"THEY SAID IT" ARCHIVES
December, 2007
Home of the Wildland
Firefighter
| DATE |
|
| 12/31 |
BEST WISHES TO ALL FOR A HAPPY & PROSPEROUS NEW YEAR
FROM ALL OF US AT THE FWFSA |
| 12/31 |
Last day to switch to
FEDS with 6 months free Professional Liability Insurance. Ab. |
| 12/31 |
In the matter of not getting paid yet, it comes down to the official pay
date is Jan. 3 by NFC standards. Those of us that use direct deposit are
lucky and get paid on Mondays. Since it is a new year for tax purposes, and
the day New Years falls on Tuesday, you will not see your paycheck until the
second. Your supervisor should have told you this, as it was a common email
that was sent out to all employees. Hope this help you out.
Green for LifeP.S. It sucks having to wait til Wednesday to get paid when
you have bills to pay and you count on those funds every other Monday. |
| 12/31 |
Hi all ! Glad to see that someone is looking into trying to how to
retain some of these
individuals ! .I only wish that they had better pay and I had a 26/0 rather
than
an 18/8. That is one of the reasons I left and went to the DOD! It was great
when I was single but when I started a family that all changed! Maybe I'll
get
lucky and it will all change and I can get out of this mad house and start
fighting
fires again!
DOD mistake |
| 12/31 |
I did not get paid, and that is very strange since I've never had a
problem getting
paid. I did get the email saying my paycheck was submitted to NFC last week.
I also see the statement on my personal page, however no transfer of funds
into
my accounts.
Some thing is up, maybe Uncle's way of saying Happy New Year.
Maybe this should be reported in the letter back to Feinstein's committee.
1) First we are going to make sure we pay our employees.
2) Secondly we are increasing pay by 3% this year and health benefits by
14%.
What a deal !!!!!! |
| 12/31 |
FyrGuy -
We were told that because of the holidays last week, we won't be
getting paid until Wed. Hopes this sheds some light on the situation.
Lori |
| 12/31 |
Who pays the fire suppression costs when Plum Creek decides to subdivide
their ownership?
An interesting view of what's coming in the 21st century to a private forest
near you at
www.billingsgazette.net/articles/2007/12/31/news/state/36-plumcreek.txt
Plum Creek's focus raises new concerns
By Michael Jamison
Missoulian
Kalispell - Not far up the road from Steve Brown's house, out west of
Whitefish and just around the corner from forest burnt black by the Brush
Creek fire, a quarter-mile of new road is headed off into the woods.
The short stretch will cross U.S. Forest Service land, using that public
patch to connect Plum Creek Timber Co. with the rest of the world. Plum
Creek has another route in, a winding six-mile twist of road used seasonally
to haul logs, but the new neighbors weren't going to put up with that.
Because Plum Creek's not going to log that land anymore. Instead, the
company plans on selling it as subdivided real estate parcels.
And so the Forest Service has granted a new easement to hasten access, that
quick quarter-mile over public land.
"I'm baffled," Brown said. He's lived here for years, and knows the fire
danger. "If the Forest Service is really all worried about wildfires, why
would they grant easements that encourage more houses in the woods? I'm just
wondering why, if they're as broke as they say they are, and they're
spending all their money protecting houses from fire, then why would they go
and do something like this?"
Because, said Lisa Timchak, the government just can't say no.
"Fire costs are huge," said Timchak, the district ranger who had to review
Plum Creek's easement request. "We're becoming a skeleton of an agency. But
right now, when they ask for something like this, the Forest Service doesn't
have the tools to deny it. Fire costs are not part of the review criteria."
(Ab note: important stuff; read on at the link)
Hundekot
Fair Use
Disclaimer |
| 12/31 |
Has anyone in the Forest Service been paid for this past pay period?
It's getting a little tight when you depend on your check to make a
mortgage payment and its not there. There have been several people
that have not been paid in 2 pay periods, I just hope I am not about
to be one of them.
FyrGuy |
| 12/31 |
Dear Abs They Said;
Extremely interesting video.
60 Minutes video: The Age of Mega-Fires.
Socal Dispatcher
The Age Of Mega-Fires
www.cbsnews.com/sections/i_video/main500251.shtml?id=3657686n
CBS News OnlineIt was good and very interesting, from the reduction in
firefighting troops to environmental predictions from tree ring data going
back thousands of years, to drought, to soil burned of all tilth back to
rocky substrate. Predicted loss of 1/2 our forested lands in North America
over the next 30 to 100 years... A wake up call for sure. Tom Boatner did a
good job for the groundpounders. The AZ fire scientist did a great job of
laying out the problems and predictions. I'd like to see it again. Ab. |
| 12/31 |
It's burning Downunda. From Firescribe: Three men killed in convoy
inferno
December 31, 2007 - 6:20PM
www.theage.com.au/articles/2007/12/31/1198949707028.html
Three men killed when a bushfire caught their trucks in the West
Australian
Goldfields are believed to be from WA, police say.
The bodies of three people, initially believed to be two adults and a
child,
were found in two burnt-out trucks on the Great Eastern Highway in a
section
of Boorabbin National Park between Southern Cross and Coolgardie about
midnight.
Deputy Police Commissioner Chris Dawson said investigators had confirmed
the
three were all adult men.
"I can confirm three adult males, believed to be from Western Australia,
have tragically lost their lives,'' Mr Dawson said. (more at the link)
|
| 12/30 |
SoCal Dispatcher,
Thanks for the info. Its good to know it least some are thinking about AZ as
an option. Maybe as cross-state boundary mutual aid comes more into play, a
quicker dispatch of resources would work. As a state cooperator agency, the
agencies I interact are always very eager to go to CA. It seems that is
often San Diego. It will be interesting to see if the dispatch process ever
improves and becomes a bit quicker the next time.
AZfirefighter |
| 12/30 |
Hi Ab, Happy New Year to all.
Peets Coffee in Corona Del Mar Plaza in Newport Beach CA (my daughter'
store) raised
$780.00 which will be matched by Peets for a total of $1560 for the Santa's
Helper Fund.
Her staff donated all their tips that day to the donation jar. I don't have
the totals from the
other two stores yet who raised money for the
Wildland Firefighter
Foundation General Fund.
Annette
Nice Job. Ab. |
| 12/30 |
Come help us bid a fond farewell to
Battalion 10 (Bill Bourbeau), Battalion 21 (Jim Snow) and Battalion 22
(Marta Woodward) as they retire from many years of public service.
Thursday January 10, 2007 @ 1800-2100
BJ’s Restaurant
26500 Ynez Rd. cross of Overland, Temecula, California
Dinner $20 all you can eat Specialty Pizza, pasta, salad and soft drinks.
12 and under $10
Gift donations gratefully accepted Please RSVP by January 8th Contact:
Carlton Joseph @ (619) 988-7717 or Gordon Martin @ (951) 415-8323
I am not sure if you post these types of announcements, but these
retirements are a loss to the Southern California fire community. Good Luck
to all.
FC180 |
| 12/30 |
Ab -
Since it's about to be a new year how about starting with a little humor. I
assume you, being the moderator of this form, might enjoy the following:
How many forum members does it take to change a light bulb?
1 to change the light bulb and to post that the light bulb has been changed.
14 to share similar experiences of changing light bulbs and how the light
bulb could have been changed differently.
7 to caution about the dangers of changing light bulbs.
1 to post in ALL CAPS
2 to explain that this is considered shouting and impolite
6 to argue over whether it's "lightbulb" or "light bulb" ...
Another 6 to condemn those 6 as stupid.
2 industry professionals to inform the group that the proper term is "lamp".
15 know-it-alls who claim they were in the industry, and that "light bulb"
is perfectly correct.
50 people to argue over the environmental benefit of fluorescent bulbs
versus incandescent bulbs
19 to post that this forum is not about light bulbs and to please take this
discussion to a light bulb forum.
11 to defend the posting to this forum saying that we all use light bulbs
and therefore the posts are relevant to this forum.
36 to debate which method of changing light bulbs is superior, where to buy
the best light bulbs, what brand of light bulbs work best for this technique
and what brands are faulty.
5 People to post pics of their own light bulbs.
15 People to post "I can't see S$%^!" and their own light bulbs.
7 to post URL's where one can see examples of different light bulbs.
4 to post that the URL's were posted incorrectly and then post the corrected
URL's.
13 to link all posts to date, quote them in their entirety including all
headers and signatures, and add "Me too".
5 to post to the group that they will no longer post because they cannot
handle the light bulb controversy.
4 to say "didn't we go through this already a short time ago?"
13 to say "do a search on light bulbs before posting questions about light
bulbs"
1 moderator to lock the light bulb thread.
1 forum lurker to respond to the original post 6 months from now and start
it all over again.
Have a Happy New Year!
AK Old TimerHaw haw, good one! Ab. |
| 12/30 |
Re: Portal to Portal Pay vs. 24 Hour Coverage vs. Doing What Is Right for
the Mission and Taxpayer
Proposed as a simple legislation change for those Forests who need 24-hour
coverage, or who have employees who work 40 (plus) hour work weeks and who
have employees on call (ie- night call dispatchers, fire prevention, or
chief officers who are not compensated during "on call" periods of mandatory
availability. This simple change allows complete flexibility based upon each
units mission needs.
Proper classification with either a wildland firefighter series, or a
distinct branch under the 0081 series is needed so folks don't have to wade
through the USC and CFR to understand that federal wildland firefighters are
firefighters..... not Forestry or Range Technicians (0462/0455).... not
General Biological Sciences (0401).... not Foresters (0460)....
People who have been employed as federal wildland firefighters.... both in
primary or secondary positions..... and others who are in allied professions
(ologists) need to be viewed as equal peers and the experts in wildland fire
program delivery....
The wildland fire program employs professionals who need to be leading and
making decisions in the fire program mission delivery and not relegated to
either "technician" or a non-defined series (0401) in the biological
sciences.
Wildland firefighters know that it isn't rocket science, and that In-N-Out
Burger offers competitive pay, benefits, and working conditions in their
profession....... The problem exists when federal land managers don't
understand they are managing a fire program that assists in land
management....... and are competing for the best of the best with other
agencies, other professions, and other federal agencies in completing their
assigned missions.
LobotomyAn amendment to (Proposed amendment highlighted) --
TITLE 5 > PART III > Subpart D > CHAPTER 55 > SUBCHAPTER V
§ 5545b. Pay for firefighters
(a) This section applies to an employee whose position is classified in the
firefighter occupation in conformance with the GS-081 standard published by
the Office of Personnel Management, or an employee whose position is
designated as either a primary or secondary firefighter under 5 CFR 842.802,
and whose normal work schedule, as in effect throughout the year, consists
of regular tours of duty which average at least 106 hours per biweekly pay
period.
> From the Forest Service: http://www.fs.fed.us/people/benefits/fers.html
FERS Firefighter - 5 CFR 842.802
Firefighter means an employee occupying a rigorous position, whose primary
duties are to perform work directly connected with the control and
extinguishment of fires, as provided in 5 U.S.C. 8401(14). Also included in
this definition is an employee occupying a rigorous firefighter position who
moves to a supervisory or administrative position and meets the conditions
of Sec. 842.803(b).
FERS Secondary position - 5 CFR 842.802
(1) Is clearly in the law enforcement or firefighting field;
(2) Is in an organization having a law enforcement or firefighting mission;
and
(3) Is either--
(i) Supervisory; i.e., a position whose primary duties are as a first-level
supervisor of law enforcement officers or firefighters in rigorous
positions; or
(ii) Administrative; i.e., an executive, managerial, technical,
semiprofessional, or professional position for which experience in a
rigorous law enforcement or firefighting position, or equivalent experience
outside the Federal government, is a prerequisite.
Firefighter Defined - 5 USC 8401(14) http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode05/usc_sec_05_00008401----000-.html
(14) the term "firefighter" means-
(A) an employee, the duties of whose position-
(i) are primarily to perform work directly connected with the control and
extinguishment of fires; and
(ii) are sufficiently rigorous that employment opportunities should be
limited to young and physically vigorous individuals, as determined by the
Director considering the recommendations of the employing agency; and
(B) an employee who is transferred directly to a supervisory or
administrative position after performing duties described in subparagraph
(A) for at least 3 years;
Note: "throughout the year" applies to either calendar year (CY), fiscal
year (FY), or appointment type. The 106 hour average bi-weekly limitation
may not apply to all areas, in which case, the provisions of the FEDERAL
FIREFIGHTERS OVERTIME PAY REFORM ACT OF 1998 may not apply to your area. In
such cases, other provisions of law relating to federal firefighters would
apply.
Reference:
Congressional Hearing: Tension in the Tinderbox: Finding Fairness in Federal
Firefighter Compensation
Congressional Hearing: Wildland Firefighters Pay: Are There Inequities?
HR 408 Federal Wildland Firefighter Emergency Response Compensation Act of
2005
HR 2963 Federal Wildland Firefighter Emergency Response Compensation Act of
2003
HR 5697 Federal Wildland Firefighter Classification Act of 2005
HR 2814 Federal Firefighters Pay Equity Act
HR 1116/ S 492 Firefighters Pay Fairness Act of 1997
Public Law 106-558 (S 439) "... to authorize equal overtime pay provisions
for all Federal employees engaged in wildland fire suppression operations."
Wildlandfire.com Archive: www.wildlandfire.com/docs/2003_n_before/firepay.htm |
| 12/29 |
AZ Firefighter,
I just wanted you to know that we in the Southern California dispatch
community are well aware that all those resources are available just across
the border. We have frequently called Arizona Dispatch Centers directly to
make "back door" deals to get those resources on the road. Quite often, the
resources are already en route or on scene before we can get the order
placed through the system. It is frustrating to know that the ordering
system doesn't always guarantee the "closest forces" and not everyone thinks
outside the box. Thanks for making the trek out here to give us a hand, it
was appreciated more then you'll probably know.
Socal Dispatcher |
| 12/29 |
Re Bob Serrato's retirement: I have known Bob for 30 years, in that time
Bob has been an outstanding firefighter,
manager, mentor, friend and ski partner. I sincerely offer Bob and his
beautiful wife
and daughter the very best in his upcoming retirement. He has been a strong
asset
to the ANF fire management program as well as R-5 as a whole. I am sure he
will
be successful in what ever path he selects in the future. Congratulations on
an
outstanding career. Ski ya on the slopes Bob.
Tim V |
| 12/28 |
Tanker thoughts: Thanks to all who answered my question. I knew someone
smarter than me had to have already thought of that airframe.
Onelick |
| 12/28 |
Everyone, I'm still tuned in to the network of scientists tracking avian
flu infections and deaths around the world. Several weeks ago there was
likely limited human-to-human infection with deaths in Pakistan. Results
should be in on that outbreak soon. This is similar to the clusters of
human-to-human infection in Indonesia, where the disease is also endemic in
birds, cats and other mammals.
I sent in the CIDRAP (Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy)
summary and it's posted on the
Birdflu Watchout Page.
For those who want to follow the latest breaking news on birdflu and
other infectious diseases around the world, please visit
flutrackers.com.
I'll let you know if things seem to be getting dicey with birdflu.
Mellie |
| 12/28 |
For those who haven't heard... President Bush signed the Omnibus
Appropriations Bill -- H.R. 2764 -- into law late on 12/26. Ab. Dear
Letterman and all:
First & Foremost, the Omnibus bill "highlights" text did in fact come from
Senator Feinstein. A quote from her follows at the end of this post.
Her efforts to place this language in the bill is the result of a variety of
folks from fire officials off the BDF to the FWFSA to many others who took
the time to educate her staff about the issues. That being said, I remind
everyone that the FWFSA is committed to securing fundamental changes in pay
& personnel policies for all federal wildland firefighters from all five
land management agencies regardless of grade or geographic location.
The text is another in a series of steps forward that have occurred over the
last year and a half or so.
The FS, after 3 years of silence finally took a position on the firefighter
liability issue, supporting the expansion of reimbursement of PLI premiums.
This occurred after the efforts of NFFE and the FWFSA secured the help of
Sen. Domenici (R-NM) to get the issue out on the table in Senate hearings
last February. As a result, language to expand the reimbursement of PLI
premiums has now been signed into law. Next step... the Agency(s) covering
100% of the premium.
Again, through the collective efforts of NFFE and the FWFSA, congress
inserted language into the Omnibus bill, now signed into law, "defunding"
the FS outsourcing studies.
At the end of last session the House of Representatives passed the Federal
Wildland Firefighter Classification Act. While OPM just hasn't gotten it
through its head that classification is a major issue, we will continue to
get that done with the help of Congress.
Retention meetings have been held in R5 after Congress sought answers to the
"exodus" of federal firefighters in R5 to other fire agencies. We obviously
don't know the details of those recent meetings but they were held because
the Agency now recognizes they can no longer rely on the bureaucratic "smoke
& mirrors" to suggest that all is fine. Too many folks are talking now.
Finally, this language in the Omnibus bill: It, as with all the other items
mentioned, are steps in the right direction. That means we keep pressing
until either 1) the Agency steps forward and recognizes its firefighters as
the asset they are and begins to eliminate the archaic pay & personnel
policies that have encumbered the firefighters for so long and works to
strengthen the infrastructure, or 2) Congress does it for them.
One of the next steps is for the Agency to decide whether they want to have
a fire program or not. If they do, it needs to recognize that the current
organizational structure of the fire program i.e. non-fire folks making
policy, is not conducive to managing a true fire department and changes must
be made. The Agency also needs to recognize that its very own policies under
this organizational structure is what has caused the skyrocketing costs of
suppression.
So, as far as gut feelings are concerned, I don't have any. I am humbled
that Congress is starting to hear the voices of these brave men & women and
that means we keep our sleeves rolled up and keep up the effort until all of
you get what you deserve.
Casey
Quote from Senator Feinstein:
“I worked to secure language in the Omnibus Appropriations Bill
because the U.S. Forest Service is losing firefighters to other agencies
in California. This is a serious problem that must be addressed, and we
are working closely with the Forest Service on a long-term solution.
California faces a real and growing threat from wildfires, and we must
have a strong firefighting capability at all levels of government.”
"highlights" text
text on Curtailing A76 and text describing Professional Liability
Insurance reimbursement (posted to theysaid 12/18)
Retention text (posted to theysaid 12/26) [scroll down
to Green for Life's post on 12/27 for links to the bill itself]
|
| 12/28 |
Ab,
I promised a follow-up on the new statutory language stopping Forest Service
competitive sourcing in FY 2008. I just posted a press release and briefing
paper that go into the how and why the language got changed over on my
corner of the NFFE Forest Service Council website. Short story: to make sure
interagency fire studies (training, dispatch are ongoing) were stopped. More
at
www.nffe-fsc.org/Documents/CSIndex/CSIndex.html.
Casey really hit the nail on the head in describing how Congress works and
how difficult it is to get anything done. We've been working competitive
sourcing since 2003 -- working it hard. Sometimes it gets pretty
frustrating. Most times, in fact. This legislative work is worse than
baseball, where even the best batters fail 7 out of 10 times. I'll bet we
swing and miss 99 times out of 100. The trick is to keep swinging -- over
100 times. I expect that's what Casey and I will be doing in 2008.
In closing, one last pitch: we need all the help we can get.
Happy New Year to all.
Mark Davis, Chair
NFFE Forest Service Council Legislative CommitteeThank you Mark and
Thanks to Casey. Ab. |
| 12/28 |
Retirement announcement coming in from a variety of sources. Here's one
message: Bob Serrato sent this out today (yesterday). I
remember first meeting Bob in the early 80's. The great thing about Bob is
he hasn't changed a bit since the day I met him.
Bob is a great, outstanding Firefighter and fire management leader, but the
good thing about Bob is, he is an even better person.
Thanks for your service Bob, have a great retirement.....
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Out of Service
Robert J. Serrato
Angeles National Forest
Farewell, I will be retiring COB January 3, 2008. I have been with this
organization almost 34 years and have enjoyed 95% all of that time. Many of
you know what happen to the other 5%; I won’t go there in this letter. Ha!
Ha!
I have given this organization my best over the years and I’m proud of my
accomplishments. It is time for me to step aside. I have been successful in
filling the position behind me. Eric McCormick was offered and has accepted
the DFMO position and I am certain that he will lead it to greater heights.
Although I am looking forward to retirement, it is with some regret that I
am leaving. I will miss my colleagues and the opportunity to see employees
develop. As I reflect on the people whom I have crossed paths with, many
thoughts come to mind. First and foremost is the high level of
professionalism that you all maintain. I have been humbled by having the
pleasure and opportunity to have known and worked with so many that I hold
with the highest respect. The Forest Service has provided me the opportunity
to do things and visit places that most people only dream of.
In closing, I feel deeply indebted to you all for the support, guidance, and
the encouragement you have provided me during my tenure.
Please keep in touch, I can be reached at (snip) or at the following
numbers; (snip). I look forward to sharing a farewell refreshment
with you all on January 19, 2008 at my retirement celebration.
Sincerely,
Robert J. Serrato
When is the best time to start thinking about your retirement?
Before your boss does! |
| 12/27 |
Casey,
What, if anything will this heightened congressional awareness we achieved
in 07 help move portal to portal forward in 08? What is your gut feeling?
P to P helps not one geographic area, not just one agency, but the entire
federal land management workforce. P to P would go a long way to solve the
recruitment and retention issues. The passage of P to P in my opinion is the
single most important thing that could be done to get things back on
the right track.
Until then I ask ICs everywhere to use "ordered stand-by" (used by
LPF and ANF during the fire siege) within your fire camps in 2008. You have
many options within your authorities and can create variations to mold for
your incidents and mirror P to P pay. Work on this at your team meetings in
08. R-5 has always been known for leading change, keep the tradition alive.
R-5 and other fed agency ICs within Ca, if you lead on this issue now, then
years, even decades from now you will always be remembered as "The Leaders"
who changed how federal emergency responders are managed and paid. Most of
you ICs have very little time left in your careers. Do something in 2008 for
the younger generation looking to follow in your footsteps. ICs;
"Management is doing things right; leadership is doing the right things".
You have the unique opportunity to do both in 2008.
See you Reno!
Letterman |
| 12/27 |
To all:
The PLI and outsourcing language included in the recent FY'08 Omnibus bill
coupled with the highlight notes recently posted here about the FS needing
to address recruitment & retention should be a clear signal to all federal
wildland firefighters that Congress is listening to and hearing your voices.
The highlight language is interestingly similar to the language of the
letter sent by 6 bipartisan members of Congress to FS Chief Kimbell and the
ANF Forest Supervisor Jody Noiron last summer seeking answers to the
problems in R5.
Likely the RO will suggest the recent retention meetings were convened
because they expected such language/direction from Congress in the Omnibus
bill. That may be true in part but that language/direction is a direct
result of the voices of our federal wildland firefighters, the FWFSA, They
Said etc.
It should also be noted that while the focus seems to be on the FS, our goal
at the FWFSA is to ensure Congress understands that fundamental changes must
occur to benefit not only FS wildland firefighters but wildland firefighters
from all five land management agencies. The Omnibus bill language
notwithstanding, the FWFSA's legislative initiative will include provisions
that apply to all federal wildland firefighters from all land management
agencies.
To re-emphasize the complexities of navigating Congress, I use the example
of the IAFF's national collective bargaining bill that after 10+ years
finally was passed by the House this year only to die in the Senate
recently. As with many such bills, the IAFF's language was included as an
amendment to the Farm Bill which was a "must pass bill." The thinking was
that with such a bill and the end of the first half of the 110th Congress at
hand, president Bush would not veto the bill.
This is a common practice... to tack language of one bill onto another
larger bill as an amendment. The interesting thing is that the practice of
changing the law on an appropriations bill (one of 13 must-pass bills each
year) while done frequently, is actually a violation of congressional rules.
That is, unless everyone agrees to set aside the rules.
Apparently the IAFF believed they had done just that with the leadership
from both sides of the aisle with respect to their language being on the
Farm bill. However at least two Senators derailed the process using
perfectly legal parliamentary tactics to kill the IAFF's language.
The point is, getting things passed and signed into law is not easy. One
person in Congress can derail even the most popular bill. Thus, the language
and reference to federal wildland firefighter issues in this bill are a
major step to fixing many of the problems, but a great deal of work remains
to be done. YOUR voices are what will make that happen.
Best to all for a wonderful, prosperous & successful New Year.
Casey |
| 12/27 |
GISgirl and others:
You mentioned how long it can take to get resources into San Diego County
when there are several fires to the north and you are geographically "a
cul-de-sac". I would have to agree. However, being a fire professional in
AZ, I wonder if there isn't more that can be done to get those resources
"from the east" as you state.
Arizona has what I feel is a solid, close knit wildfire community. From
Federal fire fighters to state cooperative fire departments, we may not have
the numbers like California, but we can be and have been of help to many
incidents in CA.
Over the years, many engines as well as crews or other resources have gone
to CA. In 2003 we sent a very large (for AZ) contingent of resources. And
now again in 2007, we were able to provide several strike teams of engines
(all NWCG types) as well as other assets. Having been a part of those
responses, and having waited for the orders, we get frustrated in knowing we
are alot closer to San Diego than the Northern CA resources. We were ready
to roll, but just needed orders.
Our time to the SD county fires was about 8 hours. With a little more
"practice", we could easily get that number down a bit more. At our October
2007 response, we relieved some OES engines who had been on the line for an
extended period, after having driven from the CA/OR border. They stated
their drive time was 15+ hours.
Now of course I'm prejudiced, but it seems maybe Arizona resources should be
given a little bit more of a look. The next time a firestorm gets going, and
fires are threatening lives from LA county down to SD county, our resources
can get rolling and be there quicker. Isn't that usually the way we all
dispatch? Closest resource concept?
The only other problem is the slow ordering process. With some pre-planning,
Arizona could be a reliable and expedient pool of resources at the next SD
county firestorm when engines and other resources are spread thin.
Just a thought. Maybe someone who makes those important decisions to get out
of state resources will read this and think about it as a viable option. I
believe Yuma (AZ) FD is a part of the CA system. Why not other AZ resources.
AZfirefighter |
| 12/27 |
Thanks, Green for Life.
As I read the Division F - Interior pdf of the Appropriations Bill, Congress
has restored
$6 million in funding for the Rural Fire Assistance program and $14 million
for Volunteer
Fire Assistance.
Thanks to everyone who asked their Senators and Representatives to bring RFA
back
despite the lack of agency support.
vfd cap'n |
| 12/27 |
Ab,
I found the information for you on how someone can look up what it says in
the bill.
Just type in http://appropriations.house.gov/ into the web browser.
Click the Bill Text and Explanatory Statements.
Then under
look for
and on page 55 it has what people might want to read. There are some really
important
other amendments also on the bill that some people might have interest in.
Hope this helps everyone out that wants to read the bill, especially those
of you in R-5.
Green for lifeThanks, Green. Ab. |
| 12/27 |
From Firescribe, more on NDT or Non-Destructive Testing of aicraft:
www.ndt.net/article/ecndt98/aero/031/031.htm |
| 12/27 |
I just found this in the spam filter. It was dated 12/18: Aging
aircraft issues:
Regarding the Navy grounding or potentially grounding of their P3
fleet..........
ALL of these aircraft are now coming due, due to aging aircraft issues
even before Mr Tony Kern (former USFS F&AVN) type knew about these and the
issues of the of the aging fleet.
To be sure, Aero Union will do its best in the NDT arena, eddy current
detection, and other aging aircraft issues.
Look on their website and see what their capabilities are. Probably will
get a Navy contract for the inspections if the Navy decides to use them as a
prime mover in this arena.
Now it is time for the USFS and other land mgmt agencies to come to the
realization that this issue is far from over and that their up and coming
fire season may be interrupted (to some degree) during 18 to 24 month
inspection schedules......
Some of these aircraft are as old as the former Hawkins and Powers fleet
of C130 series of aircraft......
And everyone in the fire biz saw what happened to that FAMOUS aviation
company after the land management agencies pulled their "Blue Ribbon
Panel". Are they going to do it again?? Are they going to claim knowledge
in all things aviation??
USFS Fire and Aviation had better be clear on this........ The Navy let
the AVIATION COMMUNITY know because of their AVIATION background, not the
land mgmt agencies pouring over BRPs and town hall meetings regarding the
aging air fleet.
Already everyone has seen the DC-10 and its possibilities, only it
probably still can't fly over Federal lands like its older brother, the DC6.
Aero Union will do its best. The land management agencies do not have
much left in the 3000 gallon inventory if they go after this one as they did
the C130 and the PB4Y series.............
Let's let the AVIATION pro at Aero Union and the Navy sort this out..
BUT to the land management agencies... Are you ready to bring back some iron
in the event of a catastrophic fire season '08?? Better get to the
boneyard at Davis Monthan and see what can be resurrected.
Just to be fair to the fixed wing community...... some of the rotary wing
aircraft are coming due also as far as aging aircraft issues also.
Again coming from a forester, former wildland firefighter, A&P, and
Commercial pilot.......
To the land management agencies, be very careful with this, I will state
the obvious, it COSTS something including people's livelihoods and it cost
something to get these issues resolved. GET all the facts B4 you pull
another BRP.
LL
Ab note:
NDT=Non Destructive Testing detects cracks or any other irregularities in
the airframe, structure, landing gear, and engine components which are not
visible to the naked eye.
BRP=Blue Ribbon Panel, referring in this case to the BRP on the aging C130s
and PB4Ys. |
| 12/27 |
As a citizen of San Diego, as a former member of the federal militia, as a
vendor to the San Diego Fire Department, and most importantly as a member of
this wildland community (no matter how many months pass from the last fire I
was on)....
San Diego county has a great number of wonderful people on the ground
fighting fire- and a number of great ones in the various government agencies
who are at the management level (Rich Hawkins I still miss you at 2am in the
Sit Unit dispensing random fire knowledge as Plans Chief on Team 5). With
that taken into consideration (having grown up in San Diego City), we are a
small conservative town with a county covering an amazingly diverse area
without a cohesive agency to cover our rear ends.
We in San Diego do not have the general knowledge amongst the citizenry
(trust me I spend sooooooooo much time trying to bite my tongue or correct
misled notions) regarding wildfire. They think water drops really do put
fires out. They think the military is the answer (and yes, they can be a
help- no arguments on that point). They do not recognize that geographically
speaking we are a cul-de-sac... additional resources have to come from the
North or East and speaking from a mere routing perspective it is a time
consideration to get resources into San Diego- especially when our neighbors
in the San Bernardino or LP are burning. Oh yeah has anyone thought of
having 64 (or are we down to the 30s now) agencies to coordinate? I have
heard the local stories about why we do not have a single agency responding
in the county and EVERY time it is politics. I did have to put the article
down for a bit from the UT b/c my brother-in-law was starting to blanch at
the colorful language being uttered under my breath...
Without becoming one of the "contract counties" (I can't believe that term
was never mentioned in the article- seriously people?), I don't think San
Diego can ever contend with the LA County, Kern County, Ventura County,
Santa Barbara County, Orange County, etc type of wildland fire support. I
mean they didn't adequately mention the variety of agreements in place, the
mutual aid vs OES vs GACC activations that have to occur for resources to be
activated- who orders what- Unified Command vs Agency Representation and all
that good stuff.
Okay- the bottom line is this- 2007 was leaps and bounds ahead of 2003. As
someone who had to deal with half of our company being evacuated in the
midst of a major company event- I lurked the sites, I check the boards and
there is a long way to go to get to the point where information that needs
to be distributed is done in a truly timely manner- but the response and
public reaction was worlds better this time. We still have room to improve
in this region. I heard from a FD source... we thought we would never see
2003 again... now we know it's not going away and we have to keep preparing.
GISgirl |
| 12/27 |
ht,
I see your point. Yes, I go back to the original “Fire Stop” at Camp
Pendleton in 1954. When I was in San Diego County all of those departments
in the north were a dream to work with. Bob Harden at Carlsbad, Jim Fox at
Rancho Santa Fe, Bill Elder at Vista and Charlie Carpenter at San Marcos
plus Escondido, Fallbrook and the Rainbow volunteers, all were very helpful
and good at what they did. If you analyze the San Diego County fire problems
those departments were always know to me as “Problem solvers” not “Problem
makers.”
On the Laguna fire in 1970 when it was making its run out of Harbison
Canyon and heading into the Dehesa area, Chief’s Tom Barnes from La Mesa FD
and Bill Thurber from Fallbrook saved about twenty five houses using good
old Yankee ingenuity. I thought they were all going to burn; when I found
Chief Barnes and told him about the problem he went back to the staging area
at Gillespie Field, got the resources together and came out and those are my
heroes even now.
The bigger problem with the whole situation down in San Diego County is
turf and “Who is going to be in Charge.” That question is still hanging as I
write this. The Chief Officer ranks of the SDFD don’t have the practical or
demonstrated experience or ability to be thrust into that role, but the San
Diego County fire service is loaded with some talented fire professionals
who sure could help to weld that into a cohesive, functioning system.
Cal Fire is now too political to be the practical leader. They are
changing Unit Chiefs too frequently for one personality to settle in and do
a creditable job. What has worked well is their ability to pull smaller
entities into their contract fold and make that work very well and make the
utilization of resources effective. I only wish that when I worked in San
Diego County that Cal Fire then had the talents they do now in the Battalion
Chief ranks. Those folks are heads and above most I ever worked for.
The politicians never quit, do they? Now they want more fire engines. Who
will organize and direct those additional resources? Who will fund the
staffing and training? They have a hundred different ideas, none of which
are practical or productive, to me, and the confusion still reigns supreme.
The solutions will be at the ballot box if the voters are truly as
concerned as they are portrayed to be by the media. All the City and County
government leaders are doing when they become critical of Cal Fire and the
Forest Service is signal to me they are looking for scapegoats, hoping that
no one comes trying to hold them accountable for their own lack of
definitive action. It is they who are legally responsible and who
continually refuse to take the helm and provide effective leadership, not
the role of Cal Fire or the Forest Service.
Normbc9 |
| 12/26 |
Forest Service provided highlights from the FY 2008 Omnibus Bill included
this one:
- FS should examine Federal Firefighter pay and personnel policies and
provide House
& Senate Committees on Appropriations with a proposal to increase
recruitment and
retention for Southern California forests no later than Feb 1, 2008.
Letterman Anyone know in what section or on what page this is
located? Thanks. Ab.
Posted on 12/27: answer is here. |
| 12/26 |
Onelick,
The A10 Warthog is built to deliver ordinance, i.e. bombs. This aircraft
flies low and slow and pinpoints single point targets. Did I mention yet
that most of the Warthogs are already old and worn out?
What we in wildland fire suppression need is a "purpose built" platform that
will paint a lengthy line of retardant. Retardant releases from an aircraft
in way different mode than bombs do...... As a now deceased airtanker pilot
buddy of mine used to say: "the airtanker needs to be able to take off and
land with different loadings and to be able to do some pretty weird stuff
while in flight."
Right now Canada and Russia are way ahead of the US on the development of
airtankers. We should be looking at what they are doing rather than looking
into our military junkyards for the airtanker of the future. Moreover, I
think Americans could produce a great purpose-built airtanker if the USFS
would just get serious about it.
NMAirBear |
| 12/26 |
Using the A-10 (Firehog) as a platform for aerial firefighting is an idea
that's been floating around for about 10 years or so, scripted by Aerotech
Ltd. The reasons this airframe was never followed through on are numerous.
One of the big obstacles for this airframe is that the armor plating cannot
be removed, thus adding un-needed weight. The original thought was to remove
the armor thus giving the aircraft around a 2,000 gal capacity, however,
even at 1,000 gallons this aircraft would be a problem to handle.
On a second note, there were some demo flight's at Camp Pendleton in
California sometime around 1999-2000, and while the maneuverability was
outstanding, many of the state and government officials walked away
unimpressed. As a last note, the first hurdle to overcome should this get
past where it is now, is for the government to release some for sale or
lease. After 9/11, I just don't see that happening for quite some time.
Something else one needs to look at when dealing with jet engines vs.
piston, is "spool up" time. In a piston engine, increased rpm's are attained
more rapidly, such as post-drop throttle to regain altitude and airspeed. A
jet engine takes longer to attain these critical rpm's. The basic A-10 uses
a TF-34_GE-100 Turbofan powerplant. It takes roughly 6 seconds to spool to
110% vs. somewhere around 4-5 seconds for a piston engine (I used a
Wright-Turbo Compound for this example). Not a big spread for the numbers,
but it's a mile if your life depends on it.
Nothing wrong at all with your thoughts. That's the only way this
industry is going to survive is by people dreaming up new thoughts and
ideas. I hope I was able to answer your question without getting too
technical.
TS |
| 12/26 |
Onelick
The A-10 has been around for a long time and it's already been proposed
several times as an aerial firefighting platform.
Several proposals were put forth to both the Federal agencies as well as
many of the State agencies.
While the proposals in and of themselves were very well produced, edited
and presented, no agency thought the proposals were worth the expense
and time to develop.
Copter 100 |
| 12/26 |
Idea for new AirTanker: Here's something that needs to be run by the
airtanker folks. With all the
airframes that are being grounded lately, has anyone thought about using the
A-10 warthog airframe as an airtanker? I was talking to my brother-in-law
during the holidays, when this subject came up. He works on the avionics on
this plane, and he said the payload capacity is around 10k pounds. Which in
my limited mental capacity, put the gallonage around 1,000 gals. Since this
plane was designed to fly slow, and low to the ground, why wouldn't it make
a good airtanker? Or is the AirTractor a better platform? Since I'm just a
groundpounder, I'm not familiar with the different airframes. Just some
food for thought. It's amazing what ideas come to your head over some cool
adult beverages.
Onelick |
| 12/26 |
Good Morning All. Ab. |
| 12/25 |
ø¤º°`°º¤ø
ø¤º°`°º¤ø
ø¤º°`°º¤ø
ø¤º°`°º¤ø
ø¤º°`°º¤ø
ø¤º°`°º¤ø
ø¤º°`°º¤ø
ø¤º°`°º¤ø
ø¤º°`°º¤ø
ø¤º°`°º¤ø ø¤º°`°º¤ø
ø¤º°`
-=MERRY=--=CHRISTMAS=--=MERRY=--=CHRISTMAS=--=MERRY=--=CHRISTMAS=--=MERRY=-
ø¤º°`°º¤ø
ø¤º°`°º¤ø
ø¤º°`°º¤ø
ø¤º°`°º¤ø
ø¤º°`°º¤ø
ø¤º°`°º¤ø
ø¤º°`°ºø¤
ø¤º°`°º¤ø
ø¤º°`°º¤ø
ø¤º°`°º¤ø
ø¤º°`°º¤ø
ø¤º°`
From the
Abs at
wildlandfire.com |
| 12/25 |
Ab and All! Praying for a safe and wonderful holiday season for
all...and may 2008
be a better year for us all!
MERRY CHRISTMAS EVERYONE!
Tom Stein |
| 12/24 |
Merry Christmas! "I'm
Dreaming" (swf file)
Click "Play" in the middle.
To further get in the snow mood... if you have DSL or highspeed
internet
Let It Snow.pps (2627K pps file, large download file if
you have dsl)
Ab. |
12/24 |
Best Wishes from the Ghost of Fire Seasons Past
(by an anonymous theysaid contributor)
May the season be a long one with lots of good starts
To see if our crew are men of good heart
May your fires be many and a challenge to fight
May your backfires be successful and easy to light.
May your rations be fresh ones, with spaghetti and cheese
And your crew be strong and not hard to please.
May your firelines be wide and not too steep
And none in the canyons or up on the peak.
May your hoselays progress without broken line
And your pump keep running along just fine.
May your boots be comfy, a nice roomy fit
May your butt stay dry, not chapping a bit
May your saws keep running all through the shift
And the copters in time to change the shiftMay the firecamp keep feeding
those big juicy steaks
And lot of OT for Christmas you’ll make
May the relief crew always show up on time
For you and your bunch to get off the line
May the night shift be rested and ready to hold
All that line you’ve been pushing since daylight unfold.
May the generator be shut down at 0 early time
So you and your crew can sleep just fine
May your sack lunches be fresh ones, not from days past
With 3 big sandwiches, all day to last ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Best wishes to you Ab, to Original Ab and the hotlist mods at Wildlandfire.com.
Normbc9 Nice poem, unnamed firefighter. Thanks, Normbc9; happy holidays to all of you as well. Ab. |
| 12/24 |
Merry Christmas and THANKS to Federal Dispatchers everywhere. Special
thanks to those working today, tonight and tomorrow in our 24 hour Federal
Dispatch Centers.
For the State, County and Local Dispatch Offices, we and our families
appreciate you being there for us 24/7/365. Have a peaceful Christmas Eve
and morning.... THANKS!ms
So. Cal Forest 24/7/365 Dispatch Centers........
CNF
|
Open Incidents (Prepared 12/24/2007 09:56)
|
| Date |
Inc # |
Name |
Type |
Location |
Comment |
|
12/24/2007 03:40 |
CNF-3209
P5DZ83 0502 |
HILLS |
Vegetation Fire |
3869 Pine Hills Road X Lazy Jays |
P5DZ83 0502 |
BDF
|
Open Incidents (Prepared 12/24/2007 09:53)
|
| Date |
Inc # |
Name |
Type |
Location |
Comment |
|
12/24/2007 07:10 |
CDD-14484 |
TC/MANNY/4R15 |
Traffic Collision |
TOWNE PASS |
. |
ANF
|
Open Incidents (Prepared 12/24/2007 09:52)
|
| Date |
Inc # |
Name |
Type |
Location |
Comment |
|
12/24/2007 09:48 |
ANF-5148 |
Big
Pines |
Miscellaneous |
Big
Pines Station, |
. |
|
12/24/2007 09:43 |
NPS-802 |
Barking Dog |
Miscellaneous |
Paramount Ranch @West end of the Park |
. |
|
12/24/2007 00:12 |
ANF-5147 |
Daily Status |
Miscellaneous |
. |
. |
|
| 12/24 |
Wind watches and perhaps warnings in socal. Luckily recent rains will
probably keep the fire risk low.
HOTLIST
Thanks to those maintaining situational awareness. Ab. |
| 12/24 |
In response to Normbc9
Sir, sorry for your losses on the Inaja; that had to have been a real b-t--
to try and get a grip on. That is some rough country there. You sure must
have a wealth of knowledge about fire in San Diego Co. You must be a very
well seasoned fire dog.
You are absolutely right about the City of San Diego; just like New Orleans.
Want someone else to bail them out but want to be the "Big Guy" when it
comes to running a county department. Obviously you live in SD and know
there are a lot of good departments/organizations here. I have a saying
going back at least 25 years that "San Diego is the Biggest, Little Hick
Town in the country".
I think that the best way to get an effective fire service for the rural
areas, if they can agree to it; is have all the little rural departments
become schedule "A" and the county add the number of additional stations and
units they feel appropriate. Leave the cities the way they are, unless they
want to join. I do not believe San Diego county can run an effective county
wide department. It needs to come from CDF; a chief with a proven track
record.
Leave Ramona, Valley Center and North County (actually is it not Deer
Springs?) as they are; Schedule "A" still under the overall CDF umbrella.
They are not broken or dysfunctional outfits, don't need fixing. How to
integrate "Heartland" might be an issue. (Might be where some of the turf
wars originate also.) (Heartland is a Joint Powers Authority to run an ECC.)
They actually have an effective integration of the paid departments; I think
is gets a little dysfunctional that they also deal with Palomar Mountain and
a lot of the departments further out east of Ramona. The volunteer
departments work their hearts out on their job. The VFDs are dealing with a
dispatch center that really is for the smaller East county cities. Back up
for all of the VFDs is CDF/USFS or the Reservation Departments, all of which
are under control of MonteVista ECC. (Except for Barona Reservation which
uses Heartland, in spite of the Ramona FD being the primary back up for
them.)
Heartland is sometimes is a little slow to notify MVU ECC when they tell
units a CDF engine is also responding. There are some MVU engines that know
what VFD calls they will go on and they roll when those calls get
dispatched. They tell MVU ECC they are rolling long before MVU knows they
are supposed to go.
Now when it is CDF/CNF rolling together you can sometimes hear the other
being dispatched, in the background. (You can tell I listen to the scanners
too much.)
For those not familiar, MonteVista ECC is the center for CDF MVU and
Schedule "A" departments, CNF, BIA, some BLM and FWS and some small rural
departments in the south east part of the county.
Normbc9; some day it will get straightened out. You have a wonderful
Christmas and a Happy New Year; and the same to all the TheySaid readers out
there.
ht |
| 12/24 |
Flying: There is all this talk about flying at night when the aircraft
shouldn't even be
flying in those conditions even during during the daylight. The wind was 50+
mph and the drops couldn't be supported by ground troops.
DE |
| 12/24 |
SoCal Firestorms: Inaja in 1956 and this year 2007... Ab,
I, along with CDF engines from Witch Creek and Ramona in unison with CNF
engines from Barona, Henshaw and Pine Hills were the IA force on the 1956
Inaja fire. It, too, occurred during some very extreme east wind conditions.
We all worked our hearts out to try to get some kind of a foot hold on that
fire, but it just simply got up at the tops of the brush on the north side
(south facing exposure) and ran from Eagle Peak Road west to the Dye Canyon
and Barona Truck Trails in about twenty minutes (five miles) and the smoke
column never reached up skyward. It was all horizontal smoke stream down
canyon following the San Diego Riverbed.
In the next hour there were at least 25 engines, four dozers and fifteen
hand crews on scene and assigned. Those were the days before aircraft. On
the second day, two aerial N3-N’s were brought down from Oroville for an
experiment. The final fire tally was, unfortunately, that several brave
firefighters being supervised by USFS Descanso District personnel died in
the San Diego River canyon. A wind shift caught them by surprise. Both fire
agencies were at the maximum effort and even found themselves defending
their respective Base camps from the fire. We all spent our Thanksgiving
still assigned to the fire, but all were mourning the loss of fellow
professionals.
The recriminations in the media began immediately and rumor after rumor
passed on the radio talk shows. Accusations ran amok. The firefighters who
were in the middle of the firefight knew what the truth was, but every time
they tried to speak out some agency attorney or manager tried to prevent the
stories from getting out. The same happened in 1970, 1992, 2003 and now
2007. In my opinion, what is the real truth is in the indifference in the
governmental bodies of San Diego City and County. Both remind me of what I
hear about the New Orleans situation. They want someone else to bail them
out.
I can however identify with what retired San Diego City Fire Chief Jeff
Bowman is saying. He was one of those guiding lights the fire service was
counting on to help identify the problems that were the task of the Blue
Ribbon Commission to ferret out. The job that group performed and the
results of their work are legend, in my book. Look at the record. L.A.
County went to work, implemented most of the recommendations, and the 2007
wild fire records will bear out. Considering the structures exposed, their
loses were much less than the governments who tried to do this on the cheap.
And yes, Chief Bowman is correct. Cal Fire’s top leadership is now
compromised by politics. Look at the news clips. Who was following the
governor to every fire (Grijalva and the Resources Secretary) who were the
window dressing the governor so desperately needed. The relaxation of the
fire resources in this state were initiated on the order of the governor.
Just days before the fire siege. When trouble hit, all were pretty much
caught by surprise with the exception of the counties of Los Angeles,
Ventura and Santa Barbara.
Make no mistake about it, if it wasn’t for the CDF Firefighters and the
FWFSA, both parent agencies at the top are led by ineffective managers and
they'd be totally paralyzed, if it wasn’t for the labor groups asking some
questions and demanding some answers. Don’t let anyone mislead you saying
that there are better circumstances in Cal Fire. Cal Fire does have very
effective Unit Chiefs, but these are offset by some indecisive leaders
further up the chain. If it wasn’t for the presence of many Schedule A
contract funded personnel, Cal Fire would be in the same or near same
position the USFS is in the Fire Control groups.
Normbc9 |
| 12/24 |
Here's a link to info on the PCADS system.
www.defensetech.org/archives/003783.html
Mid West Fire Guy |
| 12/24 |
RE: the current fed COLA's...
For those of you not yet retired... check out how well our fine Congress
treats retired feds... for those under CSRS... 2.3% ... same as Social
Security which is the lowest in recent years...
www.washingtonpost.com
Certainly food for thought for those on the "stay or go" fence...
--
retired green yactak |
| 12/23 |
I am fascinated, although not necessarily surprised to read the critical
commentary from folks to the San Diego media about Cal-Fire's role,
responses, policies during the recent fire siege.
The fascinating thing is that those who are named as the most critical in
the media were at the recent hearings in San Diego held by Senator
Feinstein's Interior Appropriations Subcommittee and were on witness panels
that provided them an opportunity to offer their comments in a forum that
might have actually done some good...not wait weeks later and nail Cal-Fire
or the federal response in the media.
If you've got something to say, say it when it counts. Don't wait for the
media to contact you for a sound bite.
Having taken an engine company to the Oakland Hills fire years ago and seen
the stunning action of wildfires, there is no way in heck I am going to
second guess the responses of either Cal-Fire or federal agencies on these
fires.
The hearings were the perfect opportunity for the San Diego Fire Chief to
address Cal-Fire's no-night flying policy. She remained silent on the
matter. And with a great deal of respect for former Chief Bowman who, for
the most part "said it like it is" at the hearings, he failed to offer his
assessment then that San Diego should "get rid of Cal-Fire."
Perhaps if these opinions were offered at the hearings, substantive efforts
in resolving some of the issues could have been made. Instead it is in the
press and will only serve to fester any ill-will between these agencies.
So while my heart & soul lies with federal wildland firefighters, I think we
should be fair to all those that did their best during stunningly difficult
times in Southern California and elsewhere this year.
So with that, Best wishes to everyone for a wonderful holiday season and an
even better 2008.
Casey |
| 12/23 |
from the
hotlist forum on the criticism of the 2007 firestorm response: More of
the same from Jarman, the city, and the local politicians. I think it's
interesting to read the responses from the public. They get it! A lack of
control, interoperability, and very poor brush management in the WUI is the
key. Not spotters and night flying helicopters. Look at LA, they had ample
resources and night flying helicopters but homes are still lost. Just like
every major fire in the WUI. As long as San Diego still has inept leaders
there problems will never be solved.
CDFFF |
| 12/23 |
from james on the
hotlist forum on the criticism of the 2007 firestorm response: CDF is
really taking a beating down in San Diego. Any of us who were there know who
was doing what and it was not the departments in the article below. We need
to support our brothers and sisters and start writing some letters and make
some phone calls. The people of San Diego are going to get screwed if the
city fire department takes control of wildland fires there. The citizens are
not being served.
Please write......
To be considered for publication, a letter must include a daytime phone
number and, if faxed or mailed, be signed. It may be sent to Letters Editor,
The San Diego Union-Tribune, Post Office Box 120191, San Diego, CA
92112-0191, faxed to (619) 260-5081 or
e-mailed to letters@uniontrib.com |
| 12/23 |
thread on the hotlist forum, on the criticism of the 2007 firestorm
response: Cal Fire drawing heated criticism over policies
www.signonsandiego.com/news/m...23calfire.html
Experts cite agency's rigid approach to job
By Tony Manolatos Mark Sauer and Jeff McDonald
Union-Tribune Staff Writers
December 23, 2007
The call from Cal Fire came at 10:19 p.m.: Could Copter 1 rescue a man who
had fallen off an ATV on a steep slope near Barrett Lake?
Sixty minutes later, the San Diego Fire-Rescue Department helicopter was
hovering above a dark ravine in East County, battling gusting winds as the
crew hoisted the 300-pound victim to safety.
The city firefighters understood precisely what was expected of them that
night in August. As the only helicopter crew in San Diego County equipped to
fly after dark, they answer such calls about 50 times a year.
What they can't understand, however, is why Cal Fire asks them to fly at
night to rescue people but says it's too risky for them from to fly at night
to drop water on wildfires, a far-less-dangerous job.
Fire experts say Cal Fire's ban on night flying is just one example of the
rigid structure that defines the state firefighting agency, which is
responsible for controlling most major wildfires.
Interviews with more than a dozen fire officials and politicians reveal a
growing concern that Cal Fire's approach to firefighting made it harder to
protect homes and save lives during the October wildfires in Southern
California, even though the agency had been told to correct similar problems
that surfaced during the 2003 fires.
Many of them said Cal Fire has become a politicized bureaucracy, saddled
with a tight budget, layers of questionable policies and less influence in
most of the state's largest counties.
These increasingly vocal critics say wholesale changes are needed.
Some are calling for new leadership. Others want a fresh approach to
firefighting that employs the best strategies from departments across
California. All agree on one thing: To prepare Southern California for
future firestorms, Cal Fire needs more resources, more accountability and
fewer restrictions, particularly when it comes to night flying and deploying
military aircraft.
Some suggest that San Diego County – which lost more homes than any other
county in October – would be better served with a unified firefighting
approach that relegates Cal Fire to a supporting role, instead of allowing
it to direct the fight. Six other California counties have taken that step.
The county Board of Supervisors already is considering buying 50 fire
engines to offset the lack of state resources. And the city of San Diego is
trying to find money to buy a second firefighting helicopter, partly because
Copter 1 was the only helicopter flying over the city for the first two days
of the fires, when 365 homes burned in Rancho Bernardo.
San Diego Fire Chief Tracy Jarman said her department needs “immediate
access and control of air resources to respond immediately to work with
crews on the ground.”
Frustrated by the state's lack of support, she has already told her staff to
begin negotiating with the Navy for the use of its helicopters during future
wildfires. That way, the city could bypass Cal Fire rules that limited the
use of military aircraft during the last two firestorms.
The Navy copters are equipped with the same night-vision technology used on
Copter 1 and on helicopters used by the Los Angeles city and county fire
departments.
Jarman says it's easier to fight fires from the sky after dark, because the
winds are usually calmer and night-vision goggles in effect light up the
ground below like a video game.
But Cal Fire, whose pilots don't have the new technology, says safety is the
issue.
Former San Diego Fire Chief Jeff Bowman, who was in charge during the 2003
Cedar fire, thinks city and county leaders should simply “get rid of Cal
Fire.”
“I'm not knocking the firefighters of Cal Fire. I'm knocking the structure
and how it's managed,” Bowman said. “I truly believe their leadership –
there isn't any. It's all politics.”
But expecting lawmakers and the 65 fire departments within San Diego
County's 18 cities and rural areas to support a unified plan is like
expecting to win the lottery. The idea has been discussed for years, but
turf battles inevitably rise, leaving San Diego County one of the largest
and most populous in the nation without its own regional fire department.
Even the counties that rely on Cal Fire only for backup are demanding more
from the state agency the next time around. (to read the rest, click the
link at the top)
WLF.com Fair Use Disclaimer |
| 12/23 |
Making the hotshot rounds... Subject: ASC-HCM, Interagency
Hotshot Crew Permanent Positions
Good Morning,
I just spoke to Lynda Kinney at ASC-HCM and the influx of e-mails and phone
calls about the status of current permanent IHC positions is overwhelming
them.
During January, a meeting will take place at ASC with classifiers and HCM
personnel to discuss and attempt to resolve the following:
- Career ladder positions with in the IHC organization
- Open continuous announcements for all IHC positions
- Position description standardization across the country
- The use of the GS-7 vs GS-6 Squad Leader Position Description
I have requested that a least one representative of the IHC organization
attend to answer questions on crew configurations across the country and any
other pertinent questions that the classifiers may have.
I realize everyone is pushing to get positions filled before the upcoming
fire season, however until that meeting very little will be resolved through
continuing phone calls and e-mails except to delay other work ASC is doing.
A nation-wide approach is in our best interest and really the only way this
will get resolved since HCM has been consolidated in Albuquerque. If you
were to do anything it would be that your Regional Fire Director and Line
Officers understand and approve the use of a GS-7 Squad Leader position
description. It will be up to the classifiers of the PD that might be used
in conjunction with development of a career ladder.
Please forward this request to limit the contact until after the meeting to
the crews you represent.
I will advise you of the representative when attendance is approved.
If you have questions call. Thanks for your time.
<snip name>
<snip IHC supt affiliation>
Region 3 |
| 12/23 |
Sent in by Firescribe, FYI: Federal Pay Raise, Part Two
12/21/07 02:00
Thanks to last-minute action by Congress, white collar feds will get a
bigger January raise than the 3 percent hike authorized by President Bush.
Last month, the OPM published pay tables (which we also carried) showing the
impact of the raise after city-by-city locality differentials were figured
in. We told you at the time that the chart was accurate but that it wasn't
necessarily the final word. The issue was whether Congress would pass an
Omnibus spending bill that included the higher (3.5 percent) raise, and, if
it did, if the President would sign it.
Bottom line: They did and he will!
The pay raise goes into effect with the first pay period beginning on or
after January 1, 2008. For about-to-retire feds, most of their unused annual
leave will be paid at the new, higher 2008 rates.
Under the original White House plan, the largest concentration of federal
workers (those in the Washington-Baltimore area) would have gotten a 2.49
percent increase in January. But once the Omnibus bill is signed into law
and after locality pay is factored in, most of those 300,000 feds will get a
3.49 percent raise. That extra percentage point will also boost the value of
their life insurance, their eventual retirement annuity and the value of
their annual leave.
The new pay tables will be posted on the OPM website soon.
Meantime, here's an estimate of what the raises will be for selected cities:
Chicago, 3.65 percent... Dallas-Ft. Worth, 3.72 percent... Huntsville, 3.07
percent... Los Angeles, Sacramento and Seattle, 3.5 percent... San
Francisco, 4.23 percent... San Diego, 3.91 percent... San Diego, 3.9... New
York City, 3.97 percent... and Richmond, 3.39 percent.
Feds who are in what is called RUS (which stands for Rest-of-U.S.) will get
an estimated 2.99 percent.
The Nearly Useless Factoid
Today, it's completely useless for those who follow The Federal Drive, but
in case you missed it, someone has actually gone to the trouble to list the
Top Ten Worst Christmas Cracker Jokes Ever and the London Daily Telegraph
has gone ever further by publishing the list. If pushed, we could probably
explain what a "cracker" is (according to Brits), but we'd be hard pressed
to explain British humour. They did say these are the worst. Enjoy!
To reach me: mcausey@federalnewsradio.com
www.federalnewsradio.com/index.php?nid=7
WLF.com Fair Use Disclaimer |
| 12/22 |
Yesterday's Mail: Our office received an envelope from our Zone
dispatch yesterday addressed
to "California Fire Fighters". In the envelope was a note and drawing from a
grade school student in California saying thank you for helping put out the
fires.
Our thanks to all in the dispatch chain that got this note to us. Glad we
could
help and ready to do it again if there is ever a need.
Seasons greetings.
Midwest Fire Guy |
| 12/22 |
Thanks to Casey for his words of support and the help, encouragement,
and information he's offered over the years.
FWFSA member, I've said it before and I'll say it again: NFFE and FWFSA are
not competitors. We are two organizations committed to advancing your
interests. I know Casey busts his butt to this end. So do I and others who
have chosen to serve as union officials. There should never be a "credit"
battle -- both NFFE and FWFSA are pushing in the same direction.
For example, let me quote from a 6/15/07 post by Casey:
I am pleased to report that the Federal Wildland Fire Service
Association's efforts, along with those of the National Federation of
Federal Employees (NFFE), specifically Mark Davis, to educate Congress
on the "unintended consequences" of PL 107-203 has resulted in
legislation being introduced today by Sen's Cantwell (D-WA), Bingaman
(D-NM) & Domenici (R-NM) that would expand coverage of those eligible
for reimbursement of 50% of any liability insurance premiums.
And this from a 6/28/07 post from me:
We were also encouraged to see the liability insurance co-pay in the
Senate bill. We worked hard to push this and I know Casey (a good man to
have on your side!) did as well. We will continue to work with Congress
to clarify the scope of this provision and encourage its passage into
law. This is only a band-aide on the liability issue; we will also
continue to work on building a statutory "privilege" firewall around
information obtained by a safety investigation.
To FWFSA and NFFE member, right on. We are both member-sponsored
organizations whose effectiveness depends upon the support of our members. I
will never encourage a federal firefighter to chose one organization over
another. I have too much respect for Casey's work. Membership in both is
great. But if you can only join one, for goodness sake flip a coin and join
one. The problem is not NFFE "winning" members at FWFSA's expense, or vice
versa. The problem is those who benefit from the work of both organizations
but support neither. Get in the game, folks! We're winning some major
battles here. But there's more work to be done. To take it to the next
level, we need your support. NFFE and FWFSA.
Finally, a clarification: while the original language stopped coverage at
the ICT3, DIVS level -- the new language in the bill extends coverage all
the way down to an ICT5, single resource boss, squad boss, and others who
were originally left out. The word document in my 12/20 post give more
details.
I'll get back with an update on the competitive sourcing language later, but
for now I'm going to get back to enjoying the holidays with my family. Merry
Christmas to all.
Mark Davis, Chair
NFFE Forest Service Council Legislative Committee
Thanks Mark. Ab. |
| 12/22 |
Ab,
On a lighter note... Got my (your) calendar. A work of art, very nice.
Thank you much.contractor
PS. Just got in from a 14 hour shift plowing snow on I-90 for MDT.
(Montana Department of Transportation) Might plow on Christmas also,
Ho,Ho,Ho.
Glad you like it. We do too. Happy holidays. Ab. |
| 12/22 |
Ab, I guess you allow for postings like Johnivan's because it promotes
free expression (which is a good thing) and allows one to learn something.
Hopefully some fellow feds, much smarter than I will teach Johnivan a few
things over the next few days. My thoughts....
Forget about FMAG or F this or F that, and try to understand how the
mutual aid system works. We as a whole would lose at a minimum 25%
effectiveness w/o CAL FIRE, COUNTY FIRE, LOCAL FIRE and FED FIRE working
together on each other's fires and other emergencies. The people of this
state or any other state expect cooperation and understand cooperation has a
price.
More important than that, is that it always astounds me to hear firefighters
calling out other firefighters. You can expect that from Lawyers,
Stockbrokers and Politicians, but Firefighters, common Johnboy! I'm Forest
Service and will be a Forest Service Firefighter my whole career. However, I
wouldn't lose much sleep or respect for a fire agency because they wouldn't
pay to fix my ride. My concern was that it was fixed quickly and correctly.
You said:
I just heard CDF, oh sorry CAL FIRE. Cut with the cutesy crap please,
that's embarrassing.
You said:
I lost a lot of respect for CDF. You lost a lot of respect because
someone made a decision not to pay for a vehicle repair? Did you ever
think that maybe a Fed Agency Rep made that decision?
YOUR ANSWER:
www.fs.fed.us/r5/fire/cooperators/rev03_ca_fire_assist_agrmt_2002-2006.pdf
This agreement has been extended through the end of 2007.
Governor's Office of Emergency Services, hereinafter referred to as
State OES; the USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region; the State
of California, Department of Forestry and Fire Protection; the USDI Bureau
of Land Management, California State Office; the USDI National Park Service,
Pacific West Region, and USDI Fish and Wildlife Service, California –Nevada
Operations, the latter five parties hereinafter referred to as Forest
Agencies
A-17. State OES assumes the normal cost of repair or damage to State OES-owned
apparatus, which may result from use under the terms of this agreement.
A-16. State OES shall assume operational costs, including necessary motor
fuels and lubricants used in State-owned OES apparatus while responding to
and returning from Forest Agency incidents.
A-21. Forest Agencies* will provide for motor fuel and lubricants, normal
servicing costs, and minor repairs incidental to operation of apparatus
including local jurisdiction support equipment while under direction and
control of the requesting Forest Agency. Minor Repair is defined as any
repair necessary to keep the equipment in operation on the fire, which
requires not more than two hours (labor time only) for one mechanic for any
one job, exclusive of obtaining parts.
COST OF APPARATUS AND EQUIPMENT LOSS OR DAMAGE
23. A Forest Agency may reimburse a local agency for the cost of apparatus
or equipment loss or damage where the loss or damage is directly caused by
the fire being suppressed, and where the local agency, its employees and/or
operational failures in the apparatus or support equipment are not a
contributing factor to such damage or loss. Loss or damage to local agency
apparatus or support equipment while enroute to or from an incident and
repairs due to normal wear and tear or due to negligent or unlawful
operation by the operator shall be the responsibility of the local agency
providing the apparatus or equipment.
24. Loss or damage to local agency apparatus or support equipment occurring
on an incident is to be reported to the incident finance section to ensure
proper documentation and investigation.
25. If post incident help is needed for cost reimbursement, contact the
appropriate Forest Agency, listed below:
Finally, the So Cal fire siege was a federal disaster that caused the
largest evac in Ca history. As a Fed and Ca taxpayer, I expect the Fed gov
to support state, local and Fed departments. Why? Remember the fire agencies
who may receive federal funds, may also be the same dept that is tasked with
saving lives. We all have moms and dads, grandparents or kids. I want and
will pay for a strong well-staffed fire dept in my community that is not
burdened with paying for a federal disaster(s).
Good Grief, go vent somewhere else, because comments like yours are not
something the overwhelming majority of readers in this forum find
acceptable.
ms
Italics above are not Ab's. <tongue firmly in cheek> |
| 12/21 |
While a success story locally, the story wasn't put to the ultimate
test. or of its designed purpose by those who analyised it..
Repeat the test and collaborate the findings under Jun-Jul fire and weather
conditions...... That is the test of fuel treatment effectiveness in most of
Region 3.
I'd bet different results would have been achieved under a different set of
known and established variables.
Supervisory Fuels Technician |
| 12/21 |
Johnivan:
Maybe a bit strong on the words you used but if it looks like an FMAG (Fire
Management Assistance Grant), smells like an FMAG and costs the federal
taxpayer like an FMAG... then its an FMAG.
Apparently the LA Times doesn't know what an FMAG is or the details behind
them. Maybe someone should educate them. Perhaps if they did, they could ask
Cal-Fire why the need for federal reimbursement for a service state tax
payers apparently think they are paying for and why should federal taxpayers
across the country pay the freight with their tax dollars to bail out
California state and municipal fire agencies.
Heck someone should ask the LA Times, or FEMA or Cal-Fire why all those
federal dollars aren't going to help retain federal firefighters and instead
are going to help "reimburse" agencies for their better salaried
firefighters.
Why should a firefighter in some other part of the country have his/her
federal tax dollars go to pay salaries of other firefighters for doing the
same job?
My crystal ball shows me a response from <¿Santa Claus?> in the near
future.
Fedwatcher IIThe italics are entirely the contribution of Ab who seems
to have lost his tongue in his cheek! Cheers, Fedwatcher II! |
| 12/21 |
Hi Joe,
I have been using
Beyond Tranquillon Ridge as one of the primary text books in my
Firefighter Safety and Survival class since it was published in 2004.
Outstanding research and thank you for not making the text a political
attack against any of the federal, state or local government fire agencies.
Beyond Tranquillon Ridge provides a platform for students to analyze
“where we were back when, to where we are now.”
When combined with case studies, selected readings, presentations from burn
survivors and entrapment crew members, and the reading of Deep Survival,
Beyond Tranquillon Ridge has allowed my students to see that safety is
much more that a “green vs.. red,” “command vs.. the line,” or any of the
other “us vs.. them” issues. As I read this semester’s final exams it
heartens me to see that many of my students are able to see past the
“mistakes” and concentrate on the human factors of each fire.
Thanks,
FOBS 73 |
| 12/21 |
Mike Johns, nice job! It's nice to have that good fuel treatments burn
example all in one place.
Should be on the hotlist too so it easily can be found with a search.
Everyone,
Whoooooo Hoooooooo, it's winter solstice! We're doing our annual
"Burning Old Man Winter" bonfire!
Happy holidays to all!
Mellie |
| 12/21 |
To all you FWFSA Members writing in about NFFE...
Mark Davis is 'THE' man when it comes to FS outsourcing and
efforts to keep the Forest Service from encroaching on fire and related
occupations.
Yea the FWFSA worked with many of the same congressional folks as did Mark
and NFFE but he truly deserves all the credit. He and I spoke on many
occasions sharing info etc but he truly did the bulk of the work.
To the member who wrote that the FWFSA does not have political ties or
agendas...better give me a call!!!
The important thing to remember is that NFFE as a labor union is bound by
labor-management rules under Title 5 of the United States Code. The FWFSA,
as an employee association is not bound by such rules. Thus, I would like to
think that both organizations compliment each other with respect to our
overall efforts on behalf of federal wildland firefighters.
Granted my relationship with NFFE leadership is primarily in R5 although
Mark Davis is far from R5.
So, whether its the liability issue, outsourcing or even the current nutty
housing policy offered up by the Deputy Forest Supervisor on the Los Padres,
NFFE has their job to do, we have ours but if there is an opportunity to
work together collectively we will.
Casey Judd
Business Manager
FWFSAHeh, wondered if that post would get you using dialup.... Ab. |
| 12/21 |
Here is the link I read about cdf getting the money.
www.dailynews.com/ci_7780371?source=rss I also wanted to say that I do
respect all fellow firefighters.
I was just venting. Johnivan |
| 12/21 |
Johnivan, I am sensing a little frustration and hostility my friend.
Let's try
to set the record straight.
A. You "heard" we were going to receive 41 million dollars. I
for one have "heard" a lot of things. Most of which if you
have been in this business long enough, know turn out to
be complete B.S. So when we actually get some money.
Then let's talk.
B. Cal Fire will pay for damages if they are related to the
to the incident. I have no idea what this issue
was with your engine. However it may well have initially
looked to be incident related. Once we find out through
mechanical troubleshooting that it may not have been
incident related, then we will not pay for the repair.
C. If the engine operator or the Forest your engine belongs
too. Believes they are getting the shaft. Then it goes to
the USFS Agency Rep assigned to the incident.
They will negotiate the issue with the I.C. or Dep. I.C. of the
Incident Command Team responsible for the incident.
Johnivan, I am sorry we have lost your respect. This is unfortunate.
Fortunately
for us, we have the respect of many others.
Cal Fire Jake |
| 12/21 |
Hello all
I just heard CDF, oh sorry CAL FIRE, is going to receive around 41
million from US grants and OES. I am a federal firefighter. I was on the
Harris fire, when the engine I was on broke down. At first CDF said they
would pay for repairs, but when all said and done they didn't pay for cr*p.
I am so glad that they are going to get all this money for fighting the
fires but can't pay for an engine that broke on their fire. I lost a lot of
respect for CDF.
I am staying with the federal service I am not going to jump ship.
Johnivan
I don't know what the rules and SOPs and channels are for paying for
things like broken engines. Anyone know? Anyone want to fill us in? Ab. |
| 12/21 |
To Theysaiders:
I am so grateful for They Said – it is used widely. As readers, I would like
you, through this next year, to support the companies that pay for ads here
on wildlandfire.com, so that this site can support all of us. Let the
companies know, when making your purchases, that you saw their ad on They
Said.
We're sending the wildland community a wonderful, warm wish for the holidays
and we've toasted to all of you from our bottle of Jaeger Meister that's
been in the freezer since Family Day in May. Really warm wishes and a Happy
New Year.
Cheers! (hiccup....)
Vicki, Burk, Melissa, and Candace
Wildland Firefighter FoundationThanks Vicki.
Readers, with respect to Professional Liability Insurance, don't
forget the FEDS offer of
six
months free when you make the switch by the end of the 2007 year. Tony
and crew were the ones that Wright called on to do the work for those on
Cramer and 30Mile. That legal brain power is working for all of us now
through FEDS. Browse their website. Make a change.
Our wildlandfire.com calendars are pretty neat too. (Link and
discount code at the top left of this page.) Ab. |
| 12/21 | The
Jobs
page Wildland Firefighter Series
0462 (Forestry Technician) &
Series
0455 (Range Technician) &
Series
0401 (Biologist) have been updated. Ab. |
| 12/21 |
Hi Ab,
Christmas Eve fundraiser for WFF - Peets Coffee in Orange County CA:
Peets will be giving free drip coffee & tea and collecting donations for the
WFF at 3 stores on Dec 24 from 7 a.m. to 5 p.m. closing. I urge everyone in
the area to stop in for a free cup of coffee and drop some cash in the jar.
Peets will match the donations up to $1000.00.
Peets in the Corona Del Mar Plaza in Newport Beach will be collecting for
the Santa's Helper Fund. My son will be at the Newport Beach store to
encourage donations and answer questions about the foundation and wildland
firefighting.
Peets in the Tustin Marketplace and Peets on El Toro Rd. in Lake Forest
will both be collecting for the WFF General Fund.
Please stop in and drop some money in the donation jar for our
Wildland Firefighter
Foundation that does so much for everyone in wildland fire. We (family,
friends & public) need to step up and support our heroes in any way we can
and donating to the WFF is a great way to do so.
Annette |
| 12/21 |
This came in from Arizona quite a while back. I've finished making
a photo page for it and linking the appropriate docs. It's a good story
of how fuel treatments and fuel breaks should and do work and is applicable
to many situations on our ever-growing interface. Our thanks to Mike Johns,
who many of you will recognize as contributing here before. Ab. Abs: I am an Assistant U.S.
Attorney who teaches a Fire Law course, and a former wildland firefighter.
November 2005 we completed much of the pile and broadcast burning on my private
land and the adjacent Forest, Payson Ranger District, under an MOU. Ice cold
night winds falling off the Mogollon Rim added some excitement, but it was very
successful in reducing dead fuels which were 30 tons per acre in places. The
fire environment is the same as the Dude Fire, but better in November than in June. Many
firefighters are familiar with my place from other fires as well, Kehl Ridge,
Bray, December, Packrat and Webber.
Burning started 10 feet from
my Ranch House with the Globe Inmate Crew assisting. They had no hot food for
next breakfast, or shelter when I arrived, and were going to bed down outside. I
opened up the Ranch House and Bunk House and made sure everyone had a bed or a
couch or a cot, and hot water then went back to town for snacks and breakfast
food. One of the inmates was an early riser and cook so I had him get me up
early from my couch near the fire and we cooked up a huge breakfast. The Navajo
Scouts replaced the Globe crew and I had a chance to visit with them as well,
many of whom had been on the Dude Fire.
So far, this thinning and
burning project has been a major success considering my 25 acres surrounded by
Forest in a box canyon under the Rim had been at serious risk for a catastrophic
and dangerous situation. Thanks are due the Forest Service, the Arizona State
Land Department and the firefighters who have worked so diligently to complete
this project. Here are some photos of the burning operations.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
After we completed this prescribed fire in November, 2005, in February
2006 a campfire blew off the Mogollon Rim and raced toward the Ranchhouse as
a crown fire until it reached the fuel break. The treatment done by us, the
State Land Department and the Forest Service made it safe enough for
firefighters to work and saved the historic structures and orchards. The
February Fire eventually burned over 4,000 acres around us. You should link
to the attached paper which received National/Congressional attention as one
of the success stories of fuel treatments under the National Fire Plan. Mike
Johns
Here's a 1472K pdf file of maps, etc:
Bray Creek Ranch Rx treatment
This is a 60K msword doc that will download if you click this link:
fuel treatment February Fire (60K doc file) |
| 12/21 |
Got some new logos up on the
Logo 13 photo page. Ab.
Messages follow:
I know you don't get many Dispatch logos, but I completed this one for
Central Idaho Interagency Coordination Center last year.
Tim B.
Here is the logo for La Cima Conservation Camp (Julian, CA).
MVU La Cima CCC |
| 12/21 |
FWFSA Member:
As a member of both organizations I believe that they are both important,
many times people (especially fire) get frustrated with NFFE, but we need to
remember that they have done a lot of good and continue to do good for the
WHOLE FS. Personally, no matter who worked on the bill it is a step in the
right direction but does fall a little short still: as an ENGB, ICT 4 type
you are not covered it stops at the ICT 3, DIVS level. There are many
decisions at the ENGB or CRWB level that are made and I feel you should be
covered, look at Ellreese Daniels.
FWFSA and NFFE Member |
| 12/21 |
Mark Davis,
Unlike many in the USFS "leadership", the partnership of the FWFSA is an
employee association without political ties or agendas and completely
spanning the GS-2 through GS-15 levels who led the way to changes..... with
collaboration of the NFFE Partnership Council assisting as they could....
Not the other way around.
Who takes the credit for changes doesn't really matter in the long term. If
NFFE or the R5 Partnership Council wants to take credit, please do so.....
and follow through. What matters is the change.
It has been a foundational difference between Unions and Employee
Associations. Unlike many Unions, the leadership and management of many who
have dedicated their lives and careers upon the communication between the
FWFSA members of all levels..... GS-2 to GS-15.
We won't play games with issues. We are the issues. It is personal to us at
all levels.
FWFSA memberThanks to both groups for doing what you do. There are
other shops within the FS that are watching the bill carefully. In addition
to liability, the whole outsourcing process is very time and money
consuming. Ab. |
| 12/21 |
Joe,
Best of retirement to you.
Beyond Tranquillon Ridge was a great book to read and remember the
losses and the horrible tragedy from first hand accounts, but I remember
the stories best when you described them to us personally over a few
cold ones a few years ago.
We never knew....
Lobotomy |
| 12/20 |
Ab asked...
Readers, here's a pic of the '06 Lakeview Fuels Crew on Handcrews 22.
Does anyone know if this is Lakeview, Oregon? Is it a state crew or FS
or some other agency crew? Thanks for any info. Ab.
The crew in he picture is BLM crew 7 out of Klamath Falls Oregon
(Lakeview BLM). The info below the picture is pretty accurate. the crew was
funded as a fuels reduction crew. They also had suppression
responsibilities, mostly local, but some of unit stuff. Crew was set up as a
type 2 IA with 1- Superintendent, 1- Foreman, 3- Module leaders (Squaddy),
and the balance crewmembers. I believe they had 10 perms, ranging from PFT
to perm 13/13's, and the rest temps. For equipment, I believe the crew had 4
six packs, multiple atv's, a type 6 engine (NWCG), a type 4 engine (NWCG),
as well as lots of chainsaws. Pretty nice set up. Sadly, I have heard that
the crew was disbanded after the 06 season, although that may not be true.
L-C-E-S |
| 12/20 |
I emailed Cathy F asking for info too. Here's her reply... Boy that
was quick! I added it to the description page. Thanks. Ab. The photo
was the BLM Lakeview District 2006 Fuels Crew located at Klamath Falls,
Oregon. The crew that started in 2000 is one of several funded by the
National Fire Plan - available for suppression but focusing on hard manual
work and lots of prescribed fire. Cathy |
| 12/20 |
lakeview is a blm fuels crew out of Lakeview oregon ND
Thanks, I added the OR info to the description. Ab. |
| 12/20 |
Hey Homey!
I didn't know you were on that fire!
That fire was a first for me in two ways:
It was the first time a fire was so close to the airport that I could see
the
airtankers taxiing in and out of the pit at the tanker base. I told Pecos
Valley
Dispatch I did not need airtanker status because I could see all 6 of them
all of the time.
It was also the only time I was involved in dropping retardant in a river...
the Pecos River. Oooops! We were all very contrite over that one and
learned not to do it again.
NMAirBear |
| 12/20 |
Readers, here's a pic of the '06 Lakeview Fuels Crew on
Handcrews 22. Does anyone know if this is Lakeview, Oregon? Is it a
state crew or FS or some other agency crew? Thanks for any info. Ab. |
| 12/20 |
AB,
These are from the Aztec fire near Roswell, NM in 2000. NMAirBear
was the ATGS on this fire.
Have a great day,
HomeyThanks, Homey, I put them on
AirTankers 24 photo page. Ab. |
| 12/20 |
Ab, here's a pic of a West Texas fire:
Picture of range fire
in Jones County Texas on Jan. 12, 2006. The
truck
belongs to the Anson Volunteer Fire Dept. Anson, Texas.
Picture taken
before the helicopters and planes arrived on the
scene.
Submitted by Shannon H. Middlebrook
Thanks for the engine and flames. I posted it on the
Engines18
photo page. Ab. |
| 12/20 |
Just got a call from Casey who says all internet is down for him in
Idaho and for the
FWFSA. He's taking a "snow day". His phone is working, however.
"Nerve center of the FWFSA"
Casey-snow, but lots more.
Wildlandfire.com was also down this morning for 45 minutes. Those winter
storms can take
their toll. If you can't get through to theysaid, just try again later. OA
and I decided by
phone this morning that it was further indication we should all take a break
and enjoy
our families when opportunities arise. Haw haw, several folks called to ask
if we knew...
I got a call from one groundpounder needing his theysaid fix. He said
he's spending time
at school with his kindergartner. They had so much fun the first day he's
opted for
being there all week! Sounds like one fine alternative.
Have fun, All! Relax... Cheers!
Ab. |
| 12/20 |
Someone did an outstanding Cost Benefit Analysis comparing the paying
of seasonals' unemployment insurance vs. hiring folks as career seasonals.
Does someone have a copy of that somewhere that they could send me?
Thanks,
Fishguy |
| 12/20 |
Hello Ab, Here are a couple of interesting articles from the Lompoc
Record
concerning the 1977 Honda Canyon Fire on Vandenberg Air Force
Base.
Today is the 30 year anniversary and I thought your readers may
want to take a long trip back in time.
www.lompocrecord.com/articles/2007/12/20/news/featurednews/news01.txt
www.lompocrecord.com/articles/2007/11/13/news/featurednews/news01.txt
Here’s wishing you a very Happy Holliday,
Joseph Valencia
Hi Joe, nice articles, but for the full story I think people should
get your book
Beyond Tranquillon Ridge and read it. Here are some good
reviews. I found your book very interesting. Ab. |
| 12/20 |
From Mark Davis, Chair
NFFE Forest Service Council Legislative Committee:To follow up on Casey’s
post of 12/18, maybe I can shed some light on the coverage provided by the
PLI provision in the 2008 omnibus appropriations bill. NFFE has been working
with the Forest Service and Congress on providing broader coverage than was
initially proposed. Here’s the short story.
The original PLI language would have expanded coverage to some, but not all,
fire line supervisors. The original language would have modified the law to
read (changes are in blue)
Word doc of the formatted version (33K) with changes in blue. Ab. |
| 12/20 |
Ab,
So do you know any places in Canada that are recruiting wildland
firefighters with no experience?
JEB |
| 12/20 |
Re: Recent Retirements
Steve Eubanks, the Forest Supervisor from the Tahoe National Forest, is also
retiring after 37 years of service. Steve has been an outspoken supporter of
wildland firefighter issues and delivery of the wildland fire program. He
was one of only a few line officers who would put things right back onto the
shoulders of the RLT and NLT for their decisions regarding management of the
fire and fuels programs.
Steve always addressed the issues, listened to his fire managers, and was
willing to support his troops in the field in getting the job done.
www.yubanet.com/artman/publish/article_72820.shtml
"Steve's collaborative leadership in sustainable forestry and connection
with forest research has been noteworthy both inside and outside the
agency," stated Randy Moore, Pacific Southwest Regional Forester.
Highlights of Eubanks' career have included:
- Working closely with researchers to develop concepts of forest ecosystem
management that were a foundation for a Forest Service-wide program.
- Working with the Russian Forest Service in Central Siberia since 1995 to
help develop sustainable forestry concepts and practices.
- Chairing the National Visiting Committee for a National Science Foundation
Advanced Technological Education program.
- Helping establish the new Sagehen Experimental Forest near Truckee in
cooperation with the Pacific Southwest Experiment Station and the University
of California, Berkeley - the first new experimental forest in 40 years.
- Sponsoring Forest Sustainability Workshops locally in conjunction with the
Forest Breakfast Group to promote greater understanding of Sierra ecosystems
and their sustainability. |
| 12/19 |
Midwest Fire Guy
Unfortunately, it’s almost a given that we’ll lose an average of two tanker
pilots/yr.
When you describe the wildland fire management community don’t forget
the Fire GIS Specialists! The job may not be the most glamorous; I’ve never
heard of high risk exposure to too many shapefiles, but the first thing
folks
ask for during a wildfire is a map.
Fire Geek
Orienting, one prerequisite for situational awareness... Ab. |
| 12/19 |
Ex Tanker Crewman
Thanks for the info on the P-3. They are a wonderful aircraft that
I have enjoyed and benefited from using. From what I have read
today sounds like they will be in our tool kit for many more years.
"What has always scared me is that a good majority of the
stones at the National Wildland Firefighter Memorial in Boise
came from contract airtanker crews...... For some reason,
their losses aren't appreciated or understood by some in
the wildland fire community."
I read once where if ground resources had the same death rate per
hour exposed to wildland firefighting as airtanker pilots is would be
many times higher than the worst year we ever saw. And no one
would find that acceptable. The nation has a duty to every wildland
firefighter to provide them with safe, effective and efficient tools to
use. Wildland fire management is a big family. Hotshots to Type 2
| |