80/20 principle range. 80 percent of the fallers will be qualified and competent and 20 percent will just be qualified. I think this is true of fire managers, fire fighters, contractors, school teachers...etc. Everyone doesn't operate at 100 percent everyday of their work life. 9 out of 10 people would admit to this and the 10th person would be lying.

You and I just disagree on some points... I believe fallers shouldn't be a brokered commodity under a contractors control. You believe the opposite. I believe I can provide adequate supervision to mitigate the fire line safety concerns for the non-agency faller (AD). You believe the best approach is to train every faller to a firefighter 2 with the standard 32. You believe there is a large problem with obtaining qualified fallers. I believe the problem isn't large (at least in my neck of the woods) or unique to finding qualified fallers. I believe a positive change in the AD rates would most likely cause an increase in the number of fallers willing to work the fire lines along with other timber industry resources such as tenders and dozers. You believe there are many fallers willing to attend 130/190. I have offered to teach 130/190 to fallers and other industrial resources and received minimal response so I'm still trying to formulate an opinion or belief on this subject. Not bad disagreements as I see it. (If I captured your beliefs correctly.)

We do agree on some issues: I agree the invitation is unnecessary <grin>...I agree with your soup kitchen analogy ...and having spent several weeks searching for the meaning of life in a little commune called Tacoma during 1970 (I think...yes it was 1970...?..I think?), I discovered listening to the minority voice to be a necessary foundation (for me) when examining the need for change. The majority comment was given as humor (as a small lad I use to poke bee nests with willow sticks). Lastly... I think we both agree that we probably won't change each others opinion in this forum.

My grandmother also had a few sayings...Oliver get a haircut and... Oliver ... If you can look in the mirror each morning and like what you see...you probably didn't do anything wrong the night before.

Good luck with the research paper. If you haven't worked with or had a chance to sit down and talk to Professor Garland at OSU I think you should. He is a great information source on the subject of forest industry and logging equipment converted to fire suppression use. He and I don't always agree but I respect his knowledge and opinions.

Oliver
3/30 Need info..

Does anyone know who was the first in land mgmt to suggest publicly that
fire was important in the natural scheme of things? this is following the 1910
fires and the "put 'em out by 10 AM policy"? Was it FS or NPS?

GGF

I bet NPS. FS had Smokey. Ab.

3/30 <------------- As Ab said, many FS crews in the west are getting cut this year, so it might be a bit tough to get a job now. I know this from personal experience because my job (along with 3/4 of the other seasonal positions on my district) got cut, and the same scenario is being played out across Region One. ------------->

I am a long time lurker and a first time contributor....

Any one know about cuts in region 5? I have a job lined up on a type 1 crew on the LP...still have not received paper work or anything, I am being told it's being held up at the forest headquarters but still should be a matter of time. Hopefully I actually have a job....

-smalltyme

Region 5 is plowing ahead as fast as mud with hiring. At least we're hiring... However, the R5 Forester wants to see your app. No one gets hired 'til their application crosses his desk. It will help if you have a hispanic name or checked the right ethnicity box. Ab.

3/30 ncbrush6,

I have worked in many places throughout this great country of ours. Many times my job has put me on the front lines with local Vol Firefighters. The best and easiest way to help them be more safe is not to blow a gasket about their policies. What I found the most effective is to put on training for them. I just came out of doing several 130/190 short courses and a couple of the full length classes. I spent one day on the 30 mile power point (that got a lot of points across). I would like to think that my agency is improving its working relationships with our local protectors. Its been a challenge not a battle. We've supplied a few radios to some for better comms. You might want to consider gathering up some of your old nomex and passing them out. A lot of Vol FF's agencies don't have the money to spend.

Keep in there, but remember, help them be safe don't tell them.

Nota
3/30 I'm a 22 year old student and summer fire-fighter form Montana.
I was proud to know that a P-38 is a small can opener, usually
carried on a key ring.

Bones

Welcome to the fray Bones. Don't hesitate to chime in here with info, questions, jokes or comments. We welcome you new folks. Come visit chat, too. You'll probably get swept away in the tidal wave of those who know each other, but folks are nice. You'll learn who's who over time. Ember, our moderator, is willing to answer questions and welcomes new folks. Ab.

3/30 terms, jargon, etc to add to the list:

Redline, or horizontal smile

The line you get from your fire back rubbing against your butt all season long as you hike*

*more of a shot or jumper thing

RR

Thanks, Ab added it to WLF Terms.

3/30 First to Dale:

I think all federal wildland firefighters should pay particular attention to what is not truly addressed by Chief Bosworth in his letter... What the Forest Service is (or isn't doing) for what should be it's most important assets...wildland firefighters.

Lots of chat about programs and budget cuts but nothing about pending legislation that would improve the lives of all of you; nothing about using fire $$ to move Human Resources to New Mexico; nothing about regions not being able to hire seasonals; nothing about the serious impact Cramer is having on ICT3 quals etc.

It is what it is...bureaucratic rhetoric.

To "Proud to Be Here" from your 3-24 or so post:

Fortunately some 14 years or so ago, a small group of federal wildland firefighters, decided that "most of this" (your text) was, and still is in their hands and yours. All of you have an inherent responsibility to make sure these and all issues affecting you are in your hands.

The members of the FWFSA have learned that there is a voice to be heard from the federal wildland firefighting community and, through hard work and exercising that voice, people in congress are now starting to take notice.

First, congress eliminated the overtime pay cap for federal wildland firefighters in 2000. Now, we are on the verge of realizing true pay reform with legislation providing our federal wildland firefighters with portal to portal pay and including their hazard pay in retirement calculations.

True, the FWFSA as an organization harnesses those voices and does the "grunt work" all year long. But if you believe these issues are out of your hands, I challenge you to join us and make your voice heard loud and clear, whether it be on your forest on in the Halls of Congress with me and other wildland firefighters.

You can bet the Forest Service has heard our voice that has in essence said "its time to take care of the firefighters." Its not likely the Agency will promote such changes for your benefit, an example being Chief Bosworth's letter devoid of any commentary on efforts to improve employee pay and benefits.

Your future is absolutely in your hands. Feel free to contact me any time at FWFSAlobby@aol.com or 916-515-1224 and I guarantee you by the time we're done talking, you'll understand just how much power the voices of federal wildland firefighters have, and will continue to become.

Respectfully,

Casey Judd
Business Manager
Federal Wildland Fire Service Assn.
3/30 Oliver & all,

Thanks for the discussion on fallers and fire training. The bottom line…anyone heading to the fireline should have basic firefighting training. Oliver, if you believe this is a bureaucratic infringement on the part of commercial fallers, we’ll just have to agree to disagree. If commercial fallers desire the economic opportunity provided by fireline employment, they should be willing to traverse the necessary to path to have access to it. Professional, proficient commercial fallers are definitely worth their weight in gold. However, the responsibility the face in the process of doing their job on the fireline mandates that the people who end up in those positions should 1) be who they say they are; 2) be able to complete the job they say they are capable of doing; 3) understand basic firefighting principles and how to function safely in the Incident Command System; and most importantly of all 4) work safely and conscientiously around other firefighters and equipment operators in proximity to them. That philosophy has come out of extensive discussion involving fallers and agency fire folks over the past four years. However, just in case there hasn’t been enough discussion so far (and there hasn’t), I am undertaking a 12-month nationwide faller study as part of my graduate degree at Oregon State University. You mentioned you weren’t a commercial faller. While I appreciate your comments, I have to ask…how would you qualify and quantify your contention that sufficient numbers of high quality fallers are hired each year on fires? Have you checked that out pretty thoroughly? In terms of commercial fallers and issues they face on the fireline, I don’t believe your contentions hold water. Also, if you believe the AD Faller program is working, I have some beachfront property you might be interested in out near China Lake Naval Weapon Center.

While the debate continues regarding whether or not commercial fallers should be required to take S130-S190, fallers across the Pacific Northwest and Northern California are doing just that – whether or not you agree with the logic or fairness behind it. These fallers are willing to commit the extra time and energy necessary to prepare themselves (both physically and mentally) for work in the fireline environment. Many of them did so last year, and this year will be taking L-180 (Human Factors on the Fireline) as part of their annual refresher. Several fallers are involved in the creation of a faller specific first aid program. Others are involved in the design of faller fireline equipment. There’s a lot of work to do. Truly, though I very much appreciate the fact that folks are discussing faller fireline issues – like so many very important things – it appears there are lines of argument that will perpetuate themselves indefinitely. The one that goes “Commercial fallers shouldn’t have to…..(list requirement here)” is one of those lines of argument. Currently, under the AD Faller program, there isn’t much a “faller” has to do to get to the fireline. As I always try to do when I disagree with someone, I would like to invite you to propose a program that would work to insure only qualified fallers make it to the fireline. But, since you contend enough already do, then I suppose that invitation is unnecessary.

The ultimate goal is to adequately prepare commercial fallers for fireline work, keep them safe and alive, as well as those they work around. Seems a pretty straightforward and reasonable goal to me.

I think it’s important to point out the distinction between the AD Faller program (which you apparently believe works pretty darn good) and the new Pacific Northwest faller module program, which is NOT part of the AD program. Under the Faller Module program, fallers are employed under the umbrella of a faller contractor. They are paid a fair wage as employees with overtime pay after 40 hours in a week. They are covered by worker compensation, and their wages are credited to both their social security earnings AND count as earnable wages for purposes of unemployment insurance. None of these things are true for AD fallers. Under the Faller Module Program, fallers must submit their commercial faller background for scrutiny. This isn’t the case for the AD Faller Program (I realize you would disagree, based on your comments – but currently you’d have to go pretty far to prove that either the federal agencies, state and any County Protective Association comes anywhere close to checking AD Faller backgrounds adequately. If you think I’m incorrect, I’ll have to issue this challenge… prove it.) Under the Faller Module Program Fallers must complete S130/S190 (or what some folks call Basic 32). The requirements under the AD Faller program can be completed in about 45 minutes if everybody keeps their mouth shut. (I saw this first hand over and over as I observed on one major project fire where “fallers” were being processed like they were stopping by for a meal at a soup kitchen.) To have access to the additions to benefits and increased pay under the Faller Module program I haven’t heard one faller complain who worked under the program last year…or the scores of fallers I’ve talked to over the past few months who are looking for work this coming fire season. As my grandmother always said…the proof is in the pudding. Or…another oldie, but goodie…”You get what you pay for.”

And just a couple more things…this is not “my” vision. I’ve worked diligently to reach out to those within the agencies and to commercial timber fallers and faller contractors (state and fed) and not exclusively in Oregon…to hear what many, many, many folks have to say. Have you? This is not “my” program. The Faller Module program was developed…through many stages, by agency and non-agency folks who care about improving conditions not only for fallers, but for the people they work around.

And don’t worry – I wasn’t offended by the “hair coated” comment. I just wanted to know what you meant. I like to know what people mean to say, compared to what they actually say.

Just one last observation regarding your comment à “I'm confident, that with a few more years of experience, those that don't agree will change their opinion to match the majority. <grin>” Sometimes, the “majority” simply appears to be “the majority” because so many people are paralyzed by the status quo. I’ve never bought into the “majority” concept myself. If that philosophy were always the wisest choice, there would have been no room for some of the most profound advancements humankind has made. Compared to the wisdom of “the majority”? I prefer a new idea.

Shari Downhill
3/29 ncbrush6,

Go to http://safenet.nifc.gov/.

Not sure if you are federal employee or not, but it's a NIFC site and designed for something like this.

The intent is to:

* To provide immediate reporting and correction of unsafe situations in fire operations.
* To provide a vehicle for sharing important safety information throughout the fire community.
* To provide long-term data to assist in identifying trends.

I have not submitted one myself, but have benefited from the information sent in by others.

SRJS
3/29 OFG

No problem...I agree that if an agency has a policy or written directives then one must follow them or accept the consequences. My agency doesn't have the 130/190 training standard for AD hired fallers. This is not a "make do" policy if we are following our agency standard and we have not waived any requirement of the standard.

As pissy as this sounds it's back to a my dad can beat your dad comparison of agency training standards...I have many friends employed by the big green and the majority agree that our operational ability to get things done are not hampered by the few differences in how each of us hire and supervise AD resources. I'm confident, that with a few more years of experience, those that don't agree will change their opinion to match the majority. <grin>

Except for the AD hired resources you could stick one of my crew members in a FS engine or crew and nobody would notice...and ditto if it was vice versa... Except the FS crew member would take a cut in pay and my person would have enough money to buy Nicks instead of Wal-Mart boots. < grin again >

Oliver
3/29 Re: NE College Student

Here's my advice to Paul regarding hiring: Call all of the places you want to work and talk to the fire person in charge of hiring. If you're a returning student (going back in the fall) you can get hired with the FS through the STEP program with less paperwork than Avue.

Check out the USAJOBS site as Ab mentioned, and don't look in just the west unless that's the only place where you want to go. The eastern regions of the US Fish & Wildlife Service and USFS hire firefighters too. Also look at state agencies, as well as the BLM, USFS, and FWS.

One place to look that is exactly what you are looking for is the Great Northern Fire Crew in Missoula, MT. It's a training crew for people with no fire experience, and will get you on the right track. The crew supervisor is a great guy, and it would be a good idea to talk to him personally, because they will start looking at hiring soon.

www.fs.fed.us/r1/fire_r1/great-northern-crew/

As Ab said, many FS crews in the west are getting cut this year, so it might be a bit tough to get a job now. I know this from personal experience because my job (along with 3/4 of the other seasonal positions on my district) got cut, and the same scenario is being played out across Region One. But don't give up, because if we have the year it looks like we'll have, the FS might have to hit the panic button mid-summer and hire anyone with a red card. Try and get the basic wildland training if you can: S-130, S-190, I-100, the Standards for Survival/Annual Fire Safety class, etc.

Also, when you apply, be sure to highlight any skills you may have outside of fire. I know more than one person from the NE that got hired on fire crews out west because they were licensed EMTs or Paramedics.

Jump on it now, talk to people at the places you want to work, and be willing to go anywhere.

Best of luck.

Young and Dumb in Region One

3/29 Oliver,

Sorry, you got caught up in a rant I've had going for years regarding AD fallers and dozer operators.

The requirements for 130/190 etc. are the same for all employed by my agency the FS. There is manual direction that permits the agency administrator to "waive" the 130/190 training and fitness requirements for AD fallers and dozer operators. So far, none of the AAs I deal with have any desire to make that waiver...... good for them! Still, the "waiver" policy needs to be removed.

Again, the acceptance of a lesser standard is by definition a "make do" policy, whether one uses the words or not.

What would the agency or the employee gain by having less training than accepted at the minimum standard? And again, I reference my litmus test.

OFG
3/29 KF

You can get the 211 Pumps powerpoint from NWCG. They have it there. It is
a good powerpoint. You can purchase it on a CD.

Fyrfghtr
3/29 CPF “Breaking News”

March 28, 2005

Pension Coalition Launches Radio Ad
Call Governor Schwarzenegger & Keith Richman NOW
Tell Them to Stop the Pension Grab

The people responsible for the attack on your pensions say they’re proud of what they’ve done, and wouldn’t change a word of it.

Here’s your chance to tell them what you think.

California Families Against Privatizing Retirement is launching a radio ad TODAY highlighting the governor’s vicious attack on your pensions – an attack that eliminates death and disability benefits.

It’s essential that the people behind this attack hear from you! That’s why we’re asking you to get on the phone right now.

Call Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and Assembly member Keith Richman IMMEDIATELY. The message is simple:

Stop attacking the retirement security of working families.
Protect death and disability benefits for police and firefighters.

Here are the numbers to call:

Governor's hotline: 916-445-2821
Assemblyman Keith Richman's Sacramento office: 916-319-2038
Assemblyman Keith Richman's District Office: 818-368-3838

Be respectful but firm, and don’t be drawn into an exchange. If anyone tries to debate the issue – specifically on the death and disability issue – remind them that the Attorney General’s opinion is crystal clear, and that labor and management are together in opposing the governor’s plan.

Tell them that the best way to protect the families of fallen firefighters and police officers is to withdraw this proposal now!

If you get any interesting feedback, please let us know – email CPF at info@cpf.org.

Your unity and commitment have made a big difference so far. Keep the pressure on!
3/29 Monterey Co F/F

I meant to include the Monterey County firefighters and public in my
post. I hit the send after adding the attachment. Please accept my apologies
for the oversight. Thank you for clarifying.

SoCal 0081 Firefighter
(! who is avoiding eating rocks and glass - is willing to apologize !)

3/29 Well folks   

i see we are all yelling about work and safety... please keep yelling, some folks just cant hear... i was on a  fire about 2 weeks ago and came across 3 vol ff that wearing  shorts and sandals out digging line... so i go to the chief in charge and point out what i have seen, he says dont worry about it, they have been firefighters a long time.... so i am now asking you all what steps do i need to take to get this point across to the local vfd.... ooo yes i did take a few pics......

thanks
ncbrush6

3/29 KW

The Federal Standard 595(b) paint code for the "green like no other green"
(quote by former FS Chief F. Dale Robertson) is No. 14620.
If you need the BLM slime green color code I have that too.

The Blue Lite
3/29 The word must not have gotten out very good, but the International Association of Wildland fire (IAWF) is offering some $100 scholarships toward the registration fee for the 8th Wildland Fire Safety Summit.

Interested? Just email a 1 paragraph reason to dtrethewey@fs.fed.us by April 3rd.

Dick Mangan
Blackbull Wildfire Services
11400 Kona Ranch Road
Missoula, Montana 59804 USA

President, 2004-2005
International Assoc. of Wildland Fire
www.iawfonline.org
3/29 The photos of the parasitic grub being removed from the firefighter's eye give new meaning to the term "wear your eye protection".

I am by no means an expert but that grub looks like what we call a wulve (pronounced like the plural wolf). These little beasties are very common in my area but, they generally infect cattle and squirrels in the summer.  It is a larvae for a biting fly similar to a horsefly but it is smaller. I used to have to give my cattle sulphur treated oil rubs to keep the flies off of them. I know just a few would drive a hereford steer nuts. I can only imagine how it would feel to have one in the eye. If it's any consolation, these pictures are the first time I have ever heard of this in the Unites States. I saw something similar that happened from a bite in a Central American jungle.

Bowhntr

I wish we had the pics of the hotshot hand that got infected from the splinter on a fire in 2002. It was reported with slide presentation at the hotshot meeting in Feb 2003. Even small medical issues can turn into large ones. Nothing like a few graphic images to harden your resolve to seek help earlier. Serious lessons learned. Ab.

3/29 SoCal 0081 Firefighter,

Is that the project for assessing the fire problems in
Monterey County / Fort Ord that's funded by a BLM
grant and directed by a Monterey County board of
directors (firefighters and citizens)? Thanks for sharing
that info. I heard about that from one of the planners.

Monterey Co F/F

3/29 Hey guys,

Awesome site, been lurking for years, wondering if anyone out there
has S-211 (pumps) on a powerpoint presentation, or if its available
online somewhere. Keep up the good work.

Thanks for your time.

KF

3/29 re: Campbell prediction system

This is the March 29th entry from my Sun-Tzu "Art of War" desktop
calendar:

"What everyone knows is what has already happened or become obvious.
What the aware individual knows is what had not yet taken shape, what has
not yet occurred. Everyone says victory in battle is good, but if you see the
subtle and notice the hidden so as to seize victory where there is no form,
this is really good."
-- Chapter 4: "Formation"

vfd cap'n

3/29 Ab, I'm a long time lurker. Thanks for the informational site.

Doug Campbell's Fire Signature Method is being used to ground truth the
computer modeling output of Farsite. Some discussion of this went on just
last week between State and Federal firefighters. I find this an interesting
development. Attached please find a description of the fire signature portion
of that meeting that's circulating.

SoCal 0081 Firefighter

3/29 Mellie, White Tornado, NorCal Tom, others interested in
novice firefighter safety,

Marc Castellnou who had just participated in Doug's fire signature
prediction class (then called CPS) in Spain in 1998 as a novice sent
this message way back then. He told me please to send it to theysaid.

From Marc Castellnou,1998
An important thing is that CPS is saving lives in Europe.

We were just four days ago fighting in a long fireline. The fire was
going down in a very steep slope (SW). We started the work in the
morning at 0900 and were there working all day. Part of the fire in
front of us was 50 meters from the bottom of the valley at 1200 and about
200 meters down the valley from our position. It was dangerous because
there was fuel between this head of the fire and us. When the fire gets to
the bottom it will be in alignment with slope, aspect and wind to make a
run, and we were in the path of this run.

I told this to the boss of the fire. It took me a half hour to explain and
convince this guy, but at the end he agreed and called everybody out of the
area. The people start to leave at 1445 and the run starts at 1510. We
were safe at that time.

Campbell's method is changing the way to fight fire and be safe all
around the world.

Another new item is that Domingo Molina put CPS questions and Doug
Campbell's name in a University test for the ones who want the Forestry
degree and knowledge about fighting wildfire.

One more thing.
I just come from Portugal, where the third Forest Fire Research and the
14th Fire Meteorology Conference was conducted last week. I exposed
there some of our research work and also the software that makes the CPS
prediction, just the paper version. So its done, its running and the
people and experts of the world like it.

Today in Spain its common practice to have tracks, trigger points and time
tags marked on maps at the beginning of shift. Evaluation of changing fire
behavior and a heads up on reevaluating tactics have saved lives.

A *Fire Signature Prediction Method* Supporter

3/29 Danfromord,

What's the P-38 you talk about? A gun or a can opener
or something different named after a fighter plane?

NewGuy

3/29 I'm gonna have to agree with OFG on the safety issue of fallers. We are not working in their environment they are working in ours. If it is hard for you to hire fallers only due to the fact they have not gone through basic 32 then you need to find a way to provide it. I grew up in logging camps in the northwest and am on my 10th year in fire so as a logger's son and a trigger puller fighting fire I think I see both sides. Sometimes fallers are busting their butts other times they sit at a drop point for 2 days not touching their saw so I'm not willing to believe this job is not worth what they make on fires. I couldn't find the post on Shari's Qual system so I can't speak about that. But in final EVERYONE on fires should have 130-190 and standards for survival.

Trigger Puller

Read the clarification from Oliver below.

3/29 Old Fire Guy

I'm not talking about waiving the present requirements for private fallers. In Oregon these requirements are viewing a basic fire safety video and completing a workbook, fire shelter training, first aide certificate, PPE and experience in falling timber. I'm arguing against further training or qualification requirements for AD fallers we hire locally from the timber industry. I said nothing about removing any existing support platform for safety or waiving any existing requirement. I would not place fallers on the line if I didn't know that I could do it safely, or at least as safe as I can make the work assignment. Make do? Where in the bejezzus did I say make do?

Bottom line for me is that I believe fallers hired as AD, with proper supervision, do not need to meet all of the requirements of agency or professional firefighters. If and when the fire ground changes, and fallers are placed on the line and given the responsibility to act independently, without supervision and without job site briefings, I will change my position and demand a professional firefighter faller series (PFFS) and will pay them $100 an hour! ...Until then I refuse to support the ever growing bureaucratic response to fire line safety by placing obtuse requirements in lieu of meaningful change. (Oliver Manifesto...pg 123 paragraph 3)

Oliver
3/29 Ab,

Over Easter weekend, we responded to several auto accidents. On one of the rollovers, we set up traffic control by closing one highway lane with a combination of apparatus positioning and traffic cones. We had a firefighter with a stop/slow paddle sign to encourage drivers to reduce their speed.

We were attempting to mitigate a known hazard, but still had motorists passing others just ahead of the lane closure and zooming through our accident scene. One of the state troopers commented about pending legislation in Colorado (like that in other states) to mandate that drivers reduce speed when approaching emergency vehicles with lights flashing.

He did pull over one truck that came flying past our guys and vented his frustration a little by screaming at the driver for a while, but probably ended up writing a minor speeding ticket or maybe just give a stern warning. The new law will change some of that, hopefully.

It seems to me that we have a similar situation with wildland safety. We sometimes impose severe penalties for those in supervisory roles when a firefighter gets killed, but really there is no enforcement on near-misses. Our unsafe acts (violation of 10, failure to mitigate 18, etc.) are treated just like speeding through an accident - not much is done, as long as nobody gets killed or seriously hurt. The 'safety cops' can vent a little in an AAR, is it enough to change the behavior of the 'unsafe driver'?

vfd cap'n
3/29 Oliver,

Re: Waiving of requirements for fallers......Every firefighter is entitled
to a safe fire assignment. That platform is supported by training,
experience, physical fitness, and personal protective equipment. Remove
one or more of those supports, and the platform becomes risky.

Litmus test: If the "firefighter" (faller) were wearing a government
uniform, would we be able to waive any of the required training,
experience, fitness or PPE? Obviously not.

Waiving training requirements for fallers is a "make do" approach, and
that's the path to tragedy. Commercial fallers certainly represent some
of the best in the world at their special skill. Let's make sure that when
we ask them to use that skill in our wildland fire venue, we invest in the
other aspects to provide a safe assignment.

Old Fire Guy
3/29 < chuckling about SteveM's "Spotfire" joke. first time I heard it the rottweiler's name was name "Jesus". Either way, good analogy.

Donovan, a little story for you: many years ago, before there was a THEY SAID, a kid was hired on a seasonal crew in R5 - hirees were advised to bring lots of cotton sox & underwear - told to show up wearing high top boots. No one offered advice for best boots - first week of side hill work good feet went bad. (impossible to buy good boots or anything in firecamp 15 yrs ago & no one carried credit cards)

Although wildland FF has changed, if it were me, I'd ask a smokejumper which brand the majority prefer... "lawn darts" are expected to be self sufficient & hike miles

northzone
3/29 Dear Sir,

I am a college student in the Northeast and am interested in spending the
summer of 2006 fighting wildland fires. I have found your site to be both
informative and helpful; however, I am a little confused as to how to begin
finding an appropriate job for someone of my skills (or lack thereof). Any
help would be much appreciated in this manner as well as anything else you may
think I might need to know. If I am wrong in asking you this question, I
would appreciate you directing me to someone who might know.
Thank you,

Paul Chatelain
pchatela@student.umass.edu

Paul, go to our FAQ page and read there. If you get a job working for the feds you will be trained. I don't know about private companies and their training procedures. To work for the feds this summer, you need to apply NOW for an OPM Series 0462, Series 0455 or Series 0401 job. (You probably should have started applying in early Feb.) These jobs do not say "firefighter", but the ones we've weeded out on the links to our Jobs page are firefighter positions (top right - Series 0462, Series 0455 or Series 0401). The thing is, you want a seasonal or temporary job, so it might be best to go to one of the fed pages that lead you through applying for those, like this FS page with a centralized listing. (Seems you need to be a rocket scientist these days to figure out the ropes.) Figure out where you might like to work. Some areas of the US are not hiring seasonal firefighters due to budget. You might call before you apply. Apply to as many as you can. I hope that's a start. Good luck. Ab.

3/28

Another casualty of the spam filter. Sorry for that Dan. I put 'em on the I remember page. Ab.

I remember when everyone carried a P-38 with them, just in case....
And for those that don't know what a P-38 is, it wasn't to ward off
hungry Bears. It was to ward off hungry F/F's.

I remember when Air Tankers were Borate Bombers.

danfromord

3/28 FS Capt -

While I'm obviously not unbiased about the fire shelter and the training associated with its use because of my work at MTDC from 1989 - 2000 and participating in way too many entrapment investigations, I must still voice my disagreement with your comments about that practicing an organized shelter deployment is "farcical". I believe that there is merit in practicing shelter deployments, and using "visualization" to prepare yourself for the conditions that you may eventually encounter.

Need an example? I'd recommend reviewing the shelter training video "Your Fire Shelter - 2001" and listen closely to the comments of Dave LaTour, who went through the "Dude Fire" entrapment with the Perryville inmate crew. Dave's impressions and comment were the result of his near-death experience and were offered to help others survive a similar event.

I'm about one-third of the way through "Deep Survival" and haven't reached the same conclusions that you've drawn from it: maybe the rest of the book will change my mind? Or, maybe it won't?

Dick Mangan

3/28 Donovan,

You're right, you have a unique foot. I've been a Certified Athletic Trainer for 13 years (I still wonder if I'm a part-time FF/full-time ATC or vice-versa) and reading a description of your foot shape tells me you need some custom fitting, in fire boots, sneakers, or even flip-flops.

You can read on and on in this forum about which boot is better, and there are some great observations, experiences, and opinions. (Who would have ever thought firefighters would have strong opinions? *chuckle*) Your biggest problem now is a time crunch. Custom fitting is going to take you about 8 weeks to see your new fire sneakers, and then there's break-in time. There is an outfit in Central Oregon called "Drew's" that should be able to fit you for Nick's, White's, or their in-house brand. I'm sure they're on the internet somewhere.

As far as socks go, the Ab's could start a whole new discussion area on that subject alone.

My humble advice is to get moving on this, and take your orthotics with you if you're going to get measured. Happy Hiking.

-FireBill
3/28 Hey All
I was just wanting some input on the letter
Mr. Bosworth put out to all the F.S. personnel. What
are peoples thoughts and reactions? My own opinion was
it was a nice rah rah session full of empty promises.
How are we supposed to meet our target for
fuels reduction with no money, and go tell the Regions
who aren't hiring seasonals that we should make do with
the resources in place to do our job. Again the
Washington office is asking us to do a dollars worth of work
and sending cents to do it with.
Just my two cents

DM

Bosworth's letter follows:

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

I’m hearing a lot of buzz about the Forest Service budget for FY 2005 and the President’s  proposed budget for FY 2006. Let me give you my take on our budget situation …

This is without question a difficult budget year, and I expect the foreseeable future to be the same. When discretionary spending is tight -- in times of budget deficits and international challenges - - I accept that the Forest Service has a role in fiscal restraint.

I know that tough choices and tradeoffs will have to be made. In my discussions with Congress, the media, and others, I openly acknowledge such challenges, but I focus on what we can accomplish in spite of them. I’m confident that we will continue to make great progress in such high-priority areas as hazardous fuels reduction, where I expect we will again set records this year. The National Leadership Team will meet in early April to focus our programs on our top priorities and identify the needed tradeoffs.

I also tell people what we’re doing to increase program efficiencies so we can reduce our overhead costs and get more dollars to the ground. The efficiencies we’re gaining in Budget and Finance Management, and Information Resources Management once again demonstrate the “can do” character of the Forest Service. To go from just a concept on paper 18 months ago to a functioning national service center today with close to 200 employees is a phenomenal achievement. I’m confident that we’ll see similar successful changes as we restructure our Human Resources Organization and that substantial savings from all three of these efforts will be realized. We’ll also gain efficiencies from stewardship contracting and other tools under the Healthy Forests Initiative and Healthy Forests Restoration Act. All this will go a long way toward getting the on-the-ground results we need to accomplish our mission, as well as reducing our costs.

We should also be proud of our three clean audits in a row, and we’ve just been removed from the Government Accounting Office’s list of high-risk areas in government. The list identifies programs and agencies that need special attention from Congress and the Administration, and we’d been on that list since 1999. Being removed from the list can’t help but make us more competitive for federal dollars in these tight times.

I’ve probably heard the most concern expressed, both internally and externally, about whether we’ll have enough firefighting resources this year. Both Congress and the administration expect a level of preparedness comparable to last year, and I’m confident that we can provide that. We’ll also have enough money to fight fires without being anti-deficient. A bad fire year is predicted, especially for the Northwest and Northern Rockies, but if we exceed available suppression funds, we’ll simply adjust. We’ve done it in the past, and we can do it again if necessary.

In my 39 years with the Forest Service, I’ve found out the hard way that it doesn’t do much good to complain about budgets. It rarely results in additional funding, and it usually doesn’t resonate well with the public. Most people feel we have plenty of funding if only we’re efficient about how we use it.

In closing, let me just say again that I know we have a challenging future. But I also know we’re up to the task. By focusing on our top priorities, working with our partners, and finding ways to improve our efficiency, we can accomplish our mission, even in these tight times.

At least, that’s my take.
Dale

3/28 FS Capt-

I have not yet read “Deep Survival,” although it is on my list. With that said, I agree, in part with your assessment of the shelter training we give our greenhorns. However, I recently taught a 130/190 class in which one of my assistants took the ball after the students were in their shelters. He took them through a visualization exercise of what it might be like to be the one in a burnover and the mental process of survival. As an veteran of the 1st Gulf War as a forward observer in the Marines, his scenario was very realistic, as he, himself, had been in life and death situations numerous times. I was very pleased he took the ball and so were the students. They came out of the shelters after five minutes visibly shaken. Train as you work, right? I know nothing will ever compare to the real thing, but many aspects of life are like that.

I pray I will never find myself in that position, but if I do, I imagine I will be pretty pissed off at myself, initially, for getting into that situation. And then, I believe I will focus inward, as you would, and worry about saving my own a**, whatever that will take. While some may think you are being selfish by worrying about yourself and not worrying about the rest, we all have to take care of #1.

Don’t worry about me, I won’t worry about you. Until it is all over. There will be plenty of time to reflect from the other side, whether that be in this world or another.

Cautiously optimistic,
X-R2LY
3/28 I have been quietly sitting back and reading the posts here for some time and feel like putting my 2 cents in (i may only have 1 cent to give if our budget keeps shrinking) and introducing myself to the group so here it goes.

I have been thinking about my personal experiences in regards to training of firefighters and more specifically the younger firefighters (this is because I am one of the younger firefighters). Since I began working for the forest service I have felt like I have to fight tooth and nail to get into some of the basic courses like S-131 and S-290. I am now in the apprentice program and am more able to get these classes but when i was not in the program and was just a 1039, I was told that I wasn't going to be able to attend these classes because I wasn't career. It seems like as the "old folks" are hitting their retirement, they should be concentrating on getting the younger people into courses to fill their shoes. I hope that all of the supervisory persons think like this because if you want to see our organization thrive with good people in the positions to make positive changes, they have to have the qualifications to be there.

Hope this wasn't too vague of an idea. I would like to see some input from others on my idea if you can consider this an idea and any advice on better posts would be appreciated.

Signed,
R5newtoR6

Your message is clear. Thanks for writing in. Ab.

3/28 Re: Deep Survival

I read the book and drew the following conclusions:
  • The number of (wildfire) disasters will increase proportionally to the number of safety plans, standard operating guidelines, high tech equipment and rules of engagement we are compelled to generate, memorize and maintain.
  • Some of us will check out the view from inside a fire shelter again this season. Gladly we're getting (new) better ones.
  • To practice "organized" shelter deployment (let alone how we intend to act once we're in there) is farcical. We may assume our leaders already experienced some sort of tactical short-circuit well before the fact. Survivors will abandon their leaders, their plans, and any operational loyalty. If it ever happens to me, I intend to pass my time (surviving in a fire shelter) deep within myself, not worrying about you. Whether I survive or not, I'm done with wildland fire.

Come to think of it, these three points have consistently proven true since I started in 1981.

Optimistically,
FS Capt

3/27 Joke:

The burglar quietly jimmied the back door and entered the house he’d been watching for some time. He snickered to himself at how easy it was. The owner seemed to be absent a lot in the summer, sometimes 14 days or more. He crept through the kitchen and into the living room with an eye out for anything he could grab and sell easily. Suddenly, from across the room he heard a scratchy voice say, “Spotfires behind you”. He jerked his flashlight across the room searching for the person who spoke. The voice came again, a little louder in front of him, “Spotfires behind you”. This time his flashlight reflected off a bird cage, in which sat a parrot, calmly watching him.

He was very relieved to see it was just a dumb old bird. In jest he whispered back, “Well, hello parrot, what’s your name”? To his surprise, the parrot answered and said, “Sparky”. The burglar chuckled aloud, “That’s a silly name for a bird”, he said, “who’d name their parrot Sparky”? The bird cocked its head, then replied, “The same guy who named his rottweiler Spotfire”.

SteveM

Haw Haw. I added it to jokes. Ab.

3/28 AB - you used to have a link to a picture of a parasite of some type
being removed from a firefighters lower eyelid. Looked like a large
grub. That picture is worth a thousand words. It still gives me
shivers, and makes me wash my hands more - rub my eyes less on fires.

eric
~~~~~~~
Ab Note with gross photo:
I found it. It was sent in by backburnfs. Reposted from 2/4/03. Now FirePsych, this should grab some attention.
~~~~~~~

Wear your eye protection. backburnfs
~~~~~~~

The story behind the photos. NOT FOR THE SQUEMISH.
Always remember to wear eyeglasses or clean out your eyes thoroughly after working outside if you feel there are intruders...... this is disgusting..... Yikes! Is there a market for RAID eyedrops!

Subject: Why do you wear PPE ? Good training issue.

Its just like from an alien movie, be very careful when you get caught with dust...
The following photos will show effects of bad dust to a person's eye.
While a firefighter was walking he felt an eye irritation. Thinking that it was just regular dust, he started to rub his eye, in an effort to remove the dust. Then his eyes got really red, and he went and bought some eye drops from a pharmacy.
A few days passed and his eyes were still red and seemed a little swollen.
Again he dismissed it thinking that the pain will go away.
As the days go by, the swelling of his eye got worse: redder and bigger.
He decided to go see a doctor for a check up.

The doctor immediately wanted an operation, being afraid of a tumor growth or cyst.
At the operation, what was thought to be a growth or cyst, actually turned out to be a live worm.
What was thought initially to be just mere dust actually was an insect's egg.
Because of that, my friends, if you do get caught in dust, and the pain persists, please go see a doctor immediately...

...and always wear your PPE.

3/28 Shari

I'm not a professional faller but I did test Newton's gravitational theory all over "Jo" county in my younger firefighting days. And I have cut more than a few cords of Madrone for heat and smoking Rogue River...Applegate and Illinois river Steelhead and Salmon.

In my post I thought I made it clear that I don't think fallers are paid enough...but what the hey... none of us are really paid enough. Even with the low pay we are able to hire qualified fallers each fire season. Are some fallers better than others? Yes, just like agency crews you get the good and the bad... eventually.

Without mincing words and causing further confusion...I have a problem with all fallers needing to attend S-130 and 190 to be qualified to work on fires. I also don't believe the faller community needs to be organized as a brokered commodity. I like the present system...I know the local loggers and fallers and we teach them basic fire and fire shelter training each year prior to fire season. They sign up their resources in spite of the pay scale. I think partly because they are connected to the local community. We provide supervisory oversight for the fallers safety and to evaluate their performance. I'm opposed to creating any system that would affect my ability to hire fallers that don't meet the qualification system you propose.

I support the need to have agency level experience and training standards for agency employed sawyers that are working hotline with a hand crew to fall danger trees and snags. And I believe we have the training standards and are slowly gaining in the number of experience sawyers.

Shari, I believe you have the best interest of the fallers/timber cutters in mind. However, we just disagree about the level of fire training fallers need or whether an organization to provide a consistent set of specifications to adequately address private sector fallers on the fire line is needed. Again, this is my personal opinion, it's not meant to be slanderous to the hard work you have done or to take away from your vision of what's needed.

Good luck with your program.

PS ...on a recent trip to Caveman country I noticed a bumper crop of Poison Oak...you might want to stock up on the itch cream.
This ugly little scratch and itch plant infected my son as he was looking for morel mushrooms last week during our visit.

Oh...hair coat is a sexist term used in the early and mid seventies to describe a Neanderthal... all male dominated work force. It was also used to poke fun at the macho types when they would make remarks like ..."stand back" and let a real man show you how it's done. I don't personally prescribe to either of those two uses. I offered the hair coat remark as a reference point for historical perspective and levity. If it offended you or anyone else I would ask that the comment be taken as intended and apologize to those offended... Besides, there is a certain non-hair coated FMO in the southern part of our state that would kick my backside if she thought I was being a sexist Neanderthal.

Oliver
3/28 sj's, all

Good code to live by jh
Didn't know if I had to be politically correct.
Am I relieved.

Now see wot you've done...Did you hear the one
about the tanker slug.....? jk

To old dogs and NG's alike,
keep 'em safe this summer.

Redwings741
3/28 Re: Forest Service Green paint codes

KW – Just so you know, I am pretty sure they don’t make the
FS green in the interior semi-gloss you were hoping to use for
your kitchen.

Just kiddin’! I am sure someone will have the code.

ExR2YL
3/28 Redwings:

As Hank Stamper would have said (in Ken Kesey's great book
about life and logging, Sometimes a Great Notion)):
"Never apologize, never explain..."

Joe Hill
- "stand tall, eat rocks and glass"

See Redwings, SJs and ex SJs just have a lott'a bark. Ab.

3/28 OK, White Tornado, I've been thinking about this issue long and hard from another direction. I think it's ready to send in tonight.

Ab and all, thanks for your indulgence. This is another long one... As I pounded away it just turned into more of a "barracuda" piece than a "guppy guppy"! I call it An Argument for Training in Tactical Fire Behavior Prediction for Groundpounders - What are the "Barriers" to Such Training?

Mellie

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

It looks like Doug Campbell's tactical fire behavior prediction class (Fire Signature Prediction) might be taught to line officers in R3 so they can try and cover their legal posteriors. Helibase managers and others have also been worried they're at risk as a result of Cramer and OIG/DOJ. Of course, here on theysaid we've had a first-hand seat on the legal concerns of ICT3s and higher ICs. Legal concerns are mitigated to some degree if firefighters buy criminal/civil liability insurance. <hellof-a'note> However, problems that led to the concerns have not been mitigated. I do commend the good efforts underway to clarify Fire Doctrine, policies and practices. We need some real solutions.

There's growing momentum for tactical fire behavior training - Campbell's fire signature prediction - and it's my professional opinion that this method has real value. I know firefighters have lot on their plate, a lot to teach, a lot for new folks to learn, a lot of new folks. That said, in my opinion Campbell's method should be taught to all on the fireline so that Commanders Intent more easily and safely can be implemented as Doctrine.

For all you old fire dogs out there, I imagine you've heard about Doug's Fire Signature Prediction class, have taken it, have integrated parts of it into your S-190 class, and/or have focused on computer-oriented fire prediction route. All of you have fire behavior experience and at this point have a perspective, which is not a novice's perspective. While you don't necessarily need a tactical fire prediction course, the groundpounding novice does, especially as more of you retire. So how does this training impact a novice?

Here's my "take" on Fire Signature Prediction from the perspective of the novice and why I think it's important training. I also offer psychological insights as to why its not more universally required for novice firefighters.

Overview: When I took Doug's Fire Signature Prediction class in spring 2000 with the Ventura Co Fire Dept, I literally "felt" the cognitive shift ("blinding glimpse of the obvious": BGO) that many inexperienced participants report. It occurred in my brain when all the many possible fire factors got organized and prioritized and I realized you could ask and answer:

  1. "what particular important fire factors made this fire do what it has done on this piece of ground" and

  2.  "when and where might those factors change, changing the fire's behavior and putting me at risk?"

The logic to evaluating fire behavior change on the ground, so as to evaluate the 10 and 18 (or more simply LCES), dawned on me in a flash. In cognitive psychology, we'd say that Doug's teaching enhances the "chunking" process -- the process of ordering and prioritizing many complex bits of information at a higher level. Chunking information can be a meta-cognitive process that develops in people with years of experience who more automatically make sense of a situation involving complex inputs. Their mental organization is usually gained in small increments, like gathering a photographic slide here, a slide there, with relations between slides -- over years. Often experts in professions that deal with very complex phenomena can't tell you how they know what they know, but if you used a method of brain imaging - like a PET scan - their brain patterns would probably light up differently than a novice's brain would when confronted with the same task.

Interestingly enough, Campbell's method has met some resistance in fed fire circles outside of Southern California for a number of reasons that I can see. Here are some I've observed in the order they popped into mind.

1) Cognitive processes: First and foremost! Through fireline experience, advanced firefighters reviewing Doug's method have already achieved some level of "chunking" of the myriad predictive fire factors. They can't go back to having an inexperienced mind (for example, as when they had no "slides" in even one tray of their Recognition Primed Decision-making or RPD fire slidetrays). As a consequence, they may not see how Campbell's method can really help new folks get a handle on all the info that they themselves first recognized and then integrated, through experience and/or guidance under their fire mentors.

Most experienced fire minds already have the bigger fire behavior picture - in the RPD analogy - more slides and fire outcomes organized by category in multiple prioritized slidetrays. As a result of their developed brain organization, experienced firefighters are freed up to notice the nuance of little details that might still impact the fire's behavior. To the inexperienced all those details are simply a jumble of little details, each item having the same importance as every other, and lots of lists to memorize in training. Lists of disjointed items are not slides that inform behavior. Slides need slide trays to have coherence and logic and meaning.

You can think of chunking as placing the many details into categories or into a hierarchy of groupings of details with an emphasis on the hierarchy, i.e., training yourself to look for the most important combination of things first in answering the question "What made the head and heel and flanks of this fire burn as they did?". Novices pull on individual slides with little or no organization imposed. Masters pull on trays of slides with known relations to other trays. Having some way to facilitate chunking of the most important information is critical to move more quickly toward achieving a metacognitive structure.  You could say that Campbell's method experienced by the novice creates and orders the slide trays that form the logical structure that the slides will go in, and provides a number of illustrative slides as well. The feeling you get when you see the logic of the slidetray arrangement is profound. It's that "blinding glimpse of the obvious".

Continue HERE...

3/28 Hello!

My name is Donovan, and I was recently hired by the USFS to work on a Type 3 Engine in Central OR. What are your thoughts on the type and manufacturer of boot that I should buy? I have large (Size 14 or 14 1/2), relatively narrow, low-volume feet. They're also flat, and I wear a custom orthotic footbed in my other shoes and boots. I've heard that White's makes an amazing boot, but is there anything comparable at a cheaper price? I realize that my foot is pretty unique, so I might have to spend the extra dough for a custom fit, but if you have any recommendations, I'd really appreciate it!!!

Donovan

p.s. What are some favorite socks out there? I can get Smartwool light hikers at a discount, I was thinking about a dozen pair or so. Are they worth a damn? Thanks again!!!

Donovan, welcome. Read back over the last month. There's been discussion of boots. If I get time today look back I'll point you to some dates. Readers, if anyone has really big feet and/or orthotics, please chime in here. Ab.

3/28 I desire to express my deepest sympathy to the families and friends of Charles Edgar, John Greeno, and Jose Victor Gonzales who gave their lives in service to their country while conducting a prescribed burn on the Sabine National Forest in Texas in order to reduce hazardous fuel accumulations on March 10, 2005.

The honor and respect given to Charles during the funeral services, and to Johnny as we performed the honor escort, placed him aboard the Forest Service DC-3, and lined the runway to see him off to be returned to his family and friends in California was very moving. The people of the Sabine National Forest and the Forest Service Honor Guard showed the deepest respect in honoring our loved ones. Our friends will be missed tremendously, but remembered often by people across the country because of the many ways they touched our lives.

For all of us that mourn the losses, we need to remember that God promises that he will not give us more than we can bear. We are also taught that our life is but a mist that appears for a little while and then vanishes. These things in mind, we need to focus upon right relationships with God, our families and friends. We shouldn’t put off until tomorrow what we need to do now. And, the important service that we perform for the People must go on. Charles would want it that way. Though I did not personally know Johnny, I feel certain that he would want it that way also.

We will always remember our friends with fondness and keep them in our hearts.

Greg Cohrs
Sabine National Forest
Hemphill, Texas

Our condolences for your loss. Ab.

3/28 Good post, White Tornado. One way to focus on this issue is to try
to understand and define FAM DOCTRINE for the current generation.
Has anyone heard where this process is?

NorCal Tom

3/27 Apology

Ab,

I didn't mean to offend anyone. It was just a joke. sry

Redwings741

Hey Redwings, this is not something to apologize over. Yer a newcomer and the smokejumper is just testing yer resolve. Stand up straight and look 'em in the eye! I thought it was pretty funny. Ab.

3/27 Ab, thanks for putting my post up on your site re: my need for photos related to wildland firefighters and injury.

The photos for my presentation would not be for the purpose of getting people to stop and talk with me. I figure the free beer out in front of my stand ought to do that fairly well. Kidding aside, my hope is that the photos would embellish the written materials that I have, and make the whole presentation a little more interesting for those who are wandering by. Nor do I need photos to make specific points. Just pics of anything injury related: air or ground ambulances in action, evacuation, accident scenes, anything that is visually interesting and related to the topic. Thanks again for your help.

FirePsych

3/27 Our National Fire Leadership Defies Logic

In the publication by Rothermel in June 1983 NFES #1573 Titled: How to predict the spread and intensity of forest and range fires. In the introduction on page 1...Quote:

"Can wildland fire behavior really be predicted? That depends on how accurate you expect the answer to be. The minute-by-minute movement of a fire will probably never be predictable - certainly not from weather conditions forecasted many hours before the fire."

The rules of engagement are used to assure that the agency and OSHA and OIG follow the lead of the Forest Service and assign blame in fatalities to those found to be in VIOLATION of such rules.

This procedure deflects blame from the agencies training and qualification standards and assumes the folks they certify as competent are in fact never over their heads on any assignment. If firefighters run into situations that are beyond their capability to understand, whose fault is it?

1. You can't possibly have a burnover fatality and not be in violation of many of the rules of engagement.

2. To avoid burnover situations one must be able to predict the minute-by-minute changes in fire behavior and detect a hazardous situation before it occurs.

3. Now if the preferred fire behavior prediction method is based on Rothermel's work and BEHAVE, and the author said the models can't make these predictions, how can we fix the blame on folks who are doing the best they can but fall short of accurate fire behavior predictions? Experienced firefighters are able to utilize their acquired knowledge to fill the gaps in the fire behavior training. When it fails and burnovers happen the S-courses are not questioned to determine if the training would have prevented the accident if it had been followed as taught.

If the training is truly adequate for these classic fire scenarios then why not write solutions using the subject training and teach from the lessons learned?

4. I think it is time that we insist that our leaders who espouse the "We don't bend or break any of the rules" take a Division assignment on a complex fire. Why don't we ask them spend time on a few fires and demonstrate their capability to accomplish what they think is possible, and document it. Maybe they should join a Hotshot crew for a season.

5. In case they do not take the challenge and are too busy with more important things I would conclude that they are just spouting these phrases but are not willing to do what leadership requires and demonstrate their ability to make fire behavior predictions that are accurate and keep the tactics always within the rules of engagement. I think this would be a valuable lesson for all firefighters. Imagine the knowledge that could be imparted to a Hotshot Supt. or Ops. Chief. If they can truly show the way to better, superior situational awareness and compliance with the rules of engagement, what are they waiting for?

Leadership is demonstrated by another saying. "Do not ask of others what you are not willing or able to do."

White Tornado

3/27 with regards to the slander, re: "Smokejumper Handline",
I would contend the only safe line is the line that's black
on both sides.

Joe Hill
Former Smokejumper
Former Wobbly
3/27 usfs paint code

Hello,

I am looking for the pale green paint code used on USFS fire vehicles,
and LEO vehicles. If you can provide any leads, I would really
appreciate it.

thanks much!

KW

3/27 Dumbo

ENOP requirements are listed in the Interagency Standads for Fire and
Fire Aviaton Operations (the Red Book) NFES 2724, Chapter 15. Doesn't
make a lot of sense to me anyway, to require this, plus a qualified crewmember on
a tactical tender. Bare minimum ENOP quals do not even include ICT5
which a normal person would think might be essential as a minimum on a tactical
apparatus. Its barely above a FFT2. My question is how often have you ever
seen a Type 1 or 2 Water Tender used in a true tactical sense? Rarely. My
experience is that it is more commonly utilized in support of tactical
operations, or dust abatement, whichever comes first.

Blue
3/26 Good Morning All,

I've updated the Jobs Page and Series 0462 (Forestry Technician) & Series 0455 (Range Technician) jobs pages and Series 0401 ("professional" Biologist).

We hope you and your families have a good day and weekend.

Ab.

3/25 The information below is from the FEMA site. I hope it stirs some discussion about classification, pay, and responsibilities. Note: It is for logistics, operations, and planning section chiefs.... FEMA is hitting the NIMS hard....

Lobotomy

www.fema.gov/career/display_group.jsp?code=164&code_type=3

LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT SPECIALIST (LOGISTICS SECTION CHIEF), GS-346-14
FL-05-RM-018-LLN
**All Eligible Candidates** Orlando, FL
04/06/2005

PROGRAM SPECIALIST (OPERATIONS SECTION CHIEF), GS-301-15
FL-05-RM-012-LLN
**All Eligible Candidates** Orlando, FL
04/06/2005

PROGRAM SPECIALIST (PLANNING SECTION CHIEF), GS-301-13
FL-05-RM-022-LLN
**All Eligible Candidates**
3/25 I remember: 
  • C-rations on Helitack in the 60's but I carried an old box Motorola which could 
    occasionally reach a tower from a ridgetop.
  • No nomex (nor could we afford the fine boots worn by the regulars).
  • Our first Hotshot buggie - a leased flatbed on which we built wooden toolboxes, 
    on which my crew sat, under a canvass top.
  • I can't recall whether we installed seat belts.
  • My Superintendent was an old gentleman in a uniform with disabilities that kept 
    him off the fireline and out of the woods.
  • My crew had no prior experience at all.
  • Morning football caused so many injuries we had to switch to jogging.
  • Crew contest - see who could catch and eat a lizard first (wasn't my idea).
  • My last bar fight - saved from personal injury by my loyal crew (the lady who 
    caused it was thrown out and the assailant and I bought each other a beer).
  • Good morale but not enough fires.

"Foreman, 1971" 

Added it to the list... I Remember ... Ab.

3/25 More Jargon

Safety Nap: The "so called" 8 hrs. you get to sleep after your 16 hr shift.

CLJ

2/26
please
note
date
Ab Note: This came in last month but ended up in the spam filter and then I overlooked it because I was out of town. I wanted to make sure our community saw Nancy's email. We will not soon forget Matt. My thanks also to Lance Honda, superintendent of the Prineville hotshots for representing our fire community well in all regards.

I was humbled and awed by the honor shown to my son, Matt Taylor, yesterday at the memorial service.

You guys just keep on blessing us!! At least a hundred hot shots from surrounding areas and long distances came for a parade, complete with banners and engines with lights on, coming through downtown Bend and to the Church. It was standing room only as we watched a power point with photos of Matt with his fire friends and listened to Lance remember Matt. The presence of all those friends meant more to the family than any of you can know...or maybe you do, and that's why you were there. The donated leave, the contributions, the cards, prayers and well wishes, certainly sustained us through this time.

As I and my other children remember Matt, we will hold a special place in our hearts for the folks who worked on fire with him. What a brotherhood.

Thank you, be safe, and God bless you and your families.

Nancy Larson

Nancy, you're fire family. Thanks for sharing with us. Sorry for the delay. Ab.

3/25 New AD rates are out. Just glanced at them. If there are changes from 2004, 
I didn't pick up on it.

One change (I think) is AD's on assignment who get a R&R are not entitled 
to base 8. Seems kinda c-s to me but with assignments at 14 days, maybe 
it's a moot point.

Sorry I don't have the link.

Old Fire Guy
3/25 Ab,

I have to fill in as the lead instructor for an S-290 next week and I am asking 
for help if anyone has it on PowerPoint. The RM version is lacking several Units. 
My WWW searches have come up empty.

Looking for help
3/25 Backburnfs,

"I am gonna call your bluff on the no hardhat part of your post, especially if you were eating Vietnam date C Rats".

Attached is a photo taken in 1981 of a couple members of an Alaska hotshot crew. If you look closely you will see no hard hat. We were in the tundra and the highest vegetation was up to our knees. If you look at photo PBY-1 on page one of the air tanker section you will several other firefighters relaxing without the benefit of head protection.

Tim

Lighter PBY-1 photo. Ab tweaked the brightness. Still hard to tell about helmets. Tim, you must'a been there! Ab.

3/25 Ab,

I am putting together a poster presentation for the upcoming IAWF summit in Missoula. The title of it is “Wildland Firefighters and Injury Recovery.” I am in need of photos along this theme, e. g. treatment, evacuation, injury scene, etc. The taker of said photo(s) would be referenced if I use their pics, should he/she so desire. I can be reached at msocharlie@earthlink.net if anyone out there has something they want to share. Thanks!

FirePsych

Readers, you're also welcome to send photos here and Ab will pass 'em on.

Are the photos for getting people to stop at your poster and talk with you? Or are they to illustrate some points in your poster paper? If they are for making points, please let us know what points - if you can do that without giving away your message. (I'm thinking about a thorn in hotshot finger that got infected and led to loss of the finger... those photos were graphic but I don't remember where I saw them.) Ab.

3/25 Jokes:

Here's another one....if you haven't heard it a thousand times.

How can you tell smokejumper handline?
It's burnt on both sides.

Redwings741

OK, Here's a place for wildland firefighter jokes. Ab.

3/25 re shot handline joke

Ah…ex shot, you of all people should know that joke was made for
jumpers. Maybe you typed it wrong, should read:

What’s the difference between a jumper handline and a deer trail?
The deer trail will hold.

And because we are on jokes, well its not really a joking matter, why
is it when you order lunches and water though helislak they always
come up with the wrong number of lunches and water? Maybe its time
for a new S class SCB-101 (should count better)

RR

3/25 Backburnfs

I can remember "K" rats my firefighting daddy brought home once (?1949).
We kids thought they were great.
And all the mystery meat variations of things we ate thru the years.
Some of them weren't so great and once you threw up on one of em you never wanted another...ever.

Yeah, engines were tankers.

Old Wolf (also a Forester)

OK, here's the list... I Remember ... Ab.

3/25 Old Wolf,

I am gonna call your bluff on the no hardhat part of your post, especially if you were
eating Vietnam date C Rats or Ocean Mice as we used to call them. And those Engines
were Tankers weren’t they? Otherwise I am there with you bro.

Backburnfs

3/25 Since we're on shot jokes...

Whats the difference between a shot handline and a deer trail?
The deer trail will hold.

ex shot

3/25 I remember when I was a GS-3 I could buy 10 gallons of gas for an hours
wages now I am a GS-9 and guess what I can buy 10 gallons of gas for an
hours wages.

Thisisprogress
3/25 F.N.G. = F***in New Guy

CLJ

3/25 Here's an old one:

whadda you get when you send hotshots down to the basement?
A whine cellar ...

Actually, most of the shots I've run into have been great folks.

Still Out There As An AD
3/25 From Firescribe:

Chico air tanker firm being sold --AeroUnion being sold to Lake Union Capital Partners

Portland OR City officials work to keep lid on tinderbox

Vision Emerges for Future of State Forest Martha's Vinyard

Martha's Vinyard,
...which fire experts say is sited on the third most flammable landscape in the nation, after the Oakland Hills of California and the pine barrens of New Jersey. Historically, wildfires have roared through the scrub oak and pitch pine at ferocious rates, crossing from West Tisbury to the edge of Edgartown in as few as five hours.

Low humidity, high winds lead to fire alert ... in Texas