"THEY SAID IT" ARCHIVES
NOVEMBER, 2005

Home of the Wildland Firefighter

DATE
SUBJECT    (Previous Archive: Oct-05)

Return to Archives Page

11/30 Ab,

One check line option for the retention problem in R-5 could be the continuation and development of government housing. As a former tenant of a tired but comfy two bedroom Forest Service house, I can attest to the fact that it made my transition from a temp. in R-1, to an Apprentice in R-5, easier for myself and my family. Of course, the isolation of the compound was difficult, however the house provided a very affordable option to a long commute and pricey rents.

I am not proposing that affordable government housing is the solution to the whole issue of federal firefighter (oh right... I mean forestry tech.) pay in California, I hold on to the fantasy of one day owning my own place, however it dose seem an avenue that could be addressed. As it stands on my Forest most of these homes are slated to be razed in the very near future, of course most are in disrepair and have stood vacant for years. Perhaps these homes could be an asset (if made livable again) in the recruitment and retention of dedicated employees.

I know that for me it was a benefit, not only financially, but in imparting a sense of family, place, loyalty and history. I don't pretend to understand Forest Service economics, though I do think the above qualities are far more valuable than the price of continuing the upkeep of these properties. I think it will take more than a one pronged approach to solve the retention and pay issues in R-5, housing is going to be a huge factor that portal to portal or better government housing cannot solve alone but with multiple approaches hopefully, most of us will elect to stick it out for the duration in an expensive but challenging locale.

007

11/30 Just passing this on.

COMT

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

<image: Safety and Health Working Team>

The National Interagency Incident Communications Division (NIICD) of the National Interagency Fire Center (NIFC), has been made aware that previously unknown problems exist with Racal radios that are currently in use within the interagency fire community.

Radios operating with the most recent firmware version (7.1) have been found to exhibit the following problems:

  • Radios will unexpectedly cease transmitting with no indication to the operator. In order to correct the problem the radio must be cycled off and then on again.
  • After having been shut down, the radios will intermittently display "Empty" on the LED display. In order to return to the desired Bank/Group, the user must access through the program mode.

All Racal radios currently being used on Wildland and prescribed fire should be immediately recalled from operational use. The NIICD has been informed that an upgrade to correct the problems will soon be released by the manufacturer.

If you have any questions call your agency communication specialist or the manufacturer.

Jim Anger
State Occupational Safety and Health Manager
California State Office
janger@ca.blm.gov

11/30 DeeAnn B,

Try the Styles Check company. Thats who I get mine through.
Few different styles to choose from.

Crash46

11/30 Ab,

My wallet with checks was stolen at work. Trying to order more fire checks but
a porn site shows up for <snip the "rescue" website> where I used to get them.

Any suggestions? I know I should work on this more and not depend on your help.
But know you'll sort me out.

Appreciate it,

DeeAnn B

Thanks for the fire photo DeeAnn. I'll post it to photos over the holidays. Readers, do you know of any place you can get fire checks online? Ab.

11/30 Santa's help needed:

Dear Ab,

Our Community has 12 little ones who need a little help from Santa this year. They have lost their Dads, and Moms are stretched a little thin. Two of the little ones were born after their Dads passed on.

Last year, Shane Heath's (Cramer Fire Fatality) Mother called me and said she wanted to donate the money she normally would have spent on Shane for Christmas to a needy family. We sent the money to a mother of 4 small children. Mom received the money just before Christmas and she called with a big Thanks, expressed through her tears of thanks.

When we had our first Family Day this year with fallen firefighter families, we discovered more little ones whose Moms could use a little help from Santa.

If you want to help, call the Foundation at 208-336-2996 and give us your information. When we send the donations to our Moms, we will include the names of those who helped Santa this season. This information is also on our website: www.wffoundation.org.

What a wonderful community we live in. Thanks for all the support.

Vicki Minor
Wildland Firefighter Foundation

11/29 Ab,

I've seen the latest post about BOISE and NIFC not acknowledging the Pandemic
threat.

There are three (out of five) NIFC Agency Directors (members of the
National MAC Group retiring between Dec. 30 and March 15. - Do people
really think that NIFC is thinking about the 'pandemic'?

BLM is bouncing around real bad today as their Director was asked today to
report to DC for official duty and said "No, I'm retiring."

KG

Um hummm. I hope local groups are working in their counties and cities to get prepared with their local plan. I called to see what plan the schools have in my area. I was told that they will be doing what the county tells them. This is a very poor rural county. The county doesn't yet have a plan. I don't know if they even have a plan for a plan. In Canada the plan is if 25% of students are absent, the school shuts down. Kids spread germs to other kids and their families. Personally, I think this is how a pandemic would spread most readily if/when it comes. Those of you with kids in school, at least ask your schools what the plan is. If you don't have one, take local action to make one. Ab.

11/29 Ab,

You hit a nerve. It was a good nerve.

Regarding your “speculation”, wildland firefighters always put themselves or their families at risk in one form or the other, it is part of the profession. That risk equates to many things such as potential loss of life, livelihood, loss of time seeing kids grow up, loss of companionship, and generally a lower standard of living than people doing comparative hazardous jobs. Risk can be minimized, but only after it is recognized as inherent to the profession. Avian flu, as well as countless other hazards, is inherent to the profession when latent safety factors exist.

Here are several latent safety factors that can be fixed to prevent future active failures (accidents).
  1. Recognize Forestry and Range technicians who specialize in fire as emergency responders and give them an appropriate classification for the hazards they perform. (A GS-5 who picks up trash for a living cannot be compared to a GS-5 who puts themselves and their family at risk each day.) Recognize these jobs as inherently hazardous.
  2. Recognize and correct the recruitment and retention problems for wildland firefighters.
  3. Require relevant education under the IFPM.
  4. Give managers the power to manage for the safety of their programs without being told their mission is agricultural, biology, forestry, or natural resources in nature. Managers are primarily managing people in the fire program, secondarily managing the mission. Emphasis needs to change to safety.

The number one PPE for wildland firefighters is their brain. Any amount of PPE cannot replace the safety provided by someone who is educated, informed, and prepared for the hazards. Recognition Primed Decision-making (RPD) is the best PPE. Without RPD, good information, training, and discussion is the next best thing.

Wildland firefighting has greatly changed over the years. At some point, the focus on keeping people safe has shifted to appointing blame and keeping agency liabilities at a minimum. This shift began the process of appointing blame to an individual or group of individuals while shifting direction away from the real causes. It began when the Swiss Cheese Model (Accident Causation Model) was hijacked by Agencies without understanding what it really says. In short, what it says is that people will always make errors (active failure) and that cultural, agency, and systematic approaches should be in place to minimize these latent failures.

The accident causation model works from the bottom up. The last act in the chain is the active failure (act or omission). The underlying (bottom of the pyramid) failures allow the person or people at the top to make human errors when they don’t have the slides to be prepared for the event.

> From Human Errors, Dr. James Reason

“There is a growing awareness within the human reliability community that attempts to discover these latent failures will have a greater beneficial effect upon safety than will localized efforts to minimize active errors.”

“One of the consequences of the developments outlined above is that complex tightly-coupled and highly defended systems have become increasingly opaque to the people who manage, maintain, and operate them. This opacity has two aspects: not knowing what is happening and not understanding what the system can do.”

As far as Avian Flu, or any non-traditional response, or any type of simple preparedness…. The people who make decisions need to act on the latent problems….. Be leaders, give direction, set policy… inform and prepare the troops for the known hazards, the potential hazards, and the potential consequences. If not, when a pandemic strikes, I am going to give a refusal (and a middle finger).

Remember the hazards of the 9/11 response (silicates, asbestos, PAH, stress, etc) and the unknown hazards of the Cerro Grande fire. How many wildland firefighters were informed of these latent hazards before saying… “Can Do”? How many wildland firefighters have, or will have problems from these duties in the future?

Doctrinal review anyone?

Lobotomy

11/29 Ab's new and old.

Here is a shot of the one of the fires down in Mexico. No fire but an interesting cloud.

As an aside, "whycome" do you not get a lot of information from the Midwest guys who are having their season now? I see posts from the Midwest occasionally but mostly the West. And of course people looking for information, which as I have been reading the archives, always get great help from people who seem to know what they are talking about. Also NPS people never seem to be on the site. I know they use "pick up crews" trained and red carded but not full time firefighters.

Too bad there has to be so much politics discussed. I think T.O. Ab wanted forums about how a crew or engine did a save or were faced with a situation and how they handled it. (Not much of that I have seen though.) But at least it gives people a place to vent and discuss life issues. Too bad the USFS is the way they are about jobs and pay. Too many other federal workers are paid too much for doing nothing. (I deal with many, no job quals just in the position.) Shortly after the Cedar fire I met and talked with a "senior" USFS captain who told me the first thing he had to do, after he was called for the Cedar fire and got to his (unstaffed) station; was to get the drip torch out and defend the station and an adjoining CDF (Schedule A) station that was empty. It worked, I saw the results and it is "too close to my house".

I also know that USFS crews have assisted CDF crews on medical cases around here. I have heard on the scanner USFS being dispatched to assist CDF with "extended" CPR and they have self dispatched (came upon returning to quarters) to at least one incident where CDF was trying to control a busy intersection for a medivac helo landing, and the USFS crew radioed in they were on scene assisting with traffic control. Everyone is on the same side; all you Fire Service people care; your job is too protect life and property, may not be the exact job description but that is what you do. I certainly appreciate it.

ranting again
RJM

Thanks for the calendar picture idea. I forwarded it on for consideration. As far as who contributes, this is the time-off season for many between Thanksgiving and year-end, before training classes come on hot and heavy. Regarding demographics, we have posters from the Midwest. They're busy with fire and getting ready for the Holidays. We have posters from the NPS. We have retired NPS firefighters who post and have been posting good information since the early days of the site. We have posters who began FS, went to DoD and came back to FS. We have posters who have similarly shifted between NPS and BLM and the FS. Many posters are from the West because most of the large National Forests and National Parks that burn during hot summers are western. There are lots of lurkers from the east... Stick around a season or two and you'll get a real sense of the variety, ebb-and-flow of the site and the interagency contributions. Ab.

11/28 A note from this Ab on behalf of the Original Ab who pays the wildlandfire.com bills... and lets me do the part I like to do on theysaid, etc.

Readers, if you're looking for that special gift that supports this online forum, check our Wildlandfire.com store. Original Ab has done a lot of work on the store. This Ab thanks him greatly for that. OA's work on the store, the Classifieds page and the page sponsor signups lets this website stay up and running in the black with bills paid. Black is good.

I feel I haven't thanked Original Ab enough lately. I really appreciate his inspired original idea for theysaid, his work to create this site, his re-entry and support of wlf.com upon his retirement from the Forest Service, and his continued dedication. Good man ==> Original Ab. Thank you so much! Carry on.

Readers, here's another way you can support us: If you're buying online and can make your purchase thru Amazon.com, please use our special affiliates link here to get to Amazon: Amazon WLF.com Affiliates Link. This link is also available on the FireBooks page (top right black link or any book link). We get a small percentage commission on all purchases made via our link, be they books, computers, household items, whatever.

We're still working on the 2006 Wildland Fire Calendar. If anyone has photos of big flames, send them in. Last year we had some CDF big flames or some LA County big flames as well as photos from the private sector and fed firefighters. We could use some more if any state, county or city wildland firefighters are reading <haw haw> I know you are. Wildfire flames are excellent! Last year the interagency feel of the calendar was very nice. One of my favorite months, June, had a night shot of Native American firefighters in silhouette with drip torch. Looking back, they all were veeeerrry nice!

When you send in photos, if you could put "Calendar Photos" in the subject line, it would help me direct the message and photos to OA. I am behind on posting photos to the photo pages, but should get to that early next week after the FWFSA Conference. I will forward possible calendar photos on to Original Ab.

Last year's calendar was dynamite. We're hoping this year's will be as good. Please send those photos in.

Ab.

11/28 Ab,

You probably have already seen this but I thought I'd forward this e-mail chain to you just in case. It's a little outdated, maybe 5 weeks. There has been a rapid spread of H5N1 in wild and domestic birds in Europe, Africa, and BC and Manitoba, Canada with fall migration. China has not been forthcoming with info and probably won't be until the Chinese New Year in February. (In the SARS epidemic they fessed up then; they didn't want to disrupt their national cash flow with negative press during that season of celebration and spending.)

Avian Influenza: Department of Homeland Security, 10/05 (1,560 K pdf file)

Folks are starting to get prepared -- some key people are starting to listen and forward preparation e-mails and ask questions about how we will do business in the advent of a global pandemic.

Many of these people forwarding the e-mail are decision makers; hopefully they will act and just not forward e-mails. There needs to be an official USFS, BLM, NPS, BIA, F&WS, etc... direction memo on how we do business, or how we have continuity of operations (if needed) if/when something bad happens. Asking questions and spreading the preparedness info is good; providing a solution or recommended action is better. Decision makers need to step up.

For me, if things go gunny sack, I'd be happy to just take my hundreds of hours of sick leave and respond from home if needed. It is pretty funny, the things I have stocked up on (rice, beans, top ramen, chili) are the same things I had to stock up on the first ten years of my career to survive the bleak winter months. Thank goodness for Sams Club.
Keep safe.

NorCal Tom

We have gotten this pdf file from a growing number of interagency sources. Thanks ALL contributors.

Some of those who have sent the pdf have sent a brief link to stories that city and state first responders have been having emergency preparedness drills, for emergencies like earthquake, terrorism, tsunami and bird flu. Those are a bit out of date now.

Speculation: On the fed side, I think there's a lot of denial (Houston we have a problem) in Boise and in the Washington office. It also could be that NIFC feels wildland firefighters are not trained in epidemic or pandemic emergency response. I've heard some team members feel they haven't signed up for this kind of duty if it puts their families at risk. It's not clear that there is or will be enough PPE like that needed for the Exotic Newcastle Disease chicken choking assignments. I've wondered myself, what if teams just say no? I also have heard there are a lot of people retiring; the rest are very busy and overworked; many are in the "use it or loose it" mode on time off; some still remain on hurricane relief assignment.

Fact: We plan to stay up and running with the best info available through whatever comes.

Be safe. Ab.

11/28 Readers,

The Wildland Firefighter Foundation is still collecting on pledges made for the Ken Perry 52 Mile Run.

This is the time to send in your donation. 208-336-2996 and Melissa will help you. (She's the one who rode her bike along supporting Ken ... she has the NICE muscled legs. Photos, what a neat event. )

You'll get to write it off on your 2005 taxes -- and it's a very good cause, providing the support our community needs.

Ab.

11/28 Hello there.

I am a 21 year old male living in Ontario Canada, looking for work in the field of firefighting.
I do have wildfire experience and I am also an American citizen.
I was wondering what kind of information you could give me about application processes
and if there are any jobs available.
thank you for your time.

Vince

11/26 Dear Old Fire Guy:

We've chatted before and I appreciate you wanting to disengage from the dialogue of current legislation, but I ask for your patience in letting me clarify a few things.

You felt as though congress wouldn't vote to give one small group of government employees exorbitant pay raises.

As you may recall, and as you may have already benefited from, congress did just that in 2000 by eliminating the overtime pay cap for federal wildland firefighters only. Despite opposition from OPM and USDA, congress approved language in HR 2814 which the FWFSA sponsored through Rep. Pombo.

It should be noted that the increase in pay for exempt folks has certainly not been exorbitant. It has however, allowed those qualified to act in exempt positions, to do just that rather than wasting their qualifications and experience by taking non-exempt positions just to make overtime and get paid logically, more than those they out-rank.

It should also be noted that despite the desires of the Administration and other federal employee groups (8 in all) trying to get the pay cap removed for them, only federal wildland firefighters received the benefit as a direct result of the homework and lobbying done by the FWFSA.

HR 408 is not intended to bring pay parity to federal wildland firefighters. It has nothing to do with buying a house, cost of living etc. It has everything to do with a long-standing inequity and contradiction in the way the federal government pays for wildfire suppression and offers a plan for the agencies to be more cost effective and efficient while improving permanent staffing and compensation for it's own firefighters and saving the American taxpayer money.

As an "old guy" you should already know the five land management agencies have discussed the benefits of portal to portal for over 20 years. This is nothing new. What's new is an organization (FWFSA) willing to go to bat for federal wildland firefighters when the agencies don't, and work to educate congress on the issues and earn their support.

What about timber, recreation, engineering etc? Again, I must remind everyone that HR 408 was written by federal wildland firefighters, for federal wildland firefighters. Again, as an "old guy" you should know that our wildland firefighters are multi-tasked just as any other municipal & state firefighter in the country. They are still working side by side their counterparts in the Gulf states doing the same work for less pay.

As a result of the evolution of the 21st century firefighter, wildland firefighters are planning and preparing for the fire season all year long. Maintaining equipment, running on a variety of calls etc. Just like any other firefighters.

With all due respect (and I've discussed this point before) the timber & recreation folks, known as militia, do not perform fire related duties all year long and are not eligible for the federal firefighter special retirement provisions. Sadly, the FWFSA cannot do anything about that. Such an issue is the exclusive territory of NFFE.

However, that being said, I have reminded many militia and NFFE representatives who had balked at supporting HR 408, that many years ago, a NFFE case against OPM re-established the definition of primary firefighter which allows for a far broader interpretation of what a firefighter is in the federal sector. I've suggested NFFE run with it if they want to.

The current "focus" is on portal to portal simply because it is what the current pending legislation is all about. Don't forget about the provision that includes hazard pay as base pay for retirement purposes. However the FWFSA is certainly not that myopic and narrow-minded. We are crafting legislation to bring hazard pay to those on prescribed burns; bringing basic health benefits to seasonals/temps that risk their lives and get nothing.

These are not new issues either and oddly, they too have been discussed by the agencies & OPM as things that need to be done. All the FWFSA has done is simply stepped up to the plate to get it done. Unlike appointed agency leadership, the FWFSA doesn't have to protect our political rear-ends. We have no chain of command. We've told the agencies we'd like to work with them but if they don't want to, we've simply suggested that they give us the ball and move out of the way.

Surprisingly, a number of top agency officials...off the record, continue to encourage us in what we are doing.

We're not trying to get rich. We're simply looking for a more fair and equitable compensation process which, if the agencies embrace, could reduce or eliminate recruitment & retention problems, and save significant sums of suppression costs each year. All we're seeking to do is re-direct about 3% of the annual suppression funding back to federal wildland firefighters.

Respectfully,

Casey Judd
Business Manager
FWFSA
11/26 Old Fire Guy,

You have been offering suggestions for years. I really appreciate them. They just don’t work. Your suggestions always seem to offer a temporary, short term fix or a masking of the underlying problems. Or your suggestions are prohibited by current rules, regulations, or laws.

You said, "I believe it a "reality" that Congress is not going to vote to give one small group of government employees exorbitant pay raises. Why only ff's? Are not the timber, recreation, engineering techs also entitled to living wage in areas with high cost of living?"

My answer - I agree that everyone in the federal government should get a living wage where they can provide for themselves and their families. H.R. 408 would still only take federal wildland firefighters within 40-60 percent of the wages of local government in the Western United States. H.R. 408 is pay computation legislation.... not an "exorbitant" pay increase. It works to align the pay computation, not the pay rate, with the computations of fellow firefighters. The Federal Wildland Fire Service Association (FWFSA) represents wildland firefighters through legislation. Ask NFFE and AFGE why they are not representing the interests of the folks in timber, recreation, or engineering. Maybe NFFE and AFGE should form employee associations and not concentrate on collective bargaining as a means of improving workplace conditions. The FWFSA is an employee association and not a union.

One small group has got legislation passed to better the wildland fire community. The legislation that got passed was opposed by the NFFE, AFGE, FMA, and several other parties that had no interest in wildland fire suppression or the issues surrounding it. They were, and are, more interested in collective bargaining and settling grievances.

You also said, "Looking to establish an entry wage that allows employees to afford the "median" home (2000 sq. ft. 1 1/2 bath, 2 car garage?)" Uh, uh. How about entry wage persons buying entry market housing..... my first was a 900 square foot "fixer upper" (emphasis on the fixer) bought it for less than half of a "median" house."

My answer - I rent a 900 square foot home. I pay $850 a month for it. If I want to buy this home, it will cost me $250,000. This amount is not much higher than the median price for a home in the U.S. Entry market housing in most areas of the Western United States is still near $140,000..... well beyond any "entry level" employee of the federal government. Even well beyond my mid career wages as a Wildland Fire Manager.

You also said, "I don't recall any tragedy that would have been avoided had the victim had a larger paycheck."

My answer - Open your eyes. You need to keep the best of the best. If you continue to promote the "C" and "D" students, you cannot expect an "A+" safety record. Yes, there are a few "A" and "B" students who stick around, but overall, the class curve is lowered.

And then you said, "Sorry, but bottom line is I just don't think it's going to happen. Best wishes to those who want to focus their effort on portal to portal."

My answer - No reason to say that you are sorry. Lots of people who haven't taken the time to get educated on the issues think it will not happen. Get educated and look at all the issues that the FWFSA is pursuing. The bottom line is safety. Portal to portal is just one of many things the FWFSA is working for. You seem to harp on portal-to-portal.... get over it. Look at the big picture for the wildland fire community. The FWFSA is working to improve safety.

Old Fire Guy, if you aren’t a member of the FWFSA.... it would be a good time to join. Don't let the damned young guys dictate your future if you are so pleased to be a mentor as you profess... learn as they do. You said, "I'll continue to focus my energies on getting people permanent assignments, training, and career ladders. So far, that's been very productive for me in keeping good folks (and I'm extremely proud of our ff's)."

Rogue Rivers
11/26 Re: Recruitment and Retention, Swiss Cheese Model, and Where Do Federal Wildland Firefighters Work?

Here is some interesting data regarding Forest Service permanent career seasonal (PCS) retention rates for the 0462 series. This data can be fact checked by using the FedScope program. FedScope is open for all to use. It is probably the only database out there that you can get accurate info from the Central Personnel File Database (CPFD) without using government computers and Agency internal databases.

Permanent career seasonal positions are a less than full-time appointments that the federal government uses for many of its non-temporary and less than permanent full time appointments. These positions do not account for apprentices who are accounted for in the SCEP database. I am working on getting the national loss numbers for apprentices but don't have access to that database.

GS-0462-3/4/5/6/7/8/9 Forestry Aid/Forestry Technician Losses – Oct. 2004 – June 2005.
         # of PCS Positions    # of Losses    Percentage Loss
GS-3          5                    2              40.00%
GS-4        131                   20              15.27%
GS-5       1002                  111              11.08%
GS-6       1140                   79               6.93%
GS-7        726                   33               4.55%
GS-8        144                    6               4.17%
GS-9         80                    2               2.50%
GS-3 thru GS-5
# of PCS Positions: 1138
# of Losses: 133
Overall Percentage Loss of Permanent Career Seasonal GS-0462 employees, Oct. 2004-June 2005: 11.69%

GS-3 thru GS-9
# of PCS Positions: 3228
# of Losses: 253
Overall Percentage Loss of Permanent Career Seasonal GS-0462 employees, Oct. 2004-June 2005: 7.83%

Note: If loss rates are this severe at a permanent position that has benefits, retirement, thrift savings plan, etc…. imagine what the figures would show at the temporary firefighter level. Imagine what it feels like for a GS-4 Apprentice, who signed a service agreement (servitude agreement), struggling to provide for his or her family for the 2-4 year apprenticeship and then having to stay around until the service agreement is completed while living just above the poverty line ($22,610 - Family with 3 children, HHS, 2005).

Safety starts with effective recruitment and retention. A loss of over 10% of our entry level permanent career seasonal positions, and an approximated loss of 40-50% of our temporary workforce is unacceptable.... especially during a single nine month period.

Also, I misspoke the other day when I said that 90% of federal wildland firefighters come from the Western United States. It is closer to 80%.... <(document attached to e-mail titled "Facts")>

Lobotomy

P.S. - I cannot understand how some people can't recognize recruitment and retention as a latent safety failure. It was addressed back in 1957..... It has been addressed for over 50 years. After reading Human Errors by Dr. James Reason, the mind behind the Swiss Cheese model, it is pretty clear that we need to get away from concentrating wholly on the causal factors and start plugging holes where we can effectively. Latent factors are things we can fix..... Active failures (intentional or unintentional unsafe acts or omissions) are not the first act in the causation model as many people in the wildland fire community claim. Active failures are the last act..... unfortunately the last act for far too many of us. Read the book.... latent failures allow active failures (causal factors) to occur. Latent protections can help prevent active failures.... but bad things do happen to good people. Deep Survival explains this best.
11/26 Median home prices:

My only input on this cost of living discussion is that it was an issue in 1967 when I stated, came to a head in the Carter Admin with the Grace Commission report, and our Association has taken it up recently. The discussions are familiar, I remember rational about GS-7's doing just fine in Southeast forests in the 70's for not increasing pay, maybe that's why the locality pay crumb came about. What was shocking about the Grace report was that in the late 70's, granted with crazy high inflation, the buying power of a GS-6 had shrunk to a GS-4 in the 60's. Regardless of the rational used in the 70's and now, and regardless of what some feel are the political realities the Forest Service FF is under paid, making them a general biologist won't fix it, and in fact will make it harder to separate from the non-fire fighter types, the fat ones with sandals, sorry couldn't resist. I am disappointed that our FF community, our Rangers, and Forest Supervisors, and association have not taken a stronger stand on this. My input as an association member, career FF going out Mandatory soon is to support the association, don't let the pay issue die, and resist the 401 series.

CBork

11/25 To Everybody;

I've been thinking long and hard about this bird flu thing. I'd like to sum up briefly what I've seen so far, and then continue on with my personal conclusions.

I see the situation as this: experts tell us that we are overdue for another influenza pandemic, which will in all likelihood effect the whole world in a matter of months. This pandemic will most likely strike in the fall, and will most likely involve a strain of influenza A, or avian influenza, to which the majority of humanity has no effective immune response. In 1996/1997, a strain of influenza A emerged in Hong Kong which appears to meet the criteria to be a pandemic-inducing candidate virus. Over the last eight years, press coverage of this particular virus has been increasing, as cases have slowly been appearing, in individuals and clusters, over Southeast Asia. Right now, confirmed cases, including cases of human-to-human transmission from outbreak patient to a first generation, have appeared in Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia, Hong Kong, and China. I'm not sure about Laos. Statistics out of China are almost certainly suspect, given Chinese government policies. The US government appears to be taking the possibility of a pandemic seriously. We were told to watch for human to human transmission; this has occurred. Now we have to wait for transmission to go from clusters to chains. We have not yet seen infection more than one generation beyond the outbreak patient.

I am currently a graduate student, living in a shoebox. I expect to move three times in the next six to nine months. I am not in a position to stock up on food and medication. My influenza preparedness plan is based on staying informed, and hopefully taking myself from where I am now to somewhere where I can realistically protect and isolate myself and my family (about 2,700 miles from my current position) before the wave hits. If that fails, I suppose I will have to count on the fact that as a female of childbearing age with useful skills, society has a collective and biological interest in keeping me alive (fairly grim humor there).

For my small rural fire department, I am suggesting adding a box of 100 masks and a box of ten body bags to every EMS supply order we put out. I'm suggesting adding a case of MREs to every fire order we put out. I'm also taking a hard look at our in-place preplanning, looking for (or adding) things like preplanning for utility failures, temporary morgue facilities, and points of distribution for food supplies, etc. The response I consistently get is "But won't FEMA (or the Red Cross, or Public Health) deal with that?" Maybe, maybe not. It can't hurt to think it through like they won't.

This is a worst-case scenario plan; in all likelihood this will blow over like Y2K did, with appropriate preparation from a variety of angles turning the event into a non-issue. Statistically, we are more likely to see an event like the 1957 or 1968 pandemics than the more serious 1918 pandemic, but we will see a pandemic; maybe not this year, maybe not this virus, but we will.

>From the point of view of the wildland fire community as a whole, the implications of a pandemic are far-reaching. In unconventional response after unconventional response (SARS, the Columbia Shuttle Recovery, various Hurricanes), the wildland fire community has shown itself to be the most flexible and easily deployed federal response pawn on the board. There's been a lot of talk about FEMA; let's bear in mind that FEMA supplies resources and organizes responders; FEMA is emergency management, not emergency response. In one way or another, wildland firefigthers will almost certainly be deployed to areas affected by a pandemic, in some capacity. The flip side of that coin is if the federal government institutes restrictions on movement in order to control the spread of disease. I'm not aware of any recent precedent for this, short of declaring martial law, but it could cripple the nation-wide wildland fire response system we've come to expect. Upshot: We may have to simply defend the urban-wildland interface and let the wildlands burn.

Realistically, do I think it will get that bad? No. Do I think it could get that bad? Hell, yeah. I'm not worried about my small rural community. I know there's enough poached elk in those freezers for a good long while, and if the power fails we can just pack everything in snow. I worry about the inner cities, where folks aren't prepared for days- or weeks-long power outages, where they buy dinner on the way home from work and expect the government to come save them if something goes wrong.

With apologies for going so long,

Nerd on the Fireline (or in this case, call me Cassandra)

11/24 Today, Friday, November 25, is the 49th anniversary of the Inaja fire, which was in eastern San Diego County near the 2003 Cedar Fire. Eleven firefighters lost their lives in 1956. More information can be found at our web site: www.iawfonline.org -- then click on "Wildland Fire Event Calendar".

Bill Gabbert
Executive Director
International Association of Wildland Fire

11/24 All,
Many wildland firefighters in Southern California (and beyond) know retired San Diego FD Battalion Chief Kenny Rice. He was a division sup and later an ops on one of the SoCal Type 2 IMTs.

Kenny has been ill with lung cancer for the past two years. He valiantly fought back after an operation where he had about a lung and a half removed as well as a lot of other stuff. Now, almost two years later he's relapsed. He'll be brought home from Alvarado Hospital to his home in Descanso for hospice care soon. As he lives so far out, hospice will only come out to the house one day a week. His wife Nancy is asking for volunteers to help during Kenny's final days. For the time being, he enjoys hearing from family and friends. Anyone who knows Kenny knows that he loves to spin a yarn. Even with only half a lung to do it with!

Anyone wishing to visit Kenny or help with his care can contact me at jfisher1@ cox.net I'll pass on contact info. I'll also let everyone here know more as I know it.

John Fisher

Thanks for the info, John. Give our best to Kenny and his family. Ab.

11/24 RR:

Sorry I jumped down your throat. I was perhaps reading something into your note.
As far as the "reality" of economics, I'll offer the following, then will disengage from future dialogue on this subject. See archives for past proposals I have offered.
  1. I believe it a "reality" that Congress is not going to vote to give one small group of government employees exorbitant pay raises. Why only ff's? Are not the timber, recreation, engineering techs also entitled to living wage in areas with high cost of living?
  2. Looking to establish an entry wage that allows employees to afford the "median" home (2000 sq. ft. 1 1/2 bath, 2 car garage?) Uh, uh. How about entry wage persons buying entry market housing..... my first was a 900 square foot "fixer upper" (emphasis on the fixer) bought it for less than half of a "median" house.
  3. I don't recall any tragedy that would have been avoided had the victim had a larger paycheck.

Sorry, but bottom line is I just don't think it's going to happen. Best wishes to those who want to focus their effort on portal to portal.

I'm done on this topic. I'll continue to focus my energies on getting people permanent assignments, training, and career ladders. So far, that's been very productive for me in keeping good folks (and I'm extremely proud of our ff's).

Old Fire Guy

Hi Old Fire Guy. Just a bit of a note here. In socali, the homes that are below the median are, for the most part, in very dangerous neighborhoods. I wish it were as simple as finding a 900 square foot fixer upper and going for it. Ab.

11/24

 

^V^'^V^'^V^'^V^'^V^'^V^'^V^'^V^'^V^'^V^'^V^'^V^'^V^'^V^'^V^'^V^'^V^'^V^'
v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v

HAPPY--..--THANKSGIVING --..--HAPPY--..--THANKSGIVING --..--HAPPY--..--TURKEY!

v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v^v
^V^'^V^'^V^'^V^'^V^'^V^'^V^'^V^'^V^'^V^'^V^'^V^'^V^'^V^'^V^'^V^'^V^'^V^'

The Abs.

11/24 AB and All

Happy Thanksgiving to all, hope there are no wildland issues over the holidays and you all can have some semblance of a decent day at home; or a least a good dinner at the firehouse. You deserve a break.

Saw some TV footage of the Mexican FFs working some of the wildland stuff South of Tijuana. Those poor guys looked like old time FDNY types. Long Black turnouts and looked like the really old Leather Helmets, out there humping hose in the brush and the heat.

I remember, a few years ago, seeing pictures of Mexican army soldiers doing direct attack in chaparral, using shovels. They were dressed in, what US military would call Service Dress; with street shoes and a rifle slung over their shoulder.

We did that (less the weapon) in early 60's fighting "grass" fires in NY State. No PPE but at least we wore boots; Kept snakes off the ankles. Scratch line, get a farmer with a D2 to open something to get a tanker in and after dark, laid a hose line and pi**ed on the red. Didn't even use a nozzle most of the time, one guy would control the flow by squeezing the hose while another aimed the coupling. Always tried to have the tanker "up hill" - gravity feed. Usually tanker did not have a pump. Going up hill was harder, had to have a pumper and a nozzle, harder to control.

Happy Thanksgiving to all and thank you Professional Firefighters for all you do to protect us.

And thanks to you Ab for this forum.

RJM
11/24 To Old Fire Guy and others,

Get your head out of the sand! What Lobotomy and others are trying to do is make ALL of our lot better off!

You seem to be out of touch with the modern day reality of economics, it is increasingly difficult for Forest Service firefighters... oops... forestry technicians and aids... to actually afford to have a decent life in much of the western states, if not other areas!

Why you dispute this is beyond me! It is REALITY!

And that reality is sad for anyone that cares about the Forest Service: with low pay, FPA, IFPM, EUSC, SERCO and a host of other idiotic program directions it is scary!

Why naysay anyone that fights to send us in the right direction?

"Wondering"
11/23 Old Fire Guy,

First, I apologize..... I don’t want YOU to fade away.. I would like non-factual and non-researched views to fade away. If people are going to discuss things, it is best to have all the facts in the bag rather than scattered thoughts... It is also better not to take pot shots at each other when the overall goal is the same...... Note The-Tongue-in-Cheek.

I looked at the Region 9 Apprentice Vacancy Announcement on the FireJobs page. It said there are only three apprentice positions available in Region 9.... Is that correct?

I guess Region 9 doesn’t have a recruitment or retention problem.. Or they have a very limited fire hiring program. This would appear much like Region 8.

An old supervisor of mine used to say, “Don’t come to me with problems unless you can offer a way to fix them”. Unfortunately, he left the Forest Service as a GS-9 ADFMO because he realized there were people who knew how to fix the problems but sat on their thumbs and took the easy way out as he lost his family and house.

The FWFSA is offering a fix to one of many problems in the recruitment and retention of federal wildland firefighters, that being wildland firefighter pay computations. They are also working to have a proper classification series…. health benefits for temporary firefighters... and proper recognition for the distinct profession that wildland firefighting is. They are also open to other ideas offered by their members and invited guests at conferences.

Are you offering a potential fix... if so, present it;  if not, as my former supervisor would say.. “Get out of my office until you can provide a fix to the problem”. We all can bitch and moan about things... it takes someone to step up and offer a fix if you don’t like what is going on. 300+ members of the FWFSA have stepped up. You said, “But your suggestion that one either agrees with you or should "just fade away" is counter to dialogue at best, and arrogant at worst.".. I accept your chastisement... The ball is in your court now. Facts speak louder than your opinion that I am countering dialogue or arrogant.

Portal-to-portal doesn’t sound like a pay rate fix to me. It is a pay computation fix that is being used by firefighters around the country. Federal employees know their basic pay will never be on the same keel as the local or private sector.

You keep incorrectly saying it is a California thing trying to be like CDF and LA County.. As long as people think that changes are only a California thing, or God forbid that federal wildland firefighters are greedy or have other itineraries… changes for safety will never happen and the latent failures of the federal wildland firefighter profession will continue.

Have a great Turkey Day.

Rogue Rivers
11/23 "Yes, it is me": Wish I were in a position to help in some way.
Well-executed GIS work really is noticed and appreciated by at least some of
us. Sometimes skills need to be at least partially developed outside the
fire community and that makes it tough for the I-started-by-carrying-a-rake
crowd to understand.

Still Out There As An AD
11/23 Thanks yactak!!!

The Santa Barbara South Coast (as seen on the link provided by you) is above a million for a median priced home.... but Santa Barbara is a diverse area when it comes to the costs of median priced housing. In any case, most federal wildland firefighters cannot afford to buy one of these houses in California or other areas throughout the Western U.S.

Sept. '05 (3rd. Quarter) - Median Priced Housing from the California Association of Realtors by zone.

California Median Home Price - $543,980

Central Valley $361,290
High Desert $312,410
Los Angeles $560,990
Monterey Region $712,800
Monterey County $680,000
Santa Cruz County $750,000
Northern California $434,690
Northern Wine Country $639,390
Orange County $708,840
Palm Sprgs/Lwr Desert $371,250
Riverside/San Bern. $389,450
Sacramento $383,920
San Diego $612,030
San Francisco Bay $709,980
San Luis Obispo $602,160
**Santa Barbara County $610,710
**S. Barbara So. Coast $1,475,000
**No. S. Barbara County $462,700
Santa Clara $733,000
Ventura $678,380

Nationwide Median Home Price: $215,900 (Not just a California problem anymore.... but who knows, an argument that it came from California could be made by some.)

The key to the whole discussion is that recruitment and retention issues will always be a problem when the root causes of losses are not addressed. Those root causes are pay, benefits, and working conditions.... not necessarily in that order.

Everyone keep safe and have a Happy Thanksgiving !!!

For this forum and the people on it who take the time to discuss the issues, inform, educate others and be educated at the same time.... for family and friends.... for the continued safety of everyone in this community.... and for knowing the Wildland Firefighter Foundation is there to help support us in times of need.... for these things, I am truly thankful this Thanksgiving.

Lobotomy

 
11/23 Old Fire Guy,

Would you like to know how much I take home a pay period as a GS-5 step 3? $550. I am wondering how you can presume any person taking home that amount of money could possibly purchase a house. I would love to own my own home but it is impossible. I live in an area with a median home price of $180,000. Perhaps, the GS- 5's you knew "came into some money", which allowed them to purchase a house. Keep this in mind. I am a very budget conscious person, extremely good with money, almost no debt, incredible credit, and excellent at saving money. I take offense that you presume someone with that meager wage could buy a house!!

sign me, 1508
11/23 Lobotomy,
Get a dictionary, then re-read my original post.....note the tongue-in-cheek.

Rogue Rivers,
You make some excellent points. I think we are in agreement that firefighter retention, (and pay is a key issue), leads eventually to a safer working organization.

You, and many others, see the solution as portal-to-portal, with the objective of achieving wages that are competitive with CDF, LA County etc. That could very well be the solution you need.

Where I'm at, we hire seasonals, eventually they get on board in targeted GS6 PFT positions.

We do lose some to other agencies....same as we do with forester, biologists, engineers. Most have stayed on board, bought homes, and are growing in their training and experience. Their experience and education will have them well prepared to climb the ladder to ADFMO, FMO, and higher (yes we have ladder positions identified). I would not be surprised to see one of them sitting at my desk some day.

But your suggestion that one either agrees with you or should "just fade away" is counter to dialogue at best, and arrogant at worst.

Old Fire Guy
11/23 To Frustrated FF

I have to agree with MT Jumper. As one of the North Dakota Firefighters that have benefited from having the jumpers on several of our fires, I have said many times "I am glad those jumpers showed up"! The USDA Forest Service in 2001 just started standing up a more robust fire program for the National Grasslands. We don't have the depth of fire experience that some other forests are able to call upon. I am an engine boss with approximately ten years experience, but on some of the fires out there , Including the Rough Draw Fire, it was all I could do to keep track of all of the engines and FFs assigned to my division. Now, I am a strike force leader trainee, and as a trainee, I wish to learn from those more experienced than me. Enter the Jumpers. They provided the qualification and experience to safely fight the fire. In recent years, they have re-invented themselves and offer a whole host of experience to keep the jump program healthy. I hope they stay around for quite some time.

Frustrated FF, I would recommend that you get out and work on some more districts. It will challenge you and change your perceptions of firefighting, and might teach you different ways to use all of the firefighting resources that we have.

MT Jumper, sorry for not weighing in on this one sooner.

Domaque.
11/23 All,

I wanted to wish all y'all a very Happy Thanksgiving!!!!!! Most of us have so much to be thankful for
this holiday season, let's count our blessings. Best wishes for a safe and happy holiday weekend.

Thankfully Yours,
Information Diva

P.S. If you had reading my message, "all y'all" is plural so it means everybody on WildlandFire.com!
11/23  Lobotomy,

For the record median price homes in Santa Barbara topped $1 mil in 2004..........

www.newspress.com/millionhome/

yactak
11/23 Do you use a map on fires? If so this affects you.

Bottom line-
The Fire GIS community has tried to create standards through the NWCG process and someone is playing politics at the last minute and threatening YOUR safety. We, the people making maps, have been policing our own through grassroots efforts because your safety is #1. The NWCG right now is threatening to reject those efforts after years of seeming support....

The long version of the story-

I work on incidents as a GIST and have been part of the NWCG process of creating an incident support function called the Geographical Information System Specialist (GISS). Folks in the ICS system (ICs, PSCs, end especially SITLs) had come to the Fire GIS community about the varying levels of skills and knowledge they were receiving. My personal favorite- the person who showed up and saw the standard software being used and commented- "Neat software, I'd like to learn that on this assignment." Fire assignments are NOT the place to learn core software competencies. The GIS folks themselves have begged for training assignments so to learn on the job in a safe environment (for you- the people who are the customers).

We, in the Fire GIS community, realized that standards needed to be developed. GIS folks needed to know the software, ICS, and the fire culture (YES- we sleep in tents). A number of people from numerous agencies have invested hundreds of hours in the past few years to do things the NWCG way though all the correct channels. A formal study on Incident GIS was studied by the Missoula folks, a national training class was implemented, a task book was written following the NWCG guidelines for task books, and standard operating procedures documents were drafted and are under review. A white paper was written showing how the position meets the six criteria of an ICS position. The GAO created a report about the promise of geospatial technology on wildfires and that challenges remained- one of the challenges listed? The LACK of national standards or qualifications.

The IRMWT supported the Geospatial Task Group (GTG) in these endeavors. The GTG is a staff group under the IRMWT. The GTG with support from the IRMWT worked with the IOSWT over the past year plus to include the GISS position in the PMS 310-1 for 2006. GISS was in the draft 310-1 published in 2005. The transition documents were written, delivered, and simply needed to be signed.

Then- on the day we were supposed to hear that everything was finalized- we heard that suddenly the decision was made that the GISS position was no more and NWCG is sticking with the technical specialist. This decision was made without any contact with the subject matter experts. This decision negated three years of work. The IOSWT blamed the IRMWT stating lack of support, the IRMWT documented their support (thanks again IRMWT for being so stand up!). The IOSWT has not gotten back to the Fire GIS community (or formally to the GTG) for over a week + to say what is really going on.

I know engines, helos, and boots are much more fun to discuss. I know some of you are not super enamored by your computers. BUT if you use maps on an incident- this directly affects the products you receive.

If anyone reading this is on whatever team that is making the decision, has any influence in the NWCG, or has a friend who is- this is the field speaking- We have done the work to police ourselves and formalize it through the correct channels. This is 2005 and there are over 750 people in this position right now (I've got the numbers and names to back this up). Word of mouth no longer works- we NEED standards.

I haven't given up just yet...
Yes, it is me.
11/23 Lobotomy,

It was quite interesting looking at all the comparisons you did. It's amazing to me that all of CA doesn't make the pay that SoCal does. Here in our neck of the woods, we are on par with them as far as housing costs, gas costs, etc. Yet the pay here is a whopping $41, 772 for a GS 9-1. I know that the argument they used was the inability to retain personnel, but we can't even get people to apply here due to housing costs. I guess it isn't such a big shock when you look at the cost of housing and gas in other states. People have told me that they want to come to CA but simply can't afford it. Maybe one day the powers that be will get the message and adjust the pay accordingly, but I for one won't be holding my breath.

Lori
11/23 To Frustrated FF

I don’t profess to be an expert on several of the topics you addressed, however I do know a lot about Jumpers and Helitack, having spent 10 years doing one or the other. To say that Smokejumpers are “totally ineffective and the least efficient of all resources” is insulting. The Smokejumper ranks are filled with 10-20 year fire veterans, most are GS-5, 6, 7’s, many with advanced college degrees, who are incredibly qualified as ICT3’s, Division Supervisors, Helicopter Managers, Burn Bosses, etc. Many are seasonals! The state of North Dakota was happy to have jumpers man several of their fires in 2004, including the Rough Draw Fire. Instead of mobilizing their ICT3 team from all corners of the state (over several days), a single load of jumpers were able to provide a type 3 team (in a few hours) and a cost savings of tens of thousands of dollars per fire!

Jumpers are adapting to change in the federal fire program very effectively, filling much needed roles in supervision and incident management Region One Smokejumpers have also taken leadership roles outside of jumping fires. Teaching fire classes around the country, directing the Region One staff ride program, as a Fire Use Module, as tree climbers, prescribed fire specialists, saw certifiers, managing and staffing helicopters, and directing FEMA relief teams are just a few of the various duties I have served as a Smokejumper. Not bad for a bunch of GS-6’s who are only guaranteed 6 pay periods of work per year!

I hope you really don’t believe these things have “long lost their usefulness to the wildland fire community”. As both a jumper and a rappeller I have caught fires that would have gone big. Who knows? Maybe if budget cuts had not closed the Cave Junction Smokejumper base, the nearby Biscuit Fire would have been caught small by jumpers. That savings alone would have funded the entire Smokejumper program for close to a decade.

A few other points:

  1. The hourly rate of a DC-3 with 16 jumpers and 1600 pounds cargo is less than many helicopters. It also has a range and payload capacity that exceeds any helicopter.
  2. Most decision makers at NIFC are not former Smokejumpers.
  3. The decision to staff single tree lightning fires is managements, not a Smokejumper, rappeller, or any other initial attack resource.

Every single tool swinger out there is important to our mission. We all need to work together and cooperate, regardless of how we chose to get to a fire. I encourage you to think critically and keep talking to all on the fireline, including jumpers. They may surprise you!

I’d also be happy to talk to you as well, encourage you to detail as a Jumper to Missoula, or for some interesting reading check out the 2004 Smokejumper use summary at the following address: www.fs.fed.us/fire/people/smokejumpers/2004_rpt.pdf

MT Jumper

PS- Thanks to Cbork, whatmousewouldsay, and ClassC for thoughtful posts!

Welcome to theysaid MT Jumper. Ab.

11/23 Old Fire Guy,

You said... "I have nothing but admiration for the firefighters in California that stay dedicated to their work while facing the challenge of limited opportunity to own a home."

It is a whole lot bigger picture than owning a home.... It is a picture about the future of federal wildland firefighting. It is a problem of getting people to look at facts and actually understand the big picture of where a profession has been heading since 1957 and before.

When did it become a California problem and not a WILDLAND FIREFIGHTER COMMUNITY problem?
Did the Chief say he was only interested in improving safety in California during his DIRECTION in 1957?

You seem to focus on your personal observations and not look at the profession as a whole through research. The work in the WILDLAND FIRE COMMUNITY is not a work from California. It is a work from the WILDLAND FIRE COMMUNITY as a whole through research, fact checking, and peer review> and yes, I'm shouting. Wildland firefighting is wildland firefighting no matter where you are from... US, AU, CN, SPN, PTU, etc..... Safety is Safety.... Equity is Equity. Simple facts, wildland firefighting is wildland firefighting....... even as you appear to present ideas that may divide and conquer.

There are lots of challenges for the wildland fire community. The biggest challenge is to understand that sociology and psychology are the biggest players for safety.

Old Fire Guy, thanks for coming to the table to discuss these issues. Someday you will understand that it is not hyperbole but fact. It is not a California problem but a community problem.

"Those that fail to heed the past are doomed to repeat it." vfdcap'n gave a great example yet again. While pay and promotions may be the underlying factors, they are the factors that have continued since the Report to the Chief in 1957..... Recruitment and Retention of quality employees are LATENT underlying factors for wildland firefighter safety. Latent vs. Causal Factors.

If you can't recognize these things, I hope you play good soldier and act like General Douglas MacArthur and just "fade away".. "Good soldiers never die, they just fade away".

There is an easy fix... Federal Agencies can stop being a puppy mill and keep the best of the best on the roles as federal wildland firefighters. Become competitive again in the recruitment and retention process....Become competitive again in PROVIDING A CAREER with a future!!!!!! Recognize that sociology and psychology have critical components as to why someone is or wants to be a wildland firefighter.

Stay Safe OFG..

Rogue Rivers
11/22 The Jobs Page and Series 0462 (Forestry Technician) & Series 0455 (Range Technician) jobs pages and Series 0401 ("professional" Biologist) are updated. Ab.
11/22 Re: Who gets paid what, who can afford what, and can a GS-5 (or even a GS-9) afford a home in areas where the majority of federal wildland firefighters work and live.

Here is a sampling of how the Southern California Special Salary rate for the 0462 and 0455 series actually pays in contrast to several Western United States Locality Pay areas, the Rest of U.S. locality pay area, and the nationwide base U.S. salary rate. Below each GS sampling is the median home price for comparison (Money Magazine, June, 2005). Note: 3rd. quarter home prices rose between 10-14 percent of these values.

Special Salary Rate (0462/0455 – Los Angeles, Orange, San Diego, Riverside, Ventura, Santa Barbara, Monterey, and San Luis Obispo Counties).
GS-5 Step 1 - $32,084
GS-7 Step 1 - $39,738
GS-8 Step 1 - $44,004
GS-9 Step 1 - $47,358

Los Angeles/Long Beach $442,000
Riverside/San Bernardino $329,000
Orange County $610,000
Ventura County $550,000
San Luis Obispo/Atascadero/Paso Robles $475,000
San Diego $554,000
Santa Barbara/Santa Maria/Lompoc $445,000

San Jose-San Francisco-Oakland, CA Locality Area (Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Monterey, Napa, San Benito, San Francisco, San Joaquin, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, Solano, and Sonoma Counties)
GS-5 Step 1 - $31,189
GS-7 Step 1 - $38,634
GS-8 Step 1 - $42,786
GS-9 Step 1 - $47,257

Oakland $535,000
San Francisco $750,000
San Jose $619,000
Vallejo/Fairfield/Napa $449,000
Santa Rosa $500,000
Santa Cruz/Watsonville $599,000

Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Truckee, CA-NV (El Dorado, Nevada, Placer, Sacramento, Yolo, Douglas County and Carson City.)
GS-5 Step 1 - $28,571
GS-7 Step 1 - $35,614
GS-8 Step 1 - $39,441
GS-9 Step 1 - $43,563

Sacramento $376,000
Yolo $379,000

Portland-Vancouver-Beaverton, OR-WA (Clackamas, Columbia, Marion, Multnomah, Polk, Washington, Yarnhill, Clark, and Skamania Counties)
GS-5 Step 1 - $28,608
GS-7 Step 1 - $35,436
GS-8 Step 1 - $39,245
GS-9 Step 1 - $43,346

Portland /Vancouver $226,000

Seattle-Tacoma-Olympia, WA (Island, King, Kitsap, Mason, Pierce, Snohomish, and Thurston Counties).
GS-5 Step 1 - $28,756
GS-7 Step 1 - $35,620
GS-8 Step 1 - $39,448
GS-9 Step 1 - $43,571

Seattle/Bellevue/Everett $315,000
Tacoma, Wash. $212,000

Rest of the U.S. (RUS) (Those areas not included in other locality pay areas.)
GS-5 Step 1 - $27,569
GS-7 Step 1 - $34,149
GS-8 Step 1 - $37,819
GS-9 Step 1 –$41,772

United States Median Home Price (Nationwide Median Average) - $190,000

Note: Nationwide median home price is now calculated at $215,900 by the National Association of Realtors > Realty Times, 11/16/2005.

Other Relevant Median Home Prices
Boise, ID - $151,300
Missoula, MT – $170,253
Bozeman, MT - $199,959
Flagstaff, AZ - $205,254
Phoenix, Mesa, Scottsdale AZ - $242,300
Albuquerque, NM - $163,052
Salt Lake City, UT - $155,000
Spokane, WA – $167,500
Las Vegas, NV - $285,000
Denver, CO - $250,000

Lobotomy
11/22 I got this a few days ago. Should of sent it sooner.
KD

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

PRELIMINARY (24-hour) SUMMARY
REPORT

Wildland Firefighter Fatality
November 17, 2005
MARVIN FIRE

This Preliminary Summary Report is intended to provide factual information from the first 24 hours of the accident review. It is published and distributed within a short time frame. The information contained within this report may be subject to revision as further investigation is conducted, and other reports and documents are received.

Synopsis

During fire fighting operations on the Marvin Fire in Buchanan County, Virginia, a single firefighter, was overrun by fire during the early afternoon of November 12, 2005. The fatality occurred during the initial attack phase of what would become a 350 acre incident.

Narrative

During the early afternoon of November 12, 2005 the Oakwood Volunteer Fire Department was dispatched to a reported wildland fire caused by an equipment malfunction (lawnmower caught on fire). The Department’s Chief, who lived near the fire department, was the first resource to dispatch to the incident. The immediate priority was the protection of a residence, and specifically a propane tank located near the woods. Prior to any other resources arriving on scene, the Chief began constructing a handline to protect the propane tank and residence nearby. Initial information gathered indicates that strong winds and very low humidity caused the fire to cross the handline below the Chief and then to advance very quickly up-slope, ultimately overrunning him during his retreat. The Chief died at the scene.

11/22 Old Fire Guy,

Do you have any facts to back up your claims that a GS-5 could afford to buy a new home in the current market in the Western United States? I know you said “many” areas, so I would like to concentrate on the areas of the United States that has 90% of the federal wildland firefighters. How’s that for countering a hyperbole presented by you?

If you can provide the facts, I would like to use a mortgage calculator to run a few figures and see just how well they can survive in the current situation. In fact, I would also like to run the figures for a GS-9. (FYI, I have run the figures for the Missoula, Flagstaff, and Boise areas and a GS-9 doesn’t even come close to being able to purchase a median priced home in the current western market).

Also, locality pay is set by the President’s Pay Agent (PPA) and the Federal Salary Council (FSC). Were you talking about special salary rates that agencies and OPM can pursue by mistake? If so, please know there are limits on the use of special salary rates and they are usually only a temporary fix to slow the sinking of the ship. Chief Don Feser wrote an excellent position paper on this subject.

Another key hyperbolic statement you presented…. A PFT GS-5?...... In most areas of the country (including California and the Western United States), federal wildland firefighters do not get PFT employment status until they are GS-7’s or above. In some areas, there are still GS-9’s working career-seasonal or WAE appointments.

In an effort to avoid hyperbolic statements, there are many places that you can find the facts. I would recommend www.fedscope.opm.gov as a starting point.

Lobotomy
11/22 CDF Handbook 7013 Update - Firing Operations

As a result of some "outlaw firing" I assume....good info.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

FYI. New communications required prior to conducting firing operations.
Please distribute as appropriate to your troops.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Subject: Handbook 7013 Update - Firing Operations

Importance: High

There has been an update to Handbook 7013 regarding communication during firing operations. See red section below. Also, you may click on the link below to go to the electronic Handbook. Please ensure all operational personnel are aware of the communications “clarification”.

INCIDENT AUTHORITY 7013.4.2
(No. 1 November 2005)

The Incident Commander has the overall authority and responsibility to set a backfire or burn should the need exist. As the incident organization expands, the responsibility and authority to backfire or burnout may be delegated. A normal progression of delegation, depending on the complexity of the incident, would be from the Incident Commander to the Operations Section Chief and could  extend down to the Branch Director, Division Supervisor, Strike Team Leader, Task Force Leader or Single Resource.

Communications When Firing:
Except where immediate firing is necessary to prevent the loss of life or major property damage, all firing operations shall be communicated to the appropriate ICS supervisor prior to the commencement of the firing operation. The officer supervising the firing operation shall remain in communication with his/her ICS supervisor and adjoining forces to the extent possible.

The level of backfire and/or burnout authority should be identified as early as possible. Radio net announcement at the incident will be made prior to backfiring and/or burnout. This will be communicated on tactical and command nets and will identify general location of geographic area to be burned.

This is notification that there has been an amendment (#1) to the 7000 Fire Operations Handbook; revises Section 7013.4.2 Incident Authority.
(No. 1 November 2005)

The 7000 Handbook is available through CDF's Intranet, CDF Issuance Publication. General questions about the handbook may be directed to: Rich Green, Fire Protection: (916) 653-7370.

Shortcut to: http://cdfweb/Pubs/Issuance/7000/7013.pdf#7013_4_2 (Requires having access to the CDF intranet. Ab.)

11/22 Mellie,

Thanks for the heads up on the PBS programs. I really enjoyed them and
they sure gave me some insight on this whole situation. See you in Reno!

Lori


Happy Thanksgiving to everyone. Thanks for all you do.
11/22 Hey Gang,

For those folks who threw their papers in for the CDF captains exam,
your supplemental app should be in your mail boxes this week, if you
made the first cut.

Best of luck!
AZ Trailblazer
11/22 Jumpers are a tradition, as are many traditions, that have lost their usefulness, but several studies over the years have shown that the JMP program is wildly more cost effective than helicopters, even after changing several of the inputs of the study.

If we're interested in saving $

* stop heli mopping
* Most light Helo's are mainly for overhead to see the fire without the encumbrance of actually going on the line.
* Most bucket work with Mediums is not as cost effective as addition FF'ers, regardless of how they get there.
* Heavy Helo's are costing about 100K/day on fires make sure they are really used for IA, get rid of the poor performers, forget fancy ways of calculating their flight rates.
* Until there is a functional fixed wing at a reasonable cost that program should be buried.

We should all remember that helicopters are not an escape route, and its the FF on the ground whether he's attached to a hose, dozer, or handtool that ultimately has to slam that line.

CBork
11/22 Ab,

Had to comment on Frustrated's post on a couple of issues regarding smokejumpers. His comments aren't new - they are the same one's that have been trotted out at least for as long as I have been in the business (1976).

The contention that helicopters and rapellers can supplant jumpers as an economical alternative have never been shown to be feasible in resource allocation studies that go all the way back to the 70's. Intuitively this makes sense, particulalry if you've spent any time in the business. For example, compare the cost of Hobbs time on a deHaviland twin otter or Casa 212 compared to a Aerospatiale or Bell Rappel ship, then factor in a personnel delivery ratio of 2-3:1.

There have been many studies conducted over the years that reaffirm the economical viability of the jump program. The archives at the Region 1 headquarters in Missoula and BIFC in Boise have them for your edification.The argument that jumpers are a historical artifact that are kept active as a public relations showcase is just plain ignorant and is negated by these studies. The jumpers have had to prove their economic and practical viability since their inception in 1939 and that paper trial is irrefutable to anyone that takes the time to learn the facts.

With regards to "broken down" jumpers and an accelerated rate of OWCP claims - that also is a canard, a blatant falsehood not borne out by the facts. Jumpers do not have a higher rate of accident or injury claims than other firefighters, nor do they account for a higher percentage of OWCP compensation. I can only speculate that is because of the higher fitness standards jumpers are held to, despite the increasing bastardization of the concept that fitness levels in physical endeavors are indirectly proportional to on the job injury rates and claims.


Joe Hill
- former USFS smokejumper
11/21 Tahoe Terrie,

There's going to be a couple of specials on PBS tonight.

9PM pacific time ; rebroadcast at 1AM
Influenza 1918 - As the nation mobilized for war in the spring of 1918, ailing Private Albert Gitchell reported to an army hospital in Kansas. He was diagnosed with influenza, a disease doctors didn't know much about. Before the year was over, America would be ravaged by a flu epidemic that killed 600,000 people -- more than died in all the wars of this century combined -- before disappearing as mysteriously as it began.

2AM pacific time -
Secrets of the Dead - Killer flu
- Modern scientists in both the U.K. and U.S. are in a desperate race to determine why the 1918 flu pandemic -- which killed an estimated 100 million -- spread so quickly throughout the world and with such virulence at the tail end of World War I.

The American Experience website: Influenza 1918
Secrets of the Dead website: Killer Flu
Schedule search is HERE.

Mellie

11/21 To Old Fire Guy,

As far as pay in CA goes, So Cal has it a whole lot better than the people
in Northern CA. I could only wish the pay had been that good here. Should
would make it easier now.

Lori
11/21 Frustrated FF -

Your comments hit a nerve:  (Ab indented them in blockquotes.)

Enough of the Bird Flu talk, with all of the funding and budget issues I propose that the people on the ground start throwing out ideas on how to save money so the people who make the decisions in DC know what our issues are.

The people in DC know what your issues are. They don't like to see firefighters come home in body bags. That's why millions are spent on making sure ff's have the best tools available - like the new fire shelters ff's asked for, and the improved qualifications of line-going overhead, and better healthier compadres to work shoulder to shoulder with on the line (aka wct.)First of all, congress funds the Fire agencies - however, it's fire money that's paying the office rent, the vehicle leases, the barracks, those all mud-trak tires, and your training. If you knew how much fire budgets dollar went to fund the "rest of the organization" I think it would surprise you that we still have a fire program. Quit your griping. Ask your line officer where the fire dollars are going - ask to see "the budget" on your unit and see who is paying for what. Don't forget those DC slugs worked in fire also. Thinking about the good old times when a ff made $2.65 an hour. Funny, Mark three's still weigh the same. But we didn't have those mini-pumps and all the "lightweight gear now available.

First of all, how about cutting back on some of these so called Type 1 Training Crews that haven't gotten their Type 1 rating yet. Three years, if you don't have it by then your axed. Don't get me wrong, their are some great IHC's that have been formed over the last few years, but there are also a lot of bad ones who don't deserve to have the word Hotshots in their name.

What's the difference between a Type 1 training crew and a Type I firefighter? Years of experience, more exposure to different types of fire management? If the crews don't do anything else other than cut line, I agree - what have they learned. And it makes me wonder why there still are type II militia crews that can outperform mentally and physically these T1 training crews.

Secondly, and more importantly, when was the last time you heard "It was a good thing we had those jumpers on our fire".

If smokejumpers are doing what their mission calls for, then you shouldn't see them on your fire. And it you do, it just may be as overhead. The jumper mission is changing, and has always evolved. If you don't know the scope of the program and the skills these Type 1 ff's bring to the arena, don't be so harsh to criticize them. Walk a mile in their boots.

When the axe falls the first place it should land is on the jumper programs, FS and BLM. If you have a chance, look at how much money is budgeted for these programs. It is a ridiculous waste of money

......sorry, have to cut in here. There is still value to keeping some fires small - especially those mid-summer nightmares that can go on forever. It's been proven over and over that the efficiency rate of using jumpers effectively is a boon to ALL of the agencies. (and besides, they don't just fight fires, spend a day with some of the gals and let them tell you what a smokejumper does for project work.)

when you look at how much funding gets to the engines, crews, and helitack programs. I don't know if it is just me, but in today's world jumpers are totally ineffective and the least efficient of all resources.

Since you wanted to spark a discussion, can you rationalize that statement? Give some examples.

I know in AK they are needed, but in the lower 48 give me a helitack / rappelle crew for anything that engines and crews can't access. It would be interesting if we could go one or two seasons without smokejumpers and see just how if affects our IA success rate, put that money into a few more helitack crews and extra CWN ships.

What, helicopters don't cost money? They can fly further and faster than fixed-wing? They carry larger loads, more firefighters to a bust area? - When you can get 12-16 highly qualified firefighters into 1 aircraft - you have capabilities to catch up to 8 fires on one flight out - or the equivalent of delivering one IHC direct to a fire.

Of course, this will never happen because who do you think sits up at NIFC and makes the decisions on where our money goes, that right, all ex-bros.

Sorry, but the last mule in charge of oats left the station about a dozen years ago. The FIRE AND AVIATION budget comes out of the Congress and the Agencies National offices, NOT NIFC. And definitely not for the Forest Service. NIFC does assist and helps provide severity authorization - but that mostly for crews, helicopters, engines, prevention techs. Smokejumpers, because of their efficiencies are nationally funded resources - they earned it because they are proven? And as for the NIFC decision makers being all Bros - can that drivel. There isn't a current NIFC Fire Director that's ever been a smokejumper. In fact, the two largest fire program directors at NIFC never dragged a shovel in their careers. And the ones who have fought fire, were highly motivated, positive thinking pounders.

Smokejumpers are nothing more than a tradition that has long lost it's usefulness in the wildland fire community. And it's not just the funding part, how much money is sucked down by broken down jumpers on workman's comp who augured in on a single tree fire that would have burned itself out if left alone for another 30 minutes.

And do you know how many former jumpers who gave years of service to fire are unable to walk, let alone can not get assistance from OWCP. You know, rather than letting you piss off a bunch of good people that have the moxy and cajones to meet, greet and challenge their dreams - Mopping you up isn't worth the effort because I just feel you'll never be open to looking at the heart of a true smokejumper. Smokejumpers have been to the moon, been the first to take on the most dangerous face of Everest (and win), and in our own small world - run 52 miles for the 52 club - the Wildland Firefighter Foundation that will be there for you - if ever anything other than your ego should seriously suffer.

Well in the question below this, you ask I wonder how many think the "same way I do"

-- Well, I don't. An old saying with the smokejumpers to maintain situational awareness used to go like this - when you get into a rut, and your frustrations run on for seasons - it's time to get out of the business because you are putting yourself and others at risk. I truly suggest if something is bothering you that bad about all of the above - please don't sign on to be the weakest link in my chain! Good luck. And by the way - have a nice day.

I don't mean to rant and rave, but this has been something that has really frustrated me over the last couple of years. I am curious, how many others out there think the same way I do? Hopefully, this starts a hot discussion.

-FRUSTRATED FF

What Mouse would say...

11/21 I've been hearing rumors for a while now about the experimental fast-roping system being tried in R5 on some of the helitack programs, the Eldorado's for one, and I'm curious about it. Could anyone point me to some more information about it? I'm curious which crews are using it and how the system actually works. (and how I might get on such a crew ;) )

I'm also interested in seeing some video of the system in action. If anyone has a crew video or training video with fast-roping on it, I'd be willing to buy a copy or set up some kind of video swap to get one.

On a side note, I thought that I'd let you all know about a new website I put up at www.fireandforestry.com. It's just some pictures from the past few seasons, mostly small IA stuff. There are a few short videos from last season, one of which has a few shots of Copter 522 from when Peppermint Helitack was up here in southeastern MT on the Bighorn fire.

Young and Dumb in Region One
 
11/21 Ab,

Friday will be the 49th anniversary of the Inaja Fire tragedy. We finally posted an .html version of the report to the Novato FPD section of the Cedar Fire investigations. www.coloradofirecamp.com/cedar_fire/inaja_fire_introduction.htm

Apparently, the federal pay issue is really nothing new:

"The investigators pointed out that in general, although not related in particular to the Inaja fire, present Government salary and wage rates make it difficult to obtain and hold competent fire control personnel."

The agency tendency to conceal parts of the investigation was also an issue then, as it has been in recent investigations:

"However, it became evident that the public interest in this particular fire disaster was so great that the interviews should be made public."

And, of course, I'm sure everyone will be as pleased as I was to read this entry in the glossary:

"Tanker.--A truck equipped to carry water or other liquids used in suppressing a fire."

vfd cap'n

11/21 Hi Abs, All;

A comment on what Frustrated FF said-- before I had actually rappelled, I held kind of the same viewpoint. Now I know better. Rappel operations take as much time to get two to four people on the ground as jump ops take to get anywhere from two to ten.

Admittedly, as an earthpig, there have been times on fires, especially in my stomping ground of the western great basin, when jump ops have adversely affected our ability to fight fire effectively. When jump ops are overhead, air ops stop, and sometimes this has prevented us from "turning the corner," as it were.

Then again, the reason you don't hear "boy, I'm glad that those Jumpers showed up" is because usually you don't hear about the fires they've been on unless they loose them. We in the shot world have a tendency to criticize jumpers for being lazy and sitting on the helispot while we go to work-- but be sure to consider the 17 to 24 hours they worked before we got there.

Another point to consider-- I've been on fires with jumpers where we take one flank with our 20 and they take the other with their 6. We put in a 40 foot saw swath and a 1 foot scrape, they put in a 5 foot saw swath and a 4 inch scrape. Both firelines stopped the fire, but ours looked better. Who cares, as long as it stops fire?

I am not immune to the jealousy that shots feel towards jumpers. We are the red-headed stepchildren when it comes to the public's eye. Even so, before piping up and snapping off about how derelict the jumper program is, get the facts straight and be fair. 6 seasons a hotshot now, and no desire to jump, yet I can see their value and have met and worked with several competent and professional jumpers.

Sorry for lurking this long, been busy with end of season projects.

Class C Sagebrush Faller
11/21 If I've said it once, I've said a million times...... There's too much hyperbole on this site!
NZ helitack.... We are not the "lowest paid firefighters in the world...".

FS firefighters in California are obviously at an extreme disadvantage in comparison pay. I have no idea how anyone at any GS level can afford to buy a house there.

Drum roll...... but pay disparity IS NOT a universal problem. In many parts of the country a PFT in fire (or any FS position) can readily afford to buy a home once they have reached the journeyman level. I know GS5's that own their own homes, and GS-9's that have some really nice houses and acreage...... but they wouldn't stand a chance of achieving that dream in California.

Maybe a better approach would be to pursue "locality pay" to bring employees up to parity with their counterparts in other agencies. That might be a better sell. Right now I think Congress is hearing "pay firefighters to sleep" and that is an inaccuracy. Still, with the cost of war, hurricane disasters leaving so many without shelter, looming pandemics, and limited desire to go further in debt, I have my doubts that Portal-to-Portal will pass as written.

I have nothing but admiration for the firefighters in California that stay dedicated to their work while facing the challenge of limited opportunity to own a home.

Old Fire Guy

11/21 Maybe "Frustrated FF" should change his/her name to "Frustrated Smokejumper Wantabe"?

There have been studies over the 20+ years rappelling has been in existence and all have
shown the need to have both forms of delivery.

Firehorse

Eh, Firehorse, glad yer still lurking out there. Ab.

11/20 My thanks to BLMer and Lobotomy for their replies regarding health plans.

After spending several more hours researching the options, it appears my best choice boils down to staying with Blue Cross/CA Care or switching to Blue Shield Access+. Since I've been with Blue Cross/CA Care for around 15 years and have been happy with them (until now), I haven't paid much attention to the other plans. Does anyone have any input on the Blue Shield Access + plan? The two plans appear near mirror images of each other with a couple of minor exceptions, but the latter is $100 p/month cheaper. Without knowing any better, it looks to me like Blue Cross wants out of the FEHBP business as demonstrated by their outrageous premium increase.

SteveM

11/20 Ab
Old Fire Guy

I give up. Keep KFCX as your mnemonic. <chuckle>

Only reason I even mentioned KFCX might not be good for "Killing Chickens duty" was I knew the NWS used that ID as I had spent WAY!! too much time in Virginia. The NWS will never know, and I was trying to be funny.

Really hope that it never has to come to that; HOWEVER, heard on the news today that the FEDS are writing a response plan for a flu Pandemic, that they "hope" to have done in a "couple of years". WOW great planning time! They are dolling out the usual BS, it should take no more than 3 or 4 months to do something like that if they had competent people to do it. Guess they have to Contract it: go for bids, select an unqualified buddy, reject the plan after paying for it and then do it all over again 3 or 4 times. Hell of a way to protect the country.

I have to deal with the Federal contract change process in my real job; it is a pain in the a**.

RJM

I got some chuckles out of it. Ab.

11/20 Re: 20+ Years and still happy without or with the pay.

Kudos Casey, I believe its that type of mentality that
a lot of folks who have the potential to change things
have. Regardless of whether or not you believe we
should be paid more, we are the LOWEST paid
firefighters in the world aside from VFDs. We can't
all "skip in the woods, and smell the flowers," when
there are bills to pay, and groceries to buy.

The FWFSA is a voice, and a sound one at that. I'm sure
you wouldn't refuse a pay increase... a pay increase
that the FWFSA is fighting for, even if you do like
"being in the woods."

NZ Helitack

11/20 Ab,

Enough is enough. This ME cat has got to settle down. First off, what is his or her experience, IHC, RHC, or SKOOKUM or ....? I am like alot of overhead on new crews in that I was on a IHC before. I take great pride in the crew that I have helped build from the ground up. Has ME done this or did they just show up on day one and get the shirt that someone else allowed him to wear. My shirt was earned on the line and off the line, I like so many other new crew o-head took a chance and left the safe world of existing crews for the unknown. Are you, ME prepared to say that a guy who was a captain on a IHC and is now the sup on a RHC is not a REAL hotshot anymore? Are you ready to disrespect these guys like that? Think about it guy, we all want to have the best team on the field and we all want to contribute, but if us new guys start to actually take money out of the IHC pockets then maybe we should go away. My experience is that there is plenty of work to go around, history shows that when it's busy we all make OT and when it's not, we don't.

Another thing to realize is that the crews in R5 have to abide by what the IHCOG says. These are the same rules that LP or Sierra or any other IHC follows. Our management wants ALL crews to be the same, qualifications wise. No doubt about it though, my crew will never have the same amount of tradition as some of the IHCs that have been around for twenty or more years. Anyway, can't we all just get along and cut some line. By the way, we may be looking for a GS-6 Squad Boss soon, wait, only IHC applicants will be considered.

DUDE
11/20 The Louisiana Department of Agriculture and Forestry, District 1 in Hammond, LA has had the SE Louisiana Interagency Type 2 IMT in place since September 28th. To date, the IMT has assisted LA A&F in suppressing 217 wildfires in the Saint Tammany, Washington and Tangipahoa Parishes totaling 1,215 acres. Most areas in LA have not had significant rainfall for over 55 days! Hurricanes Katrina and Rita blown down forests have significantly increased available fuels. The KBDI drought index is severe exceeding 700. A record low 10% Rh was recorded in Hammond, LA for 11/18/05. 113 out-of-state personnel from some 18 different local, state, federal, and private sector wildland fire agencies on two week rotational tours are providing state assistance. 10 Type 6 engines, 3 Type 2/3 Tractor-Plow strike teams, and 2 Type 2 water dropping helicopters supplement 11 LA Forestry's District 1's JD650 or 450 tractor-plow units. Averaging 2-5 wildfire responses per day since September 28th. Majority of the wildfire causes are debris burn escapes and arson. Burn bans continue in all three parishes. To date, out-of-state tractor plows from North Carolina Forest Service, Florida Division of Forestry and Georgia Forestry Commission have built 29 miles of pre-suppression firelines protecting structures in St. Tammany and Washington Parishes. The SE Louisiana Interagency IMT are planning operations through the month of December. Access the Southern Area Coordination Center's website to monitor the increasing SE US wildfire activity.

Eric Kurtz
SE LA Interagency IMT Ops Chief.

Welcome Eric, thanks for letting us know what's going on in Louisiana. Watch out for that flaming spanish moss. It can get mighty dry in drought years. Ab.

11/19 Dear Happy:

I'm thrilled to see you and I are on a first name basis!

Given that you apparently have been loving the outdoors and all the travel for the last 20+ years, I'd assume that you are in an FLSA exempt position (please correct me if I'm wrong).

Curious to know if you noticed a change in your pay about the year 2000. Until then, many exempt employees were actually paid less than lower ranking non-exempt employees because of the overtime pay cap. Many exempt employees took non-exempt positions on fires simply to earn overtime and be paid properly.

I would suggest that if you have benefited financially from the elimination of the overtime pay cap for federal wildland firefighters, (courtesy, I might add, of the "isn't going to do nothing FWFSA" ) you turn some of those earning over to your colleagues that are trying to raise a family on GS-4 pay; being taken off the clock on assignments while the federal government pays others significantly higher sums for the same job, or maybe the seasonal firefighter who doesn't get basic health care.

Isn't it great to be self -righteous? (I wouldn't know) And those "other" organizations that you suggest our folks go to...why do they pay so much more than the feds? Because they have organized groups fighting for them. They have the ability to negotiate pay and benefits with their employers, feds don't. Feds must change the law. That's what the FWFSA does.

As far as Ricky Henderson is concerned, I don't recall him ever risking his life for his millions of dollars. I don't recall him employing coyote tactics, not showering for a week or sleeping on dirt and rocks for his millions. What a stupid analogy! The wildland firefighters I know love their job. They aren't asking to get rich doing this. What they do deserve is fairness. They should expect their employer to consider them valuable and compensate them for the staggering costs of the 21st century.

Loving one's job doesn't necessarily pay the bills does it? I loved bagging groceries as a teenager. I dare say I couldn't raise a family doing it now. With all due respect sir, I commend you on your love of nature and travel. However your attack on those that simply seek fairness in the workplace i.e. similar pay for similar work, and your attack on the FWFSA, an organization working to educate the bureaucracy on what you all do, the sacrifices you make, the issues that affect you and making changes for the better, is reprehensible.

I would suggest that should the FWFSA's current legislation pass, you forego the payment of portal to portal compensation the next time you're on a 14 day assignment and you refuse to include your hazard pay as base pay for retirement purposes.

I know hundreds that will take it off your shoulders.

Casey Judd
Business Manager
FWFSA
11/19 Re: More on the Federal Employee Health Benefits Program and A-76 Outsourcing

> GAO Report, 11/17/2005 www.gao.gov/new.items/d0687r.pdf

Lobotomy
11/19 I was told you may have an answer for me on a specific question.

Is there any standard regarding silk screening on nomex shirts? If you
could shed some light on this it would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks
Rick
11/19 Hey They Said Readers,

This is for those of you who may live outside the Sacramento Metro Area, and do not receive the Sacramento Bee. The Sac Bee, has been writing a series of articles regarding the living and working conditions of "contract" forest workers within California, Oregon, and Washington, who are legal foreign workers invited through a guest worker program. It has been a week long article, culminating in an article in today's paper telling of the rise of "caring" lawmakers rallying the House Committee on Resources to look into the treatment of these workers, starting from the top with the Washington D.C. office of the U.S. Forest Service, and working its way down to the contracting agency. I wanted to send this out, due the fact that at some point it may affect every Forest Service worker directly or indirectly. Happy reading.

www.sacbee.com/content/news/projects/pineros/

A Newspaper Reader!
11/19 Old fire guy
Re: 11/18 Killing chickens

I think the good weather people of Roanoke, VA would take exception to your Mnemonic of KFCX for "killing chickens" even though I take great pleasure in your suggestion. I never dine there.
Suggest you try "KFCE"; as your suggestion is a NWS station Identifier for Roanoke, VA. I Goggled KFCE and it is not a US ship or NWS identifier. Stuff in other languages shows up but it should work. Hope it never comes down to that.

RJM

But the x fits the Rx or "Prescribed fire" assignment designation. I vote for chicken killing identifier being KFCX. It's soooo clear. haw haw. The VA weather folks may have to find a new identifier. Ab.

11/19 Hey Mellie-

There's even a use for that rice and beans- when training for the pack test I took a backpacker's backpack, loaded it up with 45 lbs of rice (forms nicely to the back and you can use different weight bags to work your way up), and would go out walking.

I'm going to try training up for arduous again this year (I had to do light for a couple years due to health) and that's what I'll be doing. Why just store things when they can be useful on a daily basis ;-)

BLMgirl
11/19 Enough of the Bird Flu talk, with all of the funding and budget issues I propose that the people on the ground start throwing out ideas on how to save money so the people who make the decisions in DC know what our issues are. First of all, how about cutting back on some of these so called Type 1 Training Crews that haven't gotten their Type 1 rating yet. Three years, if you don't have it by then your axed. Don't get me wrong, their are some great IHC's that have been formed over the last few years, but there are also a lot of bad ones who don't deserve to have the word Hotshots in their name. Secondly, and more importantly, when was the last time you heard "It was a good thing we had those jumpers on our fire". When the axe falls the first place it should land is on the jumper programs, FS and BLM. If you have a chance, look at how much money is budgeted for these programs. It is a ridiculous waste of money when you look at how much funding gets to the engines, crews, and helitack programs. I don't know if it is just me, but in today's world jumpers are totally ineffective and the least efficient of all resources. I know in AK they are needed, but in the lower 48 give me a helitack / rappelle crew for anything that engines and crews can't access. It would be interesting if we could go one or two seasons without smokejumpers and see just how if affects our IA success rate, put that money into a few more helitack crews and extra CWN ships. Of course, this will never happen because who do you think sits up at NIFC and makes the decisions on where our money goes, that right, all ex-bros. Smokejumpers are nothing more than a tradition that has long lost it's usefulness in the wildland fire community. And it's not just the funding part, how much money is sucked down by broken down jumpers on workman's comp who augured in on a single tree fire that would have burned itself out if left alone for another 30 minutes. I don't mean to rant and rave, but this has been something that has really frustrated me over the last couple of years. I am curious, how many others out there think the same way I do? Hopefully, this starts a hot discussion.

-FRUSTRATED FF
11/19 Everbody can harp on pay and what  we don't offer but what we do offer is the great outdoors and being able to travel all across the nation to what ever national crisis needs our help that is the product to sell. the fwfsa  isn't going to do nothing so casey go with it but Im proud to do my job and if I wanted more pay I would  move to another orginization but I love my job no matter what the pay, for the others who need  more pay ala ricky henderson years ago their is the door go through it and good luck

20+ years and happy with or without the pay

11/18 For new posts on the Flu Pandemic developments see the Bird Flu Watchout page.

Readers, a suggestion:

If you haven't started stockpiling food, please, my friends, set the goal of going to Costco, Sam's Club, Canned Food Warehouse, Grocery Outlet, Cash and Carry or some similar store this weekend that carries bulk grains and beans.

For about $52 you can buy:

  • 50# pounds of rice (2 - 25# bags) for $12
  • 50#  of pinto beans (2 -25# bags) for $18
  • a bottle of multi-vitamin for $12 (500 ct)
  • a bottle of vitamin C for $10 (500 ct 1000 mg; take 1/2 a C a day, 500mg).

Someone wise once said, you only have to start.
Take the first step.
Start by doing what's necessary,
then by doing what's possible,
soon you'll be on your way to achieving the impossible.

You don't have to eat well to survive, you only have to eat what's necessary.
Look at purchasing and having a food supply as insurance.
It's your "fire shelter equivalent".

The smoke is getting thicker. It's beginning to build into a column... LCES

Mellie

11/18 bluezebra,

I'm in New Jersey taking care of family. Thanks for the info.

Novato

11/18 Hello everyone,

I just wanted to chime in here and say a few words to folks. I do not know how fire folks out of R5 cope with bills and health care, but I know how I do -- "beg for extensions". LOL sounds funny huh? IT'S NOT. I just wanted to say that the folks who think that the GOV is going to do us right and take care of us are wrong. I have been doing some research on my own and we are the lowest paid professional fire dept in the country in base pay. Those that make 1000 hrs in OT -- that does not count. Now I hear some of you saying only the guys in R5 think they're a fire dept, well guess what, no mater where you are in the fed fire organization, you are a fire dept whether you like it or not. I do not mean to sound like I am slamming other regions, but hey folks, the FWFSA is something worth looking into.

I talked with Casey the other day and he convinced me that it's worth the few bucks a month. If we can get OPM to get off their asses and see the light, then we can be fairly compensated for our jobs. One last thing here then I will be done, OPM doesn't care about you and your bills or if your newborn child needs special care they do not care. All they worry about is how long can they go to work and not do a damn thing for anybody but themselves. I bet they all pay their bills on time and can afford a home???

OPM is not your friend. CHECK out FWFSA. It will help all of us if we help it.....

NorCal
Capt

11/18 Sad news about triple nickel. Along those lines it's
always good to have some humor in a dismal
situation... with that, and the interest of saving
money, can we have your helitender?

NZ Helitack

11/18 Novato:

The “pandemic” drill you refer to in San Francisco is part of the statewide WMD drill. It is not a “pandemic” but an alleged dirty bomb. Some agencies drilled up to 2 days early (Alameda County and Oakland) for some reason.

Your name is interesting, as your local hospital also participated in the drill, receiving about a dozen patients. The other Marin hospitals also participated, as did many local FDs and Haz Mat Teams. No Fed involvement as far as I know- this drill was limited to local first responders, hospitals and local and county gov’t level officials.

bluezebra
11/18 Regarding Federal Employee Health Benefits:

This may be of interest to some people. It describes how the premium costs of the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP) is going up for fiscal year 2006. These costs are important to current and retired federal employees who are still utilizing the FEHBP program. It may also be interesting to people who are interested in the overall state of the federal wildland fire program.

Some "facts" from OPM. (Believe them or investigate them if you chose to.)

> From GovExec Online 09/15/2005: www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0905/091505r2.htm

1. Most people will see an average increase of 10% in their premiums.
2. 80% of people will see their premiums increase by 2.5-15%.
3. Some people will be far left of, and far right of the average increases.
4. OPM is actively advertising Flexible Spending Accounts (FSA).

I wonder if the federal government is trying (or allowing) the premium increases to cause employees and others to switch over to FSAs and lower priced